Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Got it, well the good thing is that you both are aligned.
Sounds like you've spoken to DI. (And I mean that in a positive way)
So sorry for your loss Gary.
Go to bed
I see what you did ther.
Thanks for the laug.
That we can't say. We can speculate that there may have been further dialogue between Stupp and NWBO that clearly has swayed his opinion.
What's clear is that he is supporting/advising NWBO now. And that is the most important aspect of this revelation.
You can't twist, detract, or distract from this one Ex.
I believe it can be deduced that he is simply supportive of NWBO/DCVax in accepting an advisory role, and that in of itself is the significance.
I do not believe he would take an advisory role for a treatment that did not work or that he did not believe would get regulatory approval.
For sure - I think that may be a potential scenario AE. The case in the matter with Adam Feurenstein is that he is using diversion tactics stating that this is old news, which it is not. Until today, the vast majority of people were unaware of any relationship between Dr. Stupp and NWBO.
I believe you are re-emphasizing the justification provided and why his support is so significant. He is on record being critical of NWBO, basically stating that the interim results are flawed. It is one paper, and to your point maybe a bit of over-reaction from the community; however, he did have a clear conflict of interest with Novocure's treatment and reason to be biased against the results of DCvax.
That is clearly no longer the case.
Hi team - can you all provide some feedback on this post? I was trying to capture the significance of Dr. Stupp's advisory role with NWBO for the less-diligent/informed investors:
https://knowwhatyouhold.com/t/roger-stupp-the-significance-of-his-support-of-nwbo/107
Please don't be afraid to be critical.
Lmao, you've gotten very good Sir Danish.
Very interesting find.
Haha, sounds good X
So I'm just sharing this here for a laugh, because it will be something else if it comes true.
Backstory: my wife and her girlfriends get together every January for a weekend. This time they hired a fairly well known psychic to read them each for 10 minutes. Without any prior background or dialogue, the psychic keyed directly in on a financial situating we're waiting on.
Here is the direct text from my wife:
[3:38 PM, 1/22/2022] Wife: Psychic was wild
[3:39 PM, 1/22/2022] Wife: She said 6 weeks
[3:39 PM, 1/22/2022] Wife: And we will be hitting this financial point we’ve been waiting for
[3:40 PM, 1/22/2022] Wife: And then the alarm went off at 3:33 and I feel like March 3 is going to be a big day
I am laughing because March 3rd is a Thursday, NJEM articles are released on Wednesday. It would be something if that psychic is right. You can bet that I'll be calling her for stock picks LOL
AE- not trying to be discouraging but whatever research you are doing is unclear, disorganized and not helpful to anyone here. You may want to consider an alternative approach.
One of the best summaries I've read. Thanks flipper
Laughing out loud as well.. thanks Alpha. Can always count on you and CherryTree for a great laugh.
DavidW2 - Read his post. He clarified who he was in the first sentence.
Speculation. No fact-based conclusion can be drawn here.
Great post DMB2. Thanks for sharing.
Response from GBM Drug Development Summit:
Absolute nonsense of a post. Not even one ounce of credibility in this message.
Here's a link to one of LP's presentations at Phacilitate in the past:
You and me both. How many shares/price would allow that to happen for you?
Well said buddy
No, to the best of my knowledge and my recap of the call, I have heard it directly from the representative of the company who is responsible for communication on these matters.
We will soon know the answer.
I believe we'll have TLD between now and February 10th.
Reefrad I've spoken to ihub twice in the past 3 months and can confirm everything you've said here.
One note, that obviously is speculative in nature, regarding journal publication, is he also emphasized A. VERY. MAJOR. JOURNAL.
Then in a subsequent conversation, we were talking about how the word about DCVax will get out there and he went to me, go ahead name some major journals, and I named a few and he goes, OKAY NEJM, THAT'S A GREAT ONE, LET'S USE THAT FOR HYPOTHETICAL,
I'm fairly certain the journal is NEJM, just reading between the lines.
He sold all of his shares so now he will root against the stock to avoid FOMO.
NWBO discloses concrete facts, none of the bs nonsense.
Sure. Here are the details directly from him:
https://www.facebook.com/Northwest.Biotherapeutics.NWBO/videos/nwbo-presents-gbm-brain-cancer-survivor-bob-gibbs/127916680637585/
What's so sad is that 2 of his kids had brain tumors as well.
Also noted that I think is so incredibly special about DCVax is that there are literally no side effects, which means the patients can continue their lives while the treatment does it work instead of suffering through chemo.
As I was I digging through some information in my constant research, I found something worth sharing with you all and I believe a very beneficial reminder to us all of who NWBO is at heart. Many of us sit here and criticize management and some even go beyond that and call them con artists & liars (and all sorts of other crazy stuff).
But I found something very telling of who they are, and why they have chosen the path they have taken.
Robert (Bob) Gibbs was one of the patients treated by DCVax in 2004, he later died in 2011 and I came across his obituary: http://sylvan.tributes.com/obituary/print/92935084
On the obituary, as I was scrolling down, I saw this comment left by Les Goldman:
Dave - Advent is the operator but the certification is specifically for the facility and processes in use, SPECIFIC to that facility.
Haha, I love that bet.
There was a poster - Dan88 I believe that actually e-mailed them earlier in the month on this subject, 12/9 to be specific. I'm not sure you've seen this:
$NWBO Yahoolized ihub spreads misinformation stating FDA document FDA-2019-D-4964 is scrapped and replaced with FDA-2020-D-2316. The fact is they are two distinct different documents covering specific regulatory scopes. See attached from FDA replying to my inquiry: pic.twitter.com/LF1CMMMyEv
— Arh Dan (@Arhdan9) December 26, 2021
@biosectinvestor - I do believe a lot of the slowness in announcement has to do with this specifically.
On a more serious note - great post @senti. Excellent use of facts, evidence & details to drive home an important point that these FUDsters cannot refute. Very impressive distillation of details.
One thought I would add to your last few sentences of your post is, just imagine what that number becomes when you consider that DCVax-Direct is a platform treatment for all solid tumor cancers. What does that addressable market become then? What is a fair valuation of the company then?
I think it's very important to keep in mind that perspective as we go through these next few months; especially those thinking about selling their entire lot at a 5-10 billion MC.
haha, my parents loved that show.
I hope so as well!
hah - I'm on Long Island and my mom was born & raise a good part of her childhood in Brooklyn; Bensonhurst to be specific.
I heard that phrase a lot!