No meat today, just hopes of possible future meat.

Why is Interloc-Kings still part of FUNN after all of the renaming/rebranding?

There is no confidence here. Just hopes and prayers.

PPS going down year after year does not make one richer.

At least they're Tweeting something.

Restaurant business during pandemic run by some obviously inexperienced management. Just look at the history of PR, compare against actual accomplishments, review the filings and re-re-re-filings.

The multi-year chart says it all.

This ticker is an embarrassing mess.

Waiting for the AS increase to show up. https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/FUNN/security

Correction: what it could maybe possibly make in a year. Certainly doesn't look like FYE 2022 is going to hit $8M in unaudited gross revenue.

FUNN still has a long way to go to rebuild the lost investor confidence they've demolished over the past few years.

Here's to hoping 2022 sees no yield nor stop signs for a change.

Correct. What is missing are the specific details as to the agreement regarding the dismissal. If it were great for VPLM you can be sure there would be a PR.

You’d think there would be a PR regardless as it seems like an important material event to have more cases dismissed.

They certainly PR when they file new cases.

Does not equal "they're settling and giving VPLM money".

Love how case dismissal/loss is claimed as GREAT for VPLM. Bizzaro World.

Show they are.

There are no "ongoing settlement talks"

Ouchie. And they haven't even raised the AS yet.

Movin' on up!

Just have to keep Roger focused and his hands out of the cookie jar.

Must be why VPLM is rich and they beat Apple in court. Oh, wait... All of Apple's cases have been DISMISSED. Oops!

The new-New-NEW expansion team.

Last dip before NVAX rockets?

It'll be hilarious if VPLM ever gets anyone to an actual trial and the defendants prove they're not using VPLM's IP.

There are so many VoIP patents out there, including routing, intercept, etc. that there are absolutely zero guarantees anyone is using any IP VPLM holds. Yeah, let's sue Verizon, owner of thousands of networking related patents.

https://patents.google.com/?q=wireless+routing&assignee=verizon


VPLM certainly doesn't know if anyone is using their IP, they're just lobbing generic accusations as we saw with the cases VPLM lost in CA.

Defendants are simply using the available options to defend themselves, as any defendant would. There's no magic or unexpected legal wrangling happening.

* IPR
* Attempt to get cases dismissed (includes Alice, Markman, etc.)
* Last resort is an actual trial where depositions, discovery, etc. is required

I'm guessing that list is also sorted in order of easiest and least expensive to the defendants.

I read that to say "the more the accused try to defend themselves the more guilty they must be"

Which is rediculous.

Being accused & forced to defend does not prove infringement. Nor does it provide validity to the accuser.

Newly 0 shares traded today. Not FUNN at all.

Next quarterly is expected early Feb. Expect PPS to spike before the filing comes out. At least based on how this undulates every quarter for the past year or so.

What wins?

Looks like Twitter is still suing for attorney fees. There sure is a long list of court losses and dismissals in that list.

Underreporting their market cap @ $5.8M vs $8.8M on OTC website. https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/FUNN/security

I would say they barely leverage it. Very sporadic posts. There's not even a Tucson Twitter page at all AFAIK. New hire has plenty of opportunities to grossly improve all of this.

I don’t expect continuous shareholder updates. But I would expect continuous social media updates for the locations and brand. Other than the new hire’s compensation there’s endless opportunities for basically free marketing that’s been mostly untapped all of these years.

Please don't. Just focus solely on cafes.

Hard not to survive when you can print unlimited shares. Forever.

Allegedly. Never proven. VPLM has never even specified in detail how any company is even infringing.

And therein lies the problem.

Only “proof” of Dr Gil offer is a single VPLM PR. Hardly something to believe.

And if true shareholders should be PISSED it was rejected. Certainty would not be in shareholders financial interest to keep Malak instead of gaining an actual CEO with actual experience.

Nobody has argued otherwise. The topic being repeatedly dodged is Roger paying out of "his own pocket" which is absolutely NOT the case.

Missing the point. The statement was Roger paid for something out of his "own pocket". That is not remotely the same thing as a public company issuing shares to pay for things.

Nobody said anything about "standards". I simply corrected a misstatement that somehow Roger is paying for things out of "his own pocket" where in fact Roger pays for everything with shareholder money.

Correction: from shareholders pockets.

Gotta keep the dream alive as existing cases are lost and dismissed.