Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Viking65, who said you wouldn't trade?
Viking65, of course you can believe what you want. About the right course, it is still to be seen.
Don't just complain, do something:
http://www.cfra.info/31/petition.asp?PID=6436660&NID=1
Where do you stand?
http://www.cfra.info/31/petition.asp?PID=6436660&NID=1
If you care, show it:
http://www.cfra.info/31/petition.asp?PID=6436660&NID=1
Malcolm Philips
President and CEO
CDEX Inc.
It is my understanding that all Private Placement Investors that qualify as accredited investors and, therefore, become such, are required to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement. As a CDEX shareholder in good standing, I request that a copy of the Non Disclosure Agreement be sent to my direction. Failure to do so will prompt me to exercise my right under the Freedom of Information Act and request a copy of the document from the Securities and Exchange Commission
Thank you for your attention to this,
Respectfully,
Liviu Morovan
Malcolm Philips
President and CEO
CDEX Inc.
It is my understanding that all Private Placement Investors that qualify as accredited investors and, therefore, become such, are required to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement. As a CDEX shareholder in good standing, I request that a copy of the Non Disclosure Agreement be sent to my direction. Failure to do so will prompt me to exercise my right under the Freedom of Information Act and request a copy of the document from the Securities and Exchange Commission
Thank you for your attention to this,
Respectfully,
Liviu Morovan
The Web Site for Black Hawk Resources is up and running. It is still under development, but the Company has a Web Presence.
http://www.blackhawkresources.com/
I hope I am wrong here, but what I see is the staging of the initiation of trading for the CDEX shares registered through the SB-2 via brokers and Market Makers. Now that a ticker has been assigned, private placement investors can start trading their shares. It certainly makes sense to keep the majority of shareholders of CDEX out of the loop at least until the PP investors and other insiders make a killing on their shares, without the flooding of the market with over 23 million shares. The share price has been set at $0.75 in the Initial Offering. Interesting to watch if the Market Makers will buy those shares at that price and keep them for shorting latter in the game.
BigTips, CDEX is not trading as of yet. The assignment of a ticker does not mean the company is trading. As of this morning, the SB-2 registration is not effective, and until it becomes effective, no trading can take place, not to mention that CDEX still has to secure Market Makers willing to trade the stock.
Viking65, what you have is words on a paper. Still no contracts, no marketable product, no registration for trading, and yes, a lot of forward looking statements, as usual.
disappointed, the hope is all that stands, even despite all the evidence that nothing is going on with the technology. The hope stands that somehow CDEX will be able to register and eventually trade, so that shareholders may have a chance to recover even a part of their investment, if not making a profit. But even hope has a limit when all indications are pointing toward its futility.
blueevent, my presence on this board is only as a member. Unless otherwise specified, all my posts will reflect my personal opinions, thoughts and comments. Nothing expressed on this or any other boards is to be taken as official position regarding Blackhawk Resources. The only source of official information will be the Web Site. I thought I should make this clear from the beginning.
Information regarding Blackhawk Resources can be found here:
http://www.lmorovan.com/Blackhawk%20Resources/blackhawk_resources_inc.htm
Blackhawk Resources will have its own Web Site.
Welcome to the new Blackhawk Resources board!!!
Stewart, I see you are not up to the challenge. Kind of like expected that from you.
Stewart, it is said that you shall know them by their fruits. And the fruits are rotten and they stink. Now, if you are willing to answer some specific questions, just let me know, and many issues would fall into the right place. But remember, your answers must be consistent with the current and past events. Are you up for the challenge?
ontheedge01, much words and no documented proof. As usual, you state things as facts, but fail to provide the slightest evidence of what you say. Until you come out clean with documented evidence of what you say, you are not much that part of the group that has been conspiring to defraud shareholders, and the authorities will eventually unmask you for what and who you are. Don't pray for me, my conscience is clean, pray for yourself that the court may have mercy on you, but mostly, that the wrong you have committed and still continue to defend and hide, will not be held against you before the Highest Court of All.
ontheedge01, it took you all these weeks to come out with such a pathetic excuse for failure? I never got an answer of why was any need for a Class Action if you and Mari already were "heading" the Derivative one?
Possible scenarios:
1. The Derivative Action was worn out by the Boys and you lost all the advantage you had when you started it.
2. The Derivative Action was taken on a contingency basis, and the attorneys were not happy with what they could get out of it, so they came up with the Class Action, which, by the way, it was never clarified whether was taken on a contingency basis or not.
3. You and Mari were facing a conflict of interest from the beginning. If there would have been a shred of decency in both of you, you would have rejected being appointed plaintiffs.
4. You have consistently attempted to avoid all your activities during 2001. You have made false promises that you never kept, and when faced with the demand of explanation, you never came out clean.
5. Despite you insistence that you didn't know MP at certain times, there is a documented and incontrovertible evidence that you DID answer one e-mail I sent to him. Your consistent denial in spite of the evidence, makes you a very questionable person. Not to mention lowering yourself to the level of pure fabrication of a false e-mail that I sent you, which was proven by your own stupidity that it was false.
6. Your activities of gathering names, addresses and amount of shares owned by shareholders to evict the BOD of Loch Harris, has been proven, based on your subsequent activities, as a simple gathering of information on possible Private Placements in CDEX, a move that proved you had a personal financial interest as a broker and promoter for your own benefit.
7. You lied to shareholders, including this one, that your efforts were genuine, while you knew all the time that you will never move a finger to touch those who have benefited you for some time, by the commissions you cashed in through the promoting and selling of Loch shares.
8. You either lied in the affidavit in the Court or in your statements when you said that you did not know Heim long before the first conference call was held in January 2002. You lied when you said that you did not meet Kamber until the same conference call, while stating in the affidavit that you were having discussion with him as early as December 2001, even contradicting Mari, who stated that the CCs were initiated in November 2001.
9. You lied to shareholders when you stated several times in 2002, that an agreement was imminent, and that if you didn't get it within a time frame you specified, you will submit the DA to summary judgment.
The only thing that could get any credibility to your effort, if any, is that you come clean and tell us all the details of all the meetings, phone calls and conversations you had with all interested parties in the DA, and let shareholders know, with documented facts, why you were incapable to take the action to the court, why you failed to demand a judgment by jury (as demanded in the DA) and why did you not refuse to participate in the action in the view of the conflict of interest.
Randy has done a very poor job in explaining why we lost our advantage in the actions and why we had to accept a "grossly unfair" settlement. Randy failed to explain why he dropped an emerging action that he and closer were promoting in order to take things in our hands, and out of the hands of greedy attorneys and crooked defendants. All his explanations so far have been not much more than his own, personal opinions, with no documented facts to justify his actions. The fact that he was mobilizing shareholders, was a very good reason to be bought out with the promise of taking the action to a new level, all in accordance of the plan conceived by the attorneys, the defendants and MP. And don't come to me with the story that there was no plan, you insult my intelligence and the intelligence of all the perps.
Your participation and later, your refusal to come out clean have proven your particular interest that the script be completed as written. And you lack of honesty to acknowledge your participation in the whole scam have brought upon you the distrust and criticism of most, if not all shareholders.
Viking65, yep, another empty worded "update", LOL.
ohiotom, no notice was given to shareholders from the broker, the company or Transfer Agent. The exchange is automatic for shareholders who have their shares in brokerage accounts.
Loch shares have been cancelled, and in stead you have a CUSIP number, identifying your current shares as pending for the registration of CDEX securities. Until CDEX gets registered and ready for trading, your shares are not tradable and their value is $0.00.
Shareholders: get your Share Certificates as soon as possible.
Randy, by now, you should know who you can trust and who not to. Do your best and don't repeat the mistakes of the past.
He seems pretty much active, your post is gone, LOL.
Seems like Robert finally got to his senses and stopped posting.
domen, Loch is still alive and well, even better now that MP got them off the first hook. It will still be alive and well for at least another two years from the moment it files for dissolution, which has not happened yet.
But, we are not discussing Loch much here, we are discussing the people that have ruined this investment for the shareholders, while filling up their pockets with their money. We are talking about those who have taken over the control of the "technology" to perpetuate a scam that started a few years ago. We are talking about liars, deceivers, wicked, unscrupulous traitors that have used the shareholders to further their agenda. We are talking about people that, we Loch shareholders trusted, and who stabbed us in the back.
But in the end, justice WILL be served, one way or another, here or there. That is for sure.
Robert, wrong again, scarednomore never asked you about Ken Blackwell, he asked about Mr. Blackwell. You added Ken, just as another attempt to twist things to your favor. Pathetic.
Posted by: scarednomore
In reply to: ontheedge01 who wrote msg# 2509
Date:12/9/2003 3:40:50 PM
Post #of 2527
Robert,
I met Mr. Blackwell and his son before the hearing. It had to be, that was the only father son combo at the hearing. I had kinda forgotten about it as he said he was in town for a high school baseball game to be played later.
He also stated he had never posted on any board at anytime but seemed to know chat names as we talked. The name at that time flew right over my head, age you know. Now the name Blackwell is ringing a bell from the past. Did Mr. Blackwell have anything to do with the Tuli operation? Thanks, just trying to still sort out the players.
Robert,
"You also need to come to grips that you were soundly defeated on your agenda."
Wrong. My agenda was to expose the wicked and anti-shareholders agenda of those who fabricated the whole Derivative Action, the Class Action and the Settlement Agreement. In that, I have succeeded, so, my agenda was a total VICTORY.
Robert, scarednomore was talking about Charles Blackwell and his son, not about Kenneth Blackwell and Brian, his son.
This is the letter sent by "your" Blackwell, (not Charles Blackwell and his son that scarednomore refers about) and I don't see any word in it that is "on my side". And since you stated that he was in the Court room, you must provide proof of your statement. LIAR.
May 8,2003
The Honorable Patrick 0. Keel
P.O. Box 1748
1000 Guadalupe
Suite 514
Austin, Texas 78767
Cause Number GN 200180
Your Honor,
As a shareholder of Loch Harris Corporation, I am writing you concerning my views on the Settlement Agreement pending in your courtroom for May 30 I have been a shareholder for approximately 4 years and at this time own 1,320,000 shares. I believe the technology is good and the timing is right for a company such as CDEX to move into the national security spotlight with the services it offers.
As a shareholder I often frequent the Loch Harris message boards to get updated on what is going on. While I have never posted a message, I read all the post to obtain as much knowledge as I can. I am concerned about a particular poster that seems to think that he speaks for the majority of the stockholders. His name is Liviu Morovan. As I read his post I can’t help but think he has ulterior motives other than the best interest of Loch shareholders. I disagree with his views regarding this matter and I am voicing my opinion in favor of the distribution on CDEX shares to Loch Shareholders as promptly as possible. I sincerely hope that the unruly actions of one man does not continue to cause the shareholders of Loch to suffer through more unnecessary delays. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Respectfully your
Kenneth W. Blackwell
Robert, don't you find it interesting and even suspicious that since the hearing, no one ever mentioned any letter writer being present in the Court room until now, that is, 6 and a half months later? With all the fabrications and lies, I wouldn't doubt this is just another one. Prove that a letter writer was present. If not, shut up and stop lying.
Are you going to answer the question I asked about your refusal to submit the injunction in June, 2001?
Robert, in June, 2001, I suggested you that an Injunction case should be immediately submitted to the Court. You refused. On who's instruction?
Robert:
You said you never answered the e-mail that I sent to MP. That's a LIE.
You said you never met or spoke to MP until August 2001. That's a LIE.
You said you were chosen as plaintiff in the second CC. That's a LIE.
You said you did not met Kamber in November 2001. That's a LIE.
You said that I sent you a non existent e-mail. That's a LIE.
You said other shareholders that sided with me, wrote letters to the Court. That's a LIE.
You promised shareholders that your movement in May 2001 was to remove the BOD of Loch Harris. That is a LIE.
Robert, what you think or what is your opinion is irrelevant. The facts are there for all to read. The Judge has willfully and one sidedly neglected the serious violations and irregularities found in both the Derivative Action and the Class Action. Based on that, the Judge has been partialized and sided with the scamsters that tricked him to approve the Settlement.
Robert, nowhere in the Final Judgment or any other Court documents is stated that there were other letters that agreed with me. That is a lie.
I stated that no other writers that agreed with me were present in the hearing.
Get your facts straight. Oops, sorry, I thought you were somebody else, you can't get any facts straight. Not even read a calendar, I may say.
Robert:
Excerpt from paragraph 75 of the Final Judgment:
"For example, a letter filed March 7, 2003 states: "I would like to say that Liviu Morovan does not represent me in his letter campaign... He is obviously trying to get you to overthrow the settlement. I support the settlement agreement as is."
Excerpt from paragraph 104 of the Final Judgment:
" (one writer suggested that 1,000 shares of CDEX should be a sufficient fee)"
What is interesting is that the end of the paragraph states"
"The Court has given appropriate attention to these letters".
Nowhere in the Final Judgment the Court states that it has given appropriate attention to my letters.
I hope you can see the double standards of the Judge. If not, see your eye doctor.
Robert, do you understand English?:
Posted by: lmorovan
In reply to: scarednomore who wrote msg# 2489 Date:12/8/2003 12:38:19 PM
Post #of 2497
Robert, you just said other have written letters to the Judge, that were on my side. Which one is true and which one is a lie?
"I have aften wondered why nobody else besides you wrote letters to the judge."
The post clearly starts with "Robert", therefore, it is a post written to you.
Robert, you stated this:
"Wrong again Imo, he not only acknowledged your letters, but a few others on your side as well, and also acknowledged that the over whelming response in letters received, were FOR the SA."
You clearly say that the Judge acknowledged "a few other" letter on my side (which was, opposing the Settlement). The letter from Kenneth Blackwell was IN SUPPORT of the Settlement.
Your ignorance of the facts is amazing, given that you were a plaintiff and you, more than any shareholder, should have been more familiar with the court filings.
Robert, you definitely failed to even read the Final Judgment. Your answer is there.
Robert, when I begin my post with JH, I reply to JH. When I begin my post with Robert, I reply to Robert.
Robert,
"There was Ken Blackwell and his son Brian. I read a copy of the letter Mr. Blackwell had sent the Judge."
No letter from Ken Blackwell and his son Brian are in the case docket. They might have written a letter to the Judge that has nothing to do with the case, but that does not show any side of the Settlement. For your information, any letter, e-mail or other forms of communication that refer to the case, are entered in the docket. Learn a little about how the courts work before making a joke of yourself.
I am sure there were many letter writers in the court room. After all, everybody wrote a letter or two in their lifetime. But we were talking about letters written to the Judge regarding the Settlement case.
What a pathetic fake you are, LOL.