Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Right news = more "forward looking statements"?
Another day of hype and lies for SMAA?
I believe so!
SMAA is going no where. It's an obvious shell company that has no actual product and will never generate anything of value.
All that is ever done is PR is released so that the majority shareholder and sell stock for cash. It's how they make their living.
Here's a link to book him.
http://www.harrywalker.com/speakers/dick-cheney
I'm not sure what your drug dealer reference has to do with him being paid to speak at the energy thing. The point was, Cheney speaking somewhere doesn't mean he has connections to him and that is obviously true.
Any claims that SMAA is linked to Dick Cheney is plain false.
Btw: SMAA doesn't even have the money to get him to speak.
Kit was in the Navy for 3 years, and was an E4. That doesn't come with connections.
Anyone can buy Chenny to be a speaker if they want, it costs about $80k. I don't have connections and I can make that happen if the funds are available.
The energy thing he does is the only interesting part about it. But what product are they going to sell the military? They don't own their own product.
There is no table.
He was in state government, not federal government. He has no connection to anything remotely related to military contracts.
If they had even a hint of a government deal they'd had released multiple press releases about it already.
Not to mention the government making deals with a company that hasn't had any revenue of sort in years and is just entering the "industry" in itself sounds rather far fetched to me. Especially when they have no product of their own and can only sell those waterballs from Europe.
Windstax has a product, but the press release claims they are only trying to acquire minority ownership in it. Unfortunately if Windstax is about to get a big government contract, I doubt they would want to sell off part of the company.
There is no table.
How many months until $SMAA makes any revenue?
What awesome business model are you speaking of?
And what is the different business direction? All I've seen them do for the past 2 years is put out press releases with promises about going into new industries and then never producing anything after.
The ipod chargers are the ones that are about $200. The bigger ones cost $10k.
They've been available for years, they aren't even new technology. They don't sell over there either, and they aren't going to sell over here.
The only thing they have a license to distribute are those glass ball things, and they aren't selling those anywhere.
They've been for sale for years in Europe and they are overpriced and take up too much space. People aren't going to spend $200 for a solar ipod charger.
Even if they were to actually distribute some, it would take large amounts of sales to be anything significant. And that's never going to happen.
They do not have a deal with Windstax to distribute anything.
Is this more threats from you?
Don't need an excuse.
1. 2000% isn't much at these prices. You say 2000% rather than 0.002 because it sounds better than the reality.
2. The difference is smaller than what some of you have claimed for more than a year now, and that has never come close to true. It's been nothing but baseless hype for a long time.
3. We'll see if it maintains. I said it'll go up based on the news and then it'll come back down when it's obvious there is no real company/product. The same as it always has been. If I had bought in at 0.0001 I would have been selling at 0.0004.
4. It is in my best interest if they get an actual product and generate actual revenue. But it'll never happen because the way they make money with this stock is to sell it. When they couldn't pay my salary, they blamed me for not having a broker account setup to sell shares for money.
5. For legitimate investors - congrats. I have nothing against investors, but some of you seem to have a tons against those who tell the truth about the company. 1 guy here is even making threats about it. Why is that? Especially among people who claim to be buying? Why are the people who claim to be buying the ones who hype the most?
That's not what he said.
He said they appear as shorts until covered but aren't really shorts.
I think all they have to do is file the financials.
But Sarah told me back in the day it cost like $10k to file. No idea how accurate that is, seemed pretty ridiculous to me honestly, but then this isn't a normal business.
SMAA has the same people pulling the strings behind the scenes as always.
I keep hearing claims that Tony and Sarah are no longer involved and that Kit supposedly doesn't even know them, but either Tony and Sarah are lying about it or Kit is.
http://www.bakermyers.com/#clients
Here is claims SMAA as a "client" of Tony and Sarah. Now I know the majority of these companies listed as "clients" are really just things Tony and Sarah run/own.
And they have the updated the SMAA logo and such to the new stuff, and the new url. So either Tony and Sarah are lying about their clients, or Kit is lying when if he says he doesn't know them.
Adding the E seems to have broken things with a lot of services.
People won't care about the truth because they just want the price to go up regardless.
All you can do is point out the truth for those who don't post and are thinking about buying into the hype. I've been exposing this company for over a year now and the same few people have attacked me the entire time.
If $1,000,000 is small potatoes, can I come over for dinner sometime?
If they couldn't afford a lawyer for the original case, how can they afford one for an appeal?
They won't raise capital. They will use shares directly to pay for things rather than sell the shares for cash.
I figure it's real.
The truth doesn't really matter around here. Some have spent years hyping this stock up and anyone who doesn't fall in line is dismissed and attacked.
It won't be until after SMAA updates their financials again(who knows when that will be since they rarely do) that some will accept it.
I don't know Phillip, never meet him or knew of him/cars.net. It was never even mentioned to me in any capacity.
The lead developer of SMAA when I was hired was Joshua Stocks. However, about 4 months after I was hired they stopped paying people the first time, I was told by Sarah and Tony that I was the only programmer they were keeping(I have no idea if it was true or not, I had my doubts).
It was the reason I stayed on. Nothing to do with Josh directly(seemed like a cool guy to me and I never had any issue with him), but because they claimed to be restructuring the company(they were also moving everything over to DEAC at the time).
The only other programming types I knew of was a guy named Cash and another guy named Tommy(whom Cash and Josh had trouble working with). Most of them seemed to have deals with SMAA rather than being employees. Sold SMAA assests similiar to cars.net or something along those lines - not completely sure as it wasn't my business.
where do you get extortion when it's money owed already?
There will likely be at least 1 more lawsuit against them.
I haven't filed mine yet.
Looks like they are just as flaky as ever.
no, it wasn't SMAA. I worked for SMAA for less than a year because they couldn't make payroll.
I've worked in that industry for more than 10 years and have generated millions of dollars in revenue and profit in it for my company. I built/developed and wrote the software alone. That $SMAA couldn't keep things together with me on a below market salary because they flake out constantly pretty much highlights the entire history of this company.
I don't know anything directly about them anymore, but I don't see much change in the patterns I seen when working for Tony/Sarah.
I'm not inside trading, just exposing what I know about them because they seem to scam people constantly. So I'll take a few minutes out of my day and warn people. There are some that post here who I'm pretty sure are insiders. I have nothing against actual legitimate shareholders and will tell you the truth as I know it.
What I gave before was actual information. I don't have any direct information since then, but I can figure out if a business has merit in what they are doing, and I have yet to see a single viable business plan in what they've announced.
The biggest problem is they are flaky. I was building an actual product. It was a product I'd built before, I had 10 years of experience in the industry and software I wrote is still being used today in another company generating more revenue in a month than $SMAA has in the past 2 years.
And what happened? They flaked out and couldn't pay my below market salary for whatever reason. Nothing but constant excuses - when you could even get a hold of them. They couldn't get deals/contracts done and/or keep them in some cases.
So if you are a legitimate investor, then good luck is my position - I hope it works out well for you and I hope you get rich. Some get mad at me for telling the truth, and if you fall in that category, then sorry - but I'm not changing.
If/when I see an actual product and viable business model, I will say so. Right now the windtrax seems the most promising thing they've had over the past year or so. Mostly because it's not them running things, and Wyoming has lots of wind. The new CEO is another interesting twist. But as of now, there is nothing really happening with what they've announced so far.
They have no deal with them. If they do get one, it's just minority ownerships, which likely means - they are going to give them stock because they have basically no money or anything else of value.
Where is this military contract in the works?
I'm dedicated to lots of things, that doesn't mean I have deals in place with them. Thus far they have 1 product, those little ball things. Are you suggesting the navy is going to make a large purchase of those extremely overpriced balls?
In a nutshell - a multi-year history of being a scam, with hope that the new CEO can actually make something happen. But what the company has announced thus far looks like a sure loser.
That history is filled with announcements of things going to happen, nothing ever actually happening and bumps in them off the hype. This one is much higher than the last one.
These little ball things for solar have been out for years were already a dud in Europe. It's just a distributing license, which means they have to sell a bunch of these to people to make any kind of noteworthy revenue. It's nothing but hype for sure IMO.
The windstax thing looks more promising product wise. Especially if it's legitly based in Wyoming which has lots of wind. Farm types seem to like them a good bit, but getting wind energy isn't exactly a new industry. They are only trying to get a minority ownership of it, which they are likely going to have to pay for in stock - as they don't really have other assets.
They do not have a deal in place. If they do get a deal in place, it's their best chance at actually making money for the first time in years as the other company would be doing the actual work.
And the rest is all filler bologna on the website.
I would be surprised if they actually ever got a deal, but I'm surprised this thing has gone as high as it has thus far.
So it's a hype wave, and if you got in at 0.0001 you'd probably be pretty happy right now. Maybe it will go higher, who knows.
It's only $4,800 to clear that.
Don't know, maybe they have bought a 3rd symbol I'm unaware of. Call Tony and ask.
But that someone that should know is one of the most untrustworthy people I've ever had the displeasure of doing business with.
95% of anything he has ever told me turned out to be a lie.
Looks like Tony and Sarah are still involved. I saw someone mention that the new people didn't know them, but that doesn't look very true.
Or at least Tony and Sarah are claiming to be involved and that SMAA is a "client" of theirs.
http://www.bakermyers.com/#clients
All these "clients" they claim here are just things they've done, most of them between SMAA and their other stock DEAC.
Just more of their same old scams.
He directly said "wave tech".
And there is technology for using the currents of waves off shore to generate electricity with turbines.
Where are you getting this wave tech stuff?
Assuming they had access to such technology. That stuff requires off shore stuff and you aren't going to do that without government approval in coastal areas. Of which could take years to get assuming they ever could.
I don't see how a penny stock shell company is going to accomplish such a thing.
The LOI represents the parties' mutual intentions to complete the necessary due diligence to negotiate a definitive agreement, anticipated to be completed on or before April 15, 2016. To date, no definitive agreement has been executed, nor does any guarantee exist that it will ever be.
Another hype party for this stock with no follow through?
It seems like you are trying to claim a link between the 2 when there isn't one.
Having served in the military before doesn't make you a government contractor.