Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Kind of OT''' It's hard to fathom a stock (WPCS) trading 12 times its outstanding shares it has in its first 2 hours of the day. ''WHEN'' we get some solid judgement I hope in our favor on the 22nd of Jan or sooner, I hope VRNG would trade 40 million shares to the favorable gain of 3 or 4 dollar$ in one day. Wet dream that it may be.. I find it so hard to believe VRNG ever had a trading halt in the past on meager news compared to what's happening on WPCS. No halt there.. unreal..............
Ihub's overall final number still has not caught up to ameritrades for the day and even nasdaq says 20000 more shares traded during the day than Ameritrade's. ''weird'', so be it''
It looks like at least 200000 + shares have traded after hours if ya look at the numbers for the days trading 40 minutes after close. Ihub says 983 thousand vs ameritrades ,1,204,000.. Nice
To Vringo?
That Taylor Moffitt screwed many people here. I see his profile on linkedin. pos
We may have a long wait. Opp's longer wait. When did you have this conversation?
I HAVE 6032 RESTRCTED SHARES FROM YEARS AGO IN MY TRADING ACCOUNT THAT ARE LIKE GATHERING DUST FOR 6 YEARS. I JUST SENT THIS COMPANY A EMAIL ABOUT IT..
I HAVE 6032 RESTRCTED SHARES FROM YEARS AGO IN MY TTRADING ACOUNT THAT ARE LIKE GATHERING DUCT FOR 6 YEARS. I JUST SENT THIS COMPANY A EMAIL ABOUT IT..
ok SILLY QUESTION, Who was the 800000.00 bond payed too? It does not say To vrng in any press release, nor does it say how long to produce records of sales, production past,present and future etc in any time frame to be produced by zte that is to be reviewed by vrng for further relief. The Court permitted Vringo to seek additional relief upon its review of the quantum of ZTE`s sales pursuant to the foregoing disclosure. The Court further directed that the Indian Customs authorities continue to notify Vringo when all relevant ZTE goods are imported into India and give Vringo the opportunity to inspect such goods. WHY is there no time frame separate from the 6 month trial time frame. DOES A appeal stop these orders?
I can see why management does not go out of their way to pr post for the sake of posting. What could they say? Even when the news is good , we only hiccup. Last week I watched BGMD go up 150% for a mere 17.00 planned increase in the price of one diagnostic test. VRNG , when it does have positive news that looks to bring potential millions just hiccups. I hope this changes soon. glta.. I'm not pushing BGMD , just using as a example .. ITS still a pos.
http://www.financialstrend.com/microsoft-corporation-nasdaqmsft-wins-patent-claim-against-motorola-mobility-aapl-goog-orcl-ibm-10663.html for patent infringement.. This is a good news day
I like that you brought 963 up. That being said, if both sides can"t (won't) agree at the meeting, I wonder if 963 could be brought up by Vringo at the conference. If that is allowed, I wonder if the magistrate would conference with the HJJ and say ''GET UR DUN'' glta
I just read the last pacer #1061 regarding the ""party"" on 1-22-2014. Lots of do's and don'ts, but I would like to know is if both parties do not come to a agreement either before or at the conclusion of said meeting.( What happens next? ) Why is that never put into one of these notices? Endless loop.. Good news today out of India, hope that carry's over to tomorrow.. Glta...
just the start,,, I hope''''
I wish the Magistrate Judge would have went a step farther and said, if party's can't agree upon A compromised resolution'' I'll do it for ya.
I hope they agree on who brings the coffee and who brings the rolls. I have a feeling that's all that may be agreed opon.
Magistrate Judge Issues Settlement Conference Order in Vringo Patent Infringement Case Against AOL, Google
10:19a ET December 12, 2013 (Benzinga)
"All parties and their lead counsel are required to appear at a settlement conference scheduled in the chambers of the undersigned at the United States District Court, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, at 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, January 22, 2014, for the purpose of conducting discussions, in good faith, towards a compromised resolution of this case."
Thanks,,, glty
I was getting a email from madservices88@gmail.com with a investors trend reference tied to it pumping this stock.. How does it rise that much on low volume? How did it rise at all? Who has this power? Is it the great and powerful OZ?
pure b/s.. how or who had the power to bring this up 180%? What a corrupted market!!
Just enjoy it. Bgmd has done nothing for any investor for the past year except those who played it to go down,,so enjoy this moment if you are up.
HAPPY FOR YA'''''''
Today little miracle won't make it happen. 30.00 for a test? Hell it cost me 30.00 co-pay just for a doctor visit. Turn and cough is extra. Wake me when it gets to 4.00 when it last MAJOR yank was announced. I'm in for a long nap............................. Hopefully some little investors are making some change off this bs news. glty.........
I would have expected at least a half ass follow story to that one pos article they put out on 11-19-2013 by now, but then again it is BGMD. To me they did not say anything materially different than they did in past articles since the FDA approved (who must have been in a very giving mood) this test 3.5 years ago when BGMD went public. I got one response from the so called clinics that supposedly have this test for use on patients. That clinic was MAYO's, but their response was only to ask me if I had a service account with them. What ever that means!
Interesting article from a site I accidently came across. Its from March 2012 that maybe was on other sites but I have never seen it. Interesting on how Yahoo took on Google for patent infringement on patents they owned but google made use of them in ad-sence and ad-word till they got spanked in court and Yahoo won. ALSO The patents Google wanted at that time but were not allowed to buy because they were Lang's patents from day 1 but they used his tech anyway and still are getting away with it. Amazing this bs has gone on for 400+ days when this story ( a easy read )says it all. The sad difference between now and then is Google HAS made mighty $ by theft back in the early days. http://techcrunch.com/2012/03/31/why-google-might-be-going-to-0/
CORRECT
ABSOLUTELY
I feel for ya but Id switch with ya in a minute.. I'm much farther at a loss than yours.. I bought in on the bs they came out with on cardio score back on dec2012.. my fault for marrying into this pos on their constant story telling...the galectin test is bs,, what's different now than before when the fda passed it 3-4 years ago,, not much from what we get for information in my opinion. They don't say what's the next step after their latest findings from the last news story, which I feel was just telling the same old info they had before. The test is not taking the world by storm , that is for sure...yet the boys are cashing paychecks... wtf,,, glty
hush, hush,,hmmmm
Great read !
yes, lets do it...
Ah, the ever popular split that I-hub did not pick up on in it historical figures. My bad , should have checked historical on Yahoo. Still a hell of a move today. I'd still like to know how or who or what determines a stocks price jump like that? I can't find much info on this company Zoom acquired that frenzied this stock move.. Oh well, maybe MSFT will do us a favor and acquire Vringo.. yippeeee
STILL A P.O.S.
Oh I do,, glty
thanks for the info
Or have I misunderstood the info wrong? Is the 8.9% figure how many shares the institution shorted?
A question for the board.. It seems everyday there is a post about short interest volume.. Usually that number is apx 20-21 million shares short or apx 27% of the float is short. I just wonder about the accuracy of these numbers and why they are all so important. I know the site shortsqueeze.com is used for this info. On that same shortsqueeze page it list 8.9 % as being institution owned. I went stockzoa.com to see what funds have institutional share ownership in VRNG, and after adding all the shares up it totals a little over 23 million shares, so why would the shortsquezze site say only 8.9% when it's actually closer to +30% of the float. That's assuming(that word again) the fund ownership numbers or(stockzoa)are right.. I guess I am asking the question , if any service (trading sites) was legally bound to post updated correct info , would the share price reflect it? Also another example of conflicting numbers. If you look at 'YAHOO' as a example for VRNG of individual ownership and look up shares owned by MR Lang on 'major direct holders' the figure is 2,774,413 shares but under the 'insider roster' page Mr Lang's figure is 5,706,165 shares. Are those figures so different because not all shares are available to sell, but that is the grand total?
Why would Benzinga post this message? Option Alert: Vringo December/January 3.5 Call Spread; 4,076 Contract Trade @$0.11; Currently $3.11
I was looking at current news for vrng on Ameritrade and this was todays. Why would this be there? I don't ever recall it being done before under news. Does it mean anything to us? Is it good or bad or so/so news?
Save you're money for hard liquor,, you will get more of a return from it than these lying sacks of shite's at BGMD will turn for ya!
Interesting, now I know why my Facebook friends pictures showed up on my cellphone directory after I put Facebook on my phone. SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) - Vringo Inc. /quotes/zigman/15760123/delayed/quotes/nls/vrng VRNG +1.59% on Wednesday said the company has signed an agreement with Facebook Inc. related to Vringo's use of Facetones mark and domain name. The deal "clarifies Vringo's permitted use of Facetones mark and domain name," the mobile software platform company said in a release. Facetones is a mobile phone app that allows users to match Facebook friends with their phone contacts.