Keeping Investing Positive and Informative
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
$TPAC Thanks, $treet. That $LTNC chart is looking just like $TPAC, primed for a move. I'm going to follow them on Twitter and put them on my radar. Much appreciated!
Good call, D. We are still riding the bull trend right up the middle bollinger band on the 1yr daily chart. Cooler chart, thinner ride up, and from a fundamental perspective, the best is yet to come.
$HTIC Reversal starting. Moving fast on low volume. Yesterday's sellers are out. Buyers were longs as well as traders and new entries not selling under .01. Let's rock.
$TPAC For Traders and Investors Alike:
It's been a little while since I posted on here. I wanted to give everyone an alert on a run I see coming up. A few years back TPAC ran from .0004-.0072. I believe that is gearing up again. I'll explain why.
To get the simple stuff out of the way, there is only about $15k between .0001 and a 100% move to .0002. It varies by a few grand here and there, but is getting whittled down day by day. Also, there is a trading group on this already. They are all over Twitter. And on Ihub, if you look at the guys on the board, then cross reference those names with the list of moderators on the ADAC board, you'll catch my drift.
From a more substantial point of reference, the company has three ICOs coming out. The first one, an ebike ICO, being marketed to both retail and city govts, is going to have a coin that is a registered security, as well as an additional coin that is a utility coin for ride sharing. The CEO is quoted saying that the ICO will be $30M, and 20%, or $6M, will be allocated for share buyback. That is enough to buy back the entire O/S a few times over here, so making at least 100% from .0001 will be easy.
The second of the two ICOs will be an aerospace supply chain and quality control product using blockchain application. The CEO is a partner at ICO Advisory Services. This is being done correctly, and with an experienced team.
The third ICO will come out after a wind farm acquisition, which is slated to close within 30-90 days. The ICO will add extra megawatts and will be used for the privatized sale of renewable energy in Europe.
The ebikes are also a product for TPAC. In a post on another investment site, the CEO mentioned that selling 20,000 bikes in a year was very doable. The revenues from that would be $14M. Again, we are at .0001.
Now, here's where it gets better. TPAC just become the exclusive supplier for Onebot Global ebikes in North America. They now have better rates on the bike, as well as international support, and they are projecting 10-25k bikes sold per month. Remember from the paragraph above, 20k bikes per year would equate to $14M. Mid-range of the aforementioned figures, we're now looking at ten times that revenue number. The ICOs will be non-dilutive and will count as revenue/assets for the company. So again, the current pps is .0001.
Lastly, there is an extra horse in the race, a trading firm out of Baltimore assisting with share absorption. They mentioned on their private Twitter acct today that they would be absorbing shares through Q2. The ebike ICO pre-funds in Q1, and then funds the rest of the way via the public market in Q2. It is my assumption that this firm is buying the shares and holding them, and once the ICO revs are made, the shares will be repurchased from the trading firm by TPAC and will then be removed from both the O/S and the A/S.
It was mentioned in a filing that this was going to happen quite some time ago. I saved that filing(see 8.01): http://filings.irdirect.net/data/1422295/000168316816000428/tpac_8k.pdf
There is a ton more info, and I am just scratching the surface, so for more, go to Twitter and check out https://twitter.com/TPACbearings/with_replies
Enjoy the gains!
$TPAC For Traders and Investors Alike:
It's been a little while since I posted on here. I wanted to give everyone an alert on a run I see coming up. A few years back TPAC ran from .0004-.0072. I believe that is gearing up again. I'll explain why.
To get the simple stuff out of the way, there is only about $15k between .0001 and a 100% move to .0002. It varies by a few grand here and there, but is getting whittled down day by day. Also, there is a trading group on this already. They are all over Twitter. And on Ihub, if you look at the guys on the board, then cross reference those names with the list of moderators on the ADAC board, you'll catch my drift.
From a more substantial point of reference, the company has three ICOs coming out. The first one, an ebike ICO, being marketed to both retail and city govts, is going to have a coin that is a registered security, as well as an additional coin that is a utility coin for ride sharing. The CEO is quoted saying that the ICO will be $30M, and 20%, or $6M, will be allocated for share buyback. That is enough to buy back the entire O/S a few times over here, so making at least 100% from .0001 will be easy.
The second of the two ICOs will be an aerospace supply chain and quality control product using blockchain application. The CEO is a partner at ICO Advisory Services. This is being done correctly, and with an experienced team.
The third ICO will come out after a wind farm acquisition, which is slated to close within 30-90 days. The ICO will add extra megawatts and will be used for the privatized sale of renewable energy in Europe.
The ebikes are also a product for TPAC. In a post on another investment site, the CEO mentioned that selling 20,000 bikes in a year was very doable. The revenues from that would be $14M. Again, we are at .0001.
Now, here's where it gets better. TPAC just become the exclusive supplier for Onebot Global ebikes in North America. They now have better rates on the bike, as well as international support, and they are projecting 10-25k bikes sold per month. Remember from the paragraph above, 20k bikes per year would equate to $14M. Mid-range of the aforementioned figures, we're now looking at ten times that revenue number. The ICOs will be non-dilutive and will count as revenue/assets for the company. So again, the current pps is .0001.
Lastly, there is an extra horse in the race, a trading firm out of Baltimore assisting with share absorption. They mentioned on their private Twitter acct today that they would be absorbing shares through Q2. The ebike ICO pre-funds in Q1, and then funds the rest of the way via the public market in Q2. It is my assumption that this firm is buying the shares and holding them, and once the ICO revs are made, the shares will be repurchased from the trading firm by TPAC and will then be removed from both the O/S and the A/S.
It was mentioned in a filing that this was going to happen quite some time ago. I saved that filing(see 8.01): http://filings.irdirect.net/data/1422295/000168316816000428/tpac_8k.pdf
There is a ton more info, and I am just scratching the surface, so for more, go to Twitter and check out https://twitter.com/TPACbearings/with_replies
Enjoy the gains!
I agree with you on that, Joey. To me, that adds up. Whether we're right or wrong, who knows, but it sure does make for a strong possibility. I posted some thoughts/connections on that here: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138915208
REO, if that is the case, Harvey has turned down any toxic funding in the past that would negatively affect both his company, and his shareholders. So if your dissection of the financing language is correct, we could see Harvey's tech begin to set forth towards intercontinental expansion, especially seeing as the entity that purchased his company as a subsidiary already operates internationally. Clasico was posted yesterday. They had a foot print on multiple continents.
$TPAC ICO's are coming. Pre-funding for the electric transport ICO should begin in April. We'll clear through the .0001's on the ask before then. It's not going to take too much horsepower to get rid of them. Then we're up 100% and the pre-funding, as well as the wind farm acquisition should be right there to move it up again. Also, remember what @IRMoneyMatters mentioned yesterday: they will be absorbing shares through Q2. Ask is stacked a bit now, or so it seems, but is going to get thin.
More info here: https://twitter.com/TPACbearings/with_replies
$TPAC I'm alerting now officially at .0001 More info here: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138926004
$TPAC Momo, BB and Crew:
It's been a little while since I posted on here. I wanted to give everyone an alert on a run I see coming up. I know at least one of you is already in on this. Anyway, a few years back TPAC ran from .0004-.0072. I believe that is gearing up again. I'll explain why.
To get the simple stuff out of the way, there is only about $15k between .0001 and a 100% move to .0002. It varies by a few grand here and there, but is getting whittled down day by day. Also, there is a trading group on this already. They are all over Twitter. And on Ihub, if you look at the guys on the board, then cross reference those names with the list of moderators on the ADAC board, you'll catch my drift.
From a more substantial point of reference, the company has three ICOs coming out. The first one, an ebike ICO, being marketed to both retail and city govts, is going to have a coin that is a registered security, as well as an additional coin that is a utility coin for ride sharing. The CEO is quoted saying that the ICO will be $30M, and 20%, or $6M, will be allocated for share buyback. That is enough to buy back the entire O/S a few times over here, so making at least 100% from .0001 will be easy.
The second of the two ICOs will be an aerospace supply chain and quality control product using blockchain application. The CEO is a partner at ICO Advisory Services. This is being done correctly, and with an experienced team.
The third ICO will come out after a wind farm acquisition, which is slated to close within 30-90 days. The ICO will add extra megawatts and will be used for the privatized sale of renewable energy in Europe.
The ebikes are also a product for TPAC. In a post on another investment site, the CEO mentioned that selling 20,000 bikes in a year was very doable. The revenues from that would be $14M. Again, we are at .0001.
Now, here's where it gets better. TPAC just become the exclusive supplier for Onebot Global ebikes in North America. They now have better rates on the bike, as well as international support, and they are projecting 10-25k bikes sold per month. Remember from the paragraph above, 20k bikes per year would equate to $14M. Mid-range of the aforementioned figures, we're now looking at ten times that revenue number. The ICOs will be non-dilutive and will count as revenue/assets for the company. So again, the current pps is .0001.
Lastly, there is an extra horse in the race, a trading firm out of Baltimore assisting with share absorption. They mentioned on their private Twitter acct today that they would be absorbing shares through Q2. The ebike ICO pre-funds in Q1, and then funds the rest of the way via the public market in Q2. It is my assumption that this firm is buying the shares and holding them, and once the ICO revs are made, the shares will be repurchased from the trading firm by TPAC and will then be removed from both the O/S and the A/S.
It was mentioned in a filing that this was going to happen quite some time ago. I saved that filing(see 8.01): http://filings.irdirect.net/data/1422295/000168316816000428/tpac_8k.pdf
There is a ton more info, and I am just scratching the surface, so for more, go to Twitter and check out @tpacbearings w/replies.
Enjoy the gains!
$TPAC Hey Pistol, Mick and Friends,
It's been a little while since I posted on here. I wanted to give everyone an alert on a run I see coming up. A few years back TPAC ran from .0004-.0072. I believe that is gearing up again. I'll explain why.
To get the simple stuff out of the way, there is only about $15k between .0001 and a 100% move to .0002. It varies by a few grand here and there, but is getting whittled down day by day. Also, there is a trading group on this already. They are all over Twitter. And on Ihub, if you look at the guys on the board, then cross reference those names with the list of moderators on the ADAC board, you'll catch my drift.
From a more substantial point of reference, the company has three ICOs coming out. The first one, an ebike ICO, being marketed to both retail and city govts, is going to have a coin that is a registered security, as well as an additional coin that is a utility coin for ride sharing. The CEO is quoted saying that the ICO will be $30M, and 20%, or $6M, will be allocated for share buyback. That is enough to buy back the entire O/S a few times over here, so making at least 100% from .0001 will be easy.
The second of the two ICOs will be an aerospace supply chain and quality control product using blockchain application. The CEO is a partner at ICO Advisory Services. This is being done correctly, and with an experienced team.
The third ICO will come out after a wind farm acquisition, which is slated to close within 30-90 days. The ICO will add extra megawatts and will be used for the privatized sale of renewable energy in Europe.
The ebikes are also a product for TPAC. In a post on another investment site, the CEO mentioned that selling 20,000 bikes in a year was very doable. The revenues from that would be $14M. Again, we are at .0001.
Now, here's where it gets better. TPAC just become the exclusive supplier for Onebot Global ebikes in North America. They now have better rates on the bike, as well as international support, and they are projecting 10-25k bikes sold per month. Remember from the paragraph above, 20k bikes per year would equate to $14M. Mid-range of the aforementioned figures, we're now looking at ten times that revenue number. The ICOs will be non-dilutive and will count as revenue/assets for the company. So again, the current pps is .0001.
Lastly, there is an extra horse in the race, a trading firm out of Baltimore assisting with share absorption. They mentioned on their private Twitter acct today that they would be absorbing shares through Q2. The ebike ICO pre-funds in Q1, and then funds the rest of the way via the public market in Q2. It is my assumption that this firm is buying the shares and holding them, and once the ICO revs are made, the shares will be repurchased from the trading firm by TPAC and will then be removed from both the O/S and the A/S.
It was mentioned in a filing that this was going to happen quite some time ago. I saved that filing(see 8.01): http://filings.irdirect.net/data/1422295/000168316816000428/tpac_8k.pdf
There is a ton more info, and I am just scratching the surface, so for more, go to Twitter and check out @tpacbearings w/replies.
Enjoy the gains!
What are the odds of two people with the CEO's name both being CEO's and both being Langhang CEO's(despite not having the last name of Linghang), and both being located in Guangdong, not just in China?
From the filing:
Chun Hong Cheng Cheng 240,625,000 70.38%
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Director of the issuer
Junhao Hotel
3 Jingguan Avenue, Sanxiang Town,
Zhongshan City, Guangdong China 528463
Now, notice Linghang food's location(sources linked below):
Linghang Group is currently composed of Linghang Food (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Linghang Food (GuangDong) Co.; Ltd., Lisa & Mike International, Linghang Tanzania Corporation and Golden Dragon (HK) Ship Corporation.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138849678
https://www.pressreader.com/tanzania/mtanzania/20170905/281788514208251
With a conglomerate like Linghang, why is it so far fetched, given how vast they are, for them to have a hotel and hospitality supply chain subsidiary as well as a waste to energy subsidiary? Seems both lend themselves well to the rest of the scope their international business.
I'm still thinking game on. And instead of smaller, this might have gotten bigger. I'm playing the contrarian here. No, I don't have the answers, but that is gut sense. Let's see how that hand plays out.
Nice grab, JEM. This is the largest daily volume candle since the run started in January. 10% of the float has traded already, with longs soaking up the dip, and a few savvy traders picking up the bounce. This thing now stands to fly once merger news hits. I have a feeling it is going to be a thin ride up once the action starts, and little games here and there to pop, drop and accumulate until then. Again, nice going on the shares here!
Yeah, I'm holding as well. The 100M float lends itself to a pretty nice supply/demand ratio. We should see a bounce pretty soon. Only a few million sold on the drop(*first few mil were on the rise up this morning), and lots of new faces hitting the board. RSI is now in the 40's, RSI-14 trendline shows historical bottom at around 42. Still looking at a low-float merger play here.
Organic sell-off or shake out? Sitting exactly on the middle band. Let's see where we close. https://www.tradingview.com/x/LUwSxahH/
Chart was overheated. Harvey is not going to sell his company to a local bed and breakfast. He rejected previous financing, so to think he is just going to sell his technology to Barry and Barbara's Bed and Breakfast so he can sleep in the maintenance shed and make oil out of tires out back is preposterous. Let the filings come out.
As for the chart, the 1yr daily candlestick is above the 20MA, or middle bollinger band, far above it. We shed a couple of shares off the accumulation, but that could easily be a few traders who loaded early, saw an overcooked chart, then sold into the first filing they could in which they knew fellow holders could sense ambiguity in. The RSI just went from an overbought 85(RSI-14) down to 53(RSI-14), leaving us with plenty of room to move back up. So far, the bullish trend is still intact.
See the chart here with a few simple indicators. This is an easy read for beginning chartists as well: https://www.tradingview.com/x/Rr7MRgcU/
You are very welcome, Sir. Anytime.
Daiello, your DD today is nothing short of incredible. The patents, the UN exclusive supply angle, the $160M Tanzania deal(also mentioned by Rain), and everything else. Truly incredible. We could be looking at a +$200M company with a 105M share float(with some of that held long and no longer available). Great work. #128 for you.
Good morning, T. A member mark is a simple gesture, some call it giving someone a follow. While it does not really affect someone one way or another, it is a simple measure of respect or acknowledgement for someone's posts, whether of a personal nature, or of a financial/investment nature. In this case, it is a tipping of the hat for someone showing good character.
Thank you for your thoughts and respectful dialogue as well. I really admire you wanting to use your profits in a manner that serves God and facilitates helping others. I'm going to give you a member mark for your good character. Enjoy the evening, T.
Okay, just wanted to make sure. For anyone new here, this is going to $110 by summer! Anything under $100 is a steal.
No thunder stolen. By all means, it is a public forum. You covered a good bit of what was to be said. I have jumped in on replies and conversations as well. Sometimes you just see something that prompts an idea and you chime in. Should we start saying $110 per share by summer or would that be considered pumping?
Snax covered much of what I wish to say, but for clarity, the financing Harvey was looking for was $27M, which I would assume to cover marketing and expansion costs. The shell itself I'd guess would cost a few hundred thousand(maybe more, maybe less) and would guess Harvey sold the company for a few million. According to the unaudited disclosure filing from this Sunday, the assets alone, without profit made on sale(or anything else factored in) were $938,010, plus over a quarter million in net losses from 2016 and 2017 alone(not to mention time spent designing and laboring over the technology). And while I have not looked into it, seeing as there are many roads to Rome, Linghang might deem it more efficient or even cost effective to buy an otc shell and uplist rather than incur the cost of a formal IPO. If per say, they wish to go public, but do not care so much the exchange, you have companies such as Addidas on OTCQX trading around $110 per share: https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ADDYY/quote?utm_source=unbounce&utm_medium=unbounce&utm_campaign=OTCQX%20Best%2050%20Landing%20Page All said, we can guess and conjecture and punch holes in scenarios until we are blue in the face, but the truth comes out when Linghang files the necessary documents and disseminates information via press releases. My apologies for the lack of clarity regarding the $27M.
More and more is piecing together and adding up. Speculative, sure, but also logical and very likely. If they just wanted a cheap shell, they would not have bought out Harvey's company as well, nor would they have had the financial wherewithal to do so. Harvey was looking for $27M in financing when it was his show. So the shell plus the company, while maybe not sold for $27M, was easily more to acquire than just buying one off a has-been for $10-15k.
https://dealstream.com/public-shells-for-sale/listings
You have a heck of a point, snax. That is a distinct possibility. Unless they were just another OTCBB startup with no ambition of QB/QX or major exchange uplisting, I do not see why they would not do that, seeing as their multiple ventures have to provide for enough capital to easily afford the audits themselves. I think you're on to something. Also, should that be the case, we might have some overseas help keeping the price intact. The more competition for shares the better.
Exactly. Whether a couple weeks or a couple of months, if the gains are five or tenfold the initial investment, the wait was certainly worth it.
Hey Tmilz, you are correct. That was an error on my part. I always thought NYSE was $1, AMEX was $3, and NASDAQ was $5. I'm not sure where those numbers came from or how they got retained as memory. Thank you for the correction on that and bringing it to light. Much appreciated.
Oh yeah, I knew what you meant. I'm not as think as you drunk I am. Or something like that...
Great prompt on your part, Joey! We appreciate your insight and questions as well.
Looking forward to it!
No need to waste your final two posts replying to this, but thank you for all of your DD. The info you have presented has been a great contribution. Linghang is really looking like a winner.
Fingers crossed!
Oil tankers. Interesting. While a bit of a tangent, wasn't Harvey's tech used to turn waste(tires, etc) into oil via pyrolysis? If they are already in the oil business, whether shipping, etc., then that tech could turn waste into business. I'm curious to see what surfaces when Linghang reveals their hand.
This could be good!
Yeah, I'm with you. Trying to find out overseas information can be quite the challenge. Thanks for that link and showing it to be active and on the water. If they actually own large ships, or anything of the sort, we could be looking at serious assets and revenues. Take a peak at those numbers below. Again, thank you for the lead on Golden Dragon!
"In recent years, oversupply of container ship capacity has caused prices for new and used ships to fall. From 2008 to 2009, new container ship prices dropped by 19–33%, while prices for 10-year-old container ships dropped by 47–69%.[55] In March 2010, the average price for a geared 500-TEU container ship was $10 million, while gearless ships of 6,500 and 12,000 TEU averaged prices of $74 million and $105 million respectively.[56] At the same time, secondhand prices for 10-year-old geared container ships of 500-, 2,500-, and 3,500-TEU capacity averaged prices of $4 million, $15 million, and $18 million respectively.[57]
In 2009, 11,669,000 gross tons of newly built container ships were delivered.[58] Over 85% of this new capacity was built in the Republic of Korea, China, and Japan, with Korea accounting for over 57% of the world's total alone.[58] New container ships accounted for 15% of the total new tonnage that year, behind bulk carriers at 28.9% and oil tankers at 22.6%.[58]"
Source(see: Vessel Purchases): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Container_ship
*Note: these price figures are from 2009-2010, almost a decade ago, without today's added technology factored in.
Given the SS here, as well as how many subsidiaries Linghang seems to have, that is certainly not out of the question. Odds? Can't say, but if I had a big time overseas company that I wanted to expand upon internationally and bring recognition and credibility to via the stock market, I'd purchase a cheap, clean, and current US OTC shell; and if I could acquire the type of technology that furthered my business in one big wrap around deal that also included the shell, I would do just that. All that said, if they have the numbers already, and then they now have the shell, then it is just a matter of accounting and simple book valuation(plus or minus an industry multiplier). Playing that hand from a point of optimism here, if they are NASDAQ ready with a $5 book valuation, then hit the big boards, then announce not only their company, but also the acquisition of Harvey's tech, then theoretically, it stands to rise in price as big board traders and larger hedge funds(US, Chinese, and otherwise) step in to compete for shares, which are quite limited given the size of the float.
PS Does anyone have any info on the Linghang Golden Dragon Ship Corporation (subsidiary)? I did a quick search but must admit to coming up empty handed.
Nice grab, Sam. Last time we got walked down to .002 on super low volume. It only took something like 17M shares to drive us up 215% in a single day. If we only get a low volume walk-down to .004's or .006's, and then news hits with the InMed deal finalized, that last move will very likely pale in comparison, yet instead of launching from .002, will launch from .004 to .006(or better). We're golden. Just a waiting game.
Nice day here. .02 tested this morning with high .01's held into the close. Solid maintenance of accumulation and bullish trend strongly intact. RSI is cooking hot in the mid-80's on the 1yr daily candlestick chart, so I would not guess too many technical traders are going to make their entries without a dip. What we need more of are fundamental traders, aka longs. Traders avoiding the overbought condition based on technical indicators may still enter later for a percentage based price move once news hits, momentum starts, and we begin to get buzz, and a subsequent climb from news. The good part? Even less shares will be available by then, seeing as longs are in competition for dips as well. With enough longs and fundamental players, we could see a signal for scarcity become really apparent once it is go time. I've seen that happen, and people scramble to get in. The setup here is getting really good. Looking for a .03 test within a week or so. Might happen sooner. Way to hold, Everyone. And congrats on any shares secured on today's dips. Those are going to look very nice a few steps down the road from now.
Looking great today. $TRON proving to be just as thin on the way up. +21% on only approx $10k in current daily volume. Wait until the big news is finalized and hits the wires. Patiently waiting.
Exactly. Plenty of money can be made as a straight shooter.