Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I didn’t say you had—many have been hoping for that in the next 8K
Didn’t see anything about debt being extinguished
Someone (ES, I believe) posited a move rob the OTCQX exchange. I wonder when and what that might mean.
Very informative article (at least for me):
http://www.32trades.com/market-makers-knowing-what-youre-up-against/
Who wants to get too much into the weeds on valuation? Let it pop BIG and the market will correct
Q about &.0001-1.00 recent AH spread. If MMs set the spread, are they setting the ASK to $1 in the event that something big happens overnight, as a way to protect their investment and keep from “missing the boat”? I’ve noticed this spread for about the last month or so—but only on CELZ out of all the stocks I follow. There is ALWAYS a reason...
Ask yourself this simple question: how many times have you seen high-profile discussions of FEMALE orgasmic function—from front-cover Cosmo messages in the checkout line to Sex and the City—for the last 50 years or so? If this therapy can be used to promote female sexual responsiveness (as I suspect it can—though we need to be told so for sure), then this stock has the potential to blow up in yet ANOTHER direction. Time will tell...
Male AND female. Please do NOT undersell the other side! Can you say “tip of the iceberg”?
I am fairly new to OTC trading and just stumbled across CELZ one day about 3 months ago. In general, I am a deeply analytical person who follows the strategic precepts of the authors of “Decision Traps,” among others. This approach requires you to uncover weakness in your preferred/default posture by interrogating it and challenging its assumptions with contradictory concepts. Despite my best efforts to question CELZ in this manner, I can’t find the catch—which is why I can’t understand why this thing isn’t blowing up already! Some people in life are generous with their time and talents—and you strike me as one such. Glory and gain are not “zero sum”: so refreshing indeed to see others with intelligence, initiatives, and insight who “get it.”
Reading every one—and so hopeful
Twitter link appears to be broken.
What email where?
I’m struggling to understand why they aren’t approaching this more aggressively NOW. At worst you get backlogs for the physicians, which they can easily burn through in the first year or so: nothing like fishing every day in a stocked pond! Are they prohibited from marketing until August (when they are supposed to release some clinical results)? But they’re already marketing by virtue of conferences, contracts, and social media.
What analytics lead you to this proclamation?
No—the claim was “they danced around my bid order all day” and I want to understand what that means and, more importantly, how that can even happen
How does that happen?
You mean if one tries to purchase at the “ask,” the price goes down (instead of allowing your order to be filled)??
Is a wall “fake” if it’s doing what it was designed to do?
Reminds me to Crassus, who was notorious for setting fires in Rome—even as he was head of the fire brigade. Mafioso tactics 101!
Volume MUCH higher today than yesterday. In less than 1 hour approaching had of yesterday’s 8.6M volume.
Fair enough: big guys get to do what they want with impunity. Got it.
But that doesn’t explain WHY they are doing what they are doing HERE: why keep the stock bottled up in such a narrow range? Whose interest does that serve?
$1600 * 50,000 (less than a quarter of ONE PERCENT of the KNOWN ED sufferers for whom meds are ineffective=$80,000,000
Now, what if we went “all the way” to 10% of the identified demographic? That gives us $4.8 BILLION.
Someone (MMs) appears to prefer that the price close between .015 and .017. That’s essentially what we’ve seen over the last 2 months of trading—with occasional dips downward into the .012 range or spikes up to .02 and a little north. Why would that be? Who are these MMs anyway? Are they not required to disclose their affiliations?
Book an appointment • https://t.co/AzauL896wZ #CaverStem #StemCells #ErectileDysfunction #ED #MaleEnhancement #BeverlyHills #SoCal #Cali #WestHollywood #WeHo #MondayMotivation pic.twitter.com/qEsfwPHCoj
— Institute for Advanced Urology (@GershmanMDLA) June 4, 2018
INPUT REQUESTED: Recent shareholder update linked to FM radio webpage in San Diego!—
http://www.kfmbfm.com/story/38307052/shareholder-update-award-winning-sales-executive-to-join-company-as-vice-president-of-sales
Someone else also claims to have heard an ad for CaverStem in Charlotte. Any other check-ins? Go CELZ!
WOW—talk about a captive market:
http://www.pravdareport.com/health/11-01-2012/120204-erectile_dysfunction-0/
That’s the same Russian doctor pictured with Dr. Gershman in the CaverStem Fb page. Here’s what that said: Dr. Alex Gershman with guest Dr. Dmitri Pushkar, Professor and Chairman Department of Urology MSMSU, General Scientific Secretary Russian Society of Urology, Urologist General of Russia at AUA conference May 20, 2018.
Finally, do a little research here to get a sense of where this all MIGHT be heading—country with EPIC ED problem, consequent likelihood of fertility and diminished birth rate in this deeply proud nation-state, VERY little prospect of making problem better through existing methods because of poor economy and high cost of pharmaceutical therapies, and a state-run medical system:
https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&hl=en-us&ei=A_oWW_P2IZH1zgL0wKyIBg&q=russian+medical+system&oq=russian+medical&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.1.3.0l5.21010.27433..29789...0....201.3088.1j19j1......0....1.........41j0i71j0i67j0i131.SX4YcdkuSlQ%3D
What is your basis for the 90% probability—why not 95 or 85 or some other number?
Could also have been a signal flare to shorts, intended to circle the wagons. Will be interesting to compare today’s short activity with 10-day average.
Pathetically low volume.
That was my thinking
Another possibility? Someone intentionally sold that 50K (a small number of shares) at .01 to attract attention to the stock’s “wide spread” today (to suggest, even if artificially, that it was a wide up/down mover—at least to folks who didn’t know better)?
Gershman and Said have placed their bets, I’d say...
Thank you!
Someone dumped a TON right at opening—so much that it took price down to .01 for a split second. Looks like a shorty on the run to me!
That must be from yesterday. Strange because all the other stocks on my watch list appear to have reset to their new baselines (and I’m fairly sure several of them were green/red yesterday. Why would they reset, but CELZ still show yesterday’s gain? Weird. The bid is now .01 and the ask is .0179 (yesterday’s close). None of the other stocks I follow show all these oddities before/after hours with regard to the bid/ask. WEIRD.
TDAm shows +7.82% at 850 EST. Gonna gap up at the bell?
TD shows .017 and .0179 at the moment