Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ouch,OK now I got!
Good night to all!
What is pure sarcasm ?
Who is "we" and how could you know that?
Wrongobongo!
VPLM has had previous contact with aapl as well as others.
Through an investment firm as well as a tech co in Arizona according to documents distributed by Mr Sawyer!
IMO
Looking at all the posts generated by the announcements of recent leaves one question,why announce before service?
Was it to sell stock?
The same posters always back each other no matter what?
Imo
now it is apparent you have no clue as to what transpired,cannot wait to see the trial...IMO
just spoke to RK,what depo and when and where,he accepts that ride if his calender is open at that time.
How did VPLM pay for DIGI?
How could you believe so passionately about gossip of a person you have not met?
you still have not answered the question
Clearly you have not answered my question,as a shareholder in VPLM,why is there no interest in how VPLM paid for DIGI and pay for the development of the patents?
Hey Stef,
You seem to have a lot of knowledge in regards to VoIP-pal,could you respond to my last post?
Stef07,your comment is almost on the button however this firm has been representing VoIP-Pal for several years and has nothing to do with the lame 2014/15 financials!
How about 2012/13....the years VPLM paid for Digifonica and to complete the PATENTS
It is hard to believe the share holders don't want to know how it was all paid for,aren't you??...IMO
Agreed Budman,starting to look a lot better,congrats VPLM shareholders!!!
Show up for what,the fed case was stayed?
What does your comment have to do with my answer to the other gentlemen about MALAK?
You seem to answer my posts with comments about Kippling,who cares about him,what you should be concerned about is why there isn't interest in the patents?
Chang had pointsphone working well enough to have LI tested and proven with TATA and retail but when MALAK was asked to test/apply the others as they were approved he insisted to have it shut down.....this is what Konstantine said himself
IMO and several/dozens believe the answer to your question is EMIL MAlak scammed Chang and his financiers into paying off his tax debt and pay for the patents....that's also why they audited years 2014/15 and not 2013 which is where ALL the answers are.
I hope this helps VPLM shareholders so they may start asking the questions to get the answers that are MATTER.
JMO
It should
So stef07 you are saying VoIP-pals case is so weak you suggest the least they can do is waist the courts time and the judges time as to run up costs to punish Locksmith and the rest......WOW what ever happened to integrity and who will pay the damages when VPLM loses?
The shareholders imo
Do you know him or is your opinion based on ihub?
U nailed it but.....imo
NYT
EXCELLENT article,thanks for showing the balance as it,in my opinion shows the depth and breadth of what Malak has done to insure the patents will survive a challenge!
Understand something ,there is no fraud until proven in court,there isn't a criminal until proven in court,
Not at all.
Accuse,not cause.
The deal was struck when it was trading sub penny,stock was delivered much later when it was trading higher,GBC you always fail to tell the complete story.but then you do not know the truth as you always post allegations....not results AFTER it has been in front of a judge,hell,I could cause you of being Santa Clause,does that make you Santa?
Which has been stayed,it was filed after the State case.
Take a look at the FALSE allegations,it would be impossible for someone to do....IMO
"Case vs Kipping"
Why are you saying it like that?
Try the truth!
Locksmith/Kipping vs VoIP-pal...BOD.
This is how it started after all isn't it.
VPLM is the defendant and always has been along with the BOD.
We have read and verified the claims against VPLM etal and it seems MALAK will have some ess'plainin to do Lucy!!
IMO
They had an opportunity to "employ" the patents on VoIP-pals hybrid switch however their chief engineer whom VoIP-pal paid 30 million shares refused to install ,acting on orders from Malak.
Tata communications tested LI for them.
Would this have made a difference to being a troll ?
IMO
Arthur,I have noticed in many of your postings you seem to have a thread about Kevin Kreisler,is there a relationship between KK and VoIP-pal?
Were you using a discount service or a broker?
They keep moving the dates out further two years to make it look like Digifonica was acquired with the LI patent granted and acquisition in 2013 ,look at that last joke of a news release.....Chang and Malak signed the deal in 2012.
Smoke and mirrors ,the audit delay is a farce!
IMO
You are correct....3years since VoIP-pal paid for the final development of LI!
Seems odd MALAK stated in his latest news release that the acquisition of Digi was 2013?
That is Malaks responsibility.
And Malak is not ,in that lies the answer.
I do not believe you understand the relationship VoIP-pal,not Malak has with the two firms you speak of.
Smart and Biggar file what the PATENT CONSULTANT/MALAK and the engineers comes up with and forward it to their(SMARTandBiggars) USA counterpart (Knobbs) to file with the USPTO......you make it sound like he has a high powered bank of attorneys doing his bidding...bunch of nonesense,he couldn't pay them until KIPPING and NMR And Locksmith Came along...with VPLM
IMHO
Not really other than objectivity and the fact that I know both Malak and RK.
Follow the money.
Myself as well as several others have a lot invested in VPLM and want to see us all get what we paid for as well as all the shareholders we know that invested thinking our"Stellar" BOD would get the job done by now,I am sure as you do!
Imo
Ok now you got me again "Cisco ?
"Patent friend"please explain!
Where is the proof of any thing you say?
Allegations have been brought on both sides but there hasn't even been a discovery yet.
Using the words "criminal" and "illegal " can be used for Malak as well after all Emil provided a place for his brother and his Prostitutes to ply their trade.
Not exactly squeaky clean.
IMHO