Mars, if "nonsharehoders", and BASHERS/other shareholders talk to the accounting firm about BDGR, it cost the shareholders $s. I am asking for your, and other "nonbashing/pumping shareholders to support the position below:

I hereby declare my vote for BDGRs MGM'T/directors to inform the accounting firm to BILL directly to the caller's credit card the cost of time, or TO NOT TAKE THE CALL; BDGR will only pay for authorized calls, from BDGR identified people. I do not want MY $s spent on BSers that maybe and smell like a POS.

I would like for Lou, or other authorized personnel to take this step.

IT HAS BEEN REQUESTED ON THIS BOARD FOR PEOPLE NOT TO CALL THEM BECAUSE BDGR WILL BE CHARGED. I AM NOT WILLING TO PAY A PENNY FOR POSs calls.

Let the vote begin, and smile.

Spunky, those people that may to seem to have no morals, values, etc. could go back in their holes, take off their anti-SKUNK perfume, and

1. Avoid embarsement to their families
2. Save tax payer money via prosecution and $40K/yr for free room and board
4. Not to memention a lighter wallet
3. GET A LIFE

It may even be good to "turn the clock back" to when a "2 by 4" corrected a lot of problems.

I remember when we never locked our cars, houses, etc. but today there are so many BUZZARDs in the world that those "rats" may have been accepted as the norm. What a shame!

I spent a year in Saudi and never locked my car. It was safe because they used chopping blocks for "wondering hands" and "dead" heads. The chopping blocks were in the out doors and the worker at the chopping blocks were observed by anyone that wondered by.

CAN WE SEND SOME OF THE ZXZXZXZXZXZX to Saudi Arabia? They could find gainful employment and the pay is good (anybody can make $100K/yr with most if not all of the 1st $100K tax free), unless you are in the US military.

I wish them a safe trip, with a smile!

Well stated! Thanks!

soso, alias born on: Sunday July 15, 2007. Posted one message July 17,2007, four July 25, and and TEN messages, the last time I looked, today July 26, 2007!!!!! Who do you work for?


earl derrick, alias born on June 28, 2007. Posted three messages on July 25, 2007, and six messages, the last time I looked, today - July 26,2007!!!! Who do you work foR?

MY GUESS, it is the same person paying the two bashers.

IT COULD NOT BE BADGUY AND ACCURATE (the same person) back as twins;could it?????????

Mav, you may not know the history of the absolutely kindest, sweetest, cherry top POS listed above. My rec. is to let them rant and rave, because everyone (even the other less than positive posters) will mostly ignore them. BADGUY WAS BANNED FROM THIS BOARD AND I THINK ACCURRATE WAS FIRED by his boss.

Is that right Spunky?

When did you realize you could read Mav's mind, or anyone else.

Wow, what do other people think of yoy?

I hope you have a better day sometime. You may also need a BUNCH of prune juice.

Lou, there are a lot of people that have gone after you today.
I would place them and their words in file 13. Keep your chin up, consider the source, and "keep on trucking". Some of us appreciate what you are doing and understand "the stick and stones saying". Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As soon as the PPS slipped, the BUZZARDS WENT HOME!!!!

It is Amazing Grace no that is a good song! I meant to say, it is amazing how a MERE $0.016PPS increase in a penny stock can bring out all the jack rabbits and Buzzards. They seem to have safely returned to their holes and nests since the PPS INCREASE was reduced by one half. (I am talking from yesterdays low to this AMs high). I wish them well and I wish they could enjoy life a little more. Maybe they should re-read some of Mav's "better posts".

WOW, "THERE MUST BE GOLD IN THEM THERE HILLS", or is it black liquid gold in the marsh?

Spunky, I think when the cows come home; they will have lots of milk!

I am glad I was busy trading other stocks AND MAKING MONEY this AM or I would have been reading all of those posts, and I would have gotten so depressed because of all the shots at Lou and BDGR that I may not have bought and sold F (Ford) and associated options.

It is amazing how a big drop in the futures before the market opened kept me focused on the market, kept me from reading the visious and unfounded attacks as they dribbled in. I just read all of them at once (after the market closed), laughed at the posters, and reflected on the fact that ALL the howling just further instilled my confidence in being a long positioned BDGR shareholder.

The best to all!

Local, it is easier for me to see the glass as half full vs. half empty. The world would be a better place if it that was true of most. I am not a candy-ass, or peacie, but I try to be positive.

Lastly: AS THEY SAY AT A NASCAR RACE, "START YOUR ENGINES".

I am out of here.

crude-dude, if you want to me a $1 for each of my shares, I can be in LA, before the market closes, SOOOO you want have to wait all day. Let me know!

Local, I know that you had discussed Sep. puts. That is the reason I included the comment about the market/stocks/basket of stocks

Local, since you posted questions and what appears to be replies to "none" or yourself, which I doubt that "none" will respond, I will try to help you get through the forrest.

It appears that you asked yourself or "none" two questions, then you told yourself or "none" what your thoughts were: THIS MAY NOT BE A GOOD INDICATOR!!!!

Responses:
NO - PICKIE, PICKIE
You may not know - do you have acess to the books?

and

Who is "we" since you posted to "none". I need further clarification, before I can give you a firm response. Have you always worked on the theory "that you pay before you go"?

I SURE THINK THAT I KNOW WHAT YOU THINK - IS it GOOD or BAD? Is that the real question?

Have you ever been in attendance when the game, "WHO DID IT" was played? It just may be unfolding before our very little eyes and noses.

Take care, and good luck with your XLFs. I predict there will be several twists and turns between now and August 22 (+/- 3 days). Nothing to do with August 17/18 options expiration. This comment deals with my thoughts on the market, not any given stock or any given basket of stocks.

Mav, this post (that I am responding to) is in line with your normal posts, but what you stated/the contents of the last para. of the post I had referenced did not seem to mesh. I also have time and I can wait until "the cows come home", or the buzzards eat them, whatever.

I fully understand, which it is obvious that some folks do not, that this is a "pinkie".

By the way, since you waited so frazzling long to post another funny message, I had to move the pps to get'm. I will keep my under the market order(s) that I do not think will be executed, but I think I will stand pat with my three (with some zeros) shares for a while.

I will be "ALL ABOARD" if and when it launches to Mars, or it hits the light that some seem to see moving at the end of the tunnel. Did you notice the post that it could go to ZERO? I bet it would not be the first stock to do that, but it would be my first.

I certainly hope he/she has a crack - in the crystal ball.

My bet is on Lou and others making BDGR go "up, up, and away".

Go have some prune juice and you will feel better in the AM.

You may not be able to see the trees fot the forrest, evidently have not noticed any changes, may be a wee bit upset that some of us have less than $0.10/sh price, and want buyers to stay away so you also can $/pennies per share average downward, or????

As I said you will feel better after the nip of juice.

Good night and sleep tight.

P.S. Do not dream about the business plan. Are you applying for a job? If so, I do not think you are "going about it' the proper way to achieve the desired resultant!

Now, now Mav, the last para. deviates from your other posts.

Could you explain? I hope that you just had a "brain mis-fire" vs. that you are a "set-up" person, or worse; someone with multiple "handles" and forgot who you were posting as. That para. surely resembles at least one other poster's.

You can post wharever you choose, but????????

Mav, Man I wish you had continued with your posts. Everytime you posted a "good one:

I "got nother ordr FILED" (for my man johnny come lately/earl. I still have two mere dat me wants/that could be "fellded" - For MR Earl/badguy/accurrate. Den ME have one dat da place where da bad guys go will freeze over fore it be fELLDED. Me thinkith when doz two GOTS FELLDED, me will sit/sat/set/(shucks me not know thich vergal/gerbale to use righly on them dthere words) back e watch for the next gator. since me have time lack ou, hold dem fer a wong temer.

I wish you could come and help earlier. I will be over in that "neck of the woods" the first part of August. No on second thought, I want have time because I will be intertaining. But, maybe uncle Joe, as some people refer to JL as, could invite me over for a FREE meal or two.

I will not be staying at H. I. EX, so I may not seem very smart. But most of the time, I know when to hold'm and when to fold'm. I WILL HOLH'M FOR A LONG TIME, or until I can receive 7-10 times my investment.

I like your posts, thanks. Tell me about the gator again!

Local, do you still have your XLF 36 Sep. puts. It was a good call. It may run down for a while, but you could sell half and almost "play" with other's money.

If you would, go back and read dragon man's post again. I believe a slow and deliberate read would allow you to understand and respond to him. He has been a loyal follower of yours - not a shot, just trying to help someone gain information that may or may not be blessed with certain skills.

Lastly, did you say that BDGR could or could not use "the new technology" if it works out and is available in the local area. If the answer is yes they can use the technology, wouldn't the wells you reference in your post #7361 now be a valuable asset for BDGR at the current price of oil?

Thanking you in advance.

57tbird, the below is a quote from your first three paragraphs in post #7318. When you used 100% yeild in the third para. and used 90,000,000 shares in the 1st para., one could think (not assume) that you are stating that 90,000,000 is the # of OS.
Begin quote: "Buying 90,000,000 shares at $.07 = $6.3M and you control the company.

What would the payback have to be to recoup that investment in..say six years? What would BD's production (and NET revenues need to be on annnual basis?

Or, what would BD's production and NET revenues need to be to earn said investor(s) a 100% yield on their money?" END QUOTE

Next area of discussion:

As for as the past is concerned, my post not only included 2005, 2006, but ALSO INCLUDED, the info for 2007 that was on page 20 of 20 in the referenced report. I do believe that an investor needs to look at the past financials, current published info/their own DD, and future WAGs or SWAGS. If one does not, they will lose more often than not. I also realize the info was unaudited.

Thus, I respectfully disagree with the next two paragraghs that I have quoted below from your post #7336:

Begin quote, "Re addressing anything you referenced for 2005 and 2006, don't look for a response from me. For me, those years have absolutely NOTHING to do with the current state of BD, the events unfolding, or the current potential for the company.

You obviously feel differently, prefering to base past performances ahead of today's realities. Fine. Have good time analyzing the past." End quote.

Next area of discussion:

I tend to agree with most of the next paragraph (all but the last sentence) that I have quoted from your post #7336:

Begin quote, "I'll be busy trying to analyze the current and future possibilities and trying to make sense of it all, and hopefully forgetting about all of the past year's lies and fraudulent PR's, etc, etc. This is a whole new ballgame, with new players, new opportunities, new efficiencies, and, with the Good Lord's help, audited financials for 2007! BD's past is of no ongoing financial consequence to me." End quote.

Next area of discussion:

If you desire is to improve BDGR's PPS for current shareholders, WE can find a "COMMON GROUND" and work together with Spunky, Lou, etc.

I believe transparency is a necessity for BDGR CEO, directors, officers, shareholders, and posters on this board. Anything less in any area should be considered as dishonest, and should be dealt with accordingly.

Can we count on you in trying to improve BDGR's PPS FOR CURRENT SHAREHOLDERS????

If so, let "bygones be bygones".

Have a good day and I am looking forward to a sincere reply - even if it is only yes, count me in, etc, or whatever.

Spunky, I do not know you, but as I have stated previously, I respect your input.

If someone is using a printing machine, then I agree. And after a while there should be sufficient shares to take control. I am still buying (40,000 more shares today) and a lot of other people are buying.

Since I stated that I would respond to 57tbird, I will, BUT I WILL "tone it down". I will respond to his last post, not here.

What can Lou, you, Yank, and some others do to stop the press, if it is running. Count me in!

Thanks for the post. I had shortened LGL8054 for a while before you responded twice in one day. After that I did check and saw LG as a 2001 entry etc.

You may have noticed that I stopped using LG in reference to anyone else, after your second post. I did check and I did see you info.

I do not what purpose the last line served. But one must do what want one feels copelled to do! There is always a sharper and a duller knife.

Take care and check out message chains, sometimes they reveal a lot.

Mav, you are correct in you post, (this message is not a shot at you what so ever) but it seems as if I am the only one that has the GUTs to call a spade a spade. There is trash being posted on this board, bashers "spoon feeding each other", and no one else seems to be trying to call their BS. I don't give a D. about being PC, JUST MY INVESTMENT IN BDGR, which I bought 20K more (so for) today. The trash haulers will not prevail!!!!!!

If the good shareholders turned on about a half dozen posters on this board like lots of people did on BDGR mgm't, JUST MAYBE the transparency of posters would improve like BDGR's did!!! Thus, PPS would go up. Name the ones that have questioned the total BS posters on BDGR. (NOTE: Lou called a couple of people's hands before he became a director, but he probably cannot now, as a director. His action/corrections to the BSs silenced some until he could no longer respond).

IF the good shareholders turned on the BSers like that, IT WOULD be a WELCOMED change and the SKUNK POSTERS could not wear perfume!!!!!!

Why don't we give that a try! By the way I held off on posting some of my stuff until the BS was flying and the PPS was going south.

Please inform MR LGL8054 (his/post #7334) that Mr. Clay/Ali, the boxer, was not a bully and did not brag; he stated facts, didn’t he? I wish that posters stated facts vs. fiction and other people would challenge the BS when it is posted. You can also relate to him that shxx attracts flies. Also ask him is he, LG and LGL8054 - both may live in a state west of TX and may be the same poster with different handles. LG only posted 2 messages one day - none since and none for the previous 13 months.

You can tell the troop that I followed his advise, took my meds and now I am responding. It is a shame TRUTH PILLS cannot be forced on people, ISN'T IT?

Please ask tbird to account for his share count. I noticed he has posted something (post # 7336) that I will fill full of holes using his own post #7317. But, I will wait a while in order to allow him to review what he said and what I said. THERE IS A major DISCREPANCY in his two posts, and he NEGLECTED part of my post that appears to contradict another part of his post #7336. In any case he still just put a # in the air. I would like to know where it came from, same old TRICK?????

Mav, I do hereby request you and others start an intensive effort "seek-out" the SKUNKS, the BAShers are easy to spot.

I got a good laugh from "metrolane" (post #7335) and if the poster is a female, I am glad to have a secret admirer. I am legible, regretfully so because I am a widower - I lost the love of my life.

PLEASE SIGN UP FOR THE ABS or AB&S CLUB - anti: basher & SKUNK club.

To all the "good guys" on this board I hope you understand why I post some of my posts and ask some of the questions that I may ask.

I cannot stand to see posts that seem to not contain substance, are not explained, the poster usually does not explain the rational for their posts, and IT IS MY BELIEF THAT THE INTENT IS TO do less than good for BDGR shareholders. I am sick and tired of the make believers, bashers, etc.

It is time for all GOOD SHAREHOLDERS to recognize the changes that are being made at BDGR, to take "the make believers" to task, take the perfume of the skunk posters and see the skunks.

There appears to be some very astute posters that are able to "pat you on the back" without you realizing they have taped glass to their hand(s). If you do not realize what "the pat on the back" is REALLY doing - YOU WILL BLEED TO DEATH.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK AND TELL CERTAIN POSTERS TO ANTE UP OR SHUT UP.

IF they have facts post them, if not go to XXXXX!!!!!!!

57tbird, Please feel free to refer to my post #7324, and the BDGR posted financial report, WHEN and IF you decide to respond, with substance,to my post #7327.

You can use that 69,000,000 as a base and just explain from there.

It should be easy since you are talking about ONLY 25,000,000 or 39,000,000 shares in such a short time. The last 14,000,000 was over night. Man they can move faster than your tbird.

Another reason it will be easy is that it seems that you know more about BDGR than ANYONE ELSE.

While you are responding, which you may not since you may avoid less than easy junk, please discuss all the financial info below, which was extracted from the unaudited report and posted by me in post # 7323 inreference:

Quoted from my post in a reply to a post by crude-dude
"Did you note stockholder equity increased by 60%?

Did you note total liabilites were reduced by 26%?

Did you note total assets increased by 12.7%?

Did you note longterm liabilities/convertible notes were reduced by more than 37%?

Did you note a net operating income in 2006 vs a net operating loss in 2005?

Did you note, even with the sales of shares in 2006, the net income (loss) per share was TEN (10) times better in 2006 than in 2005? 2006 was 0.002/sh loss and 2005 was 0.02/sh loss - a ten fold improvement.

What is wrong with a ten fold improvement in net income per share in a year?" End my quote.

ARE YOU READY TO ANTE UP!!!!!!! OR???????

57tbird, if you can not explain why you used 90,000,000 shares one day, then would you please explain how you got to 104,000,000 the next day - in 12 hours and 4 minutes total elapsed time - "DURING THE DARK OF NIGHT"?

I have no personal knowledge of what has or has not been sold and I do not have a vested interest in seeing BDGR's PPS remain low.

It may be posts like yours and some others that may run the price down. I would think that if people may not have a vested interest in seeing BDGR PPS remain low, they would be transparent and answer the hard questions for me and others, but it should be easy for the ones that posted the stuff.

Do you remember the BS 10,000,000 shares sold posted that may have stopped the run up at $0.13 PPS. IT APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN TOTALLY A BS POST , the price wend down and the invisible shares referenced in the post NEVER MATERIALIZED. HUM, I wonder WHY. OH I know the PPS went down.

If you had responded to the easy question I would not be posting this one. IT IS NOT A SHOT, but a darn legitimate question asked directly to you: EXPLAIN THE DELTA FROM 69,000,000 ,90,000,000 shares and 12 hours later (at mostly night) 104,000,000 shares.

IT MAY BE TIME TO ANTE UP OR SHUT UP!!!!!!!

Please explain the 90,000,000 shares i.e. where/how did you derive that number?

For reference, please see my post #7323 and the unaudited report posted/released July 18, 2007 that covered 2005, 2006, and on the last page under subsequent events it showed 762,000 shares sold in 2007/at the time of the report prep.

I do not kmow when the report was prepared, but from that date to now, where did you find the additional 21,000,000 shares. I can not say you are wrong, but I have not read a post, report, or anything that would add up to your share count.

Thanks

Did you note stockholder equity increased by 60%?

Did you note total liabilites were reduced by 26%?

Did you note total assets increased by 12.7%?

Did you note longterm liabilities/convertible notes were reduced by more than 37%?

Did you note a net operating income in 2006 vs a net operating loss in 2005?

Did you note, even with the sales of shares in 2006, the net income (loss) per share was TEN (10) times better in 2006 than in 2005? 2006 was 0.002/sh loss and 2005 was 0.02/sh loss - a ten fold improvement.

What is wrong with a ten fold improvement in net income per share in a year?

Did you note the $0.315 per share sales?

Did you note the $0.25 per share sale?

Did you note the $1.00 per share sale?

I also noted the $0.10 per share sale.

Did you also note, the 68,241,000 shares outstanding, at the end of 2006? If you take the additional 762,000 shares sold (2007) that was listed in the subsequent events section (last page) and add to the 68,241,000 shares, the share count should have been 69,003,000 at the time of the unaudited report prepreation that was posted July 18, 2007.

I don't believe the millions of shares being sold NOW equates to the less than 750,000 shares sold this year/time of report prep.

Thanks for a positive take on BDGR. I hope you and others continue in that mode. The market/stocks/any given stock/has a degree of risk; some more than others. I do not nor does anyone know if BDGR will be real good ($s) for the shareholders, but the changes made recently are very encouraging and I hope the trend continues. If that happens, confidence will be increased and I fully believe the PPS will also increase.

By the way my statements about NOT KNOWING anyone that is part of the JL family or JL is TRUE, VALID, NOT A LIE, etc. As I have previously stated, I have talked to Joe once on the phone, one poster knows me real well, and I have talked to Lou once on the phone. Thus, two people know who I am, but only one really knows the person - charts talk. NOTE: Eventhough I talked to JL (once), to my knowledge, he does not know who charts talk is associated with. I may have told Lou.

I am serious about BDGR and my post of buying, ownership(# of shares), etc. are FACTS. I have not had, and do not have a hidden agenda.

I wish that all posters were transparent, but I do not know of any board that only the truth prevails.

Once again, thanks for a positive post.

Lou, I fully understand that it takes a long time to move a stock a LARGE amount. I would rather see the baby steps, with higher highs and higher lows.

My post WAS BY NO MEANS indicating that YOU WERE STATATING BDGR would go to $4.00 a share. I was just using someone's SHOT AT YOU, their #s in reference to a previous post, and applied the math (1 X 4).

I realize the way I worded the 1st part of my post, it almost/required a response by you. I was not trying to add to wasting your time vs. increasing BDGR shareholder value.

I believe BDGR is undervalued, some folks have tried to sink the stock, some may have dumped the stock due to their inability to accomplish "the mission", the rain has been a player, and some folks could see a pot of gold and call it a pot of STINKY.

Keep working for the good shareholders and the increased transparency.

Thanks,

Lou, BDGR must be worth $4.00/sh, because he said if only half of what you said is half true (that equates to 25%), thus 4 times his $1.00/sh =s $4.00. The $4.00 is because I believe you. That means my 250K shares are worth a cool $1M. GREAT!!

This is really good news when certain posters put a VERY,VERY high value on BDGR. I wish I had paid a little more attention to his post, because I would have bought more than the 50K this past Friday.

Lou thanks again and keep up the good work.

Spunky I could not take a "practice nap", so I got up and bought another 25,000 shares at $.07/sh. PPS/comm (250,000 shares) is now just barely below $0.11/sh. I will take a break for the rest of the day. We may "waffle" around here for awhile -not a prediction, but I do think I did the right thing.


Yankee and Mike did you buy anymore today.

Later!

Spunky, that's the reason I bought 25,000 more shares at $.07 today. I have 15K (total) more on open orders (three)/"day only" (below $0.07/sh) that I do not think will be executed.

It looks like the train, bus, or whatever contains more passengers. ALL ABOARD! That is Great News!

Have a GREAT weekend

Spunky, I agree with your thoughts. I believe most of the ones that are buying now are in it for a while and not for pennies. There will be the MO/MM players that will cash-in, but nothing goes straight up. Pull backs build strength. The higher high established earlier this month at .13 and so far the higher low is a very positive technical indicator of "better times ahead".

Have a nice evening.

Mike, I bought 19K today and 15K yesterday. I wanted a round # 200,000 shares. and If they keep pushing it down, I will buy more. I am now below $.12/pps ave, including commissions.

I would not mind being below .10/sh ave. including in and FUTURE OUT COMMISSIONS. But I would be very happy if the stock opened up in the AM (not a prediction), never looked back, and I could not continue to PPS ave. downward.

If I were not bullish on BDGR I would not continue to buy, and I could have gotten out one day this month at a BREAK EVEN. I did not sell and try to short term trade, because if I had been wrong on my "gut feeling" and charts indications, I would have missed the NOW IN THE FUTURE run-up. I did not want to risk BIG gains for pennies.

The below is a quote from PART of my post #7150 - July 14, 2007 in reply to post #7086 July 11, 2007 by LGL8054 in which a return to $0.05 could/may/etc. happen - THIS IS NOT A SHOT - just trying to explain to the new folks why I used $0.05/sh.

BEGIN QUOTE: Note: If BDGR goes to $.05/sh I SHALL increase my holdings.

Returning to that PPS will do some technical damage; BUT, a triple bottom and a very STRONG SUPPORT level will be established. That, in the "long run", should be good for several reasons. In addition to the above ((WHICH IS NOT RELEVANT TO THIS POST AND IS NOT PART OF POST #7150)), BDGR can reduce the OS, I will buy more - REPEAT -, a base to run from should be established, if the shorts drive it down to that price; they should have a MOST difficult time keeping their cloths "upon their bodies"/covering with competetion from other longs like me, Yankee, etc, and last, but not least - BDGR APPEARS to be performing better and with more transparency. END QUOTE

Mike the 50 day MA is $.095, not the lower # (7+) that you used earlier. The 30 day MA is about .077.

From a technical stand point, the short-tern downward trend line that was destroyed in early July HAS NOT BEEN RE-ESTABLISHED, by this pull back. The mid-term trend line has been penetrated - It is not as important as the short-term line - but other indicators show it should still be OK as indicated in the QUOTE above/post #7150.

Lou, Spunky, Yankee, millionairedreamer, maverick one, and others see great potential. I fully believe if the transparency continues, Lou continues to receive support of most of the vocal/posting shareholders, The current GOOD shareholders continue to hold/or add to their position, if they can afford to - NEVER invest the baby's milk money in a single stock regardless if it is listed on pinksheet, BB, NYX, etc. -, the audit is completed, the weak or BAD shareholders that dump (which BDGR and the good shareholders buy at a cheaper PPS) get through with their "selling fever", and all the other positive things continue to be accomplished; the shorts, if any will be fried ducks, and the GOOD SHAREHOLDERS will reap some very nice rewards.

NO pumping, I just posted my thoughts and where my money is.

OK Spunky. I respect you and will try my BEST to not engage certain people.

I truly appreciate what Lou is doing!!!!!!!

LG see your post #7245 and my reply in post #7247.

It seems you are the basher, not me. It seems that you are the one that has trashed people first. How many BS SEC posting did YOU post on this board THAT had NOTHING what so ever to do with BDGR. Why did you do that, if you care SOOOOO much for BDGR shareholders?

I can play with anyone, you name the game. IF you want to be nice to BDGR shareholders, then I will be nice, but when you get in the mud, this old farm boy knows have to play.

Your $.05/PPS post was made 8 days ago after the market closed, and before 6:00PM.

I hope this refreshes you memory. You know if you did not post on so many stocks in such a short time, you may be able to remember what you said where!!!!!

There may be an OLD SAYING: "It is easy to remember what someone says if someone tells the trxxh, vs. if someone tells a lxx....."

ARE you ready to now admit that you posted the $.05/PPS. Or do I have to post YOUR MESSAGE for you. By the way it was about BDGR, not any of the hords of stocks you may comment upon!!!!!!

LG, YOU POSTED THE $0.05 only 8 days ago

QUOTE FROM YOUR MESSAGE:
"I would not be surprised to see a retrace to about $0.05 before a solid move up." END QUOTE

You and someone else have a second thing in common; "the 8 day clock of forgetfulness problem".

Since you posted info about 7 different companies in a two day span recently, I FULLY UNDERSTAND WHY YOU MAY NOT REMEMBER what you posted on which stock.

When you check it out, why don't you post my reply.

"It's a huge opportunity. These areas are starved for appropriate technology and these niche markets can not be penetrated from the outside."

My comment: I looked at the last four words, above, and then I laughed, and after I wiped the laughing tears from my eyes (in order to make sure I had read those last four words correctly); I laughed some more. Mr Webster, RandomHouse, and other dictionary personnel would also have laughed, but they have gone to greener pastures.

Thanks, I needed that!

LG stated that recently in one of his little posts.

Mav, when a couple of those guys and dolls dribble out their messages, I tend to think of the movie "Dumb and Dumber".
But in this case, they will not prevail at anything! It will be like two to five things with wings sitting on different high voltage wires, and as BDGR PPS RUNS up,up, and away, they will hold wings and be shocked. End of story for the nay sayers and good times will be had by all longs.

Man this is a good pumping message and I do not get paid unless MY shares increase in value.

Mav, thanks for your positive posts?

Do you flip burgers in Vegas? Obviously you may have a hard time understanding anything that is not posted by a BASHER. Do they pay you to BASH? Why did you say $.05/sh, if you are such a nice guy? GSTH

I have my shares, I am long, I will add more if you and your "friends" drive the PPS down further, and the GOOD shareholders WILL prevail, laughing all the way to the bank.

Lou is working hard, we have more transparency, but it sure seems that a few rotten apples are trying to spoil the fruits of all". You may not have to read too many posts to understand who has a positive agenda and who may not have the same!!!!

Just read back over the posts that have been positive and some people jump on it like stink on shxx.

If I, and some other longs/good shareholders did not defend my/their shares against the constant BS by BSers that may hate BDGR/may want BDGR to fail/may pick the bones/etc, it would be as dumb as a lot of posts that have been made by BASHERS.

Told You SO!! NOTHING WILL EVER WORK (for BDGR) ACCORDING TO SOME PEOPLE.

Nice hard work really paid off, did it not?? Just Musing.

LG, you were wrong then and you are wrong now. There are two people that know who I am on this board (it was one). BOTH know I have no relation to "uncle Joe" as you say. I did talk to him on the phone one time a few months ago. THAT IS MY ONE AND ONLY CONTACT WITH HIM.

Go fishing or post another meaningless SEC message (as it pertains to BDGR), or some other BS. It is due to posters like you and your croooooonnnniiiieeees that BDGR is not trading 10+ times today's price.

Continue your adfrtymgff ways!!!!!

Hey Rotor R, I have only used one name. You are as big a fool as most people think you are. Why can't you trust what I post? Show me one post that I have not been honest about/on/etc. You are the YAPPING dog and you know how the story goes i.e. something like: barking, guilty, first, etc. You barked first on this subject.

Are you crude-dude. Did you notice the real good ENGLISH worded post, since I "exposed him as a fake writer" - how was that for P.I. EXCEPT for the "big picture" BS his post was OK. I was looking at Big Pictures, before he was a gleam in someone's eye. What a shame!