US Stem Cell Inc (USRM)

[a1tellem]

Two new postings on Pacer. No big relevance from either.

1. Denying Mitirani (one of USRM’s attorneys) request to extend because he has some personal days that conflict with the trial IF there is a trial. The judge basically said because 1, the fact that it is not proven that there will even BE a trial with pending summary judgement and that USRM has one of the prestigious national law firms at its fingertips, if he can’t be there then they can be so she will not grant extension.

2. Second motion was the judge telling USRM that they appreciate the offer but right now they don’t think it’s necessary for her to give oral clarification on USRM’s stance or protocols. IF necessary the court will revisit the issue but for now, enough information has been presented.