Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lol we shall see about that. Sharp has been truthful with shareholders. The problem is, shareholders expect a lot from him, and when he doesn't deliver on their wildest dreams of the stock skyrocketing hundreds or even thousands of percent quickly, he is labeled a con artist, bad man and overall a horrible human being.
I am sure glad I'm not Sharp. He is the one who made these tickers come alive after they were dead for years. We can at least give him credit for that. It may not be the $1 billion+ valuation the crowd was seeking, but it's a start, and Sharp at least delivered a press release, as he said he was going to.
What the retail trading crowd does with such a press release, now that's a different story. I think we've seen the head of the typical retail trader today, and what they were thinking in terms of expectations.
Oh little Nicky. Only making an appearance after bad news I see? Grow up douchebag. There's nothing fun or heartwarming about what happened today, and you are pathetic for rejoicing at others misfortune.
I will not give any consideration or thought to a criminal such as Calasse, and I am glad that Sharp did not make a deal with him (despite his very generous offer). Calasse will lose in the end, no doubt in my mind. Sharp has been fair in his dealings and has not intentionally made false or misleading statements, despite what some may state.
You're right. It doesn't matter how much money you make or lose on paper, percentage wise or other. But Glow in the Dark has been rejoicing at the misfortunate of others, while spreading false and ignorant information. Obviously no one likes seeing their portfolio go down in value. But some are just complete douchebags and want to see Sharp (and all shareholders) lose.
You can't say the same about hating Calasse, since he is bad for the stock no matter what. He abandoned shareholders after likely walking away with millions in his pocket from a fradulent pump and dump scheme. I haven't seen Sharp being questioned about securities fraud by the SEC or any indictments or judgements coming his way. The same cannot be said for Calasse and the characters he was associated with, before he abandoned his fiduciary duty as CEO and walked away from the company.
I'll take my chances with Sharp. At least he hasn't given up on getting a deal done or abandoned the shareholders, despite many of the high expectations (and resulting share price collapses).
One way to look at it is if you have the IPO market and legitimate issuers looking to go public. That demand for issuers, and specially the overall demand in the IPO market, in terms of how many companies want to go public, can put an OTC issuer like WNFT, on the radar.
After all, WNFT is an SEC registered issuer, which is an advantage relative to GVSI, and theoretically puts it on the radar of more established and reputable companies seeking the public markets.
That said, we know the IPO market has been in a downtrend, specifically around 2022-2023, the market itself was not nearly as robust as we saw in 2020 and 2021. As the market improves, we will probably will see an influx of companies seeking the public markets. I'm guessing by 2025, things could really be swinging into action.
I personally believe Sharp probably made a beneficial move avoiding a public entry for any his shells at that time. And despite the massive volatility and swings for his tickers today, this is all a matter of time and chance.
Things can change on a whim, and the conviction for me anyway is to simply hold as long as necessary for the right market conditions and events to where shareholders can see potentially a positive outcome / smooth exit. As long as it takes, regardless of how things look at the moment.
I've owned this stock for over 2.5 years. Of course I'm here until the very bitter end, because the prick Calasse stole stole the show for what could have been a completely legitimate merger. You can whine and complain all you want about how Sharp did this, did that, etc. or didn't have a legitimate merger candidate ever, all lies, yada, yada, yada.
But until you actually experience your portfolio collapsing over 98% in value and buy some shares yourself, it doesn't matter what you think. How about you join the damn ride instead of just acting like a tough bastard on the sidelines.
Damn right this is an investment. Any other questions?
When you have the mindset of getting rich within a month, I guess it doesn't matter too much what type of positive developments may be unfolding. It's not enough unless GVSI skyrockets 5,000% right away. Otherwise we're tanking the stock 50% - 70%. Lol.
GVSI dragging down the GS basket. Interesting that WNFT was mentioned in the press release as potentially providing financing. In this until the bitter end (or a new beginning).
I guess if you have a get rich in the short term mindset, your dreams are crushed. But things can change quickly on the OTC.
How we doing folks? Bye bye Calasse.
Call the Wall Street Chronicle. Extension 1605.
I believe it depends on how much financial backing the merger has. I wouldn't rule out .20 and I wouldn't rule out .50 or even $1 assuming enough demand comes into the stock. The overall name and company itself will have a huge impact. We will find out soon enough.
Has been a wild ride my friend. I'm not in this one but here for the cheerleading and fun. WNFT and SRNW looking to make a large move before too long imo. Calasse briefing the final stages. Still long and have been for 2.5+ years.
Until the very end (or a new beginning)!
Tyrus!!!!! It's Drew from the discord. What's up fam!!!!
Call the Wall Street Chronicle
Show the bashers to the door.
Show the bashers to the door.
Show the bashers to the door.
Show the bashers to the... DOOR!
Let's go! Hope you guys make bank. $10 or $20 million in buying pressure or even less sends it imo
Auto reload on the bid .023 and .0235 good buys
Hey pancake, hope all is well my friend. Rachel says hello. $GVSI
$GVSI to the moon. $10 to $20 million in block buying sends it?
Absolutely brother. It has been a crazy ride for the last couple of years, but I do believe shareholders will benefit in due season.
The trifecta changes zip codes. Let's go.
GVSI to the moon. I'm not even invested but fuck the bashers. Hope you all make bank. And check out WNFT with the Calasse loss here soon. George bringing it home.
Thanks for sharing. With the SEC's stamp of approval on Bitcoin ETFs and WNFT being a fully reporting issuer, I've had my own thoughts as to the potential of various "assets", as Sharp has mentioned, coming into WNFT and SRNW in particular. Sharp is definitely on the hunt for the right deal, and we know SRNW has interest from several parties.
Will be interesting to see what unfolds here. Been invested far too long to not see this through until the very end (or perhaps a new beginning), which includes the Calasse loss and reverse merger asset, whatever it may be.
$WNFT
Folks have had months to load up. Years for that matter. Will be interesting to see what happens here soon.
Let’s gooooooooo
Ok then. See you 10,000% from now.
It's been a long wait, but Sharp has a great shell here that he can put to use once Calasse is gone. SEC reporting is a huge plus. Having owned this stock for over 2.5 years, I can testify that us shareholders have most definitely seen better days. But I also believe much better days could be coming. Market is heating up again, and it looks like the indexes are green here today as well. 2022 was a disaster for small caps and growth. The reemergence of a "risk-on" appetite in the market and some Sharp tickers at the forefront of this trend could be a lucrative combination.
Will be fun. Still early in the game, but one thing I love about the OTC is how quickly things can change, for better or for worse.
With a Sharp victory, this SEC registered rocket is ready for launch. Interesting action on GVSI. With a lower float and overall being easier to move the price with less volume, who’s to say WNFT isn’t next? Popcorn ready.
Let’s gooooo
I’m sorry, but none of your points make sense to me either.
To me, it’s plain as day. Calasse was involved in a fraud and that alone rules out any possibility of this working out in his favor. Unless you assume that the SC only cares about extremely minor details and not the entire context of the case, including previous misrepresentations of material fact that may have been made by Calasse himself?
Common sense would tell me that a fraudulent pump and dump scheme without an SEC registration statement the abandonment of fiduciary duty to the shareholders by the CEO, and no value received for the shares is more than enough to make this case null and void.
Different perspectives and cognitive biases I suppose. We will find out soon enough.
$WNFT
Good times! Tell you what. When WNFT breaks past .05 again, I will relaunch the discord on the YouTube channel.
The court doesn't think "the law says one thing, but what's in the best interest of shareholders? We should do that instead!" It applies the law, period. And if the law is on your side, it doesn't matter how unlikable you are.
But was the law on Calasse’s side when those firms dumped $10’s of millions onto the open market without a registration statement?
Was the law on Calasse’s side as he willfully pumped and dumped the stock with false statements as these firms were dumping the illegal shares?
Would the Supreme Court perhaps risk not upholding the law by allowing shares obtained and likely dumped illegally to be reinstated as issued and outstanding?
In other words, does the Nevada Supreme Court have authority above and beyond the Securities and Exchange Commission, as it applies to rather or not these were legally issued shares in the first place?
I simply don’t see how any reasonable court, who is interested in upholding the law, could ignore such considerations.
The good news is, these things have a way of correcting themselves over time. Just as the .45 peak may have been a bit overhyped at the time, perhaps our roughly $5 to $7 million market cap will have a way of correcting itself as well here in due time, and in the positive direction.
Yes, indeed, it is a great time to buy cheapies, assuming Calasse loses the battle in the Supreme Court.
Of course not without its risk, but after collapsing from nearly a $250 million market cap at the peak, to now about a $6 million market cap, I would argue that the risk reward and overall potential return profile is definitely in favor of WNFT at the moment.
Equivalent price of .036 for GOFF, which is lower than when Sharp initially took over custodianship, for perspective.
Personally, I believe if the Nevada Supreme Court actually cares about justice and doing what is in the best interest of shareholders, they would most definitely take the previous actions of the CEO into consideration as it relates to both how those shares may have been obtained, and of course, the main question, which is if the shares should have been cancelled.
However, I also realize that the justice system in this country is anything but perfect, and that perhaps the judge looking at this case is making a decision not considering those factors.
Nonetheless, I do believe Sharp presents a good argument, laying out solid evidence for the sketchy and unscrupulous activities that occurred when Calasse was CEO.
IMHO, the SC should be more concerned about the best outcome for shareholders as a whole, and not so much with a CEO who abandoned the stock and ultimately his fiduciary duty to the shareholders. But of course I’m biased.
Wishful thinking nonsense? Lol okay. It’s not like these aren’t documented facts or anything.
The SEC didn’t “smack Sharp around”. They simply inquired about why Calasses shares should be cancelled. A completely legitimate question.
If they smacked anyone around I would argue it was Warwick Calasse, when the SEC was requesting comments for the many false statements uttered out of his mouth.
The SEC wrote to Calasse on April 24, 2013 requesting comments on one of the many false statements uttered by Calasse within a Form 8-K filing. Having received no response from Calasse, the SEC wrote to Calasse again on July 11, 2013, demanding responses by July 25, 2013. No responses were forthcoming from Calasse.
Absolutely. Great prices. Picked up a few more the other day myself.
That's awesome brother! May the favor of flippers be upon you as they dump into the bid.