Raisng grandkids mostly...full custody of my daughter's 4 yahoo's..2 boys ages 12 & 8, 2 girls ages 4 and 18 months! Dave37308 UTube channel
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Author Topic: In CYPT at .72 for a bounce..eom
Dave
Moderator posted January 29, 2004 13:53
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
!
IP: Logged
man4apenny
Member posted January 29, 2004 14:40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Dave:
!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hope it's a fast bounce. Check out our-streets.com They do research on scam stocks and they showed up there. Sorry, Didn't mean to rain on your parade.
IP: Logged
Dave
Moderator posted January 29, 2004 14:44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know about that..all I know is I'm $60 ahead at the moment..One dollar a minute..I can handle that!
and my Freetade.com is practically zero comissions is why i jump on little trades like that..they mount up..
IP: Logged
Dave
Moderator posted January 29, 2004 14:54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afterthought...our-streets.com?..heck, somebody there may have a short positon on it..who knows?..
PERSONALLY, I THINK ALL STOCKS are a little ~shady~..I know several business owners and they've ALL told me, in one way or another, that 'numbers' can be manipulated about any way you want'em. The American Way, ya know!
IP: Logged
Dave
Moderator posted January 29, 2004 15:01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Out CYPT @ .75 (for free one carton of Marlboros and 2 tanks of gas!) Cool!
Have a good day!
IP: Logged
:)
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/Forum4/HTML/000291.html
In FLCR at .23..tomorrow will be a better day..eom
in CYPT at .72..eom
Changed my 401K to guranteed 5% fund 100% until these markets quit tanking..was in PRNHX, etc.
Investment Selection
David L. Friddell Waddington North America, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Your Investment Allocation changes and Account Rebalance have been completed as of 1/29/2004 12:45:24 PM.
Please print this confirmation page for your records.
Boy, 'ol BelllSouth internet will let you build a nice website..if and when I get more time I may get off into it..
you can chatroom, photoAlbums, all kinds of stuff..just kicking it around for now..
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/s/community.dll?ep=16&groupid=180271&ck=
PennyWorld..yes I need to get more into trianglulation and such..I look for bottoms in an uptrending trend, high momentums, way oversold, etc. but as you know PR's are the WILD CARD..with the right PR, charts go out the window..that is..from rather boring to super exciting..
:)
Tim..I sold my THTHF about a week back..just dead in the water basically..those other 2 especially SBWL look good.
Kind of just like my IDGE I'm holding..we'll probably have to wait for a good PR before they do anything really good..it's just a matter if we have the patience or not to wait it out..
I hope we don't have to wait too much longer!
It can go from real boring to real exciting, real fast, in these penny stocks.
See y'all in the morning..I'm full as a tick..
(Tim..took Mom out for birthday dinner down at the hog trough..
GoldenCorral on Gunbarrel and we pigged out..getting awful sleepy now...zzzzzzzzzzz)
:)
In SCO at 2.15..
chart speaks for itself..
Have a good day!
Swampboots..I'm in with you on that SCO..
another GENR type pick?..LOL..hope so!
I hope Pat doesn't mind me posting this..
maybe betwixt all of us we can come up with a good 20..
from e-mail..
From: pat hogan <grousepoint@yahoo.com>
Date: 2004/01/28 Wed AM 03:24:21 GMT
To: superpicks@bellsouth.net
Subject: Hopes on hold...
(Choose Folder) SentMail Trash
Dave, I am a high school economics teacher in Wisconsin. Currently preparing 6 teams of students to participate in the state stock market game sponsered by the JCEE. I am an active investor in Eag and understand so are you. Would you be willing to serve as our advisor during the duration of the game??? Game starts Feb. 9 and lasts 10 weeks. Each team is given 100,000 dollars to invest and may margin out another 100,000. Must diversify with at least 5 stocks. I am an active follower of your super picks and feel you could be a valuable resource. We are looking to buy companies with real short term potential and am willing to be speculative in the selection. Would you be willing to mail me maybe 20 companies that would be worth the effort of having students research before teams narrow their selections down to five? My e-mail is grousepoint@yahoo.com. Hopes on hold...
I'll e-mail him?her? back Friday morning with a list..you guys game for this?..I'll need your help if I do this..lemme know what you think..so put your thinking caps on! Post'em if you got'em next few days! I kind of like competition myself..could be lots of fun..and help our REAL portfolio's!
Tim..I'll check around..there was one water utility company kept popping on radar a few weeks back but I can't think of the name or symbol to save my life at the moment...yes, oil sectors good and probably will be till spring..or longer.
Man..futures are stroking..going to be a GREEN day today!..not unless some major company drops a bomb and sends everybody heading for cover again..
MG..that SSFT looks good!..you already in?..I may a get couple of hundred or something..with the shorts you mention and a chart I like it sure could be a money maker..
(OT:PieSky..this is example of what I was telling you about in e-mail last week..when the planets align and all 3 moving average lines hit on one candle..about 85% chance it'll be a GO, IMO)
PieSky..Wang..All..a matter of co-incidence?..just in from work and checking my 32 e-mails...2 that caught my eye so far..you may think I'm BSing but I'm not..I'm not going to cut and paste them..BUT..the gist of them was...
1.Bob my webmaster at Allstocks says I now can feel free to post/update my page ANYTIME, from ANYWHERE, from now on. I have a direct link to his server or whatever you call it now..(For over a year, it's been where I had to shoot an e-mail to him by 7AM EST for the one and only daily post. I like that!)
2.Anybody ever hear of this outfit?..
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/
seems the 'main man' wants me to call his personal extension number..hmm..all message was is:
"I'd like to talk to you."
Am curious as crap about that..is he just merely trying to sell me something?..hmm..I don't think so..something along the lines of a job offer?..I could handle that!..
6 figures dancing thru my head..LOL..
(and all this comes on the heels of somebody shooting me a e-mail yesterday that they were sure glad they bought my IBZT pick back at .0025..they're up $23K, so far, and hope to one day to repay me..I'm thinking.."hey Bud..spread the wealth NOW a little bit, would ya?..a Walmart $20 gift card..something!"..LOL..daggum..if somebody was the key figure that made me 23K, dang if I wouldn't send them a little $500 token, at least, of my appreciation...guess everybody ain't like me though..)
OK..going to go look around a see what's happenin..
fwiw, i did pick up a little IBZT this morning..figuring it may be going to run again..saw it climbing on my phone..
Capitalist and MartyMan..thanks..you guys are correct..
I just never have placed a order like that and wondered if it could be done..
With my work schedule I may being trying some stock orders like that..
e-mail reply from freetrade..
Dear Valued Freetrade Client:
Good morning. The order is a buy stop. Click the "buy" and then "stop" button
along
with the price entered along with the other preferences (day, month, etc.)
Sincerely,
Client Services
Freetrade by Ameritrade
Division of Ameritrade, Inc.
Hello All..OT:Wang..touble posting SNNW chart?
I copied this off of 'properties' on SNNW Big charts..
chart.bigcharts.com/bc3/intchart/frames/chart.asp?symb=snnw&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&ma=4&maval=200%2C30%2C10&uf=0&lf=268435456&lf2=4&lf3=1024&type=4&size=3&state=11&sid=992631&style=350&time=6&freq=1&comp=NO%5FSYMBOL%5FCHOSEN&nosettings=1&rand=6941&mocktick=1
now if you put [chrat] in front of it and [/chrat] at the end of it the chart will show up..(chart mispelled in example on purpose so it won't try to post a chart..)
Try it if you get a chance.
One more..Below is the big news that everybody will be talking about this week. No
longer will there be naked short selling of penny stocks and we may see a
huge short squeeze in the entire penny stock market.
-----
IN THE MONEY: NASD Tightens Short Selling/Delivery Rule
By Carol S. Remond
A Dow Jones Newswires Column
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Taking most market participants by surprise, the
National Association of Securities Dealers has drastically tightened one of
its rules governing short selling.
Known as affirmative determination, the NASD rule stipulates that brokers and
dealers engaged in a short sale transaction must make sure that shares can be
delivered by settlement time, three days later.
"We closed a loophole," said Steve Luparello, executive vice president of
Market Regulation at NASD.
Until now, non-NASD members, like specialists, option markets and foreign
brokers, weren't covered under the affirmative determination rule. That means
that non-NASD members didn't have to represent to the NASD broker through
which they conducted a short sale order that they would be able to deliver
the stock by settlement date.
A short seller typically borrows stock from a broker to sell it into the
market, betting that the share price will fall so that he can buy the stock
back at a lower price and pocket the difference.
The amended NASD affirmative determination rule, which was recently approved
by the Securities and Exchange Commission, will particularly affect short
sales conducted through foreign brokers, most specifically Canadian brokers
which have often been used by investors to sell short the stock of small U.S.
companies trading on the Over-the-counter Bulletin Board or OTCBB.
Because it's often impossible to borrow the shares of companies trading on
the OTCBB, investors and hedge funds looking to take negative bets on these
often-overvalued development-stage companies have traditionally been trading
through Canada where it's not required to borrow stock before selling it
short. The practice is known as naked shorting.
That trading avenue has now been effectively closed.
The new NASD rule doesn't cover Canadian brokers, since most are not members
of the association, instead it makes it the responsibility of U.S. brokers
trading with non-members to make sure that their counterparts will be able to
settle a transaction before completing a short sale.
"It's part of (a broker's) supervisory responsibilities," NASD's Luparello
said, adding that a non-member's previous failures to deliver should be a
good indication of whether or not it will in fact be able to complete the
transaction by the settlement date.
Market makers engaged in bone fide market making activities will continue to
be exempt from affirmative determination.
Luparello said that, unlike a parallel SEC initiative to tighten short
selling rules on the small-cap markets, the new NASD rules did not originate
from worries over mounting failures to deliver stock into the national
clearing system. But Luparello said the amended NASD rule fits nicely with
the new short selling regulations now under consideration by the SEC.
"I think it addresses a gap and (shows) that we, like the SEC, are looking at
a variety of things in this area," Luparello said.
The NASD proposal was first submitted to the SEC in November 2001, well
before alleged abuses of naked shorting became the focal point of a campaign
lead by some OTCBB companies in the U.S that say they have been victimized by
the practice.
While some investors argue that short sellers provide a needed service to the
markets, others have called for the complete abolition of short selling
because of the undue pressure its puts on the shares of companies.
While market participants in the U.S. and abroad are well aware of the new
short selling regulations being put forward by the SEC, known as Regulation
SHO, most said they knew nothing of the NASD's plan before it became final.
"It's taken us by surprise," said Richard Thomas, head of compliance at
Canadian brokerage firm Pacific International.
Although separate from it, the amended NASD rule fits tightly within the
SEC's SHO which is now under review by the SEC staff after a period during
which market participants were invited to comment on it.
As it stands, the new SEC short selling rules will make it easier to short
large-cap stocks since they would do away with the "uptick" rule, which bans
short selling on a stock when the price is falling.
But it when it comes to the small-cap markets, where it's often impossible to
borrow stock, the impact of SHO will be the opposite, making it harder to
short sale stock.
The new SEC rule sets a predetermined level of so-called clearing fails -
cases in which a broker or investor cannot deliver stock within two days
after settlement - which will trigger a 90-day blackout whereby the customer
will not be allowed to short sell that security. That 90-day exemption would
affect trading of U.S. securities in and outside the U.S.
The new NASD affirmative determination rule will take effect on Feb. 20.
(Carol S. Remond is one of four "In The Money" columnists who take a
sophisticated look at the value of companies and their securities and
explores unique trading strategies.)
-By Carol S. Remond; Dow Jones Newswires; 201 938 2074;
carol.remond@dowjones.com
Below is the big news that everybody will be talking about this week. No
longer will there be naked short selling of penny stocks and we may see a
huge short squeeze in the entire penny stock market.
-----
IN THE MONEY: NASD Tightens Short Selling/Delivery Rule
By Carol S. Remond
A Dow Jones Newswires Column
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Taking most market participants by surprise, the
National Association of Securities Dealers has drastically tightened one of
its rules governing short selling.
Known as affirmative determination, the NASD rule stipulates that brokers and
dealers engaged in a short sale transaction must make sure that shares can be
delivered by settlement time, three days later.
"We closed a loophole," said Steve Luparello, executive vice president of
Market Regulation at NASD.
Until now, non-NASD members, like specialists, option markets and foreign
brokers, weren't covered under the affirmative determination rule. That means
that non-NASD members didn't have to represent to the NASD broker through
which they conducted a short sale order that they would be able to deliver
the stock by settlement date.
A short seller typically borrows stock from a broker to sell it into the
market, betting that the share price will fall so that he can buy the stock
back at a lower price and pocket the difference.
The amended NASD affirmative determination rule, which was recently approved
by the Securities and Exchange Commission, will particularly affect short
sales conducted through foreign brokers, most specifically Canadian brokers
which have often been used by investors to sell short the stock of small U.S.
companies trading on the Over-the-counter Bulletin Board or OTCBB.
Because it's often impossible to borrow the shares of companies trading on
the OTCBB, investors and hedge funds looking to take negative bets on these
often-overvalued development-stage companies have traditionally been trading
through Canada where it's not required to borrow stock before selling it
short. The practice is known as naked shorting.
That trading avenue has now been effectively closed.
The new NASD rule doesn't cover Canadian brokers, since most are not members
of the association, instead it makes it the responsibility of U.S. brokers
trading with non-members to make sure that their counterparts will be able to
settle a transaction before completing a short sale.
"It's part of (a broker's) supervisory responsibilities," NASD's Luparello
said, adding that a non-member's previous failures to deliver should be a
good indication of whether or not it will in fact be able to complete the
transaction by the settlement date.
Market makers engaged in bone fide market making activities will continue to
be exempt from affirmative determination.
Luparello said that, unlike a parallel SEC initiative to tighten short
selling rules on the small-cap markets, the new NASD rules did not originate
from worries over mounting failures to deliver stock into the national
clearing system. But Luparello said the amended NASD rule fits nicely with
the new short selling regulations now under consideration by the SEC.
"I think it addresses a gap and (shows) that we, like the SEC, are looking at
a variety of things in this area," Luparello said.
The NASD proposal was first submitted to the SEC in November 2001, well
before alleged abuses of naked shorting became the focal point of a campaign
lead by some OTCBB companies in the U.S that say they have been victimized by
the practice.
While some investors argue that short sellers provide a needed service to the
markets, others have called for the complete abolition of short selling
because of the undue pressure its puts on the shares of companies.
While market participants in the U.S. and abroad are well aware of the new
short selling regulations being put forward by the SEC, known as Regulation
SHO, most said they knew nothing of the NASD's plan before it became final.
"It's taken us by surprise," said Richard Thomas, head of compliance at
Canadian brokerage firm Pacific International.
Although separate from it, the amended NASD rule fits tightly within the
SEC's SHO which is now under review by the SEC staff after a period during
which market participants were invited to comment on it.
As it stands, the new SEC short selling rules will make it easier to short
large-cap stocks since they would do away with the "uptick" rule, which bans
short selling on a stock when the price is falling.
But it when it comes to the small-cap markets, where it's often impossible to
borrow stock, the impact of SHO will be the opposite, making it harder to
short sale stock.
The new SEC rule sets a predetermined level of so-called clearing fails -
cases in which a broker or investor cannot deliver stock within two days
after settlement - which will trigger a 90-day blackout whereby the customer
will not be allowed to short sell that security. That 90-day exemption would
affect trading of U.S. securities in and outside the U.S.
The new NASD affirmative determination rule will take effect on Feb. 20.
(Carol S. Remond is one of four "In The Money" columnists who take a
sophisticated look at the value of companies and their securities and
explores unique trading strategies.)
-By Carol S. Remond; Dow Jones Newswires; 201 938 2074;
carol.remond@dowjones.com
Below is the big news that everybody will be talking about this week. No
longer will there be naked short selling of penny stocks and we may see a
huge short squeeze in the entire penny stock market.
-----
IN THE MONEY: NASD Tightens Short Selling/Delivery Rule
By Carol S. Remond
A Dow Jones Newswires Column
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Taking most market participants by surprise, the
National Association of Securities Dealers has drastically tightened one of
its rules governing short selling.
Known as affirmative determination, the NASD rule stipulates that brokers and
dealers engaged in a short sale transaction must make sure that shares can be
delivered by settlement time, three days later.
"We closed a loophole," said Steve Luparello, executive vice president of
Market Regulation at NASD.
Until now, non-NASD members, like specialists, option markets and foreign
brokers, weren't covered under the affirmative determination rule. That means
that non-NASD members didn't have to represent to the NASD broker through
which they conducted a short sale order that they would be able to deliver
the stock by settlement date.
A short seller typically borrows stock from a broker to sell it into the
market, betting that the share price will fall so that he can buy the stock
back at a lower price and pocket the difference.
The amended NASD affirmative determination rule, which was recently approved
by the Securities and Exchange Commission, will particularly affect short
sales conducted through foreign brokers, most specifically Canadian brokers
which have often been used by investors to sell short the stock of small U.S.
companies trading on the Over-the-counter Bulletin Board or OTCBB.
Because it's often impossible to borrow the shares of companies trading on
the OTCBB, investors and hedge funds looking to take negative bets on these
often-overvalued development-stage companies have traditionally been trading
through Canada where it's not required to borrow stock before selling it
short. The practice is known as naked shorting.
That trading avenue has now been effectively closed.
The new NASD rule doesn't cover Canadian brokers, since most are not members
of the association, instead it makes it the responsibility of U.S. brokers
trading with non-members to make sure that their counterparts will be able to
settle a transaction before completing a short sale.
"It's part of (a broker's) supervisory responsibilities," NASD's Luparello
said, adding that a non-member's previous failures to deliver should be a
good indication of whether or not it will in fact be able to complete the
transaction by the settlement date.
Market makers engaged in bone fide market making activities will continue to
be exempt from affirmative determination.
Luparello said that, unlike a parallel SEC initiative to tighten short
selling rules on the small-cap markets, the new NASD rules did not originate
from worries over mounting failures to deliver stock into the national
clearing system. But Luparello said the amended NASD rule fits nicely with
the new short selling regulations now under consideration by the SEC.
"I think it addresses a gap and (shows) that we, like the SEC, are looking at
a variety of things in this area," Luparello said.
The NASD proposal was first submitted to the SEC in November 2001, well
before alleged abuses of naked shorting became the focal point of a campaign
lead by some OTCBB companies in the U.S that say they have been victimized by
the practice.
While some investors argue that short sellers provide a needed service to the
markets, others have called for the complete abolition of short selling
because of the undue pressure its puts on the shares of companies.
While market participants in the U.S. and abroad are well aware of the new
short selling regulations being put forward by the SEC, known as Regulation
SHO, most said they knew nothing of the NASD's plan before it became final.
"It's taken us by surprise," said Richard Thomas, head of compliance at
Canadian brokerage firm Pacific International.
Although separate from it, the amended NASD rule fits tightly within the
SEC's SHO which is now under review by the SEC staff after a period during
which market participants were invited to comment on it.
As it stands, the new SEC short selling rules will make it easier to short
large-cap stocks since they would do away with the "uptick" rule, which bans
short selling on a stock when the price is falling.
But it when it comes to the small-cap markets, where it's often impossible to
borrow stock, the impact of SHO will be the opposite, making it harder to
short sale stock.
The new SEC rule sets a predetermined level of so-called clearing fails -
cases in which a broker or investor cannot deliver stock within two days
after settlement - which will trigger a 90-day blackout whereby the customer
will not be allowed to short sell that security. That 90-day exemption would
affect trading of U.S. securities in and outside the U.S.
The new NASD affirmative determination rule will take effect on Feb. 20.
(Carol S. Remond is one of four "In The Money" columnists who take a
sophisticated look at the value of companies and their securities and
explores unique trading strategies.)
-By Carol S. Remond; Dow Jones Newswires; 201 938 2074;
carol.remond@dowjones.com