I do not offer advice on buying, selling, or holding securities. My posts are simply opinions and are not to be used to make decisions.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thank you, all is well in the UAMM kingdom.
Please add me as a Moderator again! I will serve my position as I did before, fair and just, with no bias. I will also serve my role diligently and update the I-box with new developments and suggestions from fellow I-hubbers
I know the 570 dollars I paid for the. 004 will fetch me $2,280 with just a thimble of my immense patience!
I won't let it carry me away though, my 7 years trading have seasoned my discipline. Back in 2014 I would have slapped the ask all the way up to .01!
I couldn't help myself I saw an ask of 140,000 shares at 004. It looked like a golden nugget someone left sitting on the sidewalk as a little treat to entice me for more!
Playing with fire now Lol! Look out above! $UAMM loud and proud again!
I honestly stopped paying attention to anything UAMM until today. Then I saw your post I'm referencing and now I see things very differently. I first had my eye opener the day we had the 8 total shares of volume. That put my thinking in a positive direction with this stock.
Right now is not a good time to be trying to flip UAMM. You literally have 100s of thousands of other options to flip. I don't think it's funny when people miss out because it's a sick feeling and I have felt it many times. I adjusted my sell order sizes and prices accordingly to that new development.
I don't think you are nuts at all. I was in XMET also. I kept a million shares as a souvenir that I bought at .0001
Alstocks the OS for $PFWIQ is approximately 1,322,992,722 according to the latest TA verified numbers on OTC markets, which is also 6,949,634,740 less shares outstanding than the highly promoted $XMET. You already knew that but I know you were trying to help me with some pointers so I say thank you and good luck in all your involvements.
If it gets that low I'm bringing all my Caterpillar and John Deere front loaders!
Yeah I know, and I'll be there every step of the way. Just saying it's at it's yearly lows right now and getting some volume at the moment. Putting the good word out about $PFWIQ so we keep the peeps reading this board well informed of David Lazar custodianship opportunities that are currently low priced, not something that's already run 100% or more. All of them are great, but some offer more lucrative situations, such as $PFWIQ
Breakout board is some sketchy territory, but lucky for us, the way this is heading is upwards from here. Just you wait and and see!
Weeeeee! I'm in good company then. Let's all make money together!
Sadly all I have to offer is pennies. But it's ok, I dance to the beat of my own humble drum.
Bless you and thanks. May your Christmas or Hanakuh dreams and wishes come true! I'll buy back in at a penny for a song and a dance!
Ok sorry for distracting you. DL plays are definitely patience pays plays. Even the ones that do reverse splits are money makers if you play them right.
I made a chit ton on Jc Penney and Sears just flipping them over and over. I made back all the money I ever spent in those stores.
I'm trying to sell my huge chunk at .012. I had to undercut the order at .0123 I hope you understand, I'm trying to get some cash for Christmas.
I think there's a group trying to get people to dump .0004s in PFWIQ
Some of my best percentage gains were Qs
Now that PFWIQ is running can we start beating our $PFWIQ drums yet? Or should we wait until it's up 100%?
But why isn't anyone accumulating at .013 then? That's where I'm trying to sell shares at so I can buy more at .01
What's happening here? How come no one wants to buy these cheapies at .013? Isn't this a great stock?
That's where you and I differ. I like to call attention to stocks like $PFWIQ that are at lows doing nothing before they break out. The hot stocks pump themselves for me.
There really isn't much to say right now. It's a good time to just focus on more important things and watch the birth of this company Born Inc. from a safe distance if you're not in heavy already like I am.
I think we should refocus and take a look at $PFWIQ. .0004 X .0005 Cheapest Lazar stock right now. Also, can we stop calling each other dawg, and calling out others for bad calls?
He loses his son every day. It's something he has to relive over and over every day. I have lost 2 people I love to opioid abuse. It's something you never get over or forget. This is why I continue to believe in Dalton. I know he's on a mission to change the world for the better. He's not going to give up.
No more hiding behind Delaware SOS. Reveal yourself to us.
WASHINGTON _ A groundbreaking measure to end the creation of anonymous shell companies in the United States cleared Congress on Friday as the Senate joined the House in passing a defense-spending bill with a veto-proof margin.
The Corporate Transparency Act, which was tacked onto the defense bill, would require corporations and limited liability companies established in the United States to disclose their real owners to the Treasury Department, making it harder for criminals to anonymously launder money or evade taxes.
The measure passed the Senate 84-13 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, which cleared the House earlier this week. President Trump has pledged to veto the defense bill – one of few laws that passes every year – because it doesn’t include his demand to repeal liability protections for social media companies. Trump also opposes a clause ordering the renaming of military bases that are named after Confederate leaders.
The anonymous-shell-company ban was years in the making, as backers slowly built a coalition of Democrats, Republicans, law-enforcement officials and even business groups that originally opposed the idea, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
“We are on the verge of celebrating the most significant anti-money-laundering victory in a generation due in large part to the widespread and growing support for reform,” said Clark Gascoigne, senior policy adviser at the FACT Coalition, an alliance of anti-corruption groups that helped push for the legislation.
Nearly 2 million corporations and limited liability companies are registered each year in the United States, at the state level. Few states today require companies to disclose their true owners, with Delaware and a few others turning the registration of anonymous companies into big business.
That’s one reason the U.K.-based Tax Justice Network has named the United States the globe’s second most financially secretive jurisdiction, behind the Cayman Islands and ahead of Switzerland.
Delaware Secretary of State Jeffrey Bullock last year endorsed the Corporate Transparency Act, calling it a “fair, bipartisan compromise” that would make it the federal government’s responsibility to collect the ownership data, which he said was better than a “piecemeal” state-by-state approach.
Tolerance of anonymous shell companies has long helped drug- and human- traffickers, organized crime groups and foreign kleptocrats launder their ill-gotten gains through the U.S. financial system, supporters of the legislation say. It took Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s former lawyer, only a few days to set up and use an anonymous Delaware LLC to pay hush money to Stormy Daniels, in violation of campaign finance laws.
Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., who introduced the legislation to the House in 2009, with the support of Peter King, R-N.Y., and continued resubmitting it each year, said U.S. shell companies have helped corrupt foreign leaders and criminals anonymously buy luxury real estate in her district, which includes Manhattan.
“If you drive through my district at night you will find a lot of apartment buildings with absolutely no lights on,” Maloney said during a news conference this week to mark the House passage. “They were purchased purely to hide money and act as a bank account.”
The new law requires anyone registering a new company to disclose the name, address and date of birth of the real owners, and an identification number for each owner, such as a driver’s license or passport number.
Anyone willfully providing false information, including lawyers helping with corporate-registration paperwork, will be liable for fines of up to $10,000 and prison terms of up to two years.
The Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, will collect the data and provide ownership details to law-enforcement agencies and banks upon request.
The legislation has limitations. The general public won’t have access to the ownership data, a disappointment to anti-corruption campaigners, who say public scrutiny would help combat criminal activity.
Delaware official Bullock said these limits on access to the data were one reason the state supported the legislation.
In some cases, allied nations will be able to request ownership details to aid their own investigations, said Gary Kalman, director of the U.S. office of Transparency International, a big backer of the legislation.
In another transparency setback, the law also exempts some entities from the disclosure requirements, including domestic investment funds that are advised and operated by a registered investment adviser. Gascoigne said that exemption was the result of lobbying by the private-equity and hedge-fund sectors.
The database is likely to help prosecutors nationwide build cases against criminal groups, said Frank Russo, director of government and legislative Affairs at the National District Attorneys Association.
The lack of such a database today is undermining efforts in Florida to combat human-trafficking networks at illicit massage parlors, Russo said.
Investigators “can’t figure out who is financing and paying for these operations,” because the ringleaders hide behind anonymous shell companies, he said.
Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, a key backer of the Senate bill, along with Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and others, said shell companies have enabled everything from sex trafficking to fentanyl pushers in his state.
“This is a really big deal to get this passed, and as you know it took a long time,” Brown said during the news conference Thursday, adding that he hoped Republican senators would “stand strong” and vote to override any Trump veto, if necessary.
The banking industry became an important backer of the legislation in recent years, after realizing it would help banks identify the real owners of all accounts, as required under Obama-era regulation.
The legislation will give banks access the Treasury ownership database to verify information on new customers requesting accounts.
Other developed nations are also cracking down on anonymous shell companies, responding to fears about terrorist financing, and public outrage about corruption and tax evasion. The E.U. instructed all member countries to create public databases by 2020 that disclose companies’ true owners. Britain mandated the same in 2016.
Born Inc. Is like a present and all of you are acting like a bunch of kids trying to peel the gift wrapping open before Christmas to see what it is! Lol! Patience, Focus
I agree with you wholeheartedly. Usually all they have to offer of value is opinion s.
I am a proud owner of a good portion of shares, that will drastically change my lifestyle and allow me to help others as well. I feel no need whatsoever to try and promote this on the message boards or anywhere else. I have already told my friends and family that invest and they are already in. These are still great prices in my opinion, and feel this stock will change many lives.
Yeah you should stay away until we get some filings posted.
You're right NOOB90, I know there's a lot of peeps that don't want to hear it because it's doing so well right now. But the process is just getting started and there's going to be plenty of room and time to run. I won't be surprised if this settles down for a while from here.
Born Electric is more flashy. BMW EV division. EV bikes and cars
I've seen this before....These are the cheapies you wish you didn't sell and bought instead next weeks ahead.
I hate you lol
Born electric BMW. Could you imagine?
I take the 8 as a sign of good fortune. My stance on this stock feels positive at the moment. Patience always prevails.
I got a good chuckle out of it. I envision a very similar outcome with Born Inc. as with the stock you used to demonstrate.