Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Anyone with any knowledge of accounting proceedures would care.
AND CARE A LOT!
If, for example, a business with NO OPERATING INCOME for the last hundred years managed to sell of a piece of land bordering their operating facility (at a profit) it would be OTHER INCOME and it wouldn't have a damn thing to do with their operations nor their potential.
OTHER income (whatever it is) is NOT operating income. Its non-recurring.
Why don't you contact the company and ask them to explain/define it?
If so that will allow them to create more restricted stock, preferred stock and notes. Like someone else said - its an ATM for the insiders.
BTW: Can you have restricted stock that is already previously restricted?
If so that will allow them to trade more restricted stock, preferred stock and notes. Like someone else said - iots an ATM for the insiders.
BTW: Can you have restricted
Yeah right, its more like MM1 calls MM2 and asks him to help "set up" a market to lure in more "investors".
NAIVE is nice!!!!
How many more shares do Moody and Big Apple have to dump?
You just got a lot of D.D. It was called a financial statement.
Sure, .0004 on Monday, and .0008 on Tuesday.
And, don't miss the current liabilities and expenses reported.
At .0002 ask and all the potential you should be mortgaging your houses to buy more. After all it will soon be .0004 and then .0008.
RIGHT?
Choke!
EXPLODE, as in BOOM - ALL GONE?
I know you have said this before and before and before BUT can/will you please explain your "point".
Its like - "this is junk but there is worse junk out there"...so?
Or its like - "a bottle of milk 2 weeks past its sell by date is better than one that is 4 weeks past" so... - they will both make you ill!
Back to an ask of .0002 BUT where oh where are all the buyers? That is those who are sooooo sure of .0004 on the way to .0008. The volume should be in the billions.
Time for another fantasy guess?
It beats selling at .0000000
Where are all of the believers? You can buy at .0002 BUT no one is stepping up.
No one is foolish enough to buy at .0002 and you are looking for .0004 and .0008.
Huh?????
Looking for .0004 but getting .0001/.0002.
"they have a very marketable product to assist this such epidemic."
You have hit the nail on the head - that is, do they have a marketable product?
This contraption (and others like it) have been around for years BUT??????
Hey Dirt, the reply to your post PROVES your point.
I am sure that you are aware of the methodology of the MM's on sub penny stocks. One or two bid high on a few shares to boost the price so that the others can sell a lot of shares at that NEW high. BTW: There is no guarentee that they will buy at that price. I have in the past offered to sell at their bid and NO takers.
Where is the NEWS in the NEWS?
The seller thanks you.
No problem, just put in a buy market order for 10M or so. That should attract a few sellers.
They can ask 6 cents if they want. Its called trolling for suckers.
The flippers are glad to have you.
Lets see if I understand this.
1. A bunch of naive "investors" are conned into buying.
2. Therefore, the price goes up.
3. Therefore, the chart "looks nice".
4, Therefore, WHAT??? does that prove???
"people are buying at 0.0003"
People are also jaywalking - that doesn't make it smart!
A lot of people throw about the term DD. I would suggest that some of them actually look up the term Due Diligence and see how inappropriate it is in this situation.
"The best part of the awesome DD posts is, they are all supported by links to information that can be viewed."
Interesting. Please cite an example of INFORMATION (that is excluding the company's slanted views).
IF this device had any more potential than the thousands of other devices pushed about for the last 50 years a Warren Buffet type would have bought the company out years ago.
What you don't understand is that - Once a person has been suckered out of 98% of his/her investment there is no REASON to sell!
The "advantage" of having them in my name as opposed to street name is that IF there is ever (haha) an opportunity to unrestrict the shares I will have already accomplished the first necessary step.
Again, NOT that it matters.
In the past, other companies, I have had the legend removed for around $75.00 BUT, in this case, the company WILL NOT ACCEPT IT. They won't even discuss it. How do you spell SCAM!
I will say one thing though, I had my broker transfer my shares from street name to my name. Not that that will do any good (?).
Here is a post from a Yahoo on Yahoo....
Take it for what its worth....
"Information I just received. There was a p.r. scheduled to be out this week, but due to some information being leaked it wasn't. I hearing that possibly within the next week or two a p.r. will be released. The news could be regarding a reverse merger, sale of another license or products being prepared to be introduced into the market.
It could be a separate p.r for each or it could be a p.r. covering two of the items mentioned or all three items.
If a reverse merger is in fact taking place and a p.r. is released confirming it, look for the pps to skyrocket.
I'm hearing that the pps is expected to reach the $.50 - $1.00 range by the end of the year.
Again, this is information I have received and passing on to the investment community. Therefore the information could be legit or it could not, you decide for yourself.
If and when I hear more, I will pass it on. "
Me too!
Shame its not the same company.
Just where does all of the money for the attorneys and experts and trustees and fees come from? How can there be anything left for "us"?
OK,,,lets sue their azzes also!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
slojab, You are preaching to the choir. The "investors" (haha) aren't interested in reality.