Not at all, it just makes me LAFF OUT LOUD!

GreenBackClub
Re: None
Tuesday, January 24, 2023 7:01:49 PM
Post# of 120295 Go
FOR ANYONE CLAIMING THAT VPLM HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING MEANINGFUL FOR THE COMPANY AND SHAREHOLDERS I OFFER THIS LIST OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY VPLM THUS FAR:


* Up-listed from OTC-PINK to OTCQB
* Removed the DTC Chill
* Conducted an annual financial audit to be in full SEC compliance and fully reporting.
* Conducted an initial damages analysis for RBR parent patent.
* Initiated 4 federal infringement lawsuits to enforce VPLM's IP rights against Verizon, Apple, AT&T, Twitter.
* Initiated 1 federal infringement lawsuit to enforce VPLM's IP rights against Amazon.
* Agreed to having all 5 cases venue transferred to Northern California and consolidated for pre-trial purposes.
* Defended and defeated 8 IPR petitions brought before the PTAB by Unified Patents, Apple and Verizon/ATT.
* Successfully defeated a motion, in part, for sanctions by Apple at the PTAB.
* Successfully defeated an Alice motion brought by Verizon & ATT.
* 27 total patents granted and issued as of February 2019 (21 U.S. Patents).
* Granted RBR patent in Europe without any opposition challenge within 9 month challenge period.
* successful efforts to recoup most of the 100 million shares from Richard Kipping et al
* Upgraded the Board of Directors to include new members with extensive experience in M&A.
* Brought on board new boutique NYC law firm (Kevin Malek) to go to battle against the big silicon defendants.
* Brought on board terrific superstar lawyer in luis Hudnell
- ceo malak returned many hundreds of millions of shares back to the treasury to reduce the outstanding share count (to the benefit of shareholders)

And more recently…….

***Patents have been validated***

***Initial damages analysis done***

***Defeated 12 more IPRS (20 total)**

***IPRs have been appealed and upheld unanimously***

***No patents have been invalidated***

*** Current with all requisite filings***

***current with prosecuting patents and keeping both parent and child patents current***

***Reduction in OS count (thanks Emil!)***

***Some claims (@20) invalidated for RBR but could be overturned with a decision on Axle at the Supreme Court***

***NDCA is a very difficult court to win as it is defendant friendly. Waco is fair and plaintiff friendly***

***Foot in the door in WACO and now some defendants must remain in Waco (Amazon’s writ of mandamus denied!) and face a trial. Other defendants currently stayed in NDCA are tied to Waco results***

***Albright is a judge that is perceived as fair, by the books and fast which means vplm will be given a fair chance to argue / defend patents on the merits (all we could ask for)***

***99% of Albright's cases settle before trial. Albright encourages settlement ALL THE TIME. If defendants get to trial they have been given multiple chances to settle so they can’t expect Leniency from judge Albright***

***Defendants are NOT working together as a formal consolidated group. There is a disconnect - which plays into VPLM’s favor***

***Most big defendants will settle before providing source code when discovery is requested and required. Vplm is well into discovery phase so it is only a matter of when and not if source code will be demanded***

***Apple's own expert admitted in court in virnetx case - on the record - that they use relays to route their calls (imessage, facetime, etc.). This admission will come to bite the apple in the butt***

***Apple tried to file a patent when VPLM was updating their RBR child patent but they failed to do so before VPLM did. We were first to file at USPTO. Now why did they do this? --> because they wanted to get around infringing. Sorry apple, you lose again***

***60+ companies have received letters that notified them of possible infringement AND offered them the chance to take a license. This was years ago. Willful infringement equals treble damages!***

***Apple and others can be brought back into litigation as they were dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE***

Only fools use infringement letters to determine the infringement. Smart investors use claim construction, IPR’s and discovery to determine the infringement. Nuff said! We do need a laff while we wait.

Things that matter:

1. Favorable Claim Construction
2. A successful Discovery which includes expert witness and the Nodal testing.
3. An experienced patent Judge
4. Waco, Texas
5. 2 of the biggest Telco providers globally that are infringing.
6. A great legal team
Bonus is willful infringement


These are the 6 key ingredients to win a patent case, and VPLM has them.
Don’t get distracted by the childish noise that won’t matter one bit on the front steps of court. VPLM is all set for this upcoming battle. Will in take 3 weeks, settle on the first day or earlier? No one really knows but we will all find out.

Here’s a sticky twist, the most recent filing by Hudnell mentions the Nodes. It’s on the 7/7/2023 filing in the MG trial. Whoopsie not another one!

The first patent was approved in 2013, it took 10 yrs, but that’s not important what is important is that trial is only a few months away!

Here is some more of those bizarro facts stickied

Recent Dismissals:

No more instituted IPRs… is this good or bad? VPLM is 20-0 but from what I hear they are costly. It is possible that eliminating this saves us shareholders from possibly up to 500 million more shares of dilution. And what if they lost some claims? Better to not take a chance and you get out of NDCA.

No more Alice 101 is this good or bad?
It’s very tough to win this in NDCA considering they don’t even do claim construction before ruling. Read up on Judge Albright and how he handles 101,s.
Probably saved us more dilution having to fight the Alice.

No more Samsung in Waco is this good or bad?
Well they had IPRs, and my thinking is that since this is a MG patent trial that maybe they don’t infringe as much as a telco provider. Probably saved us more dilution by dismissing this.

All of this was on a press release. What hasn’t been in a press release is this AMZN settlement. The lack of communication hurts but what can they say without litigating in Press releases or tipping off the opposition about your strategy.

SO NOW WE ARE LEFT WITH TWO TELCO PROVIDERS WITH THE MG PATENT AKA (ROAMING CHARGES) IN WACO WITH NO ALICE, NO IPRS AND THE TIME LIMIT TO FILE NEW IPRS HAS PASSED. SAVED US FROM MORE DILUTION WHICH WE KNOW HOW MUCH WE LOVE DILUTION.

To me this sounds like a lean mean fighting machine!!!

Please verify all that was said on this post to assure oneself what kind of position VPLM is truly in.

That’s a bit twisted, so now Rich is a mobster cause one of them was gonna shoot him. Or maybe Rich was a whistleblower and that’s why they put out a hit on him..

conveniently Special. LMAO at the humorous opinions..

Agreed, the original judges were conflicted cause they worked for Apple and T recently so they should’ve recused themselves. Unbelievable what Big Tech used sock puppets will say. Based on the filings they are stepping their game up on social media..

This was said many times don’t make me go back and read all the posts.LMFAO
Never respond to deaf ears! It’s tiresome

WTF, big tech’s used sock puppets are grasping for straws, they know better then to try and attack the patents.

Did they mention the MG patent case with AMZN? I’m no lawyer but I do believe Waco Judge is expecting a mutual update. I haven’t seen a filing, has anyone else? Not sure what will be redacted but there should be a filing of some sort.

Take a look at Netlist, they’ve claimed that their patent infringements are over a 150 billion and they’ve signed a few license deals and won a case for 300 million, yet their market cap is around a billion. So there is your example, “ patience is a virtue “ and VPLM is in its best position EVER!

Not sure, but they would need to report any financial settlement in the q’s under revenue?

I don’t remember those but I remember yours!

VPLM has beaten 20 IPR challenges so far from the big tech and has yet to lose a claim. That’s amazing!

So both my statements were technically correct. However I did make 2 mistakes.

No apology needed loophole! At least you didn’t say we were down 400 pct. That’s banter!

Mr. Market likes todays ruling, a higher high!

Great article

https://newsytrends.com/2023/05/03/voip-pal-com-otcqb-vplm-rising-fast-after-potential-settlement-reached-with-amazon-in-patent-infringement-lawsuit-in-waco-texas/

That’s what I thought but someone posted about Alice, thanks for the clarity Butters

That,s weird, they could’ve got this off of OTC Markets.

COMPANY OFFICERS & CONTACTS
Emil Emil Malak
CEO, President
Kevin Brian Williams
CFO
D. Barry Lee
EVP, Fin.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Dennis Chang
Independent Director, Audit Committee Member
Emil Emil Malak
CEO, President
Howard C Saylor
Independent Director, Audit Committee Member
Kevin Brian Williams
Audit Committee Member

PROFILE DATA
SIC - Industry Classification
3661 - Telephone and telegraph apparatus
Incorporation Information
NV, USA, 1997

He’s fair and that’s the most important quality and he is well versed in patent trial and law! Best place to be in. IMO.

So far I found only one Alice ruling were he dismissed a case based on a very weak claim construction. His ruling was a “ dismissal without-prejudice which means the plaintiff can fix his terms or hire a better attorney and comeback! VPLM was awarded a favorable claim construction. So Im leaning he’ll rule in VPLM’s favor.

I can’t find an Alice only the summary.

I’m expecting this to be quite an exciting week, probably the most exciting week in VPLMs history! Does anyone agree with that or is it just me? Please do your own DD don’t get sucked into my excitement. GLTAOU

I didn’t post it, maybe check that Locksmith financial website!

Agreed and I did! Thank you

Albright allows for 101 after claim construction and discovery, at least when he rules he is well informed about the patents. Now in NDCA it’s the first thing they do without understanding the patents.

Facts are facts that can’t be denied!,

It’s been like that since the beginning of time, I mean look how Emil gets blamed for everything even when it wasn’t him..All those pumps were paid by a company called Locksmith Financial yet the blame goes to Emil. Hmmmmm who is this company that paid to pump Vp back in 2015? And we’re suppose trust that DD. Too damn funny! Another attack debunked. If VPLM lost that many claims they wouldn’t have a patent left..

Promoter:stocktwiter.comPaying Party:Locksmith FinancialStocks covered:Compensation:Avg $ Volume for Period:VPLM$12,5007,369Max Profit: 28.76 %Gain at close: 14.38 %

Im seeing all unknown except for one, got it right from your post. The importance of the pumper is irrelevant it’s who paid the pumper that’s relevant.

Promoter:stocktwiter.comPaying Party:Locksmith FinancialStocks covered:Compensation:Avg $ Volume for Period:VPLM$12,5007,369Max Profit: 28.76 %Gain at close: 14.38 %

Great find notice there was only one named and guess who? Hmmmmm thanks for the info.

We don’t know if it’s lots of money we don’t know what they are doing but it’s not gonna be a dismissal without prejudice is all I’m saying.

No, Apple and T agreed to dismiss without prejudice, and if there’s a win in Texas I’m sure VPLM will revisit this in the future. Yes no money gained yet but eliminating cases in CA would help the new cases stay in Waco. No monkey wrenches just easy to understand, the landscape has changed in patent law, like Heartland, IPR’s, Ptab so plaintiffs have to develop a different strategy then before 2014. It’s not an easy road, but at least Albright understands the constitution and uses it in his court room, unlike CA.