Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
not all dinner tables are created equal in wavetopia
but you already knew that!
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=8445140
HhH - AmJoe gets to short wavx on a R/S imo
edit: i too believe you heard it somewhere.
in fact, you posted that SKS disclosed it to you (& 8 others) at the SF wavoid dinner in the July 2003 post to which i've replied:
He was give [sic] permission to show us a slide where it listed companies that were able to do business with the Govt. Unless you are on this list it is not possible. The list was headed by Northrop Grumman and many other names you would recognize.
do you recall who it was that give [sic] SKS "permission" to make that dislosure?
tia
------------
you wrote:
Posted by: Snackman
In reply to: SPIN who wrote msg# 101087
Date: 11/11/2005 10:13:10 AM
Post #
Sorry to disappoint you but that is not where I heard it nor did I ever see any names on any list. There was something on the computer screen, but I was to far away to see it.
------------
post #336 speaks for itself.
He was give [sic] permission to show us a slide where it listed companies that were able to do business with the Govt. Unless you are on this list it is not possible. The list was headed by Northrop Grumman and many other names you would recognize.
you also wrote in post #101089:
I was to far away to see it.
from post # 336:
I sat next to Steven and Barge was on the other side of him.
stet.
edit: what are your wavx thoughts Dudash?
3 month trend suggests no upside surprise in the offing:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=WAVX&t=3m
barchart indicators are almost across the board SELL:
http://quote.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=wavx
& btw Snackman --- this is the only post i have made re wavx on any board recently. keep chasing scrabble's tail "stroongbuy."
edit: actually i did post on Dudash's board about SKS (10/28/05) & to "Foolmoon" on this board (10/27/05).
worse than Nixon?
& if one went strictly by body count, what about LBJ stepping up things in Vietnam?
tend to agree in general though - this administration is a disaster & suspect it's gonna get worse before it gets better.
more later...
if SKS died in a car crash?
Michael Sprague would probably be named Wave CEO & Kevin Sprague would probably be named President of SpraguExcess.
"business" as usual...
jmo.
...I've been patient and respectfull of you..
i'd hate to see an impatient and disrespectful post from you!
hey foolmoon!
when do you expect wave systems to file the 8k disclosing receipt of a fourth (or is it the fifth?) NASD delisting notice?
do dolts like you ever wonder why the US has so many foreign policy & perception problems?
yer siggy graphic is the essence of ethnocentricity.
write it down voids.
You will see many companies come out of the woodwork with similar offerings moving forward IMO.
24 -- if the answer to how many wavx shares held is zero, then whether such shares are held would also be answered.
maybe the most important question is how many wavx shares are held by the Velarios?
diggrammarian
the "with" is superfluous.
& dig when ya get a chance, puhlease let Snackman know that, but for my recent "GRUB" post on 2bstealthy's new bored, i have not posted anything on any message board since he sent me his frantic flurry of e-mail denials, filled with as he calls it, "Army language."
though i have made quite a few PDFs since then.
regards,
SPIN
PS looking forward to the triumphant return of greg s.
that's the whole point.
extremist shiahs that now have a "president" who was reportedly one of the "student" leaders (kidnappers) in the assault on the US Embassy.
according to "helpful," the Iranians have a noted interest in TPMs.
what uses could they find for that co-processor?
all Iranians bad?
nope not at all.
but the ones running the Iranian "government" certainly concern me.
hey eamonnshute!
was glad to see you posted on yahoo recently that you dumped wavx back in 2000 & bought a jeep & a jag w/the coin.
do you remember PMing me about that a year or so ago?
well, b/c you sent it PM, i kept it to myself, but now that you posted/boasted it on yahoo, i have a public question for you:
did you ever disclose to the general wavoid population that you were selling your wavx shares in Spring of 2000?
if not, did you ever disclose those sales of wavx shares after the fact to the wavoids?
& if so, was that disclosure (more-or-less) contemporaneous with your sales of wavx shares?
tia
Envoys: Iran Faces Sept. Deadline on Nukes
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050811/ap_on_re_mi_ea/nuclear_agency_iran_3;_ylt=A0SOwk57wftCnw4AOwVSw6...
By ANDREA DUDIKOVA, Associated Press Writer
Thu Aug 11, 1:36 PM ET
VIENNA, Austria - The U.N. nuclear watchdog expressed "serious concern" Thursday over Iran's resumption of nuclear activities that could lead to an atomic bomb and diplomats said Tehran faced a September deadline to stop uranium conversion at a plant in central Iran.
The Iranians resumed work at the nuclear facility in Isfahan earlier this week, despite appeals from European negotiators to maintain a voluntary suspension of nuclear activities.
Diplomats, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to be quoted, made clear that insufficient progress by Sept. 3 could lead the board to consider reporting Iran to the U.N. Security Council, which has the power to slap the regime with crippling sanctions.
The International Atomic Energy Agency's 35-nation board of directors adopted a resolution that said "outstanding issues relating to Iran's nuclear program have yet to be resolved."
But it did not mention reporting the regime to the Security Council amid concerns such a move could backfire by hardening Iran's position. Iran already had said it would rather endure sanctions than back down on a program it says is a matter of national pride.
President Bush, meeting at his Texas ranch with members of his foreign policy team, welcomed the IAEA's warning to Tehran about the consequences of its nuclear ambitions. He also indicated that new Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will receive a U.S. visa to attend an annual United Nations gathering next month in New York.
European countries that have led negotiations with Iran said the resolution sent a clear message.
"We still believe there is a nonconfrontational way forward if Iran wants to take it," Britain's Foreign Office said in a statement.
Iran, which insists its nuclear program is peaceful and geared only toward producing electricity, was defiant.
"It is evident that the motive is to apply pressure," said Iran's chief IAEA delegate, Sirus Nasseri. "Fortunately, Iran will not bend. Iran will be a nuclear fuel producer and supplier within a decade."
The United States and others contend it is covertly trying to build atomic weapons.
Gregory Schulte, the U.S. envoy to the IAEA, said the adoption of the resolution "shows that the international community is united in its determination that Iran move off the dangerous course that it is on."
Iranian officials broke the IAEA seals on its conversion equipment at its nuclear plant at Isfahan on Wednesday and resumed full operation.
The U.N. watchdog also had urged Iran not to reactivate the plant, but cooperated with the Iranians after installing surveillance cameras to monitor the operations.
Some conversion activities had been restarted on Monday, a day before the IAEA board convened the emergency session on how to resolve the crisis.
The resolution expressed "serious concern" over the regime's resumption of uranium conversion at its nuclear facility at Isfahan, saying the move "underlines the importance of rectifying the situation ... and of allowing for the possibility of further discussions in relation to that situation."
However, the resolution noted that in 2004, the IAEA found that "all the declared nuclear material in Iran had been accounted for, and that such material had not been diverted to prohibited activities."
The board asked IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei to provide it with a comprehensive report on Iran's compliance with an agency safeguards agreement by Sept. 3.
Tehran rejected the text because it would bar it from converting uranium, a process it is allowed to pursue under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Nasseri said.
"All Iran wants to do is to enjoy the right under the NPT, the right which has been denied to it for more than two decades — a denial that has been firm and decisive," he said.
Enriched uranium can be used to produce energy or to make weapons, depending on the degree to which it has been enriched.
Although the IAEA board had the power to report Tehran to the 15-nation Security Council, diplomats had made clear they were not considering that step — widely seen as a last resort — and instead were holding out hope for a negotiated end to the standoff.
In the past, the IAEA board has said the suspension was a voluntary but necessary confidence-building measure to alleviate concerns about Iran's nuclear program.
On Saturday, Tehran rejected a European offer of economic and political incentives, but has said it still wanted to continue with the talks, expected to continue later this month.
___
gee, "helpful" what is Wave doing to capture this TPM opportunity?
it would seem like those Iranians might wanna have notebook computers that turn into "bricks" in the hands of unauthorized users.
in fact, i'd bet that al qaida would have a few uses for TPMs too.
maybe they are securing their hard-drives in their cold-storage facilities?
have you found anything new on that Iranian TPM DD path you began recently?
remember, all that supposed "social good" you babbled about in your prior posts.
it's all about your greed & has ZERO connection to "social good."
thanks for the admission!
a humorless group such as the voids really shouldn't attempt humor.
anyway, thanks for not denying that your graphic is in fact stored on unclever.com
delete it over here SNACKMAN
please urge "helpful" to explain his theory about IRAN & TPMs.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=6904801
you're quite welcome!
have you done any follow up DD on Wave's oppty in Iran that you posted recently?
don't forget, Wave founder Peter Sprague was previously the cold-storage chicken king of Iran.
Wave should already have a foot in the Tehran door!
SEC CHARGES CEDRIC KUSHNER PROMOTIONS AND THREE OF ITS OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS WITH FRAUD
CHAIRMAN AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER CHARGED WITH FILING FALSE CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) announced today that it filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. (CKP or the Company), its Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Founder Cedric Kushner (Kushner), its Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, James DiLorenzo (DiLorenzo), and its former Executive Vice President and Secretary and a current director, Steven Angel (Angel) for violating the antifraud, record-keeping, and reporting provisions of the federal securities laws. As part of this action, the Commission alleges that Kushner and DiLorenzo violated the certification requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).
According to the Commission's Complaint, on the evening of May 20, 2003, CKP filed a Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, that contained what purported to be unqualified independent auditor reports authorized and issued by its former auditor, BDO Seidman, LLP (BDO), and current auditor, Marcum & Kliegman LLP (Marcum). However, the Complaint charges, neither BDO nor Marcum had actually provided those reports to CKP, and CKP instead filed forged auditor reports. Moreover, CKP filed its Form 10-KSB without obtaining either independent auditor's consent.
The Complaint alleges that the financial statements included in the May 20 filing contained material misstatements and substantial errors. For example, the Complaint alleges that the May 20 filing's statement of cash flows included in CKP's financial statements for 2002 reflected, among other things, an approximate $4 million cash deficit when, in fact, CKP's cash balance was $0 by year-end 2002. The Complaint alleges that the May 20 filing's statement of cash flows showed that $5.6 million had been used in operating activities in 2002 when, in fact, only $846,433 had been put to such uses. As a result, the Complaint alleges, CKP misstated its total assets by over 100%. The Complaint alleges further that the May 20 filing misstated in its financial footnotes the number of shares outstanding following CKP's April 2002 reverse merger by 8%.
According to the Complaint, despite their failure to obtain a signed audit report and material errors in the Company's financial statements, Kushner and DiLorenzo each personally certified that the filing fairly and accurately presented CKP's financial condition, in violation of Commission rules adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which require an issuer's principal executive and financial officer to certify financial and other information contained in the quarterly and annual reports. Prior to certifying, the Complaint alleges, Kushner failed to read either the Sarbanes-Oxley certification or the filing to which it was attached, or to take any steps to ascertain whether the filing was true and accurate.
On May 21, both BDO and Marcum wrote letters protesting the forged auditor reports to CKP pursuant to Exchange Act Section 10A, which requires auditors to notify the appropriate level of management as soon as practicable once they detect, or otherwise become aware of, information indicating that an illegal act has or may have occurred. On May 23, the Company filed a Form 8-K containing the auditors' letters and simultaneously filed a Form 10-KSB/A removing the auditor reports, but including new materially inaccurate financial statements. The Complaint charges that DiLorenzo and Angel substantially participated in the creation of both the May 20 and May 23 filings.
The Complaint seeks an injunction against CKP based on its violation of Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5, 12b-20 and 13a-1. The Complaint also seeks an injunction, officer and director bars, and civil monetary penalties against Kushner and DiLorenzo based on their primary violations of Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5 and 13a-14, and their aiding and abetting CKP's violations of Exchange Act Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B), and Exchange Act Rules 12b-20 and 13a-1. The Complaint further charges that Kushner is liable for CKP's violations as a "control person" under Exchange Act Section 20(a). Lastly, the Complaint seeks an injunction, an officer and director bar, and a civil penalty against Angel based on his primary violations of Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 or, in the alternative, based on his aiding and abetting violations of Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 by CKP, Kushner and DiLorenzo, and his aiding and abetting violations of Exchange Act Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B), and Exchange Act Rules 12b-20 and 13a-1 by CKP.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr18638.htm
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 18638 / March 25, 2004
Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1979 / March 25, 2004
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CEDRIC KUSHNER PROMOTIONS, INC., CEDRIC KUSHNER, JAMES DILORENZO, and STEVEN ANGEL, Civil Action No. 04 CV 2324 (TPG)(AJP) (S.D.N.Y.) (filed March 24, 2004)
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/comp18638.htm
bull dolphin - why is/was your siggy graphic stored on unclever.com?
of course you are
that's what stalkers do!
just don't expect any answers to that type of question on *this* board BullNBear!
fyi, it was first posted by "poundanotheridiot" on yahoo!
c_m, please feel free to post the PM
why did you delete my 07/02/05 post regarding that pink-sheets pump shop (vulcan/iocircuit.com) that recently mentioned wavx?
vacationhouse already denied deleting it, leaving ONLY YOU w/the authority to do SO.
what scares wavoids so much about critical posts?
do you know if wave was granted permission to publicly use the FDIC logo on their commercial website?
http://wave.com
http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=19864721&tid=wavx&sid=19...
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-7/1042787/FDIC.JPG
using this UNCENSORED board for a reason.
a post of mine was deleted recently on the "other" iHub wavx board & it did not violate the TOS in any way.
either you or Snackman deleted it, "confusion" notwithstanding.
God Bless America!
if you didn't delete it, that only leaves one other w/the absolute power to do SO.
maybe that same person has been tinkering w/the PRs on wave's website?
hi cmf
my guess is the earlier PR simply lacked a little "polish."
maybe 24, c_m, or eamonn will graciously explain how such subsequent redactions are actually a standard industry practice?
does your "patriotism" compel you to delete posts that don't pump wavx nor violate the TOS?
'cept a particular "classless" post in which the void dream was equated w/MLK's dream.
what a coincidence!
imo "classless" would be equating in any manner the void dream of riches w/MLK's dream, on MLK Day, no less.
but you prolly already knew that.
imo no, it probably does not in & of itself rise to the level of fraud.
quid pro quo:
in your opinion, does the fact that PJS, SKS & Feeney sold hundreds of thousands of wavx shares into the artificial demand & price increase created by the 2003 intc & ibm PRs give rise to any legal &/or equitable shareholder claims?
did i make that assertion?
may i infer from your assumption that you believe PR professionals regularly manufacture quotations and attribute them to multiple speakers in multiple press releases issued in multiple years & that it is some sort of standard practice?
cm -- imo it seems that wave already has that function well covered by today's PR.
yikes!
October 2004:
Kelly Purcell, vice president of Wave's eSign Systems Group, said, "This joint offering layers on top of that what we have designed to be a complete, end-to-end solution for customers and represents what we believe is a large potential market for both companies. Wave's eTM Suite is an emerging leader in e-vault, e-sign, PKI-based identity and integration services, and we believe that a la mode is the established leader in valuation workflow technology products and services. Together it is our plan to form a unique solution in the marketplace."
http://www.wave.com/news/press_archive/04/041018alamode.html
June 2005:
Scott Schrader, president of Wave's eSign Systems group. "This joint offering layers on top of that what we have designed to be a complete, end-to-end solution for financial services customers and represents what we believe is a large potential market. Wave's eTM Suite is an emerging leader in e-vault, e-sign, PKI-based identity and integration services, and we believe that Efficient Forms is the established leader in interview-based forms creation. Together it is our plan to form a unique solution in the marketplace."
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/050630/305619.html?.v=1
found by dimar112
STALKER - oem
instinet best bid = $0.38
http://data.island.com/ds/tools/bookviewer/htmlbook.jsp?STOCK=wavx