Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
In regards to the growth of Lavashpere revenue, do you know what fits into the category?
YJ, If that is in fact the case does that equate to additional dilution and reduced debt or is my understanding of your recent posts and the implications of conversion inaccurate? TIA
MM activity by month. I found this report to be interesting and thought I would post it. Anyone see anything of significance?
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/tradeact_mv.asp?SearchBy=issue&Issue=NEOM&SortBy=volume&Month=10-1-2007&IMAGE1.x=16&IMAGE1.y=6
Thanks, yes I had read that info, just wondering if anyone had any knowledge as to whether or not we expected "the patent holder to file a statemnt concerning the new question of patentability, including amendments or new claims" TIA
Are we still expecting a USPTO ruling by the 26th (friday)?
Its a good question and I would like to know the answer too. I have seen nothing to date that would indicate they have obtained "formal approval under Chinese law" as referenced in the 10Q. I have followed this stock for awhile now but am resisting the temptation until I see some clarity to that question. Looks like we will see a new quarterly financial filing within a week or so according to the last filing 10K dated 10-28 I believe.
From 10Q
Plan of Operation
We are a start-up, Exploration Stage corporation and have not yet generated or realized any revenues from our business activities.
Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until the Joint Venture obtains funding and starts operation pursuant to a formal approval under Chinese law. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other than revenue from the Joint Venture operation. Our only other source for cash at this time is investment by related parties and others. The cash we raise may allow us to stay in business for at least one year. If able to attract sufficient capital, our success or failure will be determined by whether the Joint Venture could be successful in the on-line video sharing industry.
Can anyone provide information regarding formal approval under Chinese law? Would be very helpful for me. TIA
This is an excerpt fron the last 10Q on file with the sec. They are late on the current filing.
Perhaps he simply stepped down to facilitate an arrangement being brokered by CH that he may have disagreed with. Perhaps another party refused to negotiate any arrangement so long as CF was in the picture. All speculation of course--more dots?
Anyone know why the quarterly 10Q has not been filed with SEC?
What is a partner?
http://blog.announcemobile.com/
Are these company's one and the same? anyone?
Does NEOM have a relationship with either?
http://mobile.three.co.uk/801/football/videoaction/100/1
CYTV (.21) China YouTV's JV Partner Signed Agreement to Exchange Advertisement Resources with Online Advertisement Company: Unlimited Chance Technology Development Co. Ltd
Wednesday, September 05 2007 2:01 PM, EST
Market Wire "US Press Releases "
BEIJING, CHINA -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 09/05/07 -- China YouTV Corp. (OTCBB: CYTV), a publicly traded company that provides online video viewing services through its CnBoo web site in China , reported that its Chinese Joint Venture Partner HuaJu signed an agreement with Unlimited Chance Technology Development Co. Ltd , (referred as "UCTD"), a leading online advertisement company in China to share and exchange their advertising resources on a mutually benefiting basis.
According to the agreement, HuaJu is entitled to use a great volume of its partner, WTTD's direct mobile message advertising business.
Compared to other advertising means, direct mobile advertise has many outstanding features, such as:
- Direct: it is directly delivered to the ad viewers
- Customized: targeting the specifically selected groups
- Massive coverage: all mobile phone users are our potential viewers
- Accurate: over 98% selected viewers can see our message ads
UCTD is a subsidiary of 3G New Media Company (3g4a)[b/], one of China's major network advertising solution providers with advanced technologies and rich network advertising experiences.
I believe SB has received a licensing fee from DP but do not know whether they have done anything with the technology to date. I think I recall an earlier post from someone more knowledgable of the topic.
http://www.idspackaging.com/packaging/europe/dupont_packaging/1744/newsrelease_content.html.
Company's 2D Barcode Solutions to Be Used with Select Global Brands
Scanbuy, Inc., a global provider of wireless commerce solutions today announced an exclusive agreement with DuPont Packaging & Industrial Polymers (P&IP) to license Scanbuy's interactive 2D (two dimensional) barcode technology for packaging applications. As a part of the agreement, DuPont P&IP will be the exclusive marketer of Scanbuy's interactive camera-phone technology to the packaging industry.
DuPont P&IP selected Scanbuy as its exclusive technology provider to commercialize and market Scanbuy's interactive technology to select global brands under the DuPont banner. When imbedded in product packaging, 2D barcode technology enables a myriad of consumer interactive applications directly from mobile handsets. Some potential uses in packaging are checking nutritional content of food & beverages or determining if a cosmetic is suited for you, and more sophisticated uses like playing games & winning prizes.
"Smart packaging represents a key future packaging trend and opens up new opportunities that run the gamut from better inventory tracking to brand enhancement," said Dr. John Hillenbrand, Vice President, Innovation and Technology for DuPont P&IP business unit. "We chose to partner with Scanbuy because their barcode-capture technology and services platforms are clearly more advanced and robust than others in the market."
"DuPont has long been an industry leader in packaging innovations and has deep expertise in commercialization of new products and technology," said Jonathan Bulkeley, Chief Executive Officer of Scanbuy, Inc. "We selected DuPont as our exclusive packaging partner to benefit not only from their depth of experience but also their extensive reach into the consumer products packaging industry. "
According to a market study by NanoMarkets, LC, the global smart packaging market will account for over $1.1 billion in printable electronics components by 2011, growing to $4.2 billion in 2013.
IMO--NEOM should be the party attempting to delay the infringement case with SB and should not even consider a settelment at this time. Meantime NEOM management should be soley focused on revenue generation and business expansion. Let SB build their business and worry about the outcome of the case. The longer it goes on the more they stand to lose. Afterall they are the infringer not the defender of legally issued patents. When they lose this case and it is time to pay the piper, I for one would like to see them in a very strong financial position.
Current worldwide internet traffic rankings by Alexa most popular = 1
neom.com 844,317 3mo change down 180,530
gavitec.com 1,130,131 3mo change up 249,208
investorshub.com 3,058 3mo change up 706
Hi folks, I am new to this board and thought I would take a moment to introduce myself. I have been a stakeholder for several years, originally taking a sizeable stake in the company during the T.S. pump on the advice of a friend. I was fortunate enough to realize a significant gain when the stock was running in the .60's as my original cost basis was around .12. The bad part is that I started aquiring again in the mid .30s and additional purchases on the way down to a current basis of around .08. I will continue to aquire shares at these low levels until I get my cost basis around .045 or in line with the new CEO's options. I had no idea that an information source of this nature was available and stumbled on it quite by accident. I have been astounded by the depth of knowledge on this board (and a bit annoyed by the "expert" opinions of a few) as I have reviewed postings going way back and would like to thank the major contributors to this board. Had I found it sooner perhaps I would have made more informed decisions along the way rather than relying on company pr's and very limited information. Anyway at this point I am on the ship with the rest of the longs and hope we make landfall before she sinks. GLTA
I am asking about what is required to get formal approval under Chinese law. I understand the need for financing until revenue is generated but not sure why no revenue will be realized until formal approval is obtained and whether there is a chance that approval will not be forthcoming. Thanks
From 10Q
Plan of Operation
We are a start-up, Exploration Stage corporation and have not yet generated or realized any revenues from our business activities.
Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until the Joint Venture obtains funding and starts operation pursuant to a formal approval under Chinese law. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other than revenue from the Joint Venture operation. Our only other source for cash at this time is investment by related parties and others. The cash we raise may allow us to stay in business for at least one year. If able to attract sufficient capital, our success or failure will be determined by whether the Joint Venture could be successful in the on-line video sharing industry.
Can anyone provide information regarding formal approval under Chinese law? Would be very helpful for me. TIA
CH already has options on 20m shares and hopefully the management skills to put those options in the money. Just how many shares do you think he would need in order to be sufficiently motivated to recover for you whatever losses you may have endured to date?
"previously may have viewed as enemies but now view as friends" Another reference to former enemies/competitors interesting. Hmmm anyone care to speculate?
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-15708.htm
My understanding is that this pertains to the elimination of naked shorting. If anyone has expertise in this area could you please clarify for me.
I am looking forward to a "frictionless ecosystem with commerce flowing across the bridge and everyone gets paid" including the stockholders!
NEOM is catching a bid for first time in awhile. Have a look
Does anyone know how many phones are currently equipped with Qode technology? How many downloads from website? Seems to me that this technology will not thrive until people have it at their finger tips. If the phone manufacturers are unwilling to pre load the Qode platform it falls to NEOM management to find other creative ways to get the technology into the hands of the public. Say for example Jumbotron demos at baseball games to entice people to buy their next ticket from their mobile.