Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So, wait. You frequent racetracks, and have ridden english, so you must know how these animals are, and obviously support the races by regularity in attendance. So you should have extensive knowledge on how well taken care of these animals have to be. I would assume you are familiar with Monte Roberts and Clinton Anderson fundamentals, as well? Then, you toss in an excerpt from an obviously biased institution that is mainly there to raise awareness and enforce prevention of such unethical behavior as described, that is typically filled with more propaganda than fact. Then the timelines - learned to ride 50 years ago, been trading for over 30 years, yet have the vernacular of a much more youthful individual. Aside from that, I would think you would support the possibility of tendon and soft tissue regeneration that TCEL proposes with extensive experience with how depressed some racing animals become once they are put out to pasture. I wish you luck, as well, though, and thank you for your wishes of luck for everyone here. Happy hunting, even if you aren't interested in the biotech and further applications this may offer.
It is illegal to "bash" as well, and misrepresent a company to wash trade at a predetermined price. That it why these guys are being investigated. They pumped, then bashed and sold to wash trade at a low price that they had been decided upon. After that, they reinforced a pump campaign to overinflate the stock prices way over market cap valuations and sold all the way up and continued with others. In this way they would misrepresent stocks and obscure actual valuations, all for personal gain - at the expense of other retail traders and the credibility of companies. Main issue with the companies - they played the silent game and made no mention of pumpers overinflating valuations of what they believed their PPS should be ranged in. Good news here : SEC has now decided to go game on with these stupid pump and shorting groups. None of them get to be quite as safe as they were. :)
Have you ever ridden a warm blooded thoroughbred or even a quarterhorse trained for barrel racing? They love to run, my man. They are animals bred specifically to run and trained to do nothing but run. They even like the competition. Trust me, hop on one (I suggest knowing how to ride first), and tap them lightly to move and let them make their own pace. It won't be slow. They are quite incredible animals. TCEL helps rebuild damaged tissue to let these animals do what they love to do. Some animals may have horrible trainers and push them harder than they should, but that is not what the point of TCEL is. Most racehorses are very well cared for and pampered incredibly, because they must be to race. They are still proud (especially stallions- real peacocks), intelligent creatures and the old way of "sacking out" a horse isn't common practice anymore. Horses perform better through personal relations with their riders and trainers. So, no, that is not typically what horse racing is about when "exposed". They are not chronically drugged, obviously, because they are tested. I am not sure where you would even draw these conclusions.
One of the extremely rare companies with this kind of possibilities on the OTC. Definitely not a typical nasty OTC stock for flips turns shorts and burns. You can do it to some extent, but it has much better prospect for long term hold.
MINE has had previous Amazon product soft launches on other product lines, as well. They always sell out of stock, though. It does save on distribution costs, but I think the store shelves are where they belong for higher product visibility to the general public. I am already retired. Lol. Now I am shooting for retirement for my family. :)
Haha! You are still here! Just popping my head in to check on it every now and again, and these are exciting times. It is nice to see the full scale production finally. How has everything been holding up?
There has been a significant number of long term shareholders here that are refusing to let go since around May. And Darin Ezra himself owns a ton of shares of this company, as well. Too much confidence in the future prospects of the company due to current consumer market demand for carbonated drinks other than soda and energy drinks. Also, Darin was one of the people who worked on Vitamin Water, and we all know how well that went. The draw of consumer demand just from name association may boost initial product launch as well. So, I believe most people (including myself) expect this to be much higher in about a year. Lots of people just set the buy order, and are holding it in their portfolio and forgetting about it.
MM's pushing her up for an early gap again.
I wouldn't assume so, actually. New products don't necessarily have to be introduced at a lower or competitive price as long as other marketing practices make up for it, or the product has a considerable difference when compared to other similar product lines. Are the vitamin contents of sparkling ice and vitaminfizz equivalent (I seriously don't know)? I think the product launch here is probably a couple months late from ideal time for the type of drink (would have preferred beginning of summer - been holding shares since april/may). Was thinking of a spin of immune booster for the cold/flu season that isn't far off, with high vitamin content, but they wouldn't necessarily need to come out with competitive pricing with consumers being able to afford new items if they choose, depending on a new gimmick. (Savings levels are through the roof, just not spending levels quite yet.)
That 100 MM vol for today might be an undershoot, with already 40 MM in 45 minutes. Might be closer to 150-200, at current rates.
Whoa, slow down down today. Got a light response from Paddy over the weekend. Not sure if it means any thing yet or if I can say when I get more detail. I still want this tissue regeneration for my shoulders. Haha. I am not sure if applications would be possible for intervertebral discs. Looks like trading and flipping is flat for now. Maybe buy and hold for future possibilities, if the funding and everything else lines up well.
So far, from what I have seen Rhee just does all technicals. No news, not much in the way of fundamentals. Just chart signals. Not a bad guy really. You catch that 41.5% again shorted. I think it should be only a matter of time before this either hits nasdaq threshold list yet again or we see a squeeze. It looks like shares are getting sold underwater here. I don't think there should be a whole lot more room for conversion after the amount of volume we are seeing. The price doesn't seem to be pushing low enough fast enough for the short game to fully take over yet. Not sure how much of a push we would really get out of it, but if a squeeze trigger and news catalyst drop at the same time, it could be a wild ride. I would say I am surprised by the stocks performance, but between battling some dilution compounded insanely by the ridiculous amount of short selling that has now been repeatedly shown, it can only be expected.
Volume is still maintaining decent levels here, and not trickling lower, like I would expect for a normal dump and loss of interest. Have you heard anything recent from Meredith or Casey? I haven't gotten any word back just yet. I was tracking those reg sho threshold listings pretty regularly leading up through june, but I guess July's conversions gave enough liquidity to keep them off the list for the month. I was wondering how they had stayed off the list so long with such massive short percentages. If conversions are finished we could be looking at a possible squeeze next week, pushing up, though. Hoping the shorts continue into an oversell. Now waiting on that 31 Jul short interest publication as well.
Hey folks, sorry for the absence, had some stuff to deal with, and then suspected attempts of fraud with my account that my bank blocked. Had to change all my bank cards out. TCEL still maintaining radio silence it seems. Anybody else heard anything?
Along with the same large block sales at similar points as past two trading days. Still seems like attempts to make it appear as if there is dilution, but the short numbers racking up are pointing towards decreasing liquidity as people are flipping for percentage gains and storing free shares (IMO). I think the oversells are going to push into a liquidity trap and squeeze her as the last day of the month recall all short shares. Unless people fall for the panic wash and give up, we should see a spike this afternoon again. I am going to be keeping an eye on the NASDAQ threshold security list, as well. You said they already had the funds for Phase I, correct? Diluting at these levels wouldn't really hold much value to the company to continue into the next phases for FDA trials, I don't believe, so it would be rather silly to continue to do so at the current price.
I don't think it is simple bid whacks, based upon trading history lately. Seems more like last ditch efforts to try and use more sales or shorts to push prices lower in order to cover prior shorts at the best prices they can. The oversell that occurred from the 30+ MM short sales that went off in chunks to simulate dilutive effects on Monday didn't seem to bring about desired results. So, yesterday, liquidity dropped again and then more buys instigated further short sales (most likely lots from MM's that had no more shares to sell). Now, I think the chunks of sales look like they are mimicking the same patterns we saw on Monday in efforts to drive the price low enough to convince more holders to sell to reestablish liquidity at lower levels instead of allowing a run to bring about liquidity at higher levels. My theory is, as long as there is a longer hold out of retail traders, there should be a forced cover to higher levels again. Nothing crazy though - not looking at an immediate retrace to .006/.007, maybe more along the lines of .0026. Just my opinion, though.
You got the education of the new guy, so I don't have to? Got some other people asking me to review some other stuff, as well. You want me to let you know if I find anything interesting?
Casey is on two companies. The one working on tissue regeneration and the alternative vaccination remedies. The confusion came into play when the assets were getting thrown in together because of his involvement in both.
In the years I have been doing this I have been told the Finra reporting guidelines state only short sale trades are to be listed in the short volume (FINRA Reg Sho reporting/formatting guidelines, as well as phone calls for confirmation). It doesn't account for short covering trades. The numbers we are missing are the covers, so we just don't have the accurate short interest numbers, and if they counted them then they would end up counting some of the trades twice as much as they actually should. In all reality, a good number of those trades may have been covered during the day yesterday, without our knowledge, though. A short cover would not be considered a short sale trade (because it is a buy up of shorted shares, not a sale), and thus not be listed. (Please do let me know how they would be able to list a buy to cover under short sale trades, though. I have been trading for years under some wrong presumptions, if not, but I am almost positive buys to cover may not be listed with short sales in FINRA reporting standards. Thank you!) The other big problem is the short sale trades usually include a large percentage of MM short sales for liquidity trades, which would usually mean the ongoing shuffle up until the 15th or 1st of the month (remember that hefty selloff and the 35 MM share buy right on the ask with no upward price movement? - my best guess was MM to MM trade if there is still no company dilution). However, considering the 1st is on Thursday, they are running very low on time before they get caught in that reporting trap in which they get slapped with some nice fines. At the very least, on the 1st we will get an accurate depiction of short interest being carried on this thing. Oh! Can you PM Meredith or Casey's number? Still going to need that. I want to see if we can actually get some major progress on this technology. If they have luck with cartilage rejuvenation, I am wondering if they have tried anything with intervertebral discs. I have 9 severely damaged discs in my back, and possibly 4 in my neck (need another MRI), and there aren't a whole lot of good options for me at the moment. *Apologies for the sidetrack. I am seriously very curious just what the applications of TCEL's treatment extend into.
Especially this close to the end of the month. Might have gotten a tad overzealous on the sales yesterday, though, and the shuffles are stacking up today. Should be another green day to close out the month tomorrow, I believe.
Catch that 41% short volume for the day?
Okay. So no major dilution on company side should really be hitting, at all. That's good at least. I will definitely call him. I am more concerned with the progress and advancement of this project. Currently the only other proposals of tendon and other similar tissue repair involve some sort of stem cell therapy, and this alternative has extensive applications through a variety of fields, including a huge problem that has been hitting the news lately : care of our veterans. With the versatility of applications including treatment plans for diabetes and cardiac rehabilitation in terms of damaged tissue left from myocardial infarction (or valve damage in yours; I haven't forgotten), this could be one of the biggest treatment plans to hit medicine in a very long time. That could prove to grease a lot of wheels in movement and as far as presentation in funding. He needs to ensure his company is represented a bit better in standard, though, otherwise many are going to just assume that if he doesn't care about his own company, neither should they. This other project must be pretty damned amazing to distract him from the proliferation in value of TCEL so much.
I somewhat care about current PPS, but if this is the real deal, then to hell with it. I am just going to load up while it is down, and leave it in my pocket for the later date when the actuality of the value comes to the surface. I do like my quick gains, but this could be one of my very very very few long term holds.
It looks like mostly retail crowding at 17. 4 different sellers sitting with just under 1 MM shares each. At these price levels, it really isn't a whole lot of money to be tossed around, if the company would give shareholders and the public a real reason to buy into this. They are doing a rather poor job, at the moment, of updating company progress in a public forum, especially if they have successfully moved into Phase II of clinical trials (or at least have met the requirements for Phase I completion).
Hmmmm...Is that 1st 1 MM the combination of all the other private investors combined? I would think it would be something more. Can you PM his number to me? I am going to make some other phone calls real fast to a few other people. Might be another day or so to get return calls from them. If the other investors didn't inject more than 5 MM into this, maybe they can be bought out, depending on their progress and current timeline.
Tried reaching out to them about that one. Waiting on a response. How long did it take for them to get back to you on that last time?
How is everybody this morning? Looks like he is more into another stock with a much lower float moving a lot higher today, actually.
37 MM in short volume again today? Wow. A bit ridiculous. Liquidity must be running low. Lots of holders here apparently. Hehehe. Probably picking up a large chunk again Wednesday. :) This could get ugly if retail is seriously heavily shorting this, which would be a very risky move at these levels.
You would be surprised. IB allows it, and suretrader. Don't know why the hell anybody would do it so low, but people can be rather foolish.
Glad you joined in man. Seriously good luck, even if it is only for a quick flip. All those small gains add up. Even free chips riding can bank you big bucks. Left 1k of free cash in a company a few times and picked up 9k off of it a few months later. With a heavy short list on this, we might even get lucky enough of for a squeeze to pop off.
Nice catch. Thanks for the post!
Looks like a decent base built and some accumulation is picking up. I think a decent afternoon run is brewing with a very nice Tuesday ahead.
Taxes are much easier to deal with for corporations in NV, I have been told. Have a few friends that incorporated there, although they run their companies from here in California.
He is supposed to be holding the CEO position.
Well, hopefully they work this one out soon, and come to some proper terms so this can move uninhibited back to the levels it was at before those notes got cashed in some months back.
Your notes neglect to take into account the share structure change in september 2011 following incorporation in wyoming in May of that year, which reduced authorized shares to 500 MM and issued shares to about 200 MM. Since then, there has been some share sales increasing O/S to it's current levels, but not anywhere near 2.9 B.
I will be straight with you, though. That battle for assets can get dangerous for shareholders. Very sad and selfish of Meredith to be playing these games of who gets what out of all this, if it is Casey's developments that are the driving force in company advancement.
Their current market cap is not 3 MM, as you stated in your comments underneath the link. At market open it was under 1 MM. Even if the article was dated for a time when market cap was over 3 MM, then that means you are using information that is not of immediate importance. The article itself is actually dated for today, though, making it inaccurately reported on its own. So you cited an inaccurate article and highlighted a specifically wrong piece of information that is easily verified by crosschecking numbers. Even if they maxed out the O/S they couldn't have a market cap of 3MM without a price of at least .006. So how is your post or the article accurate in regards to TCEL's market cap? Also, market cap justification is not based upon the same thing when speaking of startups that have products in the process of FDA approval. The proposed value of the patents must be accounted for. Not simply cash and current revenues. So both you and the article are wrong on quite a bit in regards to TCEL. These are not necessarily accurate valuations of TCEL by any means. I was also not simply chastising. I was also trying to help you from reporting false information so as to not discredit yourself. Hopefully you followed my advice and banked some of those percentage swings from this morning though, there was definitely a chance. Still, I do wish you luck if you decide to try.
Oh, I see your meaning. That is a dangerous argument to have in the midst of all of this. They need their organizational structure agreed upon, or this could get rather ugly. I can't remember who posted it exactly, but he was right in stating the SEC does not take to kindly to these kinds of messes. I hope they get this all fixed rather quickly for the sake of the company, shareholders, and noteholders.
Excellent news. Do you think this is where the confusion started?
Anyhow, good morning everyone! This still looks good for a decent bounce with the price pegged low those small jumps should prove to be rather decent percentage gains here. I hope everyone does well that plays here. Good luck to everyone!
Is it me or are some of these perfect repeats of the same comments from last week in almost same sequence? Feels like deja vu almost. Lol. Let's hope the performance proves to be decent.