Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
And the problem is? The chill can be removed with SEC approval of the S1. The DTCC cooperates with the SEC on this matter.
Oh really? What role did Quraeshi play in EDWY? Officer? Director?
Exactly HOW was Snap Trends a "scam." Exactly HOW did that work? I have not heard of a single "victim."
This is ridiculous. ESCU is brand new enterprise. The past no longer applies.
None of this makes a bit of difference as it relates to ESCU today. As stated here many times: new people, new plan.
The answer to this is obvious. It's already been provided dozens of times. Kimmons received VOTING shares in 2006, that's it.
Those shares were subsequently SURRENDERED by Kimmons, so the net of it is that he received NOTHING.
Come on now!! This has been covered a zillion times here.
More? That was his payment for a half dozen years. There was no "more."
Companies acquire assets all of the time. Why should ESCU be any different?
There seems to be a consistent OMISSION of the fact that Kimmons was compensated in restricted stock for services performed years ago. Why?
Ridiculous and irrelevant based on ESCU's current circumstances.
Why is this a big deal? I don't get the point of this as it relates to ESCU's current situation.
Ahem. You do know that that's the purpose and intent of ESCU's filing an S1, right? The target investors are institutional firms. Everyone in the business knows this.
The S1 makes it clear who the key players are in ESCU. There is no issue here.
That's ridiculous. The filing was submitted to the SEC to obtain it's approval for registering shares and to establish ESCU as a reporting company. The filing has already been amended once and will be amended again before things conclude.
The fact that the public can take a "peek" into the filings as things proceed does not indicate that ESCU is "communicating" with the public. Total BS.
Come on now! ESCU has made absolutely NO claims, addresses to the public, or proclamations.
You throw the word "scam" out there at the drop of a hat! Attacks are cheap.
There's absolutely NO evidence of that. In fact, there's no evidence of ANYTHING yet until ESCU elects to address the world and share what it's up to. Until then this is all just a bunch of BS.
Institutional investors are large investment houses. Trust me, they're not going to let anyone like ESCU "twist" them into doing something unwise. Absurd.
Ridiculous. ESCU has not made any promises to anyone. NO PRs. NO announcements. Stop it!!
It doesn't matter. That's a tired old argument. ESCU = new people, new business plan, new opportunity. The past is irrelevant.
What does "reluctant investor" mean in the context of ESCU?
Ridiculous. ESCU has done NOTHING to hype it's stock. This is asinine.
Wow. What a stretch! Dragging someone who has been gone for years into totally false speculation.
Oh well, if that happens it will be a problem for those who have actually invested in ESCU.
Tired old allegations that have no basis in fact when it comes to ESCU.
There are no legal proceedings. I checked with ESCU. That fact will be reflected in their next S1 filing.
Much ado about nothing as it applies to ESCU.
You do understand that "non-affiliate" means he is not affiliated with ESCU, right? Kimmons is not an affiliate. There is no evidence of his involvement whatsoever with ESCU.
And the point here is? There is NO dilution.
The facts quoted in this post are untrue and the accusations are irrelevant to ESCU and its team.
False accusations with no bearing on ESCU's new team or operations.
Please provide a PR issued by ESCU. Answer: there are none.
Huh? Discussing people from a decade ago and trying to relate it to ESCU today?
Agree. One small "buy" and the price shot up a half a buck.
This is factually inaccurate and irrelevant as it relates to ESCU's situation today.
Several of these statements are false as it relates to ESCU.
This has nothing to do with anything related to ESCU. No relationship to fact or reality.
Irrelevant and immaterial in today's world of ESCU. Kimmons is not an officer or director.
Hello. This is NOT eDoorways, it's ESCU. New team. New business plan.
It doesn't have to say it. The S1, like a 10K, is a report to the SEC. It kicks the process in gear for subsequent Q's and K's.
Hello? The S1 exonerates Kimmmons from your accusation.
Also, ANY money Kimmons might have received via sales of EDWY /ESCU securities would have to be REPORTED to the SEC. There was nothing reported.
The audit takes into account EVERY SINGLE SHARE AND TRANSACTION. Nothing there. Period.
I suggest researching how funding associated with S1 filings occurs. The shares are registered and offered to a lead fund. The lead fund typically syndicates the placement,bringing in one or two associated funds. That way they spread the risk of the investment. ESCU is simply following SOP.
Simultaneously hilarious and ridiculous. Also irrelevant as it relates to ESCU today.