Rebel
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Get it straight. It was the COURT that said bond was unsecured and no one else. The Court JUST NOW corrected its mistake.
Right, after the R/S, I was left with 4 shares at $75.00/per share. When this hits $80.00/share, I might buy a few more. lolol. I sincerely hope no one supports this rip-off company, no matter how good they make their fake news sound. Wouldn't trust them for a nanosecond!
Not a worry in my head. lol. Selling now does seem a bit crazy though.
Why would Mark almost immediately after launching the patient portal and receiving approval for direct Medicare billing by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) around October, 2018, immediately decide to start defrauding Medicare knowing full well that it would be a major crime that would send him to the slammer?
I still think there has to be more to this become it just makes no sense.
Covid-19 study published on 7/15/20 used Arrayit’s Spotbot Extreme. It’s so over my head that it’s ridiculous and painful. lol. I have found other studies too where ARYC’s technology is being used during the pandemic.
Chemoenzymatically synthesized sialyl glycans were quantitated utilizing DMB-HPLC analysis and were dissolved in 300 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.4) to a final concentration of 100 µM. ArrayIt SpotBot® Extreme was used for printing the sialoglycans on NHS-functionalized glass slides (PolyAn 3D-NHS slides from Automate Scientific; catalogue number-PO-10400401). Purified mouse anti-HMGB1 antibody (BioLegend; catalogue number-651402, Lot# B219634) and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch; catalogue number-115-165-008) were used. Fresh HEPES buffer (20mM HEPES, 150mM NaCl ± 500µM ZnCl2) was prepared immediately before starting the microarray experiments.
Method described in (34) was adapted to perform the microarray experiment. Each glycan was printed in quadruplets. The temperature (20 °C) and humidity (70%) inside the ArrayIt[/b]® printing chamber was rigorously maintained during the printing process. The slides were left for drying for an additional 8 h. Printed glycan microarray slides were blocked with pre-warmed 0.05 M ethanolamine solution (in 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 9.0), washed with warm Milli-Q water, dried, and then fitted in a multi-well microarray hybridization cassette (ArrayIt, CA) to divide it into 8 subarrays. Each subarray well was treated with 400 µl of ovalbumin (1% w/v) dissolved in freshly prepared HEPES blocking buffer ± 500 µM of Zn2+ (pH adjusted for individual experiments) for 1h at ambient temperature in a humid chamber with gentle shaking. Subsequently, the blocking solution was discarded, and a solution of HMGB1 (40 µg/ml) in the same HEPES buffer (± Zn2+, defined pH) was added to the subarray. After incubating for 2 hours at room temperature with gentle shaking, the slides were extensively washed (first with PBS buffer with 0.1%Tween20 and then with only PBS, pH 7.4) to remove any non-specific binding. The subarray was further treated with a 1:500 dilution (in PBS) of Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Fc specific) secondary antibody and then gently shaken for 1 hour in the dark, humid chamber followed by the same washing cycle described earlier. The developed glycan microarray slides were then dried and scanned with a Genepix 4000B (Molecular Devices Corp., Union City, CA) microarray scanner (at 532 nm). Data analysis was performed using the Genepix Pro 7.3 analysis software (Molecular Devices Corp., Union City, CA).
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.15.198010v1.full
What are you talking about? That in 26 years in business one customer had a bad experience with ARYC and decided to sue them? Both sides will be heard in that case.
Do you even know what a patent is? Do you think Legos can no longer make Legos because its patent.expired? Do you think Legos are now obsolete because their patent expired and therefore too “old”? Sure, other companies can try to replicate Legos, but Legos is still the king.
See how that works?
lol lol. So?? Do you think that means Arrayit can no longer sell products based on their patents? Patents expire every day. It’s normal.
You’re welcome.
Under the law he is still innocent until proven guilty, and in this case the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt at a trial, but he hasn’t even been formally charged yet! If the Judge decides there is probable cause, then a trial will be set. In the meantime, any good lawyer would have told him to zip his lips, so don’t expect a word from him or the company other than in court.
No one has declared his innocence, not even Mark. The case hasn’t even gone that far because he hasn’t been charged yet. Reserving judgment is only fair until the DOJ proves its case. All of this castigating of the man before he is even formally charged is not cool.
Wow, and this is just the beginning. Congrats Steve Rotman and Vystar and all patient shareholders, who should be very proud of this remarkable progress.
"Devon Jurczyk, Eagle Hill Director of Facilities noted, "There is no question that masks, distancing, sanitizing, and Covid-19 testing are all critical elements of maintaining a safe environment, but from a physical plant perspective it all starts with the air we breathe. And, importantly, not only does the RxAir's UV technology kill or inactivate bacteria and viruses more effectively than traditional purifying systems, their filter-less system makes it human-proof. There is no way we would have the manpower or the budget to change out filters as often as would be necessary to fight the virus and we're happy there are no filters laden with trapped active pathogens to touch."Th
"Schena has written four books on microarrays, including the first textbook on the subject, and has been featured by journalists in interviews covered by the print media, radio and television.
Schena has pioneered an extensive line of microarray products and services at Arrayit. Schena is the inventor of Variation Identification Platform (VIP) technology, which is capable of genotyping up to 80,000 patients in a single microarray test. Schena has taken an active role in healthcare reform in the United States by promoting the importance of technical innovation as a means of improving the quality and accessibility of healthcare and controlling its cost. Schena is considered the foremost authority on microarray technology, referred to as the "Father of Microarray Technology".
"At Stanford, Schena pioneered a new field of science (microarray technology) as the first author on the Stanford team publication in the journal Science demonstrating that complementary DNA molecules immobilized on glass could be used to measure gene expression in the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. The modern microarray industry and solid-phase DNA sequencing industry have drawn heavily from the 1995 Science paper. More than 42,000 peer-reviewed microarray publications have appeared in the scientific literature since 1995.
That is NOT true. This is what I understand:
Arrayit offers at least TWENTY-ONE (21) diversified microarray scanners, which scanners obviously are manufactured outside of the lab (which is NORMAL for most companies), and which must be why ARYC is one of the "top players" in the microarray scanner industry.
If that makes people angry, then I don't care.
lol.
http://shop.arrayit.com/arrayit_microarray_scanners.aspx
Here is another focused on Global Microarray Scanners. Arrayit is listed as one of the top leading players.
Market Outlook 2026: Top Players- Agilent Genomics, Arrayit, Bioautomation Corporation, Bio-Rad, etc....
The market research report on the Global Microarray Scanners market has been carefully curated after studying and observing various factors that determine the growth such as environmental, economic, social, technological and political status of the regions mentioned. Thorough analysis of the data regarding revenue, production, and manufacturers gives out a clear picture of the global scenario of the Microarray Scanners market. The data will also help key players and new entrants understand the potential of investments in the Global Microarray Scanners Market.
Understand the influence of COVID-19 on the Microarray Scanners Market with our analysts monitoring the situation across the globe.
https://thedailychronicle.in/satellite/1625790/global-microarray-scanners-market-outlook-2026-top-players-agilent-genomics-arrayit-bioautomation-corporation-bio-rad/
That is not true. Companies CAN be and ARE shut down by agencies with the authority to do so, such as the FDA, which also issues warning letters and cease and desist orders.
Arrayit has been issued none of these, and neither has Mark or anyone else at Arrayit.
So you agree that it’s the official court document that should rule as to the continuance? That’s good.
lol. Thanks, but I’ll go with the official court document.
I did not say the delay was a victory for anyone, but it is amazing that the madman is still allowed to live among us while working at the lab with their fraudulent tests.
Wrong. Covid was not mentioned as one of the reasons for the continuance.
It’s been continued yet again to 11/16/2020. The request was made by the DOJ.
“Reset Hearing as to Defendant Mark Schena re [30] Order on Stipulation.
Preliminary Examination set for 10/15/2020 is continued to 11/16/2020, at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020)”
We will just have to wait and see. With the many inaccurate statements in the DOJ’s complaint, who knows what else they got wrong.
Lol. Right. Highly exaggerated and yet to be proven.
Here’s another.
Totally untrue.
Your $100 million figure is highly exaggerated.
It’s really no different than anything Nielsen may have said on the opposite side of the spectrum.
Steve Rotman is doing an excellent job during one of the most difficult times in the history of our country. Profitability may happen sooner than anyone ever expected.
If you can't see it, then you can't see it.
There is no point in spinning positive news when IT IS POSITIVE NEWS that speaks for itself.
No complaining from me!
That's not true.
No, it was not me. It was Neotide.
Comparing Ms. Holmes to Dr. Mark Schena is just silly. There IS no comparison.
No one is saying Mark didn’t do anything wrong, but there are two sides to this pancake.
Wrong. The investigation began when the FDA inspected Theranos starting in August of 2015 and cited many flaws on many levels. Things spiraled downward after that. In 2016 Ms. Holmes was barred from owning and operating a lab for 2 years. It took a while to dissolve the company since it put itself up for sale first, with no interested buyers.
Arrayit is conducting business with Mark working in the lab as he awaits hearings/trial. Is Ms. Holmes continuing to work in the lab while she awaits trial? No. Theranos was totally shut down years ago. The FDA cited many serious flaws during its inspections of Theranos while no such flaws have ever been cited for Arrayit. Theranos’s tests were deemed harmful to the public’s health because they were fake, while no such claims have ever been made against Arrayit.
Mark did not tell “the marketplace” that the Covid-19 test was “bad” pie because it wasn’t. The test was moved to the FDA’s Pre-Emergency Authorization list while the company improved it to “close to 100%” accuracy. There was nothing that came from Arrayit to “the marketplace” anyway about them having a Covid-19 test. There was no 8K or official PR to alert the marketplace. Hints appeared on their website and emails to people who showed an interest in the subject were answered, and people shared their findings with IHubbers. Collectively, that is hardly “the marketplace.” People on this board were clamoring to have the company issue an 8K or PR about ARYC’s test, and it’s my opinion they didn’t do that because it was still a work-in-progress.
It doesn’t matter to me who is right or wrong. It’s not about that. I am not taking a side...just trying to keep an open mind while hoping for the best.
I don’t believe there are many similar cases, if any at all. Arrayit was the DOJ’s first shot at trying to bring a Covid-19 “fraudster” down. The DOJ and SEC were so proud! They may have acted too quickly due to trusting in the SEC’s allegations, which were inaccurate and largely based on hearsay from outsiders. Several statements in the Complaint regarding the test are either wrong, convoluted. or simply bizarre. Their statements as to this date or that date seem overly picky since those times were confusing and chaotic for everyone, including labs and federal agencies.
So far, no agency has sent them a warning letter or any sort of cease and desist order about their Covid-19 or allergy or any other test.
You’d think the DOJ would be a bit more anxious to stop the fraud as soon as possible, rather than continue to delay the preliminary hearing and allowing Mark and Arrayit to continue with what seems like business as usual.
Just sayin’.
How does one "scab his flyer inside the back cover?"
What on earth does that even mean. Sounds gross.
Pacer says it was the DOJ that filed the Stipulation for the continuance, but the fact remains that it was the Judge’s decision to grant it. The Judge is aware of the charges, and since they’re related to Covid-19 and health care fraud, it would seem to me this case should be moving forward more quickly than others. I don’t believe it’s “standard” to have so many delays in this type of criminal case, especially now with the Covid connection.
So of course I wonder what the DOJ is thinking by requesting another delay. Maybe the Postal Inspector’s Affidavit is causing them grief since much of it is so sloppy.
The Judge once again has decided to let the maniac scientist continue to walk among us for yet another month. There must have been a very good reason for this further delay. This is, after all, a criminal matter. Where is the speedy trial? Why is the Judge allowing Mark’s folly to continue? Could it be that his microarray expertise is needed at the lab to fight the war against Covid? Why hasn’t this “scam” been shut down?
Makes ya wonder.....
Nice. Thank you SG.
But we haven’t seen any evidence from these beloved “multiple independent government agencies.” No one is “excusing criminal behavior.” Let’s see what they have before passing judgment. Is that so hard? It’s the law of the land.
What false information?
Agree. I think he was as disappointed as everyone else when the financials weren’t filed; if he had known they weren’t going to be filed ahead of time because he and Mark were in cahoots, as some believe, he would have sold in the $.20 range instead of selling those millions of shares for a fraction of that.
I never saw the point of lying on message boards because the only agenda I have is the same as everyone else’s, which is to make money, obviously.
Wow just wow?
As I said I am not defending anyone. Just trying to keep things in perspective without the drama and over exaggerations. Nielsen’s actions aren’t any different than thousands of others with an agenda.