Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There's no breach because the dividend was impeccably suspended. The UST simply has to return the funds that don't comply with the statutes.
Oh, boy. Pagliara didn't mention "$12 of back dividends".
He said in the email posted by the accomplice @navycmdr:
BOMBSHELL! PAGLIARA LIED TO US IN THE EMAIL POSTED BY THE ACCOMPLICE, @navycmdr, ON IHUB LAST MONDAY.
In the email, Pagliara said that on May 3rd he will file a 13F report with the SEC, where we'll see that he sold off his entire holdings of FnF common stocks.
I saw the report and it was filed confidentially, first read flag after stating that we could see it. But a convoluted annex .txt file shows that he still held a few common stocks as of March 31.
So, he wanted to spook investors stating that he sold off all, because he's part of the conspirators that want the assault on the ownership of FnF (98% dilution of the existing shareholders), while, at the same time, he wants the investors to purchase the illiquid JPS so that the holders switch them for common stocks.
It seems that the Mafia allows him to keep a few commons for his role as scam artist, trying to trick us into accepting the Moelis Plan of multiple stock offerings (massive dilution)
PagLIARa
— Conservatives against Trump (@CarlosVignote) May 6, 2021
He sent an email to this IHub user to claim that he'll file a 13-F report where we'll see he sold off his entire common stock holding.May3:it was filed confidentially,but there's an annex.txt file that shows he still holds
417,600 FNMA
276,244 FMCC
as of 3/31.#Fanniegate https://t.co/X74L37AR4g pic.twitter.com/srdWXswR7z
Pagliara told us that he sold off his holding in common stocks in the email posted by navycmdr on Monday. You can no longer say that he owns commons.
I saw the 13-F SEC report filed on May 3rd and it was filed confidentially, which is evidence that Pagliara is omitting information from the public. But a convoluted .txt file shows that he sold most of his holding.
You post a link from CNN that hasn't been updated with the recent SEC Filing. Hello?
You are the only guy that believed that the Atty Thompson quit and he told the Justices that now they must follow me on Twitter to see the Defense strategy. ROFL
Oh, boy. You are full of Ç#/&!!!
(*) I you want to learn about FnF matters, read #Fanniegate.
With the $163.5 billion owed by the UST, FnF don't need to raise Capital.
Print it out.
Are you wondering why do I hate conman_Pagliara?
Why don't you ask him why he wants to steal 98% of the ownership of FnF from the shareholders?
He proposes steal 98% of our property and you are paid to harass the people that, like me, are denouncing it on social media.
Your defense of Pagliara stating that he owns tonnes of common stocks to fool the investors, is no longer valid, as he sold off all his stake and he's another JPS holder attempting to rip off the shareholders. But now he can't hide behind his stake in commons as before.
But setting up an Association of Shareholders aiming to rip them off proves that he's a miserable person. A crook.
If you don't understand Finance, step aside.
Retained Earnings is included in the CET1 figure, which is all that matters. The $163.5 billion refund expected from the UST will be recorded as Retained Earnings.
Pagliara can't be more humiliated.A professional career trashed for his behavior on Fanniegate, setting up a phony Association of Shareholders to rip them off and benefit the JPS holders and other hedge-fund managers on the sidelines waiting for stock offerings.
With a dozen paid social media users promoting him almost daily.
A typical scam artist that can't remain quiet.
Lol. Pagliara sold off his common shares! He was a simple custodian of others' positions. Now, his opinions will be more consistent with those of a preferred stockholder in their attempt to rip off the shareholder, and not like before, that he attacked the common stocks and later a regiment of paid social media users pointed out that he can't be attacking the shareholders if he owns a lot of commons.
The stocks aren't valued differently in a Conservatorship than outside a Conservatorship.
The stocks discount the companies's fundamentals and prospects at any moment. And the methods of stock valuation are always the same. If you want to value the stocks at 1 time book value per stock, good for you, but I use the PER multiple of 13 times.
You are repeating the words of Pagliara who said that only outside conservatorship the companies will start reflecting their financials.
Later you post his internet links and praise him.
In the past? The ValueWalk article was published on September 17, 2020.
The twits were posted in February and March of 2020.
Isn't it recent?
At the time he had a position in commons. Theoretically, because I bet that he's a simple custodian of others' positions to fool us.
The friends of our enemies are our enemies.
Now apologize, @chessmaster315.
Who claimed that Pagliara doesn't demand a conversion of the Preferred Stocks for Commons?
This is from a Value Walk's article, where he claims that the conversion for commons is part of a settlement of the lawsuits.
This is a tweet,where he wants the conversion with a haircut.
In this tweet, Pagliara agrees with exercising the warrant.
All translates into the 98% dilution of the shareholders, that is, multiple stock offerings for his buddies hedge fund managers.
Tim Pagliara is a scam artist that wants to rip off the shareholder and set up a phony association of shareholders to trick us into accepting his plans.
Evidence that G.Bradford misrepresented the DOJ's take in the Oral Arguments before the Supreme Court.
BOOM! THE ORAL ARGUMENTS TRANSCRIPT BEFORE @Scotus PROVES THAT BRADFORD MISREPRESENTS @TheJusticeDept's TAKE
— Conservatives against Trump (@CarlosVignote) April 26, 2021
He omits the follow-up to the statement that he cherry-picks.
The same strategy as covering up the statutory provisions that he and the plaintiffs carry out.#Fanniegate https://t.co/73vUMO1FgH pic.twitter.com/fyFbb3Yh0W
He owns a 0.02% stake in FNMA.
Don't post ridiculous internet links.
It's embarrassing every article by Glen Bradford, the latest entitled "Fannie/Freddie Regulator", he doesn't know that the FHFA is the conservator during a conservatorship, not the regulator.
It can't be both because now it has a different authority under the Law.
It's Equity, not Common Equity. It includes the JPS par-value.
It's a derivative claim, not a Takings case.
***BREAKING*** The shareholders mull using the law (RICO Act) created to prosecute the Mafia, against the U.S. Govt.. There's a pattern of racketeering activity and all of the individuals involved are hired by the same enterprise: U.S. Govt. This law allows to go after the Godfather: the U.S. Congress.
The shareholders will defeat the defendants with just this sentence: "The authority of UST granted in the law, is related to the purchase of obligations and securities, but the UST hasn't purchased a damn thing. The UST has received the following items as of today: $301 billion in cash, $229 billion worth of SPS, plus a 79.9% Beneficial Ownership of FnF. Everything without a proper use of its authority. How is it possible? No further questions, your Honor."
No. No "thanks bro" to Glen Bradford.
You and Guido are Portuguese, right? Are you an elderly man as well? I see a pattern here.
Now, the shareholders are represented by me, free of charge. Read #Fanniegate.
Thompson is the corrupt lawyer for the hedge fund manager Berkowitz.
If you don't understand that there is a conspiracy to cover up all the statutory provisions, so that the 10% dividend and the warrant prevail and that makes fnf have to issue tonnes of common stocks to the hedge funds, better go somewhere else.
Their plan dilutes the existing shareholders 98% in their company.
This is for people with knowledge in finance and law.
Thompson is not "our lawyer".
PagLIARa is a liar. He wants to rip off the shareholders. He and the attorney for the hedge fund manager, Berkowitz, advocate for the 10% dividend to Treasury, the warrant exercised and a swap preferred for common stocks.
If you haven't read it, then remain quiet.
The 10% dividend is illegal in the Charter. You are promoting the conspirators tha want to rip off the shareholders. Step aside.
"Public statements" aren't a substitution for the law.
Pagliara is a scam artist. You don't understand that he agrees with the 10% dividend, the warrant and a conversion of JPS for common stocks, with the goal of making FnF issue tonnes of common stocks for his buddies hedge fund managers, that would buy stocks at rigged prices.
FnF have a low cost borrowing right from UST, the warrant is illegal and the JPS can't get converted into common stocks.
The difference is that with Pagliara's plan, the stocks are worth very little, with rigged stock offerings every two years at $3, $3.5, $4,.. whereas with my plan, the commons are worth between $187ps and $255 ps today.
Please, step aside. You are damaging our interests.
By the way, I don't recall that you posted something false, because I don't read anything you post. Now that I know you, I bet that everything you post is false.
If you don't understand that the post about the attorney Thompson was a joke, you have a problem.
Tim Pagliara is our enemy.
Only those that read #Fanniegate daily know why the stocks rally.
In the latest analysis, both the defendant and the plaintiff are accused of perjury, that is, an attempt to mislead the judges with lies, with regard to the letter sent by the Solicitor General to the Supreme Court and the reply brief by the plaintiff.
Both said that FnF are building up capital now, when that's false. The attorney Thompson said that it's "ephemeral" because he implies that no journal entry (how transactions get recorded on the companies' books on a daily basis) is required at the time of the transaction, so the Capital amount will be reduced in the future, when the SPS are redeemed.
The truth is that an offset must be recorded at the time of the increase in the SPS Liquidation Preference for free and that reduces the Core Capital, so the outcome is that FnF aren't building up Capital.
The more felonies are committed, the more moral and punitive damages, because they act a settlement with the equity holders.
There isn't a dual authority of the FHFA. When the FHFA director appointed the FHFA as conservator, it can no longer be regulator until FnF are released from conservatorship.
The new rules are already set forth in the law.
The FHFA remains being a Federal Agency.
Different authority, not dual authority.
You don't need to say "thanks".
The emails aren't a substitution for the Law. So, no one cares what unknown people say one another on emails.
The first person that posts a statutory provision gets a cookie.
Why don't you post the statutory provisions like I'm doing?
The plaintiffs are being accused of covering them up for the assault attempt on the ownership of FnF, the common stock.
A little bit of history about the PRIME corrective action: the Restriction on Capital Distributions.
The fact that the FHEFSSA mirrors the banks' FDI Act, proves the point that this provision is the key. A provision concealed by the plaintiffs.
This is it!
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1378953460201181189.html
That Parrot guy is a Don Nadie. FnF are ruled by Laws, not by emails from a guy that I still don't know who is he.
The plaintiffs' tactic in Court is to add up all the garbage they can find in order to divert the attention from the statutory provisions that govern the conservatorship and the Charter.
The debate is when acting as conservator. I think that Kavanaugh was talking figuratively as a way to transmit the idea that the FHFA is at the helm of a private corporation and not the opposite, that Fannie Mae became a Federal Agency.
But the DOJ saw the opportunity to now claim that the U.S. isn't responsible for the FHFA's actions.
THE SHAREHOLDERS ISSUE A WARNING AGAINST JUSTICE KAVANAUGH
The then judge Kavanaugh ruled in a 2017 case (HERRON vs FNMA) that the FHFA changed its status, shed its Govt character and became a private party, when it was appointed conservator of FnF.
This is what the DOJ wants to hear from the Supreme Court as it's the reason why it wants the case dismissed in the CFC as outlined in its reply brief 10 days ago in the Appellate Court.
It explained that it agrees with the FHFA is an Agency, but it points out that it "shed its Govt character" and thus, "its actions aren't attributable to the Govt."
The thing is that no one cares what the DOJ and Kavanaugh mean with "character". The FHFA is a Federal Agency and the United States is liable for the FHFA's breach of the statutory provisions and also for the damages for carrying out a secret plan.
THE FnF SHAREHOLDERS WARN JUSTICE #KAVANAUGH ON HIS 2017 HERRON🆚FNMA RULING
— Conservatives against Trump (@CarlosVignote) April 4, 2021
Then judge:"@FHFA changed its status & became a private party",which is what @TheJusticeDept seeks to dismiss the case.
It's always an Agency.Thus,it can't shed its Govt character.Huh?#Fanniegate @Scotus https://t.co/2US0tlBtEH pic.twitter.com/ixAZRVunYd
The plaintiff Bryndon Fisher has no shame and he comes to this board seeking a public recognition reward, after seeking the same with his pathetic behavior in court, begging judge Sweeney to continue in the Appellate court despite that Fairholme is the de facto lead plaintiff. So, he's the "special" plaintiff that has to be treated different and he's allowed to file briefs as Amicus every time the Court sends a brief to Fairholme, an Amicus brief that won't be read by the judge, obviously.
He agrees with the 10% dividend to Treasury, when FnF have special borrowing rights from Treasury in the Charter.
He also is reluctant to challenge the warrant until it's exercised. So, he, in truth, is negotiating exercising the warrant and later start a multi-year litigation in court with a "derivative claim" (he says), when every action like this one, can only be challenged as a breach of one of the statutory provisions that he covers up. For instance, the warrant is a security that the UST was only authorized to purchase under its TEMPORARY authority in HERA, "to protect the taxpayer". A protection means a collateral of its investment in SPS.
Another "accessory" working for the investors that want to rip us off.
Guido and Fisher praise each other as mandated, but this is my award: cookie?
They fool no one.
The NWS, the warrant, the 10% dividend, the SPS increased for free and the payment of moral and punitive damages.
You only say the NWS, like the conspirators Pagliara, Ackman, Berkowitz, Bryndon Fisher and T. Howard that want to steal my property.
Step aside.
Pagliara, Ackman, Berkowitz and Tim Howard to the BOD?
It's time to unmask the internet users that are praising the investors that want to harm our economic interests and these four are the best example.
Please, leave this message board and Yahoo's.