Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes it's about time for the Mueller report, they may not allow public access.....so arbitration between HDC/NEO should have been soon but it appears the case expired October and reopened.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6111103/neogenomics-laboratories-inc-v-health-discovery-corporation/
At least I think???? Oh, maybe HDC won't allow us access?
I would not be surprised if our OS is right around 370-390 million common. All the series C must convert by June 2020 others before. Patent maintenance costs to say the least. I can only see the company going for another .05 average 30 day to issue more series C shares.
Real curious about how far the attorney corporations are flexing with us. We must have some type of announcement by the 4th of April. It also doesn't look as if the company wishes to try and kiss the strike price to force more money into their EMPTY coffer involving warrants/options as I see this. Of course I'm old, dumb and blind.
Have a super weekend.
OK McGovern you slammed a few bottles of Geritol time to announce.
I believe in the past HDC shareholder meetings were announced in March for a May or June meeting? I will not give up on some type of announcement as such to surface. Oh!! this is day 3 out of T minus 14 business days : )
...not to worry McGovern just picked up a whole case of Geritol
Just maybe if you doubled the shares you added today we can get this puppy moving forward
10/27/2017 8-K Item 1.1 Entry into a material definitive Agreement
Litigation Funding - As previously disclosed, the Company notified NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc. (“NeoGenomics”) of HDC’s election to terminate all licenses that are subject to the Master License Agreement (the “MLA”) dated January 6, 2012, between the Company and NeoGenomics. The Company believes, among other things, that NeoGenomics failed to use best efforts as defined in Section 2.3 of the MLA during the Development Term of the MLA. Accordingly, NeoGenomics was directed to cease and desist all uses of the Licensed Products. Additionally, pursuant to the MLA, upon termination, NeoGenomics may not use any product or service based upon the Licensed Technology without infringing upon HDC’s technology. Furthermore, NeoGenomics was notified that any patents, issued or pending, owned by either HDC or NeoGenomics which are based in whole or in part on HDC’s patents or technology may not be used by NeoGenomics in the absence of a license authorized by HDC.
HDC evaluated the appropriate actions that HDC should take in order to protect its shareholders related to the failure of NeoGenomics to perform its obligations per the MLA. As a result of this evaluation, on October 23, 2017, the Company entered into a non-recourse purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with a litigation-funding firm (the “Purchaser”) to provide funding for the Company’s ongoing legal action against NeoGenomics. The Company is committed to pursuing all legal actions available to rectify the damages caused by NeoGenomics. The Purchase Agreement will allow the Company to pursue these actions against NeoGenomics.
In consideration for the Purchaser’s financial commitment, the Company will grant up to $1,000,000 of the potential recovery from the legal action against NeoGenomics. Additionally, the Company has engaged legal counsel who has agreed to represent the Company in these matters against NeoGenomics. Legal counsel has agreed to work on behalf of the Company on a partial contingency basis. In return, the Company will share up to 20% of the recovery from the legal action against NeoGenomics with counsel.
Now legal counsel of HDC another announcement less than 14 days : )
OT...Was Ira known as Tryn or Cosmo? I did see long ago where both had stop posting on IHUB. Chazzy ...well? a few direct phone calls between us. Terry Hallinan had past a few months ago. I never new you with an alias such as "imnofool4" but maybe so, maybe past...over on the old RB board.
As for this management I don't believe they are capable of the potential we have/had but am thankful they babied, baby sat HDC to this day, we should have folded so to our CEO McGovern my hat is off to you. Dilution at minimum with present management however subject to change if we expect to move forward in any big way.
Just so you know I have been here since May of 2003 RB message board, "Direct wireless" our old CEO Williams ---> symbol SHMP on IHUB
Oh...yes! almost forgot say hello to Karl for me :)
Long time no see : ).......I sincerely believe that Intel may or may not be using or even to state further really care. It is clear and I am sure it is to you that Intel would defend any or most patents issued to them just based on the fact that it was issued to them let along any value as WE HOPE, we assume value just because of INTEL. I hope so dearly that it is that valuable since we have suffered for so long.
re: HDC screwed up when they took $600,000+ from Vermillion!!!!
"Yes indeed that still eats my heart".
Yes they will drag that out min 2 years in civil court at min unless they have something massive emerging....I hope and hope!!
Intel may at the most buy the patent(s) needed.....actually about those series "C" shares????
Great! now we are getting some discussions going : )
You are the experienced TA "trader" but with HDC throw that out the window, excluding of course the 45 minute rule.
No matter how we look at this they need money.eom
By increasing both authorized common and preferred shares will allow more options.
Oh!!! let me make something clear, when anyone phones the HDC office using 678-336-5300 that will follow to CEO McGovern directly regardless what state he is in.
Time for Nascar, later............
I strongly believe within 14 business days that HDC will make announcement about shareholders vote to increase authorized shares, possibly even increasing preferred shares or modify series.
Now I do recall something about attorney(s) contingency fees involving NeoGenomic but not but not Intel corp. Attorney fees plus patent maintenance fees to say the least, plus HDC rent at the Georgia office.
I will never buy more into HDC period, our best hope is selling the patents and that just not enough reason for me.
As for contacting our CEO McGovern, is he in Georgia or Pennsylvania?
You really don't want me to elaborate further as we have no money for starters.
re: SOC? you mean urine? clue me in.eom
Hello HDC investor K...----->
Postate Cancer regarding Clarient, Abbott and Quest :
I took the most interesting excerpts from the 10K under the prostate cancer section
Clarient :
On July 31, 2007, we announced our alliance and licensing agreement with Clarient, Inc. (recently acquired by GE Healthcare) for development of a new molecular diagnostic test for prostate cancer based on our discovered prostate cancer biomarker signature. During 2008, the Company and Clarient successfully completed all phases of the clinical trial process with the hope of achieving the statistical significance necessary to validate the ability to commercialize a test. Results from the Phase I, Phase II and Phase III double-blinded clinical validation studies were completed at Clarient and published in the peer reviewed journal UroToday International.
However , Clarient has not been actively marketing the 4-gene prostate cancer test because pathologists, not urologists, are their primary client due to cash constraints.
From Clarient we dont have to expect much it seems
Abbott
We have now completed the Abbott clinical trial for Phase 1 and 2 of the urine prostate cancer test validation process. In addition, we have completed all clinical laboratory genomic testing on the clinical trial specimens at MD Anderson Cancer Center. We have fully analyzed the data and are pleased with the results. We have met with and submitted all of our results to Abbott for their independent analysis and are awaiting their comments. If Abbott is satisfied with these results, we expect to receive the $250,000 milestone payment for completion of Phase 1 and 2 and move on to Phase 3 and 4 as described in the FDA Submission Plan. If for some reason Abbott chooses not to move forward, we will immediately begin licensing discussions with other international IVD companies, as well as, clinical laboratories in the US, Europe and China.
Quest :
Quest Diagnostics has now completed the urine prostate cancer test clinical trial described in our Licensing and Development Agreement with them. In addition, Quest has completed all clinical laboratory genomic testing on the clinical trial specimens. The clinical trial has now been un-blinded and the patient information has been supplied to Quest. Quest is now in the process of fully analyzing the data and validating the results.
AND :
The Company is continuing to advance the development of the urine based prostate cancer test. The Company is pleased with the data and results completed to date. In a recent clinical trial, we have now demonstrated that that the 4-gene urine test for clinically significant prostate cancer outperformed serum PSA, Digital Rectal Exam (DRE), as well as, published data for PCA3 and TMPRSS-ERG assays for the early detection of prostate cancer.
End of page 8 :
We continue to progress towards the goal of commercialization of the 4-gene urine-based prostate cancer test at Quest and with Abbott Upon completion of development and validation to the satisfaction of Quest, the 4-gene urine test for prostate cancer can be immediately commercialized as an LDT under the current CLIA regulations.Upon regulatory approval, Abbott could immediately begin commercialization and sale of the individual In-VitroDiagnostic (IVD) test kits to additional national, regional and local clinical laboratories, as well as hospital, academic and physician laboratories around the world.
So we are still in the running for getting Prostate cancer test commercialized.
I expect from the Prostate cancer test the most of HDC, the others are (to me) "nice to have" in addition to the killer (or life saver that is :p) test !
The number of patents under "Intellectual Property" on the last 2 pages is quite impressive too.
Vermillion did get the Ovarian test approved in September 2009, why would a company as Quest or Abbott couldnt pull it off !
http://www.genomeweb.com/proteomics/vermillion-closes-settlement-debt-hdc
: )....you know you don't have any worry do to no press release. A press release last week would have told me we have scammer as a CEO, I feel pretty safe in stating CEO McGovern is not but believe the present officers etc are not a good fit for our potential. No doubt maybe great in their past field but at least able to babysit this mess for the past two years or so.
You know? even though I feel negative referencing present BOD moving forward what have they been handed or should I say what can they do if funds present themselves in a decent way forward.
Absolutely not.eom
King Oil, what did they file? Traders heard Intel and rushed the doors.
In the filing this would said by the company as follows....Health Discovery Corporation is currently evaluating its options for further action regarding this matter.
Now what does that mean? could that mean right around the next corner or could that mean they have no bullets in their pistol?
Let me ask you if you were the CEO you would say the same thing right? Of course you would and you would say it even if you had nothing but hope.
There are so many possibilities either way but what is going to be needed in a bad way is time.
There is so much more within these possibles but I don't want to post the reasoning's plus or minuses just yet.
Thank you for explaining the charting to me.eom
You have that correct, wow! I hope we are not going into what longs have seen in past years meaning.... the paint may never dry.
re: TA involving HDC has never been reliable, never.eom
No need to try just ask!
Dr. Vapnik worked for AT&T/Lucent and developed patents for them. We don't need to pay on them anymore as they have run their course, as I recall.
Fractal was Sandy's, Barnhill talked the old BOD into buying his patents.
8-K 10/27/17 understanding Items 1.01, 5.02 eom
This may be a very interesting day.eom
Now that sounds good to me but as of 11/21/16... Share structure 450 million authorized with 272 million OS, 45 million authorized series "C" shares with 30 million OS.
I see HDC possibly using/forced to use preferred shares!!!
The other problem is the authorized shares were raised so it could cover the preferred series. I will take a swing here and guesstimate we now have around 320+ million OS.
At any rate it would please me dearly to see a buy out at roughly $2-$4 dollars per shares.
Enough of my thought for now...except, I believe the share price is being held up to tabulate a 30 day average, share to be issued.
I don't recall if one would see the transaction between the dealer and the market maker "not" MM to MM?
Big Beef, it appears we are headed for some stability? we might have an 8-k coming soon.
Good Sport
12404-there were crappy reasons.
12405-False but have seen that in securities.
12406-Yes
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147415835
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147415870
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147415890
I don't believe that is going to happen just yet but possibly a "Share holder Letter" like in 2010. Money is the big problem which you know. Presently a letter would be a bit easier on finances however, if they have something big, they just might opt a meeting instead.
I strongly feel a shareholders letter would be appropriate long before holding any shareholders meetings with the exception of private investors or entities. At any rate as you already know this web link...Our 2010 HDC shareholders letter.
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100826005801/en/Health-Discovery-Corporation-2010-Shareholder-Letter
No problem just like "Burger King" everyone can have it their way.
Archie Bunker...did you see this BS?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147285376
what is it worth? can you tell us what your thoughts are?
Some random thoughts... but on things like this you just never know until a deal is struck.
(1) There is only one year left until it expires
(2) It is an algorithm, and algorithms are not usually patentable.
(3) The judge specifically did not rule on patentability.
(4) There are many ways to skin a cat, and this is only one of those ways.
(5) How are you ever going to know if somebody is infringing?
I think there is a lot more court time between now and an infringement ruling, however somebody may just cough up some money to avoid that.
Alan
I don't know if you are able to somehow delete my last 2 message but feel free to do so..tia
Say hello to Roger May for me and Jason Webster.. I mean your son Jason May ; )
I have known "him" since 1999 and he will come through with whatever shares he said he would but if memory serves which it does general restricted shares. I'm pretty sure he still has his old office next to John Wayne Airport right on Von Karman Ave in Irvine California.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/rich-200-man-guilty/news-story/d29e3a5234d97db46e49b16eceb8ee92?nk=b5ae786bd7846d5fba26ae0ad18bda9e-1552083564
https://www.theage.com.au/national/where-has-all-the-money-gone-20050618-ge0d74.html
https://www.itnews.com.au/news/may-protests-innocence-in-global-sdr-troubles-23577
https://www.siliconinvestor.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=29980&LastNum=430&NumMsgs=25
https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=10035563
https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=10887012
https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=8355372&privcapId=695897&previousCapId=695897&previousTitle=Advanced Communications Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd
IRVINE, Calif., Sept. 2, 2004 (PRIMEZONE) -- Military Communications Technologies Inc. (OTCBB:MLTA), announced today that it has finalized an agreement to acquire the majority of the assets of its Australian-based affiliate Global SDR Technologies Pty Ltd ("GSDR") from the majority owner of the company GIF Limited. Additionally the acquisition includes the purchase of the controlling interest in the Exclusive License for the proprietary SpectruCell SDR(tm) and PC4 Intellectual Property. At the conclusion of the transaction MLTA will own a minimum of sixty percent (60%) of the GSDR assets and SpectruCell SDR Intellectual Property rights.
Consideration for the purchase will be by way of MLTA Reg. 144 shares of common stock at US$0.15 cents and cash. Final pricing is subject to valuation and is expected to be in the vicinity of US$80 million. Full details of the acquisition will be announced when it is finalized in the next thirty days. This transaction has been in planning for more than six months and was recently approved by the Board of Directors of both companies.
MLTA's decision to acquire majority control of the proprietary SpectruCell & PC4 Software Defined Radio wireless communications technology and IP is also expected to be well received by the Wall Street investment community who while expressing a high degree of interest have consistently maintained that any funding commitments for MLTA will be entirely conditional on the controlling interest of the SpectruCell SDR technology rights being owned and held by the US public company.
It has also been well established by company management during the last eighteen months that USA based ownership of the SpectruCell SDR IP North American based development facilities should substantially enhance the company's opportunities to access the US Military and Homeland Security markets open to US based companies.
Roger May, Executive Director of MLTA said, "This transaction removes any barriers to MLTA gaining access to the enormous Homeland Security and Military communications contracts while creating a sound investment basis for the company to attract appropriate funding from US-based Investment houses. This in turn is intended to fuel the company's plans to dramatically expand marketing and distribution of the proprietary SpectruCell SDR technology both in North America and globally. The SpectruCell SDR wireless communications technology has already received substantial recognition from many key industry players throughout the USA, Canada and Asia of its `leading edge' status in the software defined radio field."
New Engineering & Development facilities in North America.
The transaction is an essential first step in consolidating MLTA's plan to establish the main SpectruCell SDR engineering and development facilities in North America instead of Australia. Specific details of the relocation timing and location should be available in the coming weeks.
May also stated that, "Company management expects that MLTA's acquisition of a controlling interest in the SpectruCell SDR Intellectual Property combined with the establishment of the main engineering facilities in North America may prove to be to be the most significant event in the history of MLTA. It is also expected to instigate a series of far reaching positive developments for the company many of which are well into the negotiating stage. It also signals a major consolidation of the company's activities as well as helping to establish firm foundations for the company's future growth as a major player in the rapidly expanding global demand for Software Defined Radio communications technologies and applications. Company advisors have indicated that establishment of US-based operations will be of significant importance and assistance in regard to finalizing a major acquisition and a substantial funding for MLTA. The securing of funding for the company has been a major priority for management and a significant acquisition and funding arrangement are presently in the in the latter stages of negotiations."
As a result of the MLTA acquisition, the Australian affiliate GSDR will maintain a smaller operational facility to align itself with the Company's plan to locate the primary engineering facilities in North America, and to establish manufacturing and development operations in both the Chinese mainland and a smaller facility in Europe during the next twelve months. The transaction takes into account certain agreements and licenses already in place in relation to the Hong Kong SunWah Finance Holdings joint venture and further development required with some of their partners that plan manufacture some SpectruCell applications in China. However MLTA will still receive revenue from this initiative. The restructured facility in Melbourne, Australia will enable the Company to maintain access to the expertise of key SpectruCell SDR engineering and development personnel not relocating outside of Australia, and complete the delivery of product to existing customers and partners in Asia and Canada.
Recent SDR Industry Report
"In a recent study conducted by Venture Development Corporation (VDC)," Software-Defined Radio: North American and European Market Demand Analysis," 88% of U.S. public safety respondents indicated that software-defined radio (SDR) technology could help solve the numerous interoperability issues experienced when trying to communicate between departments.
Because they employ radios that operate on various frequencies and use several different protocols, most public safety branches have no means of direct radio-to-radio communication. Police, fire and local government personnel resort to swapping radios between departments or transporting communication gateways to the site to solve interoperability issues, causing unnecessary delay and confusion in critical situations.
When similar interoperability issues were identified within the United States military, the DoD established the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) program. The program quickly recognized that software-defined radios could supply a highly diverse installed base of systems with support for multiple protocols and frequency bands, and alleviate these problems. Procurement of SDR devices for the military is currently underway, with plans to replace all of the military's radios. In fact, the DoD plans to spend an estimated $4.7 billion incorporating SDR devices and technology over the next four years." Go to- http://www.vdc-corp.com/telecom/press/04/pr04-40.html
About Military Communications Technologies
Military Communications Technologies, Inc. is a technology company involved in the development and distribution of proprietary software defined radio (SDR) commercial and military mobile wireless network applications. The Company's core military product, PC4 is specifically targeted to the demands of the Military and Homeland Defense agencies for large-scale defense grade reconfigurable wireless communications systems. PC4, which stands for Programmable, Command, Control, Compute, and Communicate, is a next-generation SDR framework and proprietary operating system uniquely designed for interoperable, lightweight and mobile military communications systems. The PC4 framework is also especially suitable for radar and high-speed digital RF and GSM surveillance systems. The Company's proprietary SpectruCell SDR(tm) multiple protocol wireless base station technology offers commercial wireless providers a cost-effective, software-based method to upgrade systems to next-generation standards and makes next generation networks interoperable with most wireless protocols all over the same network.
Statements in this release, which relate to other than strictly historical facts, including statements about the Company's plans and strategies, as well as management's expectations and new and existing products, technologies and opportunities, market growth, demand for acceptance of new and existing products, are forward-looking statements. The words, "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "project," and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements that speak only as the date hereof. This press release contains certain forward-looking statements regarding Military Communications Technologies, INC. ("MLTA"), its business prospects and results of operations that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties posed by many factors and events that could cause MLTA's actual business, prospects and results of operations to differ materiality from those that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by MLTA in this news release and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect MLTA's business.
Military Communications Technologies, Inc. Denis Proctor (949) 622 5508
www.milcomms.com
Sky Investor Relations Laurel Moody (212) 440 5000
Or in Australia: Global SDR Technologies Pty Ltd Kevin Graham
Vice President International Sales and Marketing (61) 3 8080 8080
____________
Military Communications Technologies -- SpectruCell SDR Patents
RVINE, Calif., Oct. 7, 2003 (PRIMEZONE) -- Military Communications Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB:MLTA) today announced that its Australian affiliate, Military SDR Technologies has confirmed that the first two of three Patent applications in relation to the functionality of the SpectruCell SDR multiple protocol wireless base station operating systems are now on file for the granting and issuance of the Patents in all major commercial jurisdictions worldwide. These regions include the United States of America, Europe, China, South Korea, S.E. Asia, India and Australia. The patents were originally applied for in October 2000.
The pending issuance of these Patents in all primary jurisdictions combined with extensive software copyright protection for SpectruCell SDR is of significant importance in securing the Company's exclusive right to the revolutionary SpectruCell and PC4 technologies. It is also an important step forward in securing the exclusivity of the Company's extensive worldwide commercialization program currently being implemented in both the commercial Telco and Military markets.
The primary commercial IPR -- trademarked as SpectruCell SDR -- relates to a revolutionary new Software Defined Radio (SDR) operating system and framework that the company engineers have designed, developed, demonstrated and tested over the past 4-5 years. The revolutionary new wireless operating system has been recognized by the industry to have extensive new applications in both the defense and commercial wireless sectors that offer significant improvements and advantages over current technology. The defense version of the technology is known as "PC4" (for Programmable, Command & Control, Computers, and Communications).
MLTA is based in Irvine; California and is currently expanding its operational facilities in Southern California to establish defense grade engineering facilities as well as Executive Sales and Marketing operations. MLTA also owns a significant holding in Military SDR Technologies Pty.. Ltd. ("MSDR"), and its wholly owned subsidiary and operational arm SDR Technologies Pty. Ltd. (SDRT") both based in Melbourne Australia. SDRT's current engineering team has developed the proprietary SDR technology over the past 5 years in Australia. MLTA will exclusively market and distribute both the PC4 military SDR technology as well as the commercial grade SpectruCell SDR technology designed for conventional wireless protocols (CDMA, W-CDMA, GSM, and other 3G protocols) network infrastructure applications throughout North and South America.
The commercial grade SpectruCell SDR technology targeted specifically at Wireless Telecom Operators is capable of simultaneously processing current 2G protocols (GSM and CDMA) as well as the new 3G and 4G protocols (CDMA2000, WCDMA, UMTS, TDS-CDMA, etc). This multiple protocol processing is achieved from the same base station as well as providing a platform for multiple carriers, using the same existing cellular network infrastructure, to operate mobile virtual networks or shared facilities over the same network. The benefits for the commercial market include significant deployment and lifecycle cost savings and speed to market for the new wireless applications.
For military applications, the technology enables rapidly deployable, highly mobilized communications between forces using dissimilar platforms. The PC4 technology is ideally suited to a range of homeland security projects; inter service communications (Army/Navy/Air Force/Civilian), digital wireless upgrades and high-end signal processing applications (electronic warfare, etc.). The PC4 operating system is a framework to aid application developers in getting complex communications systems operational in the theatre quickly. The PC4 framework is compatible with the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) and with the Software Communications Architecture (SCA) released by the JTRS Joint Program Office.
Statements in this release, which relate to other than strictly historical facts, including statements about the Company's plans and strategies, as well as management's expectations and new and existing products, technologies and opportunities, market growth, demand for acceptance of new and existing products, are forward-looking statements. The words, "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "project," and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements that speak only as the date hereof. This press release contains certain forward-looking statements regarding Military Communications Technologies, Inc. ("MLTA"), its business prospects and results of operations that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties posed by many factors and events that could cause MLTA's actual business, prospects and results of operations to differ materiality from those that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by MLTA in this news release and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect MLTA's business.
Military Communications Technologies, Inc.
Don Applegarth, Vice President
International Business Development
(949) 622 5508 www.milcomms.com
Mirador Consulting
Frank Benedetto
(561) 989-3600 www.miradorconsulting.com
In Australia: SDR Technologies Pty Ltd.
Kevin Graham, Vice President International
Business Development 613 8080 8080
___________________________
The MM's make the market and must make money. The shares are not laying around it starts with a dealer and each one must make money, the MM as you know establishes the market and I like what I see. As for our brokerage firms that just a two way street sign.
We are fine as it is going, we will come up with a 30 day average and then only or at least feel it would be time for HDC to borrow money to help support a slight forward moment internally. Now even though that average is typical it maybe to early for outside investor (not us typical retail) to give them funds of operation. It may take longer like I mentioned prior 6 months. We have no consistency.
For the basic fast in fast out traders most are gone any left know they need to leave for now. I have known (in this company) retail investors as ourselves who have bought and sold many times over and most never say much in these message threads.
Of course I have more to say but enough for this message.
* 30 day or whatever means I'm talking about options which is a certain MUST with our company. ONE BIG PLUS WE HAVE NO DEBT AND NO ONE HAS MENTIONED THAT!!
Raffis, believe me if this were old management I would agree with some things you have said much earlier but the dilemma HDC has is merely timing to do and that need is MONEY. This CEO is not watching message threads nor cares about those who trade. Investor yes but this guy isn't the SOS type of penny stock pusher. So when and if they come up with a plan we will hear about it. I expect 2 years in civil court so lets hope with 6 months that the attorneys from each reach some agreement.
I order to get this CEO had to cut everything and their filings plus hire paid positions. Let the company function or would you rather have them spend massive money on everything without having a good deal first. We should have been totally out of business by now.
Do I personally believe our management are the right peoele to carry everything through? NOPE, I HAVE TRUST IN THEM but don't believe they are a good fit to "Rockin roll" BUT THEY ARE THE RIGHT FIT AT PRESENT TO GET US BY.
sOORY ABOUT THE CAPS. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147357469
Zenos Arrow, hello "my friend" : ) you understand fully...except you didn't do the first share count on RB message board did you? please do not say my alias if you figure that out.
May 2003 to present non stop.
A2DaZ...It is really simple, are you a trader or investor?eom