Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This is true.
dstock - At the agency level I couldn't say what's happening. Gov't(s) around the world are facing unprecedented disfuntion, which for the most part is funding related. It's such a mess, and yet fixable, only if the order takers finally rise, and oust the order givers. That's as simple a picture as I can provide.
Moreover - You mean before LP described the company as, "a much different company today, as it was just 18 months ago." You never want to sell into a buyers market.
I don't harp on maybe's.
Right, which is why I wrote -
BP has a $333 billion warchest to make strategic acquisitions. R&D cost cuts are a different matter. I see the latter as a means to preserve and reallocate funds to make acquisitions.
Against a cost cutting BP backdrop, NWBO is enjoying a growth trajectory. As they say, timing is everything.Time will tell, if the current climate turns out to have been the most opportune period to maximize NWBO's value.
ae kusterer - It just goes to show, BP's are not the pioneering visionaries some may believe. Now their checkbooks have lightened.
Ruleofk - Thx for that info. I recall reading about that. Now it makes sense. I'll leave it there.
I have to admit, it does seem strange. It's one extreme to another. Didn't even bother to keep some seeds around for just in case.
I did notice the notable light share count as institutions. I wouldn't expect my own holdings, as retail, to dwarf their top holder. But I do expect that will flip on its head, when we least expect it. IMHO.
Nemesis18 - That's as poorly articulated as this ignorant statement from your earlier post:
rrflyboy - I believe this one is the full thread in case the prior one cut-off early: https://x.com/search?q=from%3A%40FlemmingBruce%20revimmune&t=grWFoGf3FXK7b9gPpx8Okw&s=09
Rare and absence of options other than having blood transfusions for the rest of their lives, or risk all kinds of dreadful diseases. It's likely cheaper to pay the cost up front to prevent payments over a lifetime to keep the disease at bay.
rrflyboy - You can knock yourself out scrolling through the DD Danish Dude put together back in April. If you have further questions, or need a little connecting or tying pieces together, I'm here to illuminate.
$NWBO
— 🇩🇰 The Danish Dude 🇩🇰 (@FlemmingBruce) April 25, 2024
The "dormant" company Revimmune Ltd, has been confirmed today, that "its intended future activities are lawful" pic.twitter.com/yneVxPhJza
These circular arguments are delirious - "If BP were so interested, why no deal yet?" If LP doesn't hurry, and allow herself to be taken advantage of after UK approval, she won't have enough to keep the lights on." All the while, I see NOTHING posted on NWBO'S corporate structure change. Everything about it screams set up for executing a CUSP registration change. Why the whining Wolfpack either willfully or unwittingly blind to the glaring option in waiting? As if any cookie cutter placeholder CEO would have the presence of mind to choose an unexpected offensive move as a better defense. For the possibility of the Judge choosing lawlessnessness over justice, LP has this hand to play, as a plan B option. She holds the advantage, because she doesn't telegraph her timing.
Riley4 - I thought about that too, while keeping in mind that the Judge had opportunities to squash the case, not once, but twice thus far.
Not surprised Buffet owns more T-Bills than the Federal Reserve. Facing a disasterous lack of liquidity, absolutely Warren is expected to step in when his name is called.
Warren Buffett now owns more T-bills than the Federal Reserve https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/07/warren-buffett-now-owns-more-t-bills-than-the-federal-reserve.html
Fluteman - On rarity and absence of options IMHO.
That's the "old normal," while dcvax is on the cusp of introducing an uncompromising "new normal," safety. That's why the poison pushers have pulled all stops in vain, as their side effects business is under a major threat.
That works.
As high a profile as this spoofing case is, and how relatively quick prior decisions and allowances to amend, and resubmit on a narrower scope have been, it seems a bit extensive at this point to still be limbo.
It's not just management's fortitude to bring its visions to fruition in a hostile environment that's awe inspiring, but also absent any irreversible decisions that could have led to failure. I can't stress the value of the latter anymore, which stems from the bitterness, that remains from my prior biotech investment.
meirluc - Doc Logic says, "Manufacturing," "Manufacturing," "Manufacturing"... and I will add in no less certain terms, "Safety, Safety, Safety... It's not only a paradigm shift in the direction of positive outcomes, but perhaps the only time in medical history for treating deadly diseases without side effects. For those who have received a cancer diagnosis, it's not only the Cancer anxiety, but the suffering from the side effects that typically compound the effects of treatment physically and psychologically. The latter goes away with the introduction of dcvax.
martyaDg - Not so fast. I haven't seen any standard established, or otherwise, that suggests cell based therapies are approvable without also showing sufficient manufacturing standards are met per regulatory guidelines. Certainly beyond the one UK jurisdiction, multiple RAs would look for capacity to satisfy their respective patient demands.
martyDG - The launch of COVID-19 vaccines is not an appropriate model to use to compare timelines. It may come as a surprise to some, but there are people on this planet who pursue research passionately, as a service to others, and not to self out of greed.
I posted the link below before. It's the work of a software engineer, who used publicly available data to construct the movement of money flows BTW entities, which ensured that the "COVID vaccine project," which was in the works, as far back as 2015 would succeed.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zjdF_66k-btfC3f0Iw0R334jJIv7FcyG/view?usp=drivesdk
FYI - My sources validated the information before I posted it the first time. I don't traffic in disinformation.
It's very interesting to see Buffet completely disassociating himself, from his once upon a time romance in support of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Unfortunately for Warren, it's way too late to wash his hands of his involvement, and what's bound to be a blemish on his family name in years to come after he's gone. .
I agree with the idea of not projecting hope on to specific timelines. I appreciate milestones when they come to pass.
dstock - I don't see it as a coincidence to find multiple BPs pursuing, or perhaps conspiring, to focus on precision medicine over broad-spectrum. Hum, now why might that be? 🤔 It's absolutely within the realm of behavior I'd expect from BP's, which is to keep cancer treatments going, and not eradicate the disease entirely. Common now, CI's cause a litney of side effects, more often, serious ones, and hyperprogression 10% of the time. Where the hell is the uproar? You won't find it, because the public has become conditioned, programmed to allow anything to become normalized.
In 1:42 seconds, let me show you how easy it was, to subliminally control Ben Stllers mind in this entertaining experiment. I've seen it work on an "entire audience" of people simultaneously:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HxXdycmaIs1BWOeUvDuMK6pHKBkvyBJJ/view?usp=drivesdk
90% of our brain operates subconsciously. Some describe it as operating subconsciously at the quantum level.
DJPele - I lean on common sense. The earlier phases involved broader subject matter. It was since narrowed to loss-causation tied to 30 * transactions. Save for the abundance of additional evidence, which Posner added to her final amended filing, we're still left with the narrow 30 * transactions. Either the Judge has the skillset needed to quantify the claim or he doesn't.
Under NORMAL circumstances, companies are rewarded with rising share values in recognition of new milestones. Critical thinkers can fill in the rest.
The court is taking an unreasonable amount of time imo. "Knock Knock, anyone home?" "Who's there?" "Loss - causation!" "Yeah so, what do you want?" "A decision on the MTD, hello!!" "Oh that, yeah well, we're a little understaffed, but we're getting there, give us some time."😡
Get used to extreme market swings. I'm surprised it hasn't happened more often and for longer durations.
CherryTree1 - Two Iconic quotes from Scarface comes to mind:
"Do you know what a chazzer is?"
and
"Don't get high on your own supply."
😎
That's not the version I read when I saw it posted. I don't have the post, but I recall it was well in advance, but FINRA was not cooperative.
Karlchen - That's fine and good, but when LP first committed herself personally and financially by choosing to make dcvax her life's work, did that include lawlessness, as part and parcel of that deal? She put her life and money, and basically her a** on line, way back then. Hate ought to be directed towards where it begs to be, at the criminals. Those who woke up every day, and it's a gigantic net at that, thinking, what can we do today, that we failed to do yesterday to kill the company. But there's a huge divide in the moral majority in which case, when greed is involved, they lose all perspective, and in this case, looking at the wrong party, who deserve every penny. Why, because they, not the MM's gave me the opportunity to participate.
2B_unknown - We heard from the Danish Dude two days ago, that the SEC Limited/Recommended for Custodian Banks and other US Banks and therefore Nordnet to buy and sell shares of NWBO to retailers. Moreover, Nordnet didn't know what was going on when asked? He was alarmed and wanted shareholders and NWBO to know, and step in if, say, Danish Citizens find themselves forced to sell, or not able to buy.
As for my statement to close my post, here's what the expression means from Google:
Dan88 - Let's hope so! The Harrington case is in discovery, and NWBO is next in line. It might appear inconsequential, but in the Harrington case B of A is being sued. It's a Goliath corporation like JP Morgan, which lost its case for spoofing. The MM's in the NWBO case, although significant for their immense electronic trading volume, represent a class of companies headed mostly by their founders, if I'm not mistaken. These kinds of business structures are ripe for a opportunistic reg skirting relationships, and the ability to keep them compartmentized. In the B of A and JPM case, it was easier to contain the fallout to specific traders and punitive damages, while the higher ups were shielded.
However, with Citadel, Canacord et al, it's quite different imo. You'll find the top brass fully engaged in the business, and the extent of their potential corruption covered-up using any means possible.
dedugan - We heard LP had asked FINRA for a trading halt on data release and FINRA didn't comply. That's concerning.
Hump4 - I believe you're spot on. It's outrageous on account of two absurdities running in tandem. I'll get to that. Investors have placed their hope on milestones to build share value ever since the dreadful waiting on datalock. The way it's supposed to go is up, even with some retraction, support should settle higher. But we see the opposite occur. All the while, in tandem, we see the same old monikers gangstalking longs, claiming it's longs pumping, and they're just angels, who have nothing else in life, but to be keyboard junkies getting their fix from being good Samaritans, as they insist the direction of the stock is all on Management. 🤡 It's a bizarre psychological petri dish. Proprietary platforms do whatever the F**k they want, timed simultaneously, with soulless devil's advocates, rince and repeating after every milestone completion. Since catalyst timelines are far apart in general, they put the recording on a loop, and broadcast it daily, just to see how many posters they can bait. All the while, investors somehow cling to the thought that the next milestone would do better. How many milestones and sp reversals does the SEC need to see, to understand that there's somethimg rotten, yep, as it turned out for real in Denmark?
beachhyena - That's an interesting take away from Danish's situation. I think it's nefarious also. Why now, so late after "All" the derisking? That doesn't add up to protecting shareholders! What's left? I'll leave it there.