Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
A better question would be feedback from a visit, as it's highly likely dispensary staff has toured the facility and are addressing product line familiarity, education, etc. I would assume at this point in time, given the timelines, facility is full and staggered rounds are in process as we speak, which was touched on months ago. (Q4 holding starting to pull down weekly rounds, etc...)
If they've toured and addressed (cultivation staff), they're probably already aware what the projected schedules are for pulls (harvests) be that weekly, bi weekly, etc....
Should be common knowledge at this point within the organization...usually is...as well as projected deliveries (and amounts), etc...
(I could tell you any and everything about any facility I've ever entered......harvest schedules, average pulls (weight) per room, and so on....it's usually basic overview/knowledge)...
On what (limited) information has been made available, I'd say weekly pulls in the 150+/-lb range would be reasonable...(I don't know the specific measurements, methods, and lighting, could be more....
You sought a riddle, one to amuse. I chose the most obvious chiding to use. I tend to ignore, as I know will annoy, but surely you'll continue as if found a new toy.
You think I'm a fan, I assure you I'm not, and pleased you would be if I said wife's a THOT, but my interest lay only in the facts of the op's, as most as you know, are certainly not.
The crew screams and cries, new nic's they create, while their handlers inform them, it's getting quite late. Tomorrow the memo's will be all the same, and baiting a game which is only just lame...
You'd think you'd have learned I tolerate little, my positions remain, no bias, the middle. I like to make money, I welcome the low's, my patience and profit easily grows...
So here is your riddle, which surely you'll miss, as you and the crew only boo and then hiss....
I'll leave you with this, as the panda crew issues; new memo, instructions, a big box of tissues.
That's $58MM each, (3 dispo, 2 cultivation) by a company with dormant licenses for cultivation and dispensary, as well as multiple non operational cultivation facilities in several states sitting as we speak, with the ones actually operational producing very little to speak of regarding quality, run by a silver spoon man baby who laughs at the dying patients boycotting his dispo's in medical states, while he states publicly "he's just in it for the money", with the majority of their PR's initially being pure deception, who pays for "best workplace" awards when one can readily find numerous reviews by ex employee's as to the nightmare they experienced working for the same lol.....
Good trading though :) LOLOL One day will be solid once they can actually execute all those empty licenses their holding lol...
If it's riddles you seek, then I'll give you a peek.
My posts here are mainly IP, as anyone checking can easily see.
My employ of the black and white fuzzy one, his checks the ones I cash when the day is done.
My one liners here I am known for providing, with most simply nonsense, warranting only a chiding...
Who am I? ;) lololol
Seriously though......you really think no one knows? lol.....
IMHO or not.....it's obvious lol....
Very promising, to be seen shortly..
I'm curious......does anyone here actually participate in the market?
Because the entire industry has gapped down the last several days/week for the most part, and is not TRTC/GLD exclusive in any way, shape or form. (Canada as well, and some substantially more.....)
Secondly, we have yet another acquisition today, of $290MM for a cumulative 90k worth of cultivation. (In case anyone is curious, $30MM build out and launch would be more than generous.....)
We now have yet another firm indicator as to the value of holdings, as deemed by the marketplace.
I'm definitely going to stick to my $700-$900MM (+) valuation on TRTC/GLD post merger value.
I believe the above represents the highest price ever paid, for anything, anywhere, by anyone....smh lolol
I'd be curious if anyone can tell me why, when able to participate in additional NV stakeholder only licensing processes, they just paid literally 10x the cost for additional cultivation (290MM for 90k footprint) facilities when they have several sitting dormant in various locations not currently operational....
At a time when countless actions have been taken even the past several months resulting in the exchange of literally hundreds of licenses not only nationwide, but worldwide, it would be more than reasonable to state the industry, and the market would not be what it is without such.....(300+/- licenses worldwide changed hands in the past 6 months?...with the market assigning beyond 10 billion cumulative valuations? +/-...(30?.....)
Being directly involved in quite a few, I personally find it questionable to have it dictated what I am allowed to do with my interests and property...
This actually is nothing new, and has been done before, and is in process in many parts of the world as we speak, with the most recent deal being with the King of eSwatini within the past month.
It seems many do not understand what such is, and enables, as well as infrastructure required, and the mechanics of export, as well as the current overview of global export activities, as some have mentioned various entities operating in South America as though that would signify no further action on the same continent can be possible, let alone profitable.
Nothing should be a surprise, and people were even told in advance of such occurring. I hope people positioned accordingly. (With more than enough opportunities to do so...)
I think sometimes people underestimate how much the CBD market has grown and exactly the depth of it's exposure and penetration into society, and continues to do so, and that's without any further action taken, and not only the U.S, but globally as well. I think CBD market is at best 20% of what it will be in 2-3 years....
I was discussing recently with someone, and, for a point of reference on the above, while it's a little dated (a month or two) a good example as to how it's being utilized and where.
I think also as just touched on McGovern might possibly go a long way as well, especially after we just were rid of the Session(s) lol, only to have water tossed on that (so quick) with mention of Christie as a replacement...(which again sent everyone running lol)....
As discussed many times before, we are nearing "the ending of the beginning" at a much greater pace than ever before....(U.S, politically)....
But seriously, you know what's really fun?
Googling a users handle to see who your talking to before engaging them....(just add iHub after the name ;) lol
You should try it some time ;) lol (and then match that against the content and number of posts that day) LOL
Glad someone shared that......a topic of immense focus this weekend (in industry)
As Representative Jim McGovern (D-MA) takes over as chair, the House Rules Committee may no longer be the place cannabis reform goes to die.
"Unlike my predecessor, I'm not going to block amendments for marijuana," McGovern told The Boston Globe. He was of course speaking of the former Rules Committee chair Representative Pete Sessions (R-TX), who lost his seat in Congress in this week's midterm elections. Sessions was well-known for his rigid, anti-marijuana stance, blocking most of the bills that came his way, something McGovern said was out of step with voters' opinions.
"Citizens are passing ballot initiatives, legislatures are passing laws, and we need to respect that. Federal laws and statutes are way behind."
I would agree on many levels, and despite what some may state or believe differently, I've been a pretty firm critic of many things that they have addressed, and they continue to, the big one being the path many are following (which possibly benefits this situation) of over priced acquisitions when they are in the position to simply expand through licensing processes.
Currently about 12 open permits (CA/NV/NJ) at a cost (app fee's) of probably $150k+. Any one of those easily falling into the $20-$30MM range (NJ, WeHo, Fremont), at a time when many moves are taking place with value in the $25-$50MM range for even dormant licenses. I believe I heard GLD also had things in on WeHo and NV last process as well.
I think something many are missing as well is regarding cultivation, Schiavone and NuLeaf are solid and if one throws quality into the equation, the upside just increases. I have firsthand knowledge of many of the operations of the recent wave of acquisitions, and despite the prices paid, they are truly inferior quality producers, so.....this is another level of value being overlooked, and as also addressed recently, vertically integrates both fully in NV and CA.
I also think the explanations for poor Q were the only valid and reasonable ones, and nothing I haven't seen or heard before...so, that doesn't necessarily concern me.
TRTC and NJ go back awhile, they were addressing political on the ground as far back as I believe before January. (In NJ as well as hosting in NV), but NJ's going to be a tougher one, but the bright side being they are already (NJ) expecting 2 more RFA's at this moment, so, the same can easily be resubmitted in each process. NJ process is extremely competitive, with the majority of applicants being larger multi state operators. (I know about 6 going after NJ).
Lot of stuff in the pipeline for both the next 30+/- days let alone rest of the Q. TRTC a little more, and I'd really like to see them clear the pipelines as far as future/potential merger value and the cumulative holdings. Fremont seems the most likely/easiest, with WeHo and NJ being rather tough ones. The WeHo specifically a 50/50 due to how much it strayed from a traditional process.(City looking for an "idea/vision" as opposed to simple scored criteria of traditional processes).
Also, regarding any "losses", we have just seem other companies with similar cumulative holdings posting as high as $80MM (single Q loss) while they also acquire for extremely unreasonable values, so....(Yet they're market favorites lol)
I've experienced firsthand a lot of these matters...ie: Pursuing and developing multiple operations while investors complain about "so much going out and nothing coming in". Yeah, that's what happens when one builds out locations...You have to pay for them to get them open and break even lol....(TRTC I think last count was 21+ open builds, locations, and permit apps, yet people shouting where's the profitability? lol....It's nonsense.. lol)
I don't see them as doing too bad....and more and more they've been addressing all my complaints (I always have a few more lol, but more and more those are becoming things which can be easily changed with very little effort and expense, etc...
This Q should be quite significant for both if they can clear/lighten current pipeline a little...
I think you're addressing the wrong person....
"I was screwed once"
Translation:
My entry point was not made with the level of expertise I wish it was, and my personal strategy was flawed, and my lack of discipline and patience in establishing my entry and exit points led to a loss, which I am holding them personally responsible for.
You're (I assume) an adult, and responsible for your trades.
One could say the very same about GLD if they purchased at the higher ranges the past 2 years (instead of patiently waiting for more reasonable entry points...which can be a month, or 6....or 9.....)
The same could be said for TRTC as well with years ago people buying a company with an herb farm for a post split equivalent of $18 a share.......
That's not the company's fault they bought a company with nothing to speak of for an outrageously high price.
Note: It's my personal opinion stated many times TRTC truly had nothing to speak of until pre Nevada launch, Last July....although I did play the early 16' run and then shorted the late 16' drop, which I rarely do (short). I'm a long by nature. The only other short I can think of being the one that recently hit 300, which was an easy call lol.
Not enough personal responsibility in America anymore.....everything is someone else's fault...everyone is a victim of another (but not their own decisions)
I don't think I have ever seen once, on this entire site, ever, someone state the above.....(I messed up my entry point, and didn't have the discipline and patience to exit and wait for a better one, and took an unnecessary loss )..
I'm sorry you took a loss. Sincerely. As I am for anyone who does, ever, on anything. I'm not one of the "dance with glee at others misfortune" crew....but you are responsible for your actions, and only you.
Facts: Both companies are at a low, with the greatest positioning either have ever experienced to date, (and continuing at a rapid pace), entering a merger easily establishing a value many times greater than both combined...
I'm an ops guys. I don't care if anyone buys, sells, shorts...I always make my money...(on both, and probably bought and sold around 8-10MM GLD since last Sept...and much more TRTC the past couple years) but I find all the nonsense about creating such an impressive (and valuable) group of holdings as somehow unwise utterly ridiculous.....(especially at a time when both at a low...)
The absolute most best wishes to all (sincerely) and hope all position moving forward as they see most wise.
We're adults. Professionals. And this is business.
Actually, the reasons presented would be the only valid ones, which to me, seem absolutely reasonable, and none situations I have not personally seen before...
I think much of the commentary also signifies very few have actually ever been involved in a business, and the running back and forth looking for "ah ha!" moments and indicators is even more ridiculous.....
(Easier for me to speak first person, as have been in many actual meetings of actual businesses that were similar)
"So, we're going to have to upgrade to meet updated code, which is going to cost us, but we'll get it done, is going to hit us a little bit this Q and possibly next, but we're going to add on as well, which is a good thing. We do have 12 permits pending which has tapped us a little heavy, but stand a good chance of coming out ahead on licenses awarded. We grabbed a building on Fremont and that should turn out well, and with several other matters combined, we took a little hit this Q, but we're solid...."
And so on......
I wonder anyone who questions such, as this is truly day to day issues, and nothing surprising, and would also question one who processes such and turns it into "Oh no, what are we going to do, we're going to be bankrupt, the sky is falling, let's just give up and close the doors....."
;) LOLOLOLOL
As stated before, I do sometimes question the manner in which they approach payroll and staffing, and think it could be done infinitely wiser. Again, I'm sure this will escape the majority who have never displayed personal involvement in a build out, and launch of new businesses. Quite a bit, and the same was seen relating to Nevada launch, seems to be related to new hiring for expanded and/or new locations, and being someone who has actually, personally been involved in many, I think they might be "leaving a little bit on the table", and "too generous".....A new employee, at a new location shouldn't be started out at top end compensation, and it's not unreasonable to utilize training, open at a slightly lower level with the assurance of bumping people up once everything started and underway. I do believe in overcompensating. Staff is everything , and all success due to the such, but think there are various ways to approach for a "happy medium"...
I have staffed facilities in the past with many starting for free. (With sizeable contractual back ends...more applicable in cultivation and dispensary management)
It is absolutely difficult sometimes to co-ordinate hiring, training, and opening, as any number of things can change a build out schedule and launch date, but you do your best to try and control the budget....and that all becomes slightly more difficult when your working open applications, future locations, and awaiting answers on if those, with the target being proceeding full force rapid pace once news is received....ie: If we win x and x, we need 100 people screened, hired, trained while simultaneously building out and trying to schedule for the launch...
I see/saw no "ah ha" moments.....just business as usual...
Revert back to the above:
"Oh no, let's just give up and close the doors"..
There are many in life who this is their response to the slightest obstacle....but I couldn't say much, as usually when displayed, they're not seen again ;) lolol
And no surprise the nonsense continues with many obviously hard at work....
One week later and not one single post touching on the results and final holdings of such a merger, and their value when quite a few examples to reference in the industry over the past several months, all displaying similar actions taken and holdings carrying values anywhere from 3-6 times greater than both combined currently.
Claimed shareholders insisting such a dramatic increase in value somehow is a terrible thing, as one can reference their chart to assess their exceptional performance the past 2 years...
The majority of feedback from those who have stated very clearly no interests held in either....
So one has to ask themselves, why would one go to such lengths to oppose something with an upside far greater than without?
Who stands to benefit (and profit) from such not taking place? From the much greater combined value not occurring?
And last, but not least.......
Who's writing the checks to keep people busy 24/7 at not wanting to achieve a result of both companies combined falling in the $800MM+ range? (Which by January, if both can clear their pipelines, might possibly increase further?)
I would welcome any reader to familiarize themselves with exactly whom is speaking at any given time for the answers ;)
What is always most lacking is the question "why?"....
Why would a "shareholder" of either be "against" an action which creates immeasurably more value. (3-6x reasonable, the market activities as of the last 6 months dictating 4 x a reasonable figure).....
What would be gained, and who would benefit from the above vastly greater value not being established?..
The question(s) is always why, who benefits, and what is gained?
At a time in the industry (and market), when consolidated holdings are fetching larger and larger prices, who would benefit from doing everything possible to prevent such?
It is certainly not "shareholders" who seek greater profits, value, footprints.
One can take a simple glance at either board to easily and quickly see the post list and comments..
A large portion of my day to day professional duties lay in the areas of "PsyOps"..so anything and everything is usually fairly simple to see, especially when implementation and execution is so poorly done lol...
We see quite a few rushing to grasp (and provide, post after post) deliberately misleading information to support their argument(s) as to why any activity creating immeasurably greater value isn't desired...
One will also note the absence of the very same...(avoiding any and all discussion of the final product of the action) Odd how hundreds (upon hundreds) of posts by those opposed fail to address the actual results...
One will note the abundance of posts by those who have clearly stated holding no interests in either.
So the question is:
Who would desire to avoid a greater collection of holdings, for a substantially greater value?
The other question being who would dedicate time, effort, and expense to preventing such? The answer to all is certainly not shareholders wishing a greater return...
Hundreds upon hundreds of posts.....yet none addressing the recent activities of the market, the valuation of such holdings...
New WeHo unscheduled update yesterday if anyone curious.
At this time we are aiming to announce the scores for all of the screening applicants, including the top eight, by December 7, 2018.
They're also addressing taxation as well.
But seriously, what's really funny is if one actually looked into any of those matters presented, the content itself contradicts the presentation lol...
As the very same people surface time and time again, with the very same statements...
Claiming to be shareholders, claiming to have an interest, yet desperate to prevent an event which creates a collection of holdings easily (immediately) worth 3-6 times what it was yesterday......
Then it's obviously not about their own personal profit as shareholders.
So then one has to ask.......exactly what is it about?
(I'll save the time.......one can read my sig line.....LOLOLOL)
You are more than welcome to attempt to engage me. But if that is the manner that your tiny, rodent like little brains deem as the best approach?, I'd rethink it....
Because I have yet to even begin to get started...
And you know, that actually touches on one of my issues, which are only displays of what many lack in many areas.
Yes, let's review daily that which occurred months ago to attempt to get a glimpse of things months from now.
Of course, as touched on before, the glee at the loss and misfortune of another isn't called for, nor a display one would possess any positive characteristics.
That being said, I'm genuinely sorry if one entered at higher points, if one did not take profits, and was not able to for various reasons.
The "just wait until" argument isn't one. Argumentative, and only made by those with no business experience. It's not "just wait until", it's "every day things are changing and evolving". Such is the process of building out and launching multiple locations, which in this industry, depending on the state and program sometimes takes a while.
So, as mentioned, let's review a month old situation 1 page a day........and with each day and week, more licenses, more performance, more locations proceed, making it even more outdated by the time finished...
But this is the game, isn't it? Refuse at any and all costs to address anything current, which has been proven many, many times before...(and I just might again shortly , just for fun lol)
There is a reason the majority absolutely refuse at all costs to address any and everything in process...
Cultivation and retail CA in build out, NV cultivation approaching 100% production (sales), NV manufacturing the same, WeHo, NJ, NV/Fremont......all going to happen within the q most likely. (I know, stated NJ possibly January, we'll see)....(and now a merger to fully vertically integrate in NV and CA as well)....
But let's look for the secrets in old data lol....
People, statements on this board.....lol.....it is so far removed from actual real life it never ceases to amuse.....
The only issue, which is probably going to be a serious one is the stakeholders are pressuring the sponsors to prevent additional licensing, much more so for cultivation, insisting they are capable of production/supply (20 cultivators at about 700k total sq. ft.) for a 130MM market, which even non industry readily acknowledge is idiotic to even begin to claim...as markets several times smaller have literally up to 50+ times the footprint......(and experienced shortages...)
(Extensive work/client list in IL program, as well as with political)
It's always interesting to see commentary......and kind of illustrates (and separates) those actually involved in the market, and those involved with posting :) lol
A large portion of cannabis sector gapped down today, even Canada, all for obvious reasons, and easily seen the last 2 days...many substantially more (several times) that of TRTC and GLD...
Anything and everything to fit the narrative...(as always lol)
But that's not the (whole) real story.....now is it?
The real story is that which your addressing was created by those with no industry experience or knowledge, no business experience, no commercial property knowledge, no information as to the actual costs of the properties they are addressing, no understanding or knowledge of private security contractor rates, nor any knowledge of actual build outs, nor the industry average costs of such, and all has been confirmed, time and time again...
Continually insisting it is unusual for dispensary or cultivation to lease properties, when it is actually the norm, and for much higher rates nationwide. For any and every statement made there are a dozen cases which would contradict such happening in the industry every day.
Rule #1 always applies:
If one actually had a valid point(s), why would one feel the need to knowingly create false information?
Zero credibility, old and tired cut and pasted posts....
All the while, people seeming to disagree a merger creating holdings similar (and superior) to the last 3 largest actions taken in the market at 4 times the combined cap of both is a wise idea lol....(one of those groups having dormant, inactive cultivation sites and licenses carrying 8 figure lease payments...)
If the claims, position(s), and stance's were real, they would be based on reality, now wouldn't they?
They're already (both-together) a buy out candidate for $800MM+/-...
But of course, all management has no idea what they're doing....I mean, not like the guys on a board lacking experience in any and every area listed above ;) lol
With a "flagship" cultivation that was designed by one majoring in Theater, and requiring up to 10+ revisions during the build out due to errors in design.....and an $80MM Q loss after paying $650MM for a dozen locations considered "distressed" and another dozen inactive locations with 8 figures in lease payments....
There you go....
But this move isn't wise? ;) lolol (according to wanderers on an internet forum questioning decisions of day to day management from anon handles ;) LOLOL
All while Canadian management cash in hundreds of millions of dollars in shares..lololol..(The old "enrichment" argument) lol
Many obviously failed "Lemonade Stand 101"....lol
I believe one of the several company's who have done such the last several months also just posted an $80MM Q loss...
So let's see......
They go out (3 different companies), spent $26-$53MM per location, many of those simply dormant licenses, and in some cases with 8 figures annually in lease agreements, all with valuations in the billions, but the merger of 2 companies with a combined cap of less than $200MM to assemble a similar collection of holdings doesn't show promise, and is a bad idea?
There is zero honest, unbiased, and accurate commentary on these matters, and no one who actually has any interest in profits would state the action, and results are nothing short of quite wise...
And btw......since of course the endless nonsense is from non industry, non business owners, unfamiliar with even the basics of any of these companies:
Between Schiavone and NuLeaf, they automatically surpass (quality, production skill sets) by leaps and bounds all companies discussed....I have first hand intimate knowledge of quite a few operations from all 3 companies mentioned..
(I'm trying to leave specific company names out.....one a $650MM collection of B listers with 8 figures in leases for non operational grows, whose product is generally known as bunk......another unable to build out cultivation sites....yet another that every time they take over a dispo they're boycotted and their cultivation's (the ones that are actually operational) are disaster zones.......smh...
So yeah....
Let's compare companies with essentially the same holdings, lesser quality production, the greatest deceptive statements ever produced in the industry, losing up to 10 x more per quarter, paying up to 10 x more than reasonable for holdings, with multi billion dollar valuations referenced and applauded by those who don't have a clue lol...
Want to talk "real"? There you go.....because no one thus far is actually talking "business".
They should proceed, and focus on clearing their pipelines over the next quarter or so, and the final product will provide a far greater value than either company would hope to achieve on their own...
According to actual industry activity, by the time they're done, (clearing pipelines and merger) value's anyone's guess but recent comparable (of lesser quality operations and holdings) fall in the $700-$850MM range.
I've got a post over at the red company's page with some of their lease agreements and pics of what one of their recently acquired $26MM dispo's (rented in a strip mall with $2k in office furniture) looks like....
I'm curious, is there a single person here who can actually provide an outline of GLD's current and pending holdings and activities?
Should be an easy one with so many people with so much to say.
See, I love the GLDFF board....
So is there like a contest today for how many inaccuracies can be fit into single posts?, and then highest total posts in one day of inaccuracies wins a prize?
The articles and media pieces regarding the effects on cannabis industry (market) are just getting started ;)....
And all decisions on all licenses pending should be within 3 weeks give or take (as well as Nevada pulls starting to come down shortly as well, etc)....
Rarely do I use the word "fun"....(I'm not a "fun" guy lol)......but I do have the feeling this next q leading into NYear's going to be "fun" market wise ;) lol....
What has just occurred is actually a little too much for many, and I'm personally seeing a combination of shock and positioning (while people and organizations further process it all....)
Michigan Rec......Utah medical....Missouri medical.....and this one's for you, Pritzker in and ready to go, 3rd largest market, New Jersey closer by the day, Pete Sessions out, Jeff an extra bonus on top, rumblings of action following mid terms....
I don't think the full impact has yet to be seen in the market(s)...
This was/is all far too much for all to process immediately/single sitting ;)
I'm also seeing a sense of "pinching themselves" combined with "holding their breath" regarding what, if anything, comes next (or not).......and afraid to give in to relief ;)...
You know what's quite interesting about that:
Edit: I'm a much simpler man (indifferent to corporate drama), and my entertainment other avenues as you know....
All comparable moves the past several months have seen purchases in the $26-$53MM range, with those prices including dormant licenses, as well as very modest operations (retail) and "distressed" operations. (And as shared elsewhere, I have firsthand, intimate knowledge of many of those operations from all companies mentioned)
I tend to leave Florida licenses out because FL does carry multiple locations per license with a floating cap tied to patient counts, so, FL values somewhat of a reason for larger value. (Despite now the possibility they will have additional licensing processes in the near future.
One can then add on the various possible events coming the next 30 days where 3 may very well carry a value (by the above standards) as much as both companies cap's combined.
I definitely support it, and the combined value a much higher level than either company's shareholders could have obtained otherwise...Of course, people always talk of 5-10 baggers, but most of the time it's unrealistic, and a shame, as their greed and lack of discipline probably prevents taking advantage of extremely nice gains, but in this specific case......the final holdings by all recent market reactions and standards does actually create something of a substantial value.
You're coming very close to touching on somewhat reasonable today....lol
Note: I still say they both have to get their pipelines cleared out to......TRTC quite a few open applications of significant value, all which should be announced within maybe 3 weeks (WeHo, NJ, NV) and get the NV cu;ltivation pulling rounds and the Dyer location up and beverage line done.
I have to say, I'm a little surprised.....
That seems like a yes for a round II.
Fortunately, readers wouldn't have to read all 10,000, as you may have 10,000 posts, but really it's only about 1,000, repeated over and over, and many of those were corrected as being inaccurate, deceptive, and dishonest (over and over as well.)
It has already been clearly displayed who enters unarmed.
Imagine if you will......
So now your entry is .67? I didn't see anything about "the TRTC fortune(s)" you made which you have touted dozens of times......
"Imagine if you will" a user who consistently posts knowingly 100% false information, but someone links those to that posters own previous statements that clearly illustrate they are regularly doing so.....
I liked this board how it was.....been trading this and happy for quite a long time...
You want to go for round 2 here champ?
That was probably one of the most significant of the evening, Rohrabacher and Sessions races aside. IL Essentially mirrored the NJ/Christie situation with medical, and there has been an adult use draft(s) waiting for him for quite a long time. (I'm a little biased on IL. More and more have a lot of work there, and quite the pipeline built up on hold ready to move forward. 3rd largest U.S market, etc. If could get NJ (adult use) out of the way, between MI, NJ, IL, NY would also move a little faster and produce quite the dent industry wise moving forward. WI also had questions on the ballot today as well.
Looks like wins across the board tonight aside from ND....haven't seen Rohrabacher finals but last I saw disturbingly close (less than 100 votes)...
Where would one even start to address the absolute pure nonsense lol...
I've been waiting to see which direction the crew wants to try and approach this......
Starting with touting the most deceptive and dishonest user I know of, and repeated cries of opposition from one user doesn't seem like a sound start lol......
Cannabis industry, business experience, shareholder value....there is no sound argument as to why this isn't infinitely more wise than all similar actions which have taken place as of late in the industry.....This being a similar organization for a 1/4 of the value, with upside too numerous to mention. (And note the caution in anyone actually addressing it ;) lol The last several collections of similar holdings valued in the billions lol...
The only thing offered being "I'm going to write and call and let them know about a short hitpiece which a substantial portion was fabricated" lol....
One has to question the opinion and motive(s) of those who would question two companies, combined, becoming the equivalent of several who have recently spent $700-835MM to achieve the same (or less), for a 1/4 of the price, and seeing that as an issue, while both are at their low's.....
smh........
You have to love "the crew" ;) lol....
(Because buying at a low, moving towards extremely positive events is such an unwise investment/trader move..lolol