Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The tech is more nascent than OOBA. GuardedID is always mentioned in any short list review and SFOR has another strong patent on it.
Who else are you thinking about?
Read the question to which I'm responding. Try again.
Existing ooba (patent 698).
That's one reason this is a many play stock with very long legs. Keystroke encryption (I think) will go through similar transformation and adoption.
With the keystroke encryption, how will others relate to the patent holders when employing the technology?
BUY BUY BUY - is this how you do that?
To be fair, there ARE technological approaches out there that can beat the security provided by SFOR. However, those are completely not ready for any prime time. The Census, IRS, DoD, and players like Swift are only now looking at OOBA and keystroke encryption.
IMO, the keystroke holds as much or more value over time for SFOR. I believe there will be the near term reactions to what happens with OOBA and be repeated in similar form for keystroke encryption. Play that as you might.
In the 5+ year plan, either SFOR needs to meet or beat that wave of technology or they will falter. BUT, they will have been absorbed by another company well before that time comes.
To paraphrase someone else, I know enough to know that this is a rare opportunity in many ways. It's true investing. How you play it going forward is up to you. There are MANY ways to play going forward.
The only limiting factor right now are those trying to sell for whatever reason.
Kay said the court cases take awhile. It's the fault of a few on here who pumped the dream of 9/9 being THE DATE of action, when it was just the beginning.
So, place blame where it lies.
In case you haven't done your DD, here's the court schedule, so sometime around 11/17 things will heat up on that front, though I think things will be exciting before that time comes.
SCHEDULING ORDER: that any motions to join parties or amend pleadings, whether by third-party complaint or amended pleadings, shall be made by 1/24/17, dispositive motions shall be filed by 2/16/18, scheduling an in-person status conference on 1/12/17 at 10:00, telephone status conference on 2/17/17 at 3:30 p.m., in-person status conference on 4/19/17 at 10:00 a.m., telephone status conference on 5/24/17 at 4:00 p.m. AM before Magistrate Judge Mark Falk, all Fact Discovery shall be completed by 11/1/2017; etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 11/30/16. (sr, )
Well I've only heard things directly and publicly that end up being accurate. If there's no new site come February then that would be the first time. It all adds up but you can choose to not agree and move on to the next stock. The market is good that way and is wide open.
Why do you say no recurring revenue from MSFT? Beside Comcast where does the other recurring revenue come from? The questions you've posed this afternoon can be asked of you the other way. I see proof in numbers, and I've had some of their business models I deduced from said numbers confirmed by them in hearing about their licensing structures. It's all there. Make a decision, please. Either dump because you're obviously fed up, or enjoy the coming ride up.
You're thinking retail. Their core business doesn't operate at the retail level that much. Probably never will as much as licensing on a larger level.
For those deals at least one model they have is on a monthly or annual recurring fee.
That proof IS in the numbers and softly confirmed by Kay's statement to Shalley.
http://www.microcapdaily.com/a-close-look-at-strikeforce-technologies-incotcmktssfor/117456/
“StrikeForce remains very positive in regard to our developing recurring gross revenue opportunities, with all of our deals now in play. In addition we are especially enthusiastic with our enterprise channel that is growing.”
This is what keeps getting missed. The email reply was recent. The last fins were for period ended 9/30. License deals are generally steady and build on each other. There were some that undoubtedly came online, so to speak, during Q3. Probably others have started since.
So the email reply comes from a place that is seeing what's happened since 9/30.
I believe this is a very steady company now, with potential fireworks.
Nice finding JTech.
Like Comcast?
New deals are always being sought and worked. We should see some things in the quarterlies, but just because a couple of prime deals get set doesn't mean you stop working new ones. It's the pipeline, and they have a healthy one, inclusive of good partner strategies.
Multiple big paydays.
Everyone see the January date moved?
So..... why do the bulls stay here?
People glad this board is down then come flocking back.
Worth takes a lot of things into consideration including "blue sky". So if there's an argument that pps has been held down from infringement then it really has no bearing on value in a buy-out.
Unless part of the case is or could be made that pps is low due to infringement.
Only a hostile takeover really works on pps, I believe.
It those who claim to have no shares and are here all the time. Usually bashing. How transparent can you be?
I said it earlier, but why would Trustwave buy the other two who are being sued? More likely to buy the plaintiff.
No. Why would Trustwave buy two others in litigation?
It's a dead patent. Subsumed by SFOR's 698.
I have to say it's fun to watch the demoralized clueless drop their ask with their tails between their legs.
There are some good things on the horizon, in plain sight.
Manipulators getting stuck. If they didn't mess with this so much over the past weeks they could've been selling these shares for nearly twice the price at least.
Again, talk about shooting yourself in the foot!!!
Me too. I chase other things. This one is different and just requires me to wait. I can get my trade obsession on elsewhere with this basically bring good money in the bank.
And what's changed?
Deal with Comcast. Deal and settlement with MSFT. Product on the shelves. Steadily increasing revenue.
Go SFOR
Today might be a good one! $SVTE!
I've spent about 15 years in proposal development for large gov contracts for small companies. This is opposite. Even the bugs have to through the same hoops.
Some inside tips help and that has happened here as well. The large contract pursuit, along with retail presence is a good way to go.
Maybe. I think it's mainly that those three are most closely aligned in the marketplace with SFOR. More of a stretch to go for companies that use OOBA, like Google, but where that's not the core business.
But after these victories it's easier to go to Google, FB, etc and tell them they need to pay their licensing fees.
And again, I doubt SFOR is out to crush these three. They want their fees from every unit sold, past present future. Plus damages since they had to litigate.
Would still be liable for their portions ala Phonefactor/MSFT,. Don't think that'll happen. Better play is buying SFOR and collecting from the other two.
Yeah, might have to put some of it offshore! Thanks for the tip!
Meh, they seem stable for once. I like the various angles being played. They're going to form a nice wave.
It happened pretty quick. He said good things were coming and they did in revenue. He didn't lie.
I think he wants the company to grow on merit. Too much hype was going on back then. Everyone thought the one court date was IT, not the beginning of a process. It probably would've been worse had he not popped the balloon.
I think he could have done that in auch better way, though. But I think that's why he did what he did.
2 million less than it otherwise would be.
You know this doesn't tie to one person?
Probably not the same person.
Can you link to it?
Eh, three pretty certain ones panned out for me over the past month and one more set for this week.
SFOR isn't one of those. Multiple plays available if you're smart and know what you own.
Now isn't the time to exit.
Yes!