Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I explained to you that there is no fraud. Dr Gil was fully capable of paying the money & emu was fully capable of accepting the "offer", but what's to stop them from having a preconceived private agreement that the offer would not be accepted. How could fraud ever be proved? It couldn't be (unless they were stupid about it & used emails or texts). Do you understand that it was reported right here on this board, 2 mos earlier than the PR, that the Emu had made a deal with Dr Gil to boost vplm?? Do you understand THAT? Do you not believe that? Do you need to see it?
And also, how do you figure 20 cents? The "offer" was only to the Emu, not to shareholders.
Re: ".20 bid"
The so called "offer" was not for the company or the patents, it was for Emu's shares. So I'm not sure what "bid" that equates to or not? In my opinion (and some others as well...) it was not a real offer at all. It was a ploy. Do you honestly think .20 could ever be accepted after all the years of this alleged fight for the promised 10's to 100's of billions of dollars? Of course not... In any event, it was a phony offer. As reported here several times, the Emu and/or Dr Gil were overheard (or leaked) making a deal (Emu hired him) to find a way to boost the price of vplm. They were overheard making this deal at least 2 mos before the announcement of the alleged "offer", or more. The conversation was reported here 2 mos before, but could've taken place even longer ago. I have posted a copy of the report made here, a couple of times after. The way I see it, after that "deal" was heard about to boost a sagging vplm, no way the subsequent "offer" for Emu's shares, could be seen a true offer. I see it as a ploy to boost the price (it failed..).
Some say Dr Gil or his "group" could not & would not risk being busted for making a phony offer. I say, they had nothing to worry about because no doubt Dr Gil had the money & it was known ahead of time & a forgone conclusion that the "offer" would not be accepted. So the ploy could never be proven. I think they were friends & maybe Dr Gil owed a favor or something along those lines. It certainly would not be the 1st time that vplm has used questionable and/or downright lying tactics in attempt to sell shares, boost the pps & garner new shareholders. If you don't know that to be absolute fact, you don't know vplm. Vplm has a clear track record of lying to shareholders in the I terest of perpetuating the fiat share printing/selling machine that vplm has been from day one.
Vplm... The leader w/no followers
The "company" w/no sales
The sue-er w/no wins
The promiser w/none kept
The billions & billions never to be seen
Patents PROVEN to have no value to anyone, anywhere, anytime.
A pipe dream
A Mirage
Smoke & mirrors
Dust in the wind
As usual, for the past 10 yrs, all there is is yap, yap, yap about all these alleged great things happening.......meanwhile, back at ranch reality, Mr Market says no, no, noooo, no! I think the majority see what a bunch of smoke & mirrors make up this play. The patents have proven worthless ever since created & all they are is a smokescreen for a very well executed fiat share printing/selling machine that benefits only the inside & their supporters. Patents supposed to be worth hundreds of billions (according to vplm) yet never a sale, a license, a partnership or even an offer.
Ppl that are supposed to be smart about this play, fail to deal with such blatant realities as Emu saying digi paid some $17 or $18 million to make the software & then they follow that act with saying (reporting) that they no longer wish to be in the VoIP business & just want to sell the patents for cost & peg that to be under $400k. (what happened to it was $17 million??? And how could they spend $17 million on something worthless???
No one so much as questioned that... They just let them get away with any & all BS.
So then they wind up taking over vplm after saying they wanted out of the business.
Then they swear up & down 6 ways to Sunday, for nearly 2 yrs, that they tested the software but never give any test results.....doink.....
And that they would forthwith be folding the software into the vplm Voip platform AND will be immediately gaining millions of new subscribers (never happened) AND will immediately begin collecting upwards of $100 million per yr in royalties & blah, blah, blah in the PRs for 2 yrs...
And they totally & completely reneged on all of that bullshit AFTER THEY MADE SURE THEY SOLD MANY MANY SHARES & GARNERED MANY NEW SHAREHOLDERS!!!
It was nothing but box of lies & when they reneged on all of it, NO ONE CARED! NO ONE TOOK THEM TO TASK FOR IT. They were allowed to get away with it & that's why the scheme succeeded to this day.
There is no way in this world or this universe that every single voip service provider on the planet, all alleged by vplm to be infringers, would think the same thoughts as to the value of the patents & the threat of infringment damages that would eventually come their way.....and not be the least bit concerned and it one of them to ever buy or license or partner with a company who claims the patents are the end all & be all of the communication industry, thus hold an insane amount of power.....and they could've grabbed it for a song or at least protected themselves from the INEVITABLE infringment damages & triple damages.
It's unbelievable that ppl ACCEPT all that as NO PROBLEM - VPLM ROCKS!
SO 10 to 15 yrs later YOU GOT WHAT YOU ASKED FOR BY ALLOWING ALL THAT TO SLIDE & COULDN'T CARE LESS ABOUT TEST RESULTS, PROOF OF INFRINGMENT, THE BIG UNKEPT PROMISES, OR any of that crap..
Karma
Boy oh boy, are the monkey wrenches gonna start flying now, imho...
That's all you'll ever see here, excuses for this, excuses for that... And that's another thing vplm thrives on, supporters & beliebers who make excuse for all of vplm's misgivings. Vplm has them wrapped around their finger of one hand while the other hand is cranking the fiat share printing/selling machine... Excuses after excuses after excuses for all that's wrong with this play. And they have been allowed to get away with so many shady things. Their motto is: "can't touch this".
That's right, but I'm guessing there's some preloaded good excuses for THAT as well??
The fact that some wont/don't accept that vplm has BLATANTLY lied to them, over & over, going way back to pre acquisition times, boggles my mind. The furtiveness of vplm is so obvious, Helen Keller could see & get it.
For what reason? Link? I don't know how to get there..
As I've stated before, my answer as to why the other companies spend so much defending against vplm is simply because they have to, otherwise they lose by default.
And vplm spends so much on legal & everything else because that's what it takes to make it look real & legit & stay out of trouble w/the sec, et al. In fact, everything IS REAL! except the patents efficacy, need & value. But those things do not have to be proven in order to gain patenthood, thus its all real & legal, but will never sell. And there's still about 9 more yrs of this 3 ring circus to go.
All the posted reasons for why would vplm do this, that & the other if it was a scam are nothing but very shortsighted observations. Yes, they are all great sounding reasons......when one doesn't understand the true nature of vplm. In order for such a scheming operation to be as successful as it has been & continues to be.....without eventually getting busted.....it has to be a very very sophisticated plan & execution. In fact, it has to do everything necessary to not only appear but actually BE a legal operation, despite the fact that it's goals & outcomes are not what the shareholders want & expect & never will be. The real goals & accomplishments are cloaked by all the perfectly legitimate actions that surround it at all times. There is only one thing that is not legit but it is so well hidden by all the other activities. And that is that the patents are useless, worthless junk while vplm has spent the last 10 yrs doing everything it takes to convince you otherwise.
There is a reason why this company has no sales, no licenses, no settlements, no partners, no regular revenue and a 97%, 4 yr long downtrend, while all along the way, you keep hearing about what a great position it's in & buyouts always around the corner & all that's needed is PERPETUAL & undying patience.
Most experienced otc goers know it's a bogus patent play & have no doubts about it.
The rest are bamboozled by the unusual level of planning & sophistication behind vplm.
When one askes for proof of the results of the alleged worldwide nodal testing, in every case all you get is crickets. And for good reason...Because no one can produce such proof. Vplm does not want to get into discovery, for that's when the big reveal will happen.
"watch & see what happens"???
Lol, I've been watching & seeing what happens for 10 yrs. My take on how vplm operates & why is just as clear to me as your theories are to you. And my predictions have all come true for yrs, not just talk & hope.
I also have my own ideas as to what it often means when there is self praise as to how big, bad & great one's things are, albeit their wallet or any other things. These are just my opinions. Others milage may vary...
There are certainly more than one possible reason, esp when it comes to a circus like vplm, for why they filed new suits. Why did the Emu twice file suit against Cameron, swearing he would see the case thru to the end...and then walk out on the 1st day? There was zero evidence for a payoff & several indications there was not?
Why did Dr Gil make the so called "offer" that the Emu could never accept?
Why did Microsoft apply for essentially the same LI patent as vplm when they knew they had not a chance in getting it approved since it was the same & was 2 yrs later after vplm applied?
Why did vplm tell its shareholders & other readers at large, exactly what they were going to do with the newly acquired patents, in detail, and then without rhyme, reason or any notice, totally renege on it, to instead become a patent troll poster child? And soooo many other anomalies along the way (that have very good dot connecting reasons when vplm is seen for what it is, ie, a fiat share printing & selling scheme that has benefitted numerous insiders & the cabal.
I can "spell M-O-N-E-Y too. Here, let me spell it: The pps is down again today, on the news! I think I spelled that right...
"THEY ARE GETTING MONEY SETTLEMENT FROM THE TWO BEFORE..."
.........................
THEY ARE GETTING MONEY???
WHERE? WHEN? WHERE IS THIS MONEY???
or is that just a fantasy made up from thin air or wishful thinking. TO ME, "they are getting" sounds like it's supposed to be fact. VERY MUCH THE SAME KIND OF VERBIAGE PRACTICED BY VPLM IN THEIR PRs for the past 10 yrs. If they are "GETTING MONEY" where is it????
"Has as much of a chance of winning as suing China for Chopsticks infringement."
That's hilarious!
"Isn't it part of the plan to keep this going?"
Exactly right!
If vplm can muster some really, really, REALLY big news......maybe we will hit sub-penny?
And I must again bring to attention...
The FACT that in almost every case, the more the volume is turned up about court cases & new cases & how utterly positive it all is.....
The more the smartest stock guy on the planet, Mr Market, shows his disagreement, by lowering the pps, almost w/o fail.
Jez sayin
Vplm been creating the illusion that there will be settlements, for the past approx 10 yrs. That illusion has been designed to sell shares & gain sharehders to support the house of cards. They have even lied on several occasions that there were impending deals & "offers on the table", because vplm will do anything & say anything in order to perpetuate the fiat share printing/selling lemonade stand that have & there have been enough supporters to keep it afloat.
" I TRULLY NOW BELIEVE THAT VPLM WILL HIT .50 AGAIN IMO."
Vplm never hit .50 in the 1st place
Nah, that would be meaningful & substantive. Vplm doesn't deal in meaningful & substantive.
I'd like to see total buys & total sells to date
And just as much selling apparently, since the pps goes basically nowhere. And that's true for the past 4 yrs. A simple look at the 5 yr chart shows that.
In my opinion, that's a dumb strategy, whereby IF a company believes the patents are "ALL THAT", they would never allow their competitors to snatch the patents out from under them. Remember...these patents were said to be the total control of Voip, worldwide & that ALL other Voip service providers were in violation & that there was NO WAY AROUND THAT FACT! and that the patents were necessary for Voip services to continue. And were worth billions & billions. Any company that believed then, that they indeed were infringing, would be playing Russian roulette to not do SOMETHING to protect themselves from the INEVITABLE incoming meteors w/THEIR name on it. But the reality IS and HAS BEEN that neither threats, nor years, nor lawyers, nor judges nor courts, nor damages, nor triple damages, nor threats to greatly raise the damages models, nor the fact that vplm has been able to, contrary to the past popular opinion, keep on keepin on year after year after year. NONE of that produced any patent purchases, nor licenses, nor partnerships, nor any sign of weakness or worry from any of the accused companies. Zip, nada, nothing. And that is true to this day, even tho some trials are moving fwd & discovery seems to get closer & closer... That speaks volumes.
Not the way I recall it...
I dont think 50 companies were notified & I don't think 50 companies were told they were in violation of patents...
The way I remember it, approx 50 companies were named by vplm & posted on their website & very soon thereafter those names were all removed. Why, I don't know, but I remember it happened & my guess would be that vplm was violating some kind of law by posting those names & had to remove them. Maybe, maybe not, but that's certainly how it looked to me at the time.
Additionally, I remember there was a longtime push, here, for vplm to send infringement letters out. There were many calls for that but it didn't happen for a long time. Some were calling vplm a coward for not sending out such infringement letters. I remember this clearly. Finally, after a very long time, we were notified that some, a very few, a small number of letters went out & in fact, those letters were posted on the vplm website & when read, I characterized them as "love letters", as they simply informed the few companies that "they MAY BE infringing & need to take a look at it. As I recall, there were also a few responses posted, which in every case, they told vplm they were not infringing & were not interested in entertaining any such claims & basically told vplm to go pound salt.
And to my knowledge & memory, no other letters of infringment were ever sent out!
I would be very much interested in seeing anything to contradict the above. Nor do I believe it generated any negotiations whatsoever.
I would love to see someone give a good reason why vplm quickly retracted those 50 or so named companies from their website.
Useless information...supposed to drive your imagination...you can't get no..no, no, no.
Hasn't done anything nice for me.. Has it done anything nice for you?
THIS COULD BE THE WEEK!
...when a new record is set for notices of court dates, filings & other assorted & sundry actions, but worthless in terms of value for shareholders.
Nothing to see here...move along...
(unless you're into collecting useless court dates & filings)
Isn't it amazing there isn't a single voip services provider or any other kind of investor with brains enough to buy, license or partner with vplm??? No good answer for that one...
If you're here to check on the fwd progress of vplm, yes, it's still wasting your time...
# check here to send a personalized thanks to the CEO for all his wonderful efforts to keep you updated on all news of the Company.
"Thats 6 more million in less than one month. Shows why pps continues to collapse."
....................................
Gotta pay the crew somehow.....
"And no, ‘missys shares’ are never coming back that is a lie perpetrated by the company. They’ve been pumping that crap for years.
...............................
You must mean the dirt ball company...
"Please continue waiting... We are experiencing higher than usual delay tactic volume. We will get to you as soon as possible. We appreciate your continued virtuous patience & all your generous contributions, which help greatly in our endeavor to print more fiat shares for your buying pleasure!
Apparently, nothing to get hung about....
Be advised...this is a waiting room only & for those with never ending patience. So get to the back of the bus, sit down & exercise the virtue of everlasting patience. Those are vplm reqirements.
Basically, thats all that vplm amounts to:
A WAITING PERIOD...
Basically, that's ALL that vplm amounts to:
A waiting period...
I've long ago accepted the loss of money I will have for the remaining shares I own & I must say that cost is well worth the entertainment value driven by vplm, especially since there is likely to be at least another 9 yrs of the same daily bs & many willing to keep buying the fiat shares. Vplm, the land of mirages... It's just a bad Holodeck program..
As far as I know, there is no such case as "vplm vs Kipping". There was a voip-pal.com vs locksmith financial, rk, tk, etc. As I said, it was dismissed w/o prejudice long ago. I'm not sure, as I don't do too well reading legalese, but it looks like it was brought up again in the locksmith vs VP trial (that vplm lost) as a counterclaim (VP against locksmith) and they lost the counterclaims as well, as far as I can read it and I'll now post the documentation to support what I'm saying...
.......................
1st the orig vplm vs locksmith that was dismissed:
VOIP-PAL.COM, a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC., a British Columbia entity; TK INVESTMENT, a British Columbia entity; RICHARD G. KIPPING, an individual; TERRY KWAN, an individual; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE ENTITIES XI through M, inclusive, Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Nevada, Clark County.
September 14, 2016.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a)
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Nature of Suit: 370 Fraud
Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Adam R. Knecht , Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sander.
Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Kurt R. Bonds , Alverson Taylor Mortensen, et al.
Locksmith Financial Corporation, Inc., Defendant, represented by Elaine A. Dowling & Harold P. Gewerter , Harold P. Gewerter, Esq., Chtd..
TK Investment, Defendant, represented by Elaine A. Dowling .
Richard G Kipping, Defendant, represented by Elaine A. Dowling .
Terry Kwan, Defendant, represented by Elaine A. Dowling .
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
ECF No. 26
JENNIFER DORSEY, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, VOIP-PAL.COM, by and through its attorney of record KURT BONDS, ESQ., and ADAM R. KNECHT, ESQ., of the law firm ALVERSON TAYLOR MORTENSEN & SANDERS, and Defendants LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC.; TK INVESTMENT; RICHARD G. KIPPING, and TERRY KWAN, by and through their attorney of record, HAROLD P. GEWERTER, ESQ., and ELAINE A. DOWLING, ESQ., of the law firm of GEWERTER & DOWLING, that the above entitled matter be dismissed without prejudice, each side to bear their own attorney fees and costs and a mutual release regarding the subject matter hereof is granted to all parties to this Stipulation.
The Parties agree that the Stipulation does not affect the parties or have any preclusive effect on any ongoing litigation in any other jurisdiction. Furthermore, the parties agree that any claims that have been filed by either party with respect to this action to date; will be tolled until the conclusion of the Clark County, Nevada district court case.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedural 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows the parties to dismiss a case without court approval if all parties sign the stipulation:
(a) Voluntary Dismissal.(1) By the Plaintiff.(A) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing:. . .(ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.
All of the parties agree to the Stipulation. Rules 23(e), 23.1(c), 23.2 and 66 do not apply.
ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 26], IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSEDATED this __ day of ____, 2016. This case.
..................
And the key language as to the outcome of the counterclaims (VP vs locksmith) is as follows:
"...and having awarded Defendants nothing by way of their counterclaims and third-party claims."
.....................
So the orig case was dismissed & when brought up as a counterclaim in locksmith vs VP, the claims of VP were denied. (see above).
Thus if there is still an VP vs RK case ongoing, I'm not aware of it.
By paying attention, one would know the simple & obvious fact of the matter is that vplm vs locksmith was dismissed long ago...simple, because it doesn't take much to know the difference between vplm vs locksmith & locksmith vs vplm & obvious, because both facts have been posted here before. Both sides began their sue me/sue you actions long ago, like 2015, give or take... At some point vplm vs locksmith was dismissed by mutual agreement, as far as I know. Locksmith vs vplm ended a couple yrs ago with the verdicts I've posted several times...you know....where vplm, Emu at the top of the list, along with Sawyer, et al, we're found by a jury of their peers, to be guilty of, responsible for, or however you want to characterize it, "unjust enrichment" & "breach of fiduciary duty". I don't know what's so hard get...unless the above facts are wrong. I think not.
boomshaka...
Why, are there developments more current in that case? The verdict was only about 2 yrs ago. Later, vplm paid the fines & damages. What is it that you want?
ON JUNE 16,2015
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORP.ANNOUNCES THAT ON APRIL 30,2015 A COMPLAINT
WAS FILED AGAINST VOIP-PAL.COM.INC., OTC Pink: VPLM
CASE NO.: A-15-717491-C DEPT.NO.: I
DISTRICT COURT ,CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORP (Plaintiff)
? vs
VOIP-PAL.COM.INC , a Nevada corporation
THOMAS SAWYER, an individual
EMIL MALAK, an individual
EDWIN CANDY, an individual
COLIN TUCKER , an individual
DENNIS CHANG, an individual
DOES I through X, inclusive
and ROE ENTITIES XI through M, inclusive
? Defendants
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORP. FILED PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'S MOTION TO DISMISS and MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORP. (Debt Capital,Corporate Finance,Private Placement and Debt Financing for Public Companies-)
COMPLAINT FOR:
?1) Breach of Contract
2) Fraud/ Misrepresentation
?3) Securities Fraud
?4) Breach of Fiduciary Duty
5) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and fair Dealing
?6) Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Arbitration Exemption Requested:
Amount in Controversy Exceeds
$50,000.00
?
?2.VOIP-Pal.ComWAS SERVED AT THE OFFICE OF THE RESIDENT AGENT ON MAY 21,2015
1.????EMIL Malak SERVED MAY 4, 2015
....................................................
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC., et al. vs. VOIP-PAL.COMq, INC., et al. CASE NO.: A-15-717491-C DEPT. NO.: 25
having heard and considered the testimony, evidence, proof and arguments offered by the respective 4 parties and the cause then having been submitted to the Jury for decision, the Jury being fully advised 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18
in the premises; and having duly rendered its verdict, in favor of the above-named Plaintiff Locksmith Financial Corporation, and against the Defendants Emil Malak, Dennis Chang, Thomas Sawyer, Colin Tucker, Edwin Candy, and Mike Waggett on the cause of action of breach of fiduciary duty; and having rendered its verdict in favor of above-named Third-Party Counterclaimant TK Investment, Ltd. and against the Defendant VOIP-Pal.com, Inc. on the claim of unjust enrichment; and having awarded Defendants nothing by way of their counterclaims and third-party claims. NOW, THEREFORE, the Court being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, That Judgment be entered in favor of
Plaintiff Locksmith ·Financial Corporation and against Defendants Emil Malak, Dennis Chang, Thomas Sawyer, Colin Tucker, Edwin Candy, and Mike Waggett, on the claim of Breach of Fiduciary+
Duty, in the amount of $355,000.00, plus pre-judgment interest from May 21, 2015 in the amount of
$91 .306.17 (calculation attached as "Exhibit 1").
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, That Judgment is entered in favor the
19 Third-Party Plaintiff TK Investment, Ltd. and against Defendant VOIP-Pal.com, Inc., on the claim of
20 Unjust Enrichment, 1n the amount of $84,000.00, plus pre-judgment interest from January 29, 2019 in 21 the amount of $3,456.53 (calculation attached as "Exhibit 1"). 22 I I I
23 Ill 24 Ill 25 I I I 26 I I I 27 I I I 28
3
.................................
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC., et al. vs. VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., et al. CASE NO.: A-15-717491-C DEPT. NO.: 25
2 3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, That judgment is entered in favor of 4 Counterdefendants and Third-Party Defendants, against Counterclaimant and Third-Party Defendant, 5 respectively. 6 7 8 9 10 Submitted by:
d3d DATED this day of
11 LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL E. SMITH, ESQ., P.C. :~~~~
14 Randall Tindall (6522)
1515 E. Tropicana Ave., Ste 530 15 LasVegas,Nevada 89119
16 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Third-Party Defendants
and Third-Party Plaintiff
17 Approved as to form and content by:
18 19 20 21 Kurt R. Bonds (6228)
OR& SANDERS
22 Adam R. Knecht (13166)
6605 Grand Montecito Pkwy 23 Las Vegas, Nevada 89149
24 MALEK MOSS PLLC
25 Kevin N. Malek (pro hac vice)
340 Madison Avenue, FL 19 26 New York, New York 10173
27 Attorneys for Defendant, Counterclaimants and Third-Party Claimants
28
4
............................
2 , _)
4 5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
EXHIBIT 1
?, ~-'
24 25 26 27 28
5
........................
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Period Beginning:
05/2112015 1 07/0112015 01/0112016 07/0112016 01/0112017 07/01/2017 01/01/2018 07/01/2018 I 01/01/2019 07/01120 19j
INTEREST CALCUALTION
Prime
Judgment Interest
Interest
Rate ( 0/o) Rate (Prime + 2°/o)
3.25 5.25 3.25
5.25 3.50 5.50 3.50 5.50 3.75 5.75 4.25 6.25 4.50 6.50 5.00
7.00 5.50 7.50 5.50 7.50 TOTALS:
27 1 Calculated from date of service of summons, May 21, 2015 Calculated from date Counterclaim was filed, January 29, 2019 Calculated through Aug. 16, 2019 date ofjury verdict
28
6
$ Interest on $355,000.00
4,594.54 9,318.75 9,762.50 9,762.50 10,206.25 11,093.75 11,537.50 12,425.00 13,312.50 3,428.42 91,306.17
$ Interest on $84,000.00
2,645.302
811.23 3,456.53
Really a shame all the frustrated & disappointed shareholders and the number of them grows everyday, not only underwater many are but salt gets rubbed into the wound by the never ending "patience is a virtue" & "vplm is in its best position ever, a so called company that labels itself as the "technical leader of the Voip idustry. A leader...with NO followers...
And no income forever! No revenue, aside from selling fiat shares...
And nothing but losses in court re: infringment
And found to be "in breach of fiduciary duty" & committed "unjust enrichment".
And far more TALK about talks, than actual talks...
And a 4 yr long MASSIVE 97% downtrend & loss..
And in the negative for 1 week, 6mos, 1yr, 3 yrs & 5 yrs. The only brackets not negative, 3 mow & 6 mos, are only in the black by .000 decimal numbers. It goes on & on & on... Fighting judges, all the BOD has got up & went...
It's a riot how the market, Mr Market, which possesses ALL the accumulated data & knowledge there is to possess, thus the most accurate, logical & factual laden reflections, in its posted pps, etc......DOES NOT AGREE, AT ALL W/ANY OF THESE POSITIVE & so called, lol, "best position ever" calls, whatsoever, but it agrees w/me & I agree w/it. Funny that... All playing out the way I've guessed, opined & predicted, for the last several years... Funny that, lol