Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Just read the first page of posts and have one question.
Why post a link to something that has no relevance or anything of value.?
I could care less for reading one poster bashing another. Weak minds tend to bash people they don't like or just can't understand. They are not open to opinion. They are quick with judemental attacks on the person stating an opinion rather than the idea it self.
That stinks for them.
Interesting point very interesting comparision. My question is who is the 16 y ear old kid?
But Q has nothing....they have less viewers than some 16 year old kids public access TV show.
Where did the mid teens go or the .0006?
So how do you know where people are accessing this site from?
For all we know Skunks, robg, irish, etc are accessing the sight remotly anywhere in the USA or abroad. Just because they post a lot does not mean they are not doing things.
My dad has a friend with an RV that travels the states. He has a wireless connection, DirectTV, and basically anything he wants in the thing.
So I never rule out where people might be or what they might be doing. Wireless data systems have come a long way.
Myself I'd be lost without my laptop, pocketpc, cell phone (blackberry), and spot watch.
I basically have access to anything I want on my home/corprate network regardless of where I am. Information overload is highly likely on busy days.
Hmm. Thought we should be in the low teens by now. Funny how this works and everyone just guesses where the stock will be.
I could point out the same thing for most companies. Things happen.
Frank Olsen (correct me if any of these are wrong or add more if I missed some)
Launched the first radio station focused on African Americans and their culture in Seattle.
Created a four-hour home shopping program which was the forerunner of the current home shopping channels.
President of The Hospitality Movie Channel which he sold to Showtime/Viacom.
Started 17 clubs centered on LGBT entertainment.
Now Launching Q Television.
He does show some visionary ability. So I will stick with my stake in Q.
OT: Does anyone have a clue on the next QBID/SIRI type stock. I have been looking and just do not see a clear choice yet. Currently I am looking at PDSS and PRRM but am not sold on anything yet as solid.
You ignore the progress Q has made and write it off.
Q is an actual channel not pay-per-view which Here! is. Logo is delayed and looking to launch also. I would rather have Q as an actual channel on DirectTV versus a pay-per-view station.
Logo will be the #1 channel when launched. It is my belief that Q will be the #2 and I will be fine with that.
Looking at the contet of Here! does not impress me near as much as Logo and Q. Then again it is pay-per-view.
When did I say Logo would be no match for Q?
I have stated in previous posts that Logo has a lot of good shows that will be coming out with the Launch when it happens. I even described the shows.
I also stated that I believe Logo & Q will serve differnt audiences.
So please do not take my words out of context.
The fact that they are delayed is the only thing I pointed out.
1. Not all tech things are late although that is an easy blow off.
2. Every company listed is considered a succesfull company. Every product was put on the list to show even the large companies have delays and false PR's. The fact they are false does not make the people behind them corrupt or liars.
3. You might think it's a poor analogy but the fact is just because he is not hitting the PR dates does not mean the described products are not moving foreward. Q was never broadcasting now they are. They had no orginal shows no they do. They had no talent for the shows now they do.
4. i am not defending the poor track record. I am saying in the long run it does not matter as long as the company is moving forward on the ideas.
Gran Turismo will be a hit even as late as it is. The apple will sell even though it is late. Longhorn will sell even though it is years late.
5. No it's not a lost argument if I disagree with missed PR's having any true relevance to the viablility of the product or company.
I try and avoid calling anyone a basher.
I think it could be most of the vapor ware products from major companies are eventually released (Except Duke Nukem forever).
Gran Turismo was promised in mid-2002, postponed to late 2003, then early 2004, then early 2005. Not everything is released on time.
[VIAcom] Do you believe LOGO is going to launch? They have released PR's that had inaccurate information.
[Microsoft] Do you believe Longhorn will be released. It was supposed to be in 2004? WinFS has been promised for a decade and still not released.
[AlienWare] Do you believe alienware Video array will be released?
[Apple] How about apple's 3ghz g5 that as of Jan was 6 months late?
[Sierra] How about half-life 2 did you think it was going to be released ever?
[Sony] Gran Turismo 4 was announced in 2002 and has had several launch windows not sure of the status on this one.
[Tivo] Tivo HD was about a year late, as well as TivotoGo.
Merely boring and repetitive. No actual information what so ever.
Regardless of the issues the fact we have seen forward progress is enough for me. There is no solid proof of why the duplicate PR came about. Also, there is no proof one way or the other of private invstors so making a judgement on it is not logical.
The same issues but far worse in my opinion came up with SIRI and I held through that simply because I believed in the company. I still believe Q is a company that will be worth holding down the road.
Y..a..w...n.
Who was the one that thought we would already be at .0006?
No one can predict this stock. Way to volatile.
Irish: Question.
Can you locate any other PR's that are similiar besides these two? It would be intersting to see exactly how many of these were released.
OT: You almost convinced me to sell my remaining shares in SIRI with that one.
Wow. Another boring post.
He cut his losses on those and bought back in at .0039.
Y a a a a w w w w w n n n n
Blah blah blah blah
More message board truth. Wow.
Others have done it before. Mark Cuban comes to mind. also why is it wrong to state what you believe the value of your company is?
Did the PR say that would occur today? A full out buy to .01?
I took it to mean that over a period of time they will purchase the stock up to the .01 mark.
Yyaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnn
blah...blah....blah....blah....blah
Bogus? Please post proof this was a bogus PR. Links would be nice.
How so? What did MLON do?
Y-a-a-a-a-w-w-w-w-n-n-n.
Ok. I feel the need to say this. I am not a basher as anyone who reads my posts knows.
But why announce just the Bid was in. It bothers me the deal is not done yet. Just seems strange to announce it early. Just to much to go wrong. So I can not get excited about this until it closed.
Hopefully this will be the push we need to get to .01
I'll play guitar to give you some background music.
I want to hear his reasoning and him explain WHY it is wrong.
A lot of people post with out backing up with facts.
Please explain why this is wrong.
I'll assume you do not know the orgins of MTV.
It started on a special system only in some city in ohio not sure the name. It was basically an interactive group of stations that allowed users to have a direct feed back with the station. MTV was called something like sight & sound and showed concert footage and allowed viewers to vote on things here and there. Once the station got popular enough and the formula and shows were worked out over 4 or 5 years it was renamed MTV and started viewing in New York.
Now that's the timeline I am talking about. From idea to finalizing what would work. If you look at the timeline for MTV becoming national you can add another 3-4 years I believe.
So it started in 1977 and became national sometime in the mid-80's. The size and number of people having cable did not keep it from maturing quicker. In fact it probably made it easier since the market was not saturated already.
It took MTV over 5 yrs to get to the first video and the formula right. It orginally started in a VERY small area broadcasting. Smaller than Q actually.
I will give Q 1 more year to make things happen then re-evaulate at that time.
How about the fact that the market in general is tanking?
Not just QBID. Smaller companies feel the impact far worse than the larger ones. If major corprations (PG, MSFT, SLE, are nearing the 52wk lows why would QBID be differnt?
Good suggestions.
I'm surprised no one took any profit? None at all?
Who said it would be .10 soon?
Frank o is just a judgement call.
Qlive is good. If someone is watching then fine. I want to know.
You can listen. Hmm..I would assume that a fact.
Showing ads. Thats more facts.
Media website. More facts.
PRs's. Well depending on your investment outlook those are both good/bad.
Wow! Heard that about SIRI to. To bad I kept my investment in it.
Good idea.