Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
DC, the notice was addressed to Radient Pharmaceutical.
As for any assets of value, I saw none but the lab has all the windows blacked out. The computer monitor on the reception desk would have no value as well as the computer I saw through a window in a small office. Those would all just be recycling material.
IMO, the conversion of this building into office condos has created a situation where several of the condos are empty. Sales may take a long time and until then, Radient's old offices will probably not even be cleaned out.
Woofie, a computer on a desk would not be worth shipping to Australia. The Aussies would have been interested in the lab equipment used to make the tests.
The notice was back in May so during the past few months, the creditor has probably made entry and determined if there were any assets remaining that were worthwhile. A computer I saw on the desk would have just gone to electronic recycling.
DC, if the Aussies were some sort of temporary caretakers as you imagine, why would they even go to the trouble of registering some websites?
What I think happened is this. Either Brown or Charter contacted Mac for some reason. At this point, Mac was ready to dump his relationship with Radient after narrowly escaping the class action lawsuit. Whatever the Aussie wanted, Mac just suggested they take control of Radient and do whatever they want. Once the Aussies got control, after they registered those websites and looking into the actual situation Radient was in, they obviously decided it was a hopeless situation which it indeed is.
We don't know if the Aussies stole the remaining assets or if they did much of anything at all. The Aussies have just left it to blow in the wind.
As for Provista and GCDX, they have both denied any connection with Radient and would certainly want nothing to do with the Aussies who now have control.
Jim, even though the notice from the sheriff's office was dated in May, it does not look like anything that you can see inside has even be disturbed since the last time I stopped by about a year ago. The reception area is still identical and the one office you can see still has the computer, books on the shelves and a couple of yellow post it notes still on the desk. No one has been in that office. The rest of the windows are all blacked out so you cannot see if any lab equipment remains.
I don't know what is going on about the entire building. Property records show the building has been converted into private office condos. That probably accounts for the other vacancies in the building.
I stopped by the old Radient offices in Tustin today. The name is still on the building but it appears no one has been there in quite a while. Taped to the door is a orange colored notice from the Orange County Sheriff's office for a seizure of assets. It was dated 6/16/14.
It looks like something is going on with the entire building. A couple other business's have moved out.
DC, All 5 billion shares are outstanding. The last 500k were held in the employee incentive fund. The fund was set to hold 10% of the total shares. They could not be used to pay lenders but could be used for employees and consultants. Lawyers are consultants so that's where the shares went. Mac used them to pay his lawyers in the CA suit and the lawyers dumped them all in one massive day of selling.
So, all of the shares are held by retail gamblers or should I say "losers".
Also, you have yet to explain how your imaginary "takeover" group is going to regain control from the two felons now in charge of Radient.
DC stated: "The debt has not been re-paid thru normal means."
Radient tried to pay back the debt via "normal means" but their stock became worthless so the debt could not be paid.
I hope you realize the "normal means" for paying a debt by a company like Radient was hyping news and issuing shares for the lenders to sell.
That was Plan A for Mac. Oops, there was no plan B.
Neither DC nor Woofie can explain why two felons are now in charge of Radient. Couldn't the imaginary "takeover" group have prevented this? Supposedly Mac is part of their takeover group so why would he leave and hand the company to convicted criminals.
Living, $18 million you refer to is the debt listed in the last filing for 2011. The agreement on that debt also contains default interest and penalties of 24% per year. How much do you think the lenders are owed today.
It has been 2.5 years since the last filing data so the debt is now around $30 million.
Woofie is avoiding answering the question.
DC stated: "Once again- the Aussies do not control Radient.
They were appointed By the Majority Shareholder Group to run day-to-day affairs and be The Face of the company till takeover is completed."
Well, then you explain why a "majority shareholder" would appoint a couple of felons from Australia to run the company. Why wouldn't Mac just keep the position of CEO? Giving control to the Aussies is just a disaster if someone was planning anything at all.
What have the Aussies done with the remaining assets? You don't even know.
Woofie, you have still not answered.
Why would any "takeover" group put or allow Radient to be run by a couple of felons from Australia who were convicted of securities fraud?
Answer this or stop claiming any takeover group even exists.
Come on woofie, please answer why Reese, as part of a takeover effort, would put two felons from Australia in charge of Radient?
That is absolutely true. There is no reason whatsoever for any company to not be public about any dealings with Radient. Nothing announced would have any effect at all upon Radient.
The rumor created by Woofie is totally false.
As for the Aussies, why would anyone put them in charge of a reorganization effort? Two of them have criminal histories and certainly would not be anyone you would want to be dealing with.
Can you imagine Reese having to explain to his investors why he chose a couple of felons to be in charge of a company he is acquiring? It was a huge amount of money they stole. Ridiculous. These two guys don't appear to have any real jobs because no one hires felons.
Please explain that to all of us. We're waiting.
There is no "pestering" if there is no way to contact them. I don't think any more will ever be heard. The Aussies will either use the assets or sell them and pocket the money. That's the operational mode of Brown and Charter.
If you had stolen the remaining assets, do you really think they would tell anyone? No one is ever going to hear anything from the Aussies.
Their best path at this point is to say nothing and hope it just fades away.
Old Git, did you take any time at all to actually read the press release?
Reese stated: "We believe our proteomics approach, which combines the sensitivity of autoantibodies with the specificity of known serum protein biomarkers along with standard-of-care imaging, may reduce the number of missed actionable breast cancers while avoiding the stress and added diagnostic costs of false negative reports."
Ok, take them one at a time.
1 Autoantibodies. Nope, nothing to do with Fibrin degradation products.
2. Serum protein biomarkers. Nope, nothing to do with Fibrin degradation products.
3. Standard of care imaging. Nope, nothing to do with Radient.
That's the approach Provistadx is taking and it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Radient.
Should this end all the foolishness about a merger of Radient and Provista? I certainly think so.
BOCXW is still trading.
It is ORDERED that the hearing scheduled to begin on September 26, 2014, is
POSTPONED and a telephonic prehearing conference shall be held on Friday, October 3,
2014, at 11:00 a.m. EDT. Respondents that fail to file Answers by September 22, 2014,
fail to appear at the prehearing conference, or fail to otherwise defend the proceeding
may be deemed in default. OIP at 4; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), .220(f).
_______________________________
James E. Grimes
Administrative Law Judge
I_Invest, the SEC is just extremely slow to act on anything.
It was interesting that at the bottom of one of the SEC notices was a phone number for Enforcement regarding BioCurex. I called, left my number and was called back the following day. I gave him everything I knew including the crooked stock scam Wittenberg was running. He also said that Revenue Canada would be interested in the R&D credits that Moro personally pocketed.
BioCurex was served notice by mail so that would not go anywhere. In the near future, a hearing will be held and will result in the revocation of the registration.
The stock has not traded since the suspension so maybe the SEC has continued the suspension. It is indeed amazing that people were still buying the worthless shares and obviously doing no DD at all.
It certainly looks like there is no way to communicate with the Aussies. It is coming up on 5 months since they took over with absolutely nothing done AFTER they took over. The website was created prior to the announcement.
IMO, the Aussies may have had some intentions to reorganize but those were quickly dumped after the smallest amount of due diligence by the Aussies.
I think I was correct about what would happen and they just took what assets were left and disappeared.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS
Release No. 1819/September 19, 2014
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-16052
In the Matter of
ASIA CORK, INC.,
BIOCUREX, INC.,
CARTHEW BAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY CORP.,
GAMECORP LTD. (n/k/a DEALNET CAPITAL CORP.),
GLOBETECH VENTURES CORP., and
PEPPER ROCK RESOURCES CORP.
ORDER POSTPONING
HEARING AND
SCHEDULING
PREHEARING
CONFERENCE
On September 4, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued an Order
Instituting Proceedings (OIP) pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, alleging that Respondents have securities registered with the Commission and are
delinquent in their periodic filings. A hearing is currently scheduled for Friday,
September 26, 2014.
On September 10 and September 12, 2014, the Division of Enforcement filed
declarations establishing that Respondents were served with the OIP by September 9,
2014, in accordance with Commission Rule of Practice 141(a)(2)(ii). See 17 C.F.R. §
201.141(a)(2)(ii). I find that Respondents were served on September 9, 2014, and
therefore their Answers are due by Monday, September 22, 2014, as service was effected
by mail. OIP at 4; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.160(b), .220(b).
It is ORDERED that the hearing scheduled to begin on September 26, 2014, is
POSTPONED and a telephonic prehearing conference shall be held on Friday, October 3,
2014, at 11:00 a.m. EDT. Respondents that fail to file Answers by September 22, 2014,
fail to appear at the prehearing conference, or fail to otherwise defend the proceeding
may be deemed in default. OIP at 4; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), .220(f).
_______________________________
James E. Grimes
Administrative Law Judge
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 73158 / September 22, 2014
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-16052
In the Matter of
Asia Cork, Inc.,
Biocurex, Inc.,
Carthew Bay Technologies Inc.,
Current Technology Corp.,
Gamecorp Ltd.
(n/k/a DealNet Capital Corp.),
Globetech Ventures Corp., and
Pepper Rock Resources Corp.,
Respondents.
ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND
REVOKING REGISTRATION OF
SECURITIES PURSUANT TO
SECTION 12(j) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 AS TO GAMECORP LTD. (n/k/a
DEALNET CAPITAL CORP.)
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it necessary and
appropriate for the protection of investors to accept the Offer of Settlement submitted by
Gamecorp Ltd. (n/k/a DealNet Capital Corp.) (“GAIMF” or “Respondent”) pursuant to Rule
240(a) of the Rules of Practice of the Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 201.240(a), for the purpose of
settlement of these proceedings initiated against Respondent on September 4, 2014, pursuant to
Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).
II.
Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on
behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or
denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject
matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order
Making Findings and Revoking Registration of Securities Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as to Gamecorp Ltd. (n/k/a DealNet Capital Corp.) (“Order”),
as set forth below."
Gamecorp agreed to the revocation but since the SEC would not have been able to contact Moro, this will go to a hearing in 90 days with revocation at that time.
Now that makes sense. Gartner isn't paying for any office space.
The address you posted for the Iron Horse lab is not valid anymore. The only address you get now is the address with Gartner but that doesn't have anything to do with Radient.
GCDX has an address in Tempe that is also the lab address for Iron Horse Diagnostics. Those are the only two at that address. Gartner has to be paying for some of that.
Anyway, it is all immaterial since Gartner has totally denied any connection with Radient.
Woofie, I will help you do some real DD.
Here is the link to the official Australian patent data base. You can enter whatever you want to search for. When you find that "secret" patent, post it. Otherwise, it clearly stands that no patents on DR70 exist in Austalia.
http://pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/ols/auspat/
A search using AMDL that will show patents from AMDL inc and AMDL Australia as well.
http://pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/ols/auspat/quickSearch.do?queryString=amdl&includeAbstractText=on&resultsPerPage=
Most people who use the never even file for a registered trademark so claiming that generic DR70 cannot be sold because of a is ridiculous.
Woofie, do you know the difference between ® and ?
When someone uses the , they really do not have a registered trademark.
All of these patent applications would have lapsed from non payment or non response.
No Australian patents. They are all expired or lapsed.
2011901578 Methods for detecting and monitoring cancer AMDL Australia Pty. Ltd. Dirks, Chistopher; Charter, Dennis; Brown, Darren 2011-04-29 LAPSED
2 2009343805 Detection of fibrin and fibrinogen degradation products and associated methods of production and use for the detection and monitoring of cancer AMDL, Inc. Small-Howard, Andrea 2009-03-30 LAPSED
3 1998077134 Immunoassay for the detection of cancer AMDL, Inc. Cress, Michael C.; Moore, Ronald J.; Ngo, That T. 1998-06-02 LAPSED
4 1995037285 Antibodies against an extracellular matrix complex and their use in the detection of cancer AMDL, Inc. Lallone, Roger L 1995-09-27 LAPSED
5 1990060934 An in vitro method and probe for detecting the presence of the ring shaped particle and malignancy in humans and animals AMDL, Inc. Guerrero, Robert R. 1990-08-13 CEASED
AU-A: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (43) Publication Date: 23.01.92 (71) Applicant(s) AMDL, INC. (72) Inventor(s) ROBERT R. GUERRERO (74) Attorney or Agent
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS
Release No. 1762/September 5, 2014
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-16052
In the Matter of
ASIA CORK, INC.,
BIOCUREX, INC.,
CARTHEW BAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY CORP.,
GAMECORP LTD. (n/k/a DEALNET CAPITAL CORP.),
GLOBETECH VENTURES CORP., and
PEPPER ROCK RESOURCES CORP.
ORDER SCHEDULING
HEARING AND
DESIGNATING
PRESIDING JUDGE
The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) has ordered, pursuant to
Rule 360(a)(2) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, that the Administrative Law Judge
assigned to this proceeding shall issue an initial decision no later than 120 days from
service of the Order Instituting Proceedings. See 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(a)(2).
IT IS ORDERED that the hearing in this matter commence at 9:30 a.m., Friday,
September 26, 2014, in the Commission Headquarters Offices, Hearing Room 2, 100 F
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Administrative Law Judge James E. Grimes
preside at the hearing in these proceedings and perform other and related duties in
accordance with the Commission’s Rules of Practice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties confer and notify the presiding
judge of a suggested date and time for a prehearing conference which will be conducted
telephonically unless the parties prefer otherwise.
Service of all orders and rulings on parties is made by the Office of the Secretary,
or other duly authorized Commission officer, pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice
141. See 17 C.F.R. § 201.141. All issuances by Administrative Law Judges and other
documents of importance are posted on the Commission’s web site at
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/ap-open-fileno-asc.xml.
For the Commission, by its Chief Administrative Law Judge, pursuant to
delegated authority.
_______________________________
Brenda P. Murray
Chief Administra
Woofie stated: "We know SRL is developing CIT"
Really? Show us where you found that item.
DC, If UNI Pharma has not cancelled the agreement with Radient, then why have they not continued the patent application as required by the former agreement?
Woofie, haven't you heard of DtectDx? It has nothing to do with Radient, SRL, GCDx or anyone else but Provistadx.
DC stated: " Fortis acquiring Radient thru their subsidiary SRL is the type of move they would make for Onko-Sure."
That would really be a stupid move by Fortis. They have zero need for Radient. Radient has no patent on DR70 so anyone can make and sell kits. Buying Radient would be the most stupid move in history. Is their CEO that dumb?
DC, you claim that SRL wanted to license Onko Sure from Radient but there was never any attempt for them to get a license.
If SRL wants the DR70 test, they can get it from UNI or one of the companies in China who are manufacturing generic DR70.
Why would SRL even want to be associated with Radient? They have everything they need to sell DR70 right now.
Please explain.
DC, Please explain why the Aussies would file a provisional patent application and then never follow up with the required actual non-provisional patent application. They just let it lapse like they did not even care anymore.
This appears to be critical to your scenario so you need to explain.
SRL never had any connection to Radient at all and that was publically admitted by MacLellan.
Bhatia had onko sure kits he purchased for the India scam and gave them to SRL to sell. SRL had a half price closeout sale to get rid of the kits when the kits were expiring.
Nothing more has been heard from SRL and Onko Sure is no longer even listed as a product on their website.
The comments about SRL doing anything with Radient is just total foolishness.
I also find it hilarious that Dennis Charter's self promoted claim to fame as an inventor was a "provisional" patent application where no real data was submitted and then allowed to lapse. The guy is a joke.
What do you think Charter and Brown have done with the remaining assets of Radient? You would never suspect they just sold them and pocketed the money would you? They have never done anything like that before....oops, I guess they have.
The only connection I ever found with Jim Green and the other Aussies was the fact that Jim Green had an office in the same office building as Darren Brown. That was the connection.
Remember, the connection between Dennis Charter and Darren Brown was the fact that they spent time in prison for felony crimes at the same time.