Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What's your point? They no longer have any convertible notes so you don't have to worry about new shares from convertible notes. The company has already addressed the issue.
If you're going to claim something, state sonething that is physically possible.
For anything to be down 100%, it would have to go to 0. Absolute zero.
Which still means it was paid off.
Sometimes I think you're TOO nice lol.
Oh well, as long as we're talking FACTS about GEQU and explaining away the misconceptions about different types of shares, it's all good.
Hope everyone's learned something today!
Restricted stock IS common stock, just with restrictions.
Restricted stock are almost always among common shares. Restrictions are placed on them.
However, shares given to management are restricted.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/restrictedstock.asp
"Insiders are given restricted stock after merger and acquisition activity, underwriting activity and affiliate ownership in order to prevent premature selling that might adversely affect the company. An executive may have to forfeit his or her restricted stock if he or she leaves the company, fails to meet corporate or personal performance goals or runs afoul of SEC trading restrictions. The SEC regulations that govern the trading of restricted stock are outlined under SEC Rule 144, which describes the registration and public trading of restricted stock and the limits on holding periods and volume."
Read more: Restricted Stock Definition | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/restrictedstock.asp#ixzz3rY4Kw1Rb
There is only one "linked in DD."
The information you quoted is from a single SEC filing from a different company.
I'm pretty sure it's by individual trader(s). The small blocks and and small trades/paint jobs tell me that.
It also helps that I've been asked in the past to help manipulate this stock price. And that is NOT something I will do.
I know that there IS an extension. I'm talking about the LIE about there being writing on the wall previously to warn people about a completely normal and acceptable filing of a 5 day extension.
There's been no writing on the wall about a 5 day extension anywhere. These posts never have any logic or sense behind them...
Congrats! Wish I was doing something like that!
Makes zero sense. Why would they do that? Increasing revenue and paying down debt with said revenue. They just uplisted to QB. NO reason to RS.
Oh wait, you're just trolling...
Anybody noticing all the paints as well? Happening both ways unfortunately...
Haven't posted this in a little while, so here's a reminder.
This is not info about where the pps is going... it's not a claim that this is going to skyrocket or whatever. This is simply background information about our management that shows their education, career history, character, and accomplishments. Whether or not this will be a huge success or become a billion dollar+ company, I can't say. The only thing I CAN say is that these guys are smart and they don't seem like the types of guys that would be involved in something they didn't believe in.
TTCM DD Post
Roadships Holdings, Inc. Changes Name to Tautachrome Inc.
"TUSCON, Ariz., Nov. 5, 2015 /PRNewswire/ --Tautachrome, Inc. (OTC-PINK: TTCM) today announced that the corporate name change has now been effected from Roadships Holdings, Inc. to Tautachrome, Inc., together with a symbol change from RDSH to TTCM."
Here's the links I've compiled so far showing the background some of our management here. It includes names like Raytheon, NASA, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy, and Texas A&M University.
It also shows patents that our CEO/Founder, Jon Leonard and Co-Founder/Chief Engineer, Matt Staker have been granted.
Jon N. Leonard, PhD
A Mars Colonization Approach that was submitted to The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2007-6135
List of all Patents associated with Dr. Jon N. Leonard
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/jon-n-leonard
Raytheon Newsletter showing that Dr Leonard had received patent through Raytheyon:
http://www.raytheon.com/news/technology_today/archive/2010_2.pdf
(pg 55:
JON N. LEONARD
JAMES SMALL
4490433 Mass spectrometer for entrained particles, and method for measuring masses of the particles)
5th International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2006)
http://ronaldazuma.com/papers/ISMAR06_final.pdf
Shows him as attendee at the 2011 systems engineering research center annual research review
http://www.sercuarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Attendee-List.pdf
Joel Sercel, PhD
NASA SBIR 2015 Proposal
Demonstration of "Optical Mining" For Excavation of Asteroids and Production of Mission Consumables
http://sbir.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/15/sbir/phase1/SBIR-15-1-H1.01-9278.html
Seminar given by Dr. Sercel at University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy
https://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/colloquia/abstracts15A/sercel.html
Links showing that Dr. Sercel's proposal was selected by NASA for study under the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC), a program that aims to turn science fiction into science fact through the development of pioneering technologies.
http://www.parabolicarc.com/2015/05/08/niac/
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/niac-2015-phase-i-and-phase-ii-selections
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/apis-asteroid-provided-in-situ-supplies-100mt-of-water-from-a-single-falcon-9
Seminar at Texas A&M University
https://engineering.tamu.edu/media/2154178/SERCEL-02122015-AESS-Announcement.pdf
Link showing Dr. Sercel quoted in article about NASA's Asteroid Initiative and talking about ICS Associates Honey Bee project
http://spacenews.com/37559commercial-firms-push-alternative-approaches-for-nasa-asteroid-initiative/
Article about his Asteroid Mining business model
http://www.space.com/30582-asteroid-mining-water-propulsion.html
Matthew Staker
List of all Patents associated with Matthew Staker
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/matthew-staker
Matthew Staker was founder/chief technologist in VisualSoftware, which was acquired by Micrografx for approximately $17 million (inflation adjusted)
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/MICROGRAFX+COMPLETES+ACQUISITION+OF+VISUAL+SOFTWARE,+INC.-a018157203
Matthew Staker - New Image Industries, Inc
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=291000
SC 14D1/A for DENTSPLY acquisition of New Image Industries, Inc
http://www.secinfo.com/dsvrv.8Je.htm#1stPage
Article about New Image Industries, Inc's "The New Image 610 Landscape Design System", mentioning Matt Staker
http://landscapeonline.com/research/article/9460
"The 610 Landscape Design System dates from 1984, with the research and marketing of the successful NIII ‘hair salon’ system. At the time John Halloran, a successful physicist began researching the system. Later he was to team up with Bob Garavitch, a businessman who has worked for Revlon and other cosmetic firms, to finalize studies on the hair salon system to bring it to market. With the help of Matt Staker, an imaginative programmer, the imaging system became a reality."
SRI’s Center for Vision Technologies under Mike Piacentino’s leadership worked with Jon in the development of the MANTIS soldier imaging system for the US Army, under a $40 million DARPA program that Jon defined and managed while at Raytheon.
Some proof that they've worked together before:
Dr. Leonard talking about MANTIS in 2006.
http://www.afcea.org/content/?q=us-recoups-nighttime-primacy
Mike Piacentino on MANTIS
http://archive.defensenews.com/print/article/20090301/C4ISR02/903010305/Through-haze-smoke-night
Mike Piacentino profile on SRI
https://www.sri.com/about/people/michael-piacentin
Oh wow! And here I was thinking and looking back only like 15-20 years lol.
I'm still thinking it was just quite awhile ago when he worked there. Bloomberg usually only lists current management for cos. And since GEQU is supposed to the 'capstone' he's probably older and may not have a linked in profile or something else showing that.
If he was the cfo 10+ years ago, there very well may not be any information you can get via Google.
My opinion only, but I've tried finding info on any of att's previous cfos and I've found next to nothing.
This post makes no sense. The pps is still up from where it was churning a few weeks ago before you guys took a break. Nothing substantial happened that would have caused it to hold in the higher range. And obviously barely anyone is selling with such low volume.
The restrictions put on the shares, if there even would be, aren't put on when the authorized shares increases. The restrictions are put on when bought by the individual in the terms of the deal.
Insiders currently own billions of those common shares and they are restricted. It's dependent upon how and by whom they are bought.
That is a good point...
Nothing has changed. The company is still putting out info and getting things done.
The only issue is that there aren't new buyers. New buyers are needed for every stock to move up, no matter what.
The reason it was going down was because almost everyone that was holding long had all the shares they wanted and there weren't many new eyes on it.
So yes, good news came, but the people that saw it already owned it.
So then you get the negativity brewing like crazy due to stagnation and low volume markdowns, but those same people complaining all the time aren't doing anything to help bring in more investors. New people might check out the board, but then they see all the whining and of course they're going to want to move along.
Also, make sure you post facts if you're calling them facts and back it up with links if you have them. When it's hearsay, rumors, accusations, or just opinion, say that it's one of those. I know nothing on here is ever supposed to be considered fact, but you instantly lose credibility if you don't qualify your statements.
Most likely when we hear from the company. Until then, we just have to put up with the games.
And now here's the conspiracy theories...
Are you really comparing this to MDCN? Take a look at the financials of both and get back to me.
GEQU has increasing revenue and decreasing debt and DOESN'T have a loss of over $100 million dollars.
There was no rug pulled out over there... There was just a company that really knew how to spend without making money.
And CDEL is gone lol
Well I picked up another 350k today, so I think I'm set for this ride!
Who puts a 400k ask up on low volume if they're wanting to sell at that level?
Well, not anyone that knows better, that's for sure...
Looks to me like someone's trying to capitalize on the mini dump to get em even cheaper.
I actually never thought I'd get that order filled lol.
Perfect buying opportunity!
Yet the stock is still up about 15% for the day...
There is manipulation. Paints have occurred both ways. It happens all the time in the OTC.
Sound pretty sure of yourself with nothing to back it up... Why do you say that and how low do you think it's going?
Don't see anything about this stock on that site...
I still can't convince anyone to sell to me in the 022s... So we'll see.
It's a holiday today. A lot of people not paying attention to the market.
I'm still trying to average down while it's here. My average is over 3. That's why I'm trying to catch it on the dips.
Haha. Well, I moved em up to 258 niw cuz some jerk outbid me at 256 lol
My shares are finally showing at 255! Sell to me!
Yeah.. Still wish I would have had the money when it dipped to the low 2s those few days... And now that I bid it won't do that lol. My bad luck will hold this up!