Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Addition to the team. He already works for are firm. Just addition.
https://www.venable.com/about/news/2017/06/michael-blume-former-justice-department-consumer-p
“Michael Blume, Former Justice Department Consumer Protection Branch Director, Joins Venable's Regulatory Practice in New York”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No.: 0:18-cv-61047-UU UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, v.
US STEM CELL CLINIC, LLC, et al., Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR
PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION, AND REQUEST TO ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING
THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Michael Blume, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notice of Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Special Rules Governing the Admission and Practice of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having considered the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. Michael Blume may appear and participate in this action on behalf of Defendants US Stem Cell Clinic, LLC, US Stem Cell, Inc., Michael Blume. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to Michael Blume at msblume@venable.com.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this _2d__ day of May, 2019.
copies provided: counsel of record
_______________________________ URSULA UNGARO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
New filing yesterday:
Granted USRM s new lawyer to enter the fold from Venable. Michael Blume use to work for the Department of Justice and now works for Venable law firm. :)
“The treatment uses liposuction to remove fat tissue from the belly, treats it with a special enzyme and then isolates stem cells from the fat. These stem cells are called adipose-derived regenerative cells.”
Aka Adipocell :)
Let’s not forget that the FDA already finished it’s safety study on adipose stem cells in Jan with Sanford Health lol I wonder if the judge will stumble upon this info in her research before decision lol
https://bismarcktribune.com/news/state-and-regional/stem-cell-treatment-for-rotator-cuff-injuries-gets-safety-approval/article_b2ffe6f1-8e3e-5611-83c8-d8e824b8229e.amp.html
“FARGO — After a year-long study, the Food and Drug Administration has approved the safety of an ongoing stem cell treatment project that Sanford Health in Fargo and Sioux Falls are leading.
It's a medical advance that could eventually change the lives of millions living with partial rotator cuff tear issues, a condition affecting muscles and tendons surrounding the shoulder joint. The treatment's developers say it's one of the most common orthopedic impairments in the United States and other developed countries.”
Agreed. Even better, Mayo Clinic uses adipose stem cells already :)
Good thing we’re on the “common sense” side.
Doesn’t guarantee a victory but in ANY bet, I prefer to be on the common sense side.
Whats your take on the DTC buys?
Taken private? It’s DT’s only post for the day but can someone elaborate on that thought/statement?
Funny you say that about the short interest. I noticed that last month also and wondering what it meant if anything. Glad someone else noticed it as well.
Can you post?
Can you post the new certification from the 26th?
AMAZING INTERVIEW FROM TODAY LIVE IN AUSTIN, TX
John Salley and Luis Ortiz as well
All about perspective. One could easily be pleased that the judge said that she doesn’t think it’s necessary at this point but open to if need be.
USRM already produces more revenue than at least 4 other names on that list and all four have PPS Of .50¢ or higher. Most in dollars. Tick tock..
Np good sir
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No.: 0:18-cv-61047-UU UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, v.
US STEM CELL CLINIC, et al., Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants’ Unopposed Request for Hearing (the “Motion”). D.E. 61. The Court has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
The Parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on March 11, 2019, and Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion in limine on March 29, 2019. In the instant Motion, Defendants request a hearing on each party’s motion for summary judgment. In support, Defendants note that the Court “will benefit from an in-person hearing regarding the complex legal and scientific issues presented by the parties in the motions.” D.E. 61 at 1. In contrast, the United States represents that the motions can be decided on the written record, but does not oppose a hearing. Id. While the Court appreciates the complexity of this case, the Court does not perceive a need for a hearing at this time,. particularly as the parties were granted an extra ten pages each to explain their positions and the scientific background of the case.
If issues arise during the Court’s consideration of the parties’ motions or after, the Court may consider holding a status conference on any specific issues at that time. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion, D.E. 61, is DENIED.
Case 0:18-cv-61047-UU Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2019 Page 2 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this _18th__ day of April, 2019.
copies provided: counsel of record
_______________________________ URSULA UNGARO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No.: 0:18-cv-61047-UU UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, v.
US STEM CELL CLINIC, et al., Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial Date (the “Motion”). D.E. 64. The Court has considered the pertinent portions of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
On August 13, 2018, the Court entered its Scheduling Order for Pretrial Conference and Trial, setting a trial date commencing the two-week period beginning June 10, 2019. D.E. 29. In the instant Motion, Defendants request that the Court continue the trial date due to one of Defendant’s counsel’s (Isaac Mitrani) observance of the Jewish Holiday of Shuvot on June 10, 2019 and the graduation of Defendant’s Counsel’s son in California from June 14 to June 17, 2019. D.E. 64.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) provides that a schedule “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “To establish good cause, the party seeking the extension must establish that the schedule could not be met despite the party’s diligence.” Fisher v. SP One Ltd., 559 Fed.Appx. 873, 878 (11th Cir. 2014) (citation omitted).
At this time with cross-motions for summary judgment pending, it is far from clear that a trial will be necessary. But, in any event, the parties have not presented good cause for the
Case 0:18-cv-61047-UU Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2019 Page 2 of 2
extension. Defendants are presently represented by seven attorneys, five of whom work for a national law firm, Venable, LLP; presumably one of these attorneys could stand in for Mr. Mitrani during his absence and would have two months to prepare for trial. Moreover, Mr. Mitrani has not been diligent. He was presumably aware that Shuvot and his son’s graduation would take place during the trial period set in August 2018, over eight months ago. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion, D.E. 64 is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida, this _18th__ day of April, 2019.
copies provided: counsel of record
Two new postings on Pacer. No big relevance from either.
1. Denying Mitirani (one of USRM’s attorneys) request to extend because he has some personal days that conflict with the trial IF there is a trial. The judge basically said because 1, the fact that it is not proven that there will even BE a trial with pending summary judgement and that USRM has one of the prestigious national law firms at its fingertips, if he can’t be there then they can be so she will not grant extension.
2. Second motion was the judge telling USRM that they appreciate the offer but right now they don’t think it’s necessary for her to give oral clarification on USRM’s stance or protocols. IF necessary the court will revisit the issue but for now, enough information has been presented.
LIVE LOOK at a fat extraction from US STEM CELL EMPLOYEE Michelle Parlo at 1 of the US STEM CELL CLINICS in Florida. Famous biohacker Anthony DiClementi gets stem cell treatment using USRM protocols.
He says it’s virtually painless
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1277323612420926&id=649814195175627
Disagree. On many fronts. But we will see.
Lose not loose USRM for the win
JEEZUS lol
Praying for us all
Kali?
Accumulation to the max aye?
And if I’m wrong and you wish to correct me please do, but come with something tangible we cAn see or something factual.
Those are SEC filed documents
Almost 8,000 new investors joined in between March 2018 and March 2019. Seems like people know something is coming soon either way.
2018
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/191760/content
2019
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/215070/content
What’s amazing to me is we have over 8000 new investors in a year and somehow the price maintained levels under .04¢
You wanna talk about manipulation geeeesh
For those who don’t know, the FDA has lost to Drs. before. See the case of Dr. Sebi In the 80’s. He was sued twice for claiming he had natural medicine that could cure aids and other serious diseases.
He brought patient examples along with in-biased Drs. to the witness stand to verify these claims of the patients. Also provided scientific data that proved the diseases were in remission. He won his state and federal cases against FDA.
It’s been done before, it’ll be done again.
https://www.naturallifeenergy.com/dr-sebi-speaks-about-winning-the-nyc-supreme-court-case-against-him/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfredo_Bowman
Hey Joey! Do you mind posting the filing that from the year before that you reference that will show all the shareholder growth within a year?
Thanks in advance, tried to find it myself.
I only said something because I’ve made multiple purchases over the last three years on this stock before and can always trace it back to the tape. This time, no good.
VERY ODD!
Does anyone else have a suggestion as to why that would happen? I purchased 41500 shares around 2pm, it all executed at once and I have my shares in my account. But no where on the tape does it say there was a 41500 buy nor is there a breakdown of buys that add up to that. Never seen it before..