is…out the door and not looking back…
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Excellent point. Same leader in both companies. At this point, it's awfully tough to argue any breach of that Agreement, as long as it benefits both companies.
"Everyone knows Liquidmetal" according to CEO Lugee. It would appear to make sense, if his comment is to be believed, that they lead in to the territory with the Liquidmetal name, while having Eon manufacture. This benefits both companies - would be hard to argue the contrary if they're both making money.
First, though, LQMT has get contracts to make money. Money in - check (and two months earlier than allowed); c.c. scheduled and done - check; new location mentioned in call - check;
New website - ?
Revenues - ??
Billion dollar company - ???
He's been a man of his words and a man of action so far. Go Lugee. (aka GL).
Nah, you're not starry-eyed. You're a realist. It's all about ROI in business. Lugee has his skin in the game. He's only laying out for the return on his investment. He's not doing it to make himself feel special or for the bling. Great point.
Will be interesting to see what the intention is with that purchase and what the return is that he's expecting.
Interesting analysis. That's very detailed. I'm impressed you were able to find those expirations. Thanks.
lqmt will serve the world from their 40,000sf facility
Take a look at the 1 year chart. If you were here 1 year ago at this time, you'd have found some really miserable people. And the ones not miserable, were suspect of the Company. And the ones optimistic were called lunatics. All 3 positions about all 3 groups had validity. GL.
With Lugee's timelines, I don't think watts will need to refer to an unsatisfied PERT diagram any longer.
Lugee has proven to exceed even the wildest expectations, while totally being a person of his word. Wow. It's heady stuff.
I suspect I'm not the only in that boat either
Wanted to believe it, but could never REALLY get my mind into that, but firmly digging in roots with this building purchase certainly pushes Lugee and LQMT closer to that possibility. Lugee has a LOT of money, has been aggressive, and his actions follow his words - quickly.
I like the sound of "global leader" in amorphous alloys. I also like the words of Rasinger at Engel comparing it to the "thermoplastic revolution."
Anyone else getting giddy??? Tee hee hee, lol.
Very perfectly stated, although I shouldn't be taking a cheap shot at a guy who drew up the roadmap as to where this was going when he showed his hand by buying in at the prices he bought in. I almost wonder if buying at market provided him some "buffer" (aka SEC inquiry) as opposed to exercising those cheap options.
I'm pretty sure we can say we've officially moved on from the previous history no matter what you thought of it - good, bad, or indifferent. I'm leaning towards history is going to tell us the market just wasn't ready for it at the time and the tech wasn't there.
Ah, who gives a crap about that, LET'S MAKE SOME $$$$$$$$$$$!!! Glta.
Where's our Chinese insider???
Haha, you just don't stop!!!
T trade.
So glad we have a real leader and experienced business person running the show who has his own skin in the game.
About the size of your average grocery store.
A Publix or a Walmart Neighborhood Market is that size
Lugee's not a talker. He's a doer and backs up his words with actions. Good for Lugee, good for LQMT shareholders. When was the last time LQMT paid 8 mill and did it in CASH?
Hence, positive news IS important and carries much more relative weight in driving the stock price for small stocks than fundamentals. Fundamentals are of course important, but so is positive news, even more so in a stock whose price is driven by POTENTIAL. The fundamentals will follow. Certainly, no potential, no fundamentals. But potential is king at this level.
There is definitely something in the LQMT pipe, but not everyone is smokin it.
That is, of course, Lugee's last tranche - 100 mill shs at .25.
Oooh, maybe a merger.
This seems like it's very possible. The whole case thing seems like a big stretch, but the frame thing seems like a good possibility.
Yes, he brings great, useful stuff every time.
Or I could always communicate with myself!
Through LQMT Honk Kong or any number of scenarios that could play out, some form of merger would make perfect sense, and I am certain Li has thought about that.
https://www.google.com/finance?cid=853317561149216
So? What to do now??? It's up. Must be something bad, right??? GL.
I said it wrong. This is the correct way to have phrased it. You hit the nail on the head.
Lugee just became CEO in December and were already being merged out??? Don't understand the thought process. To think it's simplistic is just way beyond rationality.
Of course! Go LQMT! Just watch out for the mergers! Haha.
Cassius Coolidge
Edit this. You need to keep posting.
There are some potential hurdles..."
Agreed!!!
They get upset about optimism, though, so you might want to pull back on that!
Good point. Steipp's interest is still in increasing value, so his shares can benefit. Negotiating those territories is a key component in doing so.
Thanks.
Well it's easy to summarize...
Being mired in the past is dangerous, particularly when the past was fraught with despair and angst. To dwell on it is self-defeating. To harbor the resentment is particularly damaging. Time to move on from the issue of the departed CEO and move on to what's important - the new CEO and what he does, or does not, bring to the table.
A differing point of view is vastly different than indifference. It's a colossal waste of time to continue referencing the old CEO. He went bye-bye. The door closed behind him and that's it. Era over.
"Bias" is removed when there is indifference. Indifference and bias are antonyms. Not giving a care about the prior CEO at this point is being indifferent to an era gone by and moving on to a new era. Perhaps the "bias" is more towards embracing the new CEO and forgetting what the old one did, or did not, do. If that is what bias is, then consider me "biased" - towards the new CEO. The old one is gone. That's over with. Failure to reference what's important - the new CEO - is counterproductive because dwelling on what was, fails to recognize what could be. What could be is what is important now, not what was, and 300% plus returns for many people are the facts of the change to a new CEO.
Time to move on. And if you can't move on with the new CEO, then maybe it's time to move out.
Well said. That's the bottom line. GL as well.
Ah well, still fun to bash that loser.
What ever is going on here?
...but it us intended to draw attention to the ignorance that portrayed Steipp as a God
$100 million! 10 employees and one machine in the garage producing no contracts. No there's no reason to ask where that hundred million dollars went... it was used to keep some very large and expensive lights burning