Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This is the overview of exhibits...
Exhibit Assignment and Assumption Agreement 55 pages 2.7 mb
2 Exhibit Assignment and Assumption Agreement 54 pages 4.1 mb
3 Exhibit Assignment and Assumption Agreement 54 pages 2.7 mb
4 Exhibit CTI Agreement 40 pages 1.8 mb
5 Exhibit Efacec Agreement 14 pages 1.3 mb
6 Exhibit NetSuite Agreement 22 pages 1.3 mb
7 Exhibit Credit Card Receipts 3 pages 39 kb
There is a filing(84)in the 4020 case...I sent to stockbarber. Just the main...the 7 exhibits are over 200 pages I didn't get.
This is what pacer said today about the filings 92 and 93 in 3124 case...
You do not have access to this transcript.
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 7/19/13 before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Court Reporter Contact Information: Michael P Snyder (312) 435-5563 michael_snyder@ilnd.uscourts.gov.
IMPORTANT: The transcript may be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter/Transcriber or PACER. For further information on the redaction process, see the Court's web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Quick Links select Policy Regarding the Availability of Transcripts of Court Proceedings.
Redaction Request due 1/20/2014. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1 /30/2014. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/31/2014. (Snyder, Michael)
93...
You do not have access to this transcript.
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 10/18/13 before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Court Reporter Contact Information: Michael P Snyder (312) 435-5563 michael_snyder@ilnd.uscourts.gov.
IMPORTANT: The transcript may be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter/Transcriber or PACER. For further information on the redaction process, see the Court's web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Quick Links select Policy Regarding the Availability of Transcripts of Court Proceedings.
Redaction Request due 1/20/2014. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/30/2014. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/31/2014. (Snyder, Michael)
The speed/meaning of the U.S court system is a complete joke.
I'm disappointed in our new CEO too. Ya can't run a public company with shareholders and not say a thing going on 8 months. I know they've had next to zero work during this time, but some forward guidance would help.
Do you know why we go to judge Martin now?
Think thursday's is cancelled?
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 17, 2013:
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Daniel G. Martin: Minute entry docket no.
[90] is hereby vacated. Mailed notice(lxs, )
Looks like it's all going our way.
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 17, 2013:
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Status hearing held on
12/17/2013. Motion hearing held on 12/17/2013 regarding Motion to Dismiss [55], motion
to stay [84], motion to reset [87]. Defendants' Motion to stay briefing on plaintiffs' motion
to dismiss counterclaim [84] is granted. Plaintiffs' motion [55] captioned "counter motion
to dismiss for failure to state a claim," which I understand to be superseded by plaintiffs'
motion [76] to dismiss, is denied. Motion to reset [87] is terminated as moot. Mailed
notice (jdh)
Back in court Thursday.
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 17, 2013:
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Daniel G. Martin: Status hearing set for
12/19/2013 at 09:30 AM. Mailed notice(lxs, )
Now it turns into a civil case?
ORDER REFERRING A CIVIL CASE TO THE
DESIGNATED MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of
Honorable Daniel G. Martin for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: As
discussed in open court, discovery disputes relating to plaintiff's rule to show cause
motion only [51]. (jdh) Mailed notice.
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 17, 2013:
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Status hearing held on
12/17/2013. Motion hearing held on 12/17/2013 regarding motion for leave to file [71],
motion for rule to show cause [51], motion to file instanter [55]. Defendant 350 Green,
LLC's oral motion to withdraw voluntarily its motion [71] for leave to file counterclaim is
granted. Plaintiff's motion [55] to file affidavits in support of its motion for a rule to show
cause is granted. Plaintiff's motion [51] for rule to show cause is set for hearing on
1/21/2014 at 10:00 AM.
As discussed in open court, discovery disputes relating to
plaintiff's rule to show cause motion are referred to the calendar of Magistrate Judge
Martin.
Mailed notice (jdh)
It was moved up a day. Ccgi's lawyer had to be in new York for another case on wed.
In court tomorrow....hopefully get somewhere.
As far as work goes there isn't anything to release. 80k in revenue in the last 6 months. The way it looks these last 3 aren't going to be good either. So if the court case is causing no work then we have about 18 more months of this.
Just sent you Friday's 350green counterclaim(it's more than crazy)...that's why I think JNSH has at least 2 more years in court, CCGI has unlimited time and money for this.
BTW, how can they counterclaim for damages when the original hasn't been determined?
JNSH will be lucky if they are out of the courts with CCGI by 2015.
350green just filed a counterclaim in the 4020 case(I'm assuming the judge denied their time for leave...haven't uploaded her decision yet).
The 3124 case isn't even close to being done. Haven't even started the damages side of it. CCGI's stalling so far is nothing.
The company's silence sucks, isn't a way to run a public company. I'm more worried about the 6 months plus of next to zero work. Also the 20 million shares they sold for less than .005-that's 15% of the company.
Must be a new pacer filing...not scheduled for tomorrow now.
Both the run to .025 and the drop back to .01 was on pocket change. Until we trade real money this will continue daily.
Not saying 8-10k isn't a lot of money, but in the big picture it's nothing.
Company did sell 20 million at less than a half cent...they're not putting much of a value on the company. I think they could have gotten a better price than that.
Doesn't look like a lot of shares are on the ask, but it seems endless.
I've seriously heard "have patience" one hundred times on this board for the last 3years.
2 totally crap quarters, no work, 20 million dilution, months in a lawsuit and not a peep from the company in 6 months.
From ccgi 10Q...
As of November 14, 2013, the assets
have not been transferred to JNS as the parties are negotiating the specific assets to be transferred.
Closing of the APA is contingent upon a bill of sale which has not been approved by the parties. The net liabilities, $326,283, to be transferred
upon a mutually approved bill of sale based on their respective fair values as of September 30, 2013 consisted of fixed assets, net of
depreciation of $1,272,586 and goodwill of $1,323,425 and liabilities consisted of accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1,800,589 and
deferred revenue of $1,121,975.
As a result of the above events, the Company assessed the carrying value of its goodwill on a qualitative basis for impairment and determined
that no other adjustment for impairment would have been required. The Company will record the adjustment upon the transfer of the assets to
JNS
25k in revenues for the three months(308k total)...not good. Need an update from the company, plus explanation why rev's are at least 50% lower than previous years.
Ya...It's very weird. I've looked at all of them. I'll check the previous ones again tonight.
The biggest problem this stock has is volume.
Our court battle partner has some serious coin flowing into it today...somebody knows.
Too bad Pacer and the reporter from the Chicago Tribune is all we can go by...company hasn't said a word in almost 6 months...pathetic.
Almost every time...by 6-7 pm.
I think you're right. I'm thinking the ruling on the appeal was made and the blink chargers. This hopefully is done and can move on to the damages.
Still nothing new on pacer..only been one time, that I remember, that docs or the next court appearance wasn't uploaded.
One filing, but most were emails...between the lawyers. Hope things get settled this Friday and JNSH can move on.
New filing on pacer...I'll email.
A lot of new completed jobs on jnspower website!...via twitter
Do you let it ride or do you hedge a little?
Can't find another stock with the CMF Indicator above zero for as long as JNSH. Going to be an exciting week.
That's exactly how I read it. Nothing new. I think the judge will throw this out very fast and move to award damages.
New filing on pacer today...hopefully stockbarber can share it...I like this part.
40. Because of 350 Green’s failure to perform under the APA since April 30, 2013,
JNS has been damaged insofar as JNS has incurred additional operational costs and expenses,
including attorney’s fees and costs incurred both before and after the entry of the Court’s
September 24, 2013 order, and will incur additional costs in terms of overtime wages that will be
required to timely complete the network under the terms of the Chicago Grant because of 350
Green’s failure, refusal and delay in performing under the APA.
Ya...next Friday was granted. I would like to know how much the damages will be. Probably won't know til next year for that though.
Volume has always been an issue. Even though since August it has increased...it's still pathetic and that's why no move.
Need a paid promo, if the company is legit, like I think it is, it will bring more awareness to the chicago assets.
Zero pr's in 2nd or 3rd quarter on work done/awarded doesn't help.