Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
CCTC should be able to run huge now with news since there hasn't
been any dumping from the company since Hauge left. I think with
their new leadership this stock will blast off soon.
Last chance to get in cheap IMO
at least they keep shareholders in the loop with a quarterly webcast on whats going on. Most other pinks do nothing of the sort. This is gonna be a great year for CCTC
Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. Hosts Investor Webcast on
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (the Company), a cleaner-energy technology company, “fully-reporting” and listed on the Pink Sheets-QB (symbol CCTC), today announced it will be hosting an investor update web cast on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 11am EST.
WHAT:
Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. Investor Update Call
WHEN:
Wednesday, January 18, 2012 - 11:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time
HOW:
Visit http://www.investorcalendar.com/IC/CEPage.asp?ID=166927
REPLAY:
Web cast replay available until February 18, 2013
"As part of our ongoing effort to share our vision for 2012 and to maintain ongoing communication with our investor base, we are very pleased to be hosting our quarterly investor webcast. The webcast will give management an opportunity to update shareholders on developments over the past quarter, our vision for the upcoming year, and address shareholder questions. We look forward discussing CCTI’s ongoing progress and near-term objectives,” stated Mr. Robin Eves, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
he must be terrible at running any business if he doesn't care about anything.
No way this or any of his "companies" will amount to anything.
why would he? hes used to running failing companies
huge volume still doing nothing for the pps
huge volume and we still cant move this POS
Massive dilution here. I think we are about toast with MMTE
they couldnt post false information on their website without legal repercussions.
they said the same thing about wamu and i made a killin on that
someones dumping huge amounts everyday holding us down. Question is, when will they stop?
sweet sell yours to me!!
check their site, it has all these answers. Even has a link with their relationship with SAIC/Benham who is helping them develop and patent their processes.
http://www.cleancoaltechnologiesinc.com/technology.php
http://www.cleancoaltechnologiesinc.com/images/ccti_process_diagram.png
N.J. to benefit from new EPA regulations for coal-fired power plants
Published: Thursday, December 22, 2011, 9:30 AM Updated: Friday, December 23, 2011, 7:48 AM
Seth Augenstein/The Star-Ledger By Seth Augenstein/The Star-Ledger
More than 20 years after the Clean Air Act was passed, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a rule Wednesday that particularly benefits New Jersey by forcing coal-fired power plants to reduce their emissions of mercury, arsenic, acid gas, nickel and cyanide by 2014.
New Jersey implemented its own stringent standards for mercury and other toxic pollution in 2004 and now sees most of its coal plant pollution waft in from the west.
"A tremendous amount of mercury comes into New Jersey from out of state," said Judith Enck, the EPA’s administrator of Region 2, which includes New Jersey. "Air pollution does not recognize state boundaries."
The EPA estimates the seven New Jersey power plants that will need to cut back emissions disperse 68 pounds of mercury into the air a year, while western neighbor Pennsylvania has 38 power plants that pump out more than 4,000 pounds of mercury a year, much of which falls down on New Jersey.
The new regulation nationally will prevent 11,000 premature deaths per year and 4,700 heart attacks, as well as thousands of cases of asthma and bronchitis, the EPA says.
Federal officials said the law was a long time coming. The Clean Air Act was passed in 1990, but the mercury-emission rule was caught up in litigation for years, according to EPA officials. Lisa Jackson, the current EPA administrator and former head of New Jersey’s Department of Environmental Protection, signed the new rule into effect on Friday, the final day of a court-imposed deadline that resulted from environmental groups suing the EPA.
"The law was passed in 1990 — 21 years ago — and nothing had happened," said U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.). "Today we’re telling the polluters ‘No more delays.’ "
The generation industry, however, contends few if any health benefits will be realized because standards for soot emissions are already so stringent. They also say the environmental rule is not scientifically based.
"The rule suffers from statistical errors, inaccurate technological assumptions and inadequate economic and reliability analysis," said Scott Segal, director of the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council. "Given that the rule is one of the most expensive air rules ever, the American public deserves better."
One New Jersey power company, however, welcomes the changes. Ralph Izzo, the president of PSE&G, wrote a letter to the Wall Street Journal this month urging the adoption of the mercury rule, saying his company invested $1.5 billion to make it possible in the Garden State.
"The vast majority of power plants can meet this schedule," Izzo wrote. "Action is long overdue."
Environmentalists were thrilled with the new rule.
"This landmark achievement reflects what every parent knows, which is that powering our homes should not poison New Jersey’s kids," said Doug O’Malley, field director with Environment New Jersey.
"Mercury pollution from coal-fired plants affects us every day, from the can of tuna fish we eat to the air we breathe," added Jeff Tittel, executive director of the New Jersey chapter of the Sierra Club. "Mercury is a neurotoxin that especially affects pregnant women and children. Removing it from the air will help our families become healthier."
New Jersey scientists have said there is a legacy of pollution downwind from Pennsylvania power plants such as the GenOn plant in Portland. Robert Laumbach, an assistant professor at the Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute in Piscataway, said he’s seen cases of elevated mercury levels from eating seafood — because the mercury comes with evaporation and precipitation into water sources, where it enters the food chain and eventually ends up on people’s plates.
Stanley Weiss, a professor of preventive medicine and community health at the University of Medicine and Dentistry-New Jersey Medical School, said he’s identified the cause-and-effect relationship of asthma cases in Belvidere, White Township and Harmony Township to pollution from coal-fired plants in Pennsylvania.
"We saw direct health implications," Weiss said. "Clearly it’s affecting all of us.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/12/nj_to_benefit_from_new_epa_reg.html
new epa standards are tightening up in the us and abroad demanding the use of cleaner burning fuels.
this is good for CCTC since carbon capture is in its very infant stage and CCTC already has 2 patents for much more efficient
Pristine technology™
Big things coming for CCTC in 2012!
Load while u can at these bargain prices!
lol i guess those Greenpeace people don't like using electricity either.
Climate Talks Prove Growing Need for Carbon Capture and Storage Globally
Without technology to capture CO2 and store it safely and permanently, climate change cannot be constrained
By David Biello | December 10, 2011 |
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=climate-talks-carbon-capture-ccs&page=3
a long but great article about clean coal future and use
directly from your post #29249 on 12/27/11 05:09:46 PM
"This is the CCTC board however sector specific comparisons and posts are always welcomed and appreciated here."
?????
so u let robert post news about another company in trouble with SEC but my news pertains to clean coal and u remove it?
they do them every 2 to 3 months. Prob one out in Jan or early Feb
Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. Introduces Pristine-M at Roundtable Conference on Coal
Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), a cleaner-energy technology company that is listed on the Pink Sheets-QB (Pink Sheets:CCTC), announced that it participated in the Roundtable Conference on Coal organized by the India Energy Forum and the Indian School of Mines Alumni Association, hosted in New Delhi, India, on September 21, 2011. Attended by various high-ranking officers in the Government of India, as well the country’s top companies in power, coal mining and steel, Clean Coal was the only western coal technology company invited to present at the conference. Against a backdrop of rapidly rising demand for coal-fired electricity in India, the conference theme was the “Way Forward to Meet the Demand of Coal."
In its presentation at the conference, Clean Coal announced its PRISTINE-M™ technology, a new process invented by Clean Coal and commercially developed by SAIC (Benham) for which a provisional patent application was filed in September. PRISTINE-M™ is a dry, Btu-enhanced coal that is produced using Clean Coal’s new “moisture substitution” technology. In fact, the process was conceived specifically to address the growing need for coal imports from Indonesia. Indonesian coal typically contains between 35% and 40% moisture. PRISTINE-M™ addresses the need for a low moisture coal that is economical to transport, stable in transportation and does not reabsorb moisture. In addition to the stability of the product, the Benham-designed commercial scale facility is estimated to be very cost-competitive both from the standpoint of plant cost and operating unit costs. The new technology complements Clean Coal’s existing PRISTINE™ technology.
"As part of our ongoing effort to continue building relationships internationally and offer cleaner-energy solutions, we are very pleased to have been part of the Roundtable Conference. The select and diverse group of attendees allowed our PRISTINE-M™ technology to be introduced to an audience who fully understand the value of both PRISTINE-M™ and PRISTINE™. Discussing our clean coal solutions in India, a country with great demand for energy, served as an ideal venue and we hope will set the stage for discussions with other countries encountering pressing energy issues,” stated Mr. Robin Eves, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
About Clean Coal Technologies, Inc.
Clean Coal Technologies, (http://www.cleancoaltechnologiesinc.com) a cleaner-energy, technology company headquartered in New York City owns a patented process technology to convert coal into a cleaner burning fuel source. This technology is a “mild gasification” process that removes moisture and volatile matters without pulverizing the coal or pelletizing it. The coal remains highly resistant to moisture re-absorption as it is naturally coated in the process. The Company's patented end product “PRISTINE™” coal is based on long-established benefaction processes and utilizes off-the-shelf components and equipment. The process may remove as much as 90% of chemical pollutants from coal, thereby helping to resolve emissions issues affecting coal-fired power plants all over the world.
Matters discussed in this press release contain forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainties, which could significantly impact the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the Company’s prospects and revenues, product development and commercial introduction, the development of the PRISTINE-M™ technology, the impact of price and technological changes, and competition, manufacturing and supply uncertainties as well as other risks.
About Cooper Global Communications, LLC.
Founded by Richard Cooper, a seasoned and highly-respected Wall Street veteran, Cooper Global Communications is a boutique investor relations/public relations firm with a highly-seasoned team of investment/financial professionals who are committed to offering high-quality service to their global clients. Since its origins, Cooper Global Communications has achieved unparalleled success.
Gasification Technologies From Rentech and Clean Coal Technologies Look to Revolutionize Energy Sector
Date : 11/23/2011 @ 8:16AM
Source : MarketWire
Stock : Paragon Financial Limited (CCTC)
Quote : 0.022 0.0 (0.00%) @ 9:18AM
Gasification Technologies From Rentech and Clean Coal Technologies Look to Revolutionize Energy Sector
Print
Alert
Clean Coal Techs (QB) (USOTC:CCTC)
Intraday Stock Chart
Today : Wednesday 23 November 2011
Click Here for more Clean Coal Techs (QB) Charts.
Clean coal technologies are rapidly becoming a viable source of energy. These particular technologies could stem the environmental concerns of using coal long term and would benefit the United States immensely as the leading coal producer in the world. The Paragon Report examines investing opportunities in the Clean Energy Sector and provides equity research on Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: CCTC) and Rentech, Inc. (NYSE Amex: RTK). Access to the full company reports can be found at:
www.paragonreport.com/CCTC
www.paragonreport.com/RTK
Coal is the dirtiest of all fossil fuels. When burned, it releases carbon dioxide and other emissions in flue gas. Gasification avoids burning coal altogether. With integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems, steam and hot pressurized air or oxygen combine with coal in a reaction that forces carbon molecules apart. The resulting syngas, a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, is then cleaned and burned in a gas turbine to make electricity.
Clean Coal Technology owns a patented process technology to convert coal into a cleaner burning fuel source. This technology is a "mild gasification" process that removes moisture and volatile matters without pulverizing the coal or pelletizing it. According to the company, "the process may remove as much as 90% of chemical pollutants from coal, thereby helping to resolve emissions issues affecting coal-fired power plants all over the world."
The Paragon Report provide investors with an excellent first step in their due diligence by providing daily trading ideas, and consolidating the public information available on them. For more investment research on the Clean Energy Sector register with us free at www.paragonreport.com and get exclusive access to our numerous stock reports and industry newsletters.
Rentech has developed and patented the Fischer-Tropsch gas/coal-to-liquids technology, which uses coal, petroleum coke, or natural gas to produce diesel or jet fuel. Earlier this year Altona Energy inked a cooperation agreement for application of Rentech's technologies in gasification of coal and biomass at its Arckaringa project located in South Australia. The company plans to initiate gasification of biomass in conjunction with the gasification of coal at the project for the production of energy products, including diesel, jet fuel, naptha and electricity.
The Paragon Report has not been compensated by any of the above-mentioned publicly traded companies. Paragon Report is compensated by other third party organizations for advertising services. We act as an independent research portal and are aware that all investment entails inherent risks. Please view the full disclaimer at http://www.paragonreport.com/disclaimer
Power Plants Face Stricter EPA Rules to Prevent Toxic Air Pollutants
By Krystina Steffen, Editor – December 28, 2011
For more than two decades the power plant industry was able to evade parts of the Clean Air Act that Congress had passed. Because of this, families living near power plants were still harmed by toxic pollutants in the air. Environmental advocates also fought to implement stricter regulations for mercury, toxins, and other pollutants that many of America’s power plants still emitted. Environmental lawsuits and toxic tort cases have involved the Environmental Protections Agency (EPA) for its ineffective regulations and many power plants for compromising individuals’ health. But in mid December, the regulatory landscape changed after the EPA finalized the national Clean Air Act in regards to reducing mercury and toxic air pollution that coal and oil-fired power plants emit.
The Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) establishes a final rule that mandates that power plants reduce mercury from being released into the air by 90 percent, acid gas emissions reduced by 88 percent, and sulfur dioxide emissions cut by 41 percent. This is beyond the decreases already proposed in the Cross State Air Pollution Rule. [1] A Presidential Memorandum backs up MATS and directs the EPA to use the tools in the Clean Air Act to implement emission controls.
The finalization “…from President Obama and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson marks a milestone for parents and families across the country. It means that, after decades of delay, we now have strong nationwide protections against toxic mercury, and most of all, it means peace of mind for the parents of more than 300,000 American babies born every year that have been exposed to dangerous levels of mercury,” the Sierra Club commented in a recent press release [2].
Across the United States, there are 600 power plants and approximately 1,400 oil and coal fired electric generating units (EGUs). The EPA states that power plants are the main mercury, acid gas, and toxic metal polluters in the United States. [3] Populations living close to power plants, and, in particular, children have been affected by power plant pollutants. Health issues such as cancer, respiratory illness, and neuro-developmental problems have harmed individuals living near the power plants. And even fish that have been contaminated with mercury runoff can affect individuals thousands of miles away who eat this food source.
“These standards for mercury and other air toxics will help to reduce mercury emissions from power plants and help children across the country avoid preventable birth defects and learning delays and have a brighter, healthier, more productive future. Finally, putting people over politics,” said Adrianna Quintero, Director of Voces Verdes, La Onda Verde de Natural Resources Defense Council. [4]
Before MATS was in place, 48 tons of mercury pollution was pumped into the air each year and also affected U.S. waterways and the fish that thrived there. Why fish become such an important part of the story is this – inorganic mercury seeps into the water and bacteria convert it to methylmercury, which can then accumulate in living tissue. As fish age, the more mercury will be present in its meat. When humans eat fish, they then accumulate mercury in their tissues and hair samples can show elevated concentrations. Testing has shown that 40 percent of human mercury exposure is due to eating Pacific tuna. [5] For sushi lovers or those that eat fish out of preference or to maintain a budget, it can be daunting to know what to eat. The Sierra Club has created a chart for easy reference to make smarter eating decisions. [6]
Put in perspective, 48 tons of mercury could contaminate a 20-acre lake. [7] For those that are experiencing illnesses that are not easily explainable and perplexing doctors, mercury toxicity is noted for causing concentration problems, tremors, balance and coordination concerns, slurred speech, motor skill loss and muscle weakness, decrease in memory, insomnia, loss of vision, hearing, and hair, and long-term damage that can only sometimes be reversed. But for expecting mothers and their newborns, the dangers are even more severe.
More than 300,000 babies have been born each year with dangerous levels of mercury inside the womb. Power plant pollutants can damage a newborn’s developing nervous system and cause cerebral palsy, brain damage, and delayed speech and motor skill development. [8] These pollutants were scientifically proven to cause premature death, hospital visits, and many days of lost work.
With the new MATS, EGUs that are larger than 25 megawatts and generate electricity for residential, industrial, or commercial use will have to comply with these modern pollution controls. [9] For power plants that do not already have adequate pollution control, they will have to utilize wet and dry scrubbers, fabric filters, activated carbon injection systems, or dry sorbent infection systems to comply with the new emission rules. EPA advocates making upgrades to existing pollution controls, installing new ones, or switching fuels to lesson emissions.
Power plants will have until 2016 to get their facilities compliant with MATS. For environmental advocates this is long overdue as many power plants are more than 30-years-old, with some even over the 50-year-old mark. The EPA estimates that for every dollar spent, $3 to $9 of health benefits will be created. [10] EPA’s analysis shows that power plants should be able to retrofit or build these pollution controls in a cost effective way that also ensures electric reliability. After plants have these measures in place, EPA will conduct annual performance tests and inspections. With MATS, airborne soot levels should also decrease.
As the MATS rule takes effect, the EPA estimates that 540,000 sick days from work will be avoided. Air quality improvement and human health costs will improve by a minimum of $37 billion, the agency predicts. [11] Premature deaths will decrease by a minimum of 18,000, emergency room visits will lessen by 13,000, and 540,000 asthma attacks due to power plant pollution will not occur.
“The overall cost of the regulations is expected to reach $10 billion a year, with homeowners paying perhaps three percent more on their electricity bills,” noted a Los Angeles Times editorial. [12] “But it’s not as though the country hasn’t been paying that and more over the years; the price of high pollution levels has simply been pushed into the health sector in the form of higher rates of illness."
http://www.seolawfirm.com/2011/12/power-plants-face-stricter-epa-rules-to-prevent-toxic-air-pollutants/
Thanks to EPA, prepare for higher electric bills soon
12/27/2011 7:13:00 PM
Last week, just before Christmas, the Environmental Protection Agency issued its new rules for Utility MACT standards governing the release of mercury and other emissions by coal-fired power plants. Coal produces nearly 50 percent of the nation's electricity, and coal's cheap and affordable costs have helped keep electricity affordable for most Americans. That's about to change.
The new EPA mandates require drastic reductions in emissions - reductions which seem almost intentionally designed to drive coal-fired plants out of business in favor of plants more favored by the Obama administration.
As Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) said, "The EPA's decision just days before Christmas is unwelcome news to the thousands of Ohioans who could lose their jobs or see a big increase in their electricity rates, due to the new rules. I am concerned that EPA continues to press forward with some of the most costly Clean Air Act rules ever imposed on our nation's economy while failing to demonstrate that the agency truly understands the impact that its regulation could have on grid reliability and economic growth."
By EPA's own estimates, Utility MACT will entail an annual cost of $9.6 billion on the power sector. Many electric plants, including in Ohio, have already announced they will close if the EPA mandates are made effective, since they will not be able to afford to continue operating.
As Portman noted, concerns about this rule and its potential to cause significant constraints in electricity reliability have been raised repeatedly this year in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, of which Portman is a member. The concerns have been raised by both Republicans and Democrats on the Committee.
"The uncertainty caused by these regulations could result in the loss of thousands of Ohio jobs and will increase electricity rates for families during tough economic times, in return for less reliable power," said Portman. "To get the economy moving again, Washington needs to rein in government overreach and regulations that are creating uncertainty and stifling innovation."
We agree. Once more, the EPA seems to be catering to extremist political interests while sacrificing common sense economic realities. Average American households will pay the price.
US-China Deal Intended to Speed Clean Coal Research
The world's two largest emitters of greenhouse gases will share innovative technologies to clean up coal burning
By Joel Kirkland and ClimateWire
clean coal, china, carbon dioxide, greenhouse gas, carbon capture, climate change, global warming CLEANER COAL?: A new deal will promote collaboration between the US and China to restrain the carbon dioxide emissions from coal burning. Image: Kleineolive/Wikimedia Commons
U.S. and Chinese officials heading up a series of joint advanced coal projects Friday signed an intellectual property agreement meant to ease the sharing of innovative technology while protecting patents and licensing agreements.
Companies collaborating on research and development projects tied to the U.S.-China Clean Energy Research Center (CERC), a program started in 2009, can enter into regular commercial contracts. But energy technology companies participating in the U.S.-China program must negotiate licenses "in good faith" to ensure both nations benefit.
Inventors of technology can set the terms, according to a description of the agreement, including royalties and limits on the use of an invention. But the terms cannot be so restrictive that they in essence bar the sharing of advanced coal technology by the United States and China.
Major energy companies have a stake in the plan for protecting intellectual property, including U.S. energy giants General Electric and Duke Energy and the French conglomerate Alstom. U.S. and Chinese officials visiting the West Virginia University campus in Morgantown to sign the agreement Friday said the governments also have a lot to gain by greasing the wheels for further cooperation on clean energy.
Robert Marlay, director of the CERC program out of the U.S. Department of Energy, said the intellectual property agreement flows from direct talks among U.S. and Chinese leaders, "suggesting diplomatic and binding support of the agreement."
Ending a culture of distrust?
With both governments putting their stamps of approval on an enforceable approach to intellectual property, Marlay said, U.S. and Chinese companies could be more willing to work together.
U.S. developers of energy technology have been wary about making innovations available to Chinese energy producers for fear their inventions will be copied. Chinese companies are also doing more inventing, and the nation's patent laws are becoming more sophisticated. That has spurred both sides to negotiate a solution.
The agreement, officials said, is meant to cut through a culture of distrust that has kept American and Chinese scientists and companies from collaborating on potential solutions to the knottiest energy issues. China and the United States are the world's biggest users of energy and producers of greenhouse gas emissions tied to global warming. They both rely on coal, and cutting emissions at coal-burning power plants and other industrial plants is the goal of one of three programs tied to U.S.-China CERC.
Joint research is attempting to advance technology for capturing and storing carbon dioxide emissions, turning coal into natural gas and stripping coal of its pollutants while it is used at a power plant. It is also working on capturing carbon produced at plants designed to turn coal into diesel fuel.
"With today's signing, our consortium members can know that their own intellectual property will be protected," said Jerald Fletcher, a professor at West Virginia University and director of the U.S. advanced coal consortium under U.S.-China CERC. "New technologies created by the U.S.-China teams will be shared in a fair and clearly defined manner."
Cooperation more possible on other technologies
Besides coal, CERC includes partnerships to speed the development of electric vehicles and expand measures in both countries to cut energy use and emissions from buildings.
Officials and the consortia of corporate and research partners tied to the three programs plan to use the advanced coal intellectual property plan as a model.
Protecting technology tied to electric vehicles is viewed as a particularly sticky issue for both countries. U.S.- and China-based companies are racing to commercialize battery technology and grab a potentially big global market for electric vehicles.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=us-china-deal-intended-to
Older, dirtier coal plants about to take their last bow
Michael Allan McCrae | December 26, 2011 Print Article
In a ruling that will be felt most heavily by older coal-burning power plants, the United States Environmetal Protection Agency announced new regulations last week to limit emissions of toxic air pollutants like mercury, arsenic and metals.
New emission standards will be based upon “. . . levels achieved by the best-performing sources currently in operation,” states the EPA.
The ruling should mothball roughly one-tenth of older coal-fired power plants. Roughly 45% of the United States power comes from coal.
The EPA says the ruling will have significant health benefits, and even puts a number on expected impact.
“The value of the air quality improvements for people’s health alone totals $37 billion to $90 billion each year. That means that for every dollar spent to reduce this pollution, Americans get $3-9 in health benefits,” estimates the EPA.
Plants that are considered sources of the toxic pollutants identified in the ruling have four years to comply with the new regulations.
“These standards are long overdue. In 2000, after years of study, EPA issued a scientific and legal determination that it was ‘appropriate and necessary’ to control mercury emissions from power plants. The prior administration finalized a rule to cut mercury pollution from power plants, but the D.C. Circuit struck the rule down and required EPA to develop standards that follow the law and the science in order to protect human health and the environment,” writes the EPA.
Grist writer David Roberts says that the rules are significant:
There is some flexibility — more than industry admits — but there’s no getting around the fact that this is going to be an expensive rule. It’s going to kick off a huge wave of coal-plant retirements and investments in pollution-control technology. That is, despite what conservatives say, a good thing, since the public-health benefits will be far greater than the costs. Every country on earth is modernizing its electric fleet. Even China’s ahead of us. These crappy old plants are an embarrassment and good riddance to them.
http://www.mining.com/2011/12/26/older-dirtier-coal-plants-about-to-take-their-last-bow/
sell! RS is never good no matter who says it is. A company is good standing would never do a RS
we will be at no bid way before that time period
ya, then he'll give us a RS for new years
alot of time to do DD on MMTE
watching this stock is like watching paint dry. When will something happen?
ya dont know whats going on with this company. We were way higher last spring with nothing. Now we have lots and just barely hanging on? The market doesnt like MMTE.
we need all the help we can get but i dont think this will do a thing for the PPS.
i will take em. Next hearing is coming up early Jan.
this post is confusing me
is this stock ever gonna do anything? sick of it trading sideways hovering near .0001.
If we own all this land why is it not reflected in the pps? We were at .004 with nothing? Just another scam pink i guess.
I thought William said shareholders would be very happy at the end of the year, well i dont know about you guys but im not happy
because what ever will make shareholders money EVCA does the opposite.
no never, this is a sinking ship and has been since last pump and dump about a year ago.
only merger here will be a Reverse Split!
people selling must either be crazy of not been following wamu for very long.
wonder it .0001's will show today, if not surely by next week