Prescribing-Placebo-is-deemed-ethical
http://www.bmj.com/content/337/bmj.a1938

Results 679 physicians (57%) responded to the survey. About half of the surveyed internists and rheumatologists reported prescribing placebo treatments on a regular basis (46-58%, depending on how the question was phrased). Most physicians (399, 62%) believed the practice to be ethically permissible. Few reported using saline (18, 3%) or sugar pills (12, 2%) as placebo treatments, while large proportions reported using over the counter analgesics (267, 41%) and vitamins (243, 38%) as placebo treatments within the past year. A small but notable proportion of physicians reported using antibiotics (86, 13%) and sedatives (86, 13%) as placebo treatments during the same period. Furthermore, physicians who use placebo treatments most commonly describe them to patients as a potentially beneficial medicine or treatment not typically used for their condition (241, 68%); only rarely do they explicitly describe them as placebos (18, 5%).

Most-of-these-"shelves"-projectations-based-on-PR-that-historically-are-lacking-crediblity and are intended to drive TOXIC Stock Dilution sales not product sales.

Great-stock-distribtuion-deal,family-run-lending-entities-pocket-50%

As noted in SEC filing:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

....unlawful distribution of securities
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities

Yes-there-is-more:Mounting-legal-fees,Toxic-Dilution,AS-near-20B soon, very soon

Mounting-legal-fees,Continued-TOXIC-Dilution,End-to-the-End Soon very soon

If-company-had-any-profit-projection-we-would-be-seeing-daily-PR

Year_of_Incorporation-->2000_deeper-in-the-red-each-day-->April-2016

Minor-Typo-Considering.....should-be-trading-in-the-0.0003-0.0005-range

Sales-$2.3M-produces-Losses-$1.8M-top-and-bottom-lines

Sales $2,339,646
Loss from Operations($1,804,541)
Net loss ($2,469,964)

Difference subsidized by uninformed investors via TOXIC Dilution program

Double-the-TOXIC-dilution-from-4.8B-to-8.5B

Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding -Basic and Diluted

---- 2015 -------- 2014 ---
8,561,703,614 4,836,167,956

Where did that ~$4M dollars go?

Astrological-humor-FDA-is-pending-and-virtually-in-the-bag!!

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=118807594
==> Sunday, 11/29/15 07:01:39 PM

Suggest reviewing historical record before BIELieving

Irrelevent-targeting-same-marketable-space

If both devices on shared shelf space, which they would be, who you gonna be persuaded by Shaq or whom-ever the Biel spokesman is. Dr nobody ever heard of before.....

Every-unit-sold-results-in-negative-revenue according to historical financials released from company. There is not rational extrapolation that shows a near term profitable balance sheet.

Especially considering investors are now funding high value lawyers to defend leadership in SEC legal proceeding.

Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

....inaccurate public disclosure
....unlawful distribution of securities
....falsely recognizing revenue
....overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
....offerings were not registered with the Commission.
....constitutes improper professional conduct.

throwing-Investors-money-out-the-window-other-50%-funding-lifestyles
Financial reporting from company shows company looses money on every sale.

It's not the companies money, the company is using ~50% of investor capital, so investors essentially bought the marketing award. The other 50% according to the SEC is in somebodies pocket.

Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

....unlawful distribution of securities
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities

If-any-doubts-read-the-filing/complaint-if disagree-suggest-writing-to-the-SEC


Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

....inaccurate public disclosure
....unlawful distribution of securities
....falsely recognizing revenue
....overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
....offerings were not registered with the Commission.
....constitutes improper professional conduct.

Exact-unembellished-statements-from-SEC-action-against-perpetrators

Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

....inaccurate public disclosure
....unlawful distribution of securities
....falsely recognizing revenue
....overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
....offerings were not registered with the Commission.
....constitutes improper professional conduct.

If any doubts read the filing/complaint, if disagree suggest writing to the SEC as any comments on this forum are not going to change reality of what has been filed for public knowledge and subsequently the legal system to takes its course.

Very-Very-Very-Very-Very-Very-Very-Under-Investigation-by-SEC

Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

....inaccurate public disclosure
....unlawful distribution of securities
....falsely recognizing revenue
....overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
....offerings were not registered with the Commission.
....constitutes improper professional conduct.


remedial action is appropriate in the public interest ......
including, but not limited to, a censure, disgorgement, a civil penalty and a penny stock suspension or bar....
should be ordered to pay disgorgement pursuant....


Emphasize --> "but not limited to"

Creative-beyond-imaginable-Very-Very-Very-Very-Very-Very-Very

Oblivious-to-context-qualifies-one-as-having-succumb-to-irrational-exuberance
That means you ;)

-->
What is 'Irrational Exuberance'

Irrational exuberance is unsustainable investor enthusiasm that drives asset prices up to levels that aren't supported by fundamentals.
<--

Please-Read-"Important-Information-Safety-Warning"-"not-be-used....pacemaker...defibrillator...neurostimulator"

http://www.amazon.co.uk/ActiPatch-Back-Pain-Therapy-Device/dp/B00RLLN3IM --> "ActiPatch Back Pain Therapy Device"

-->
Important Information
Safety Warning
ActiPatch should not be used by persons with a cardiac pacemaker, cardioverter defibrillator, neurostimulator or any active medical or metallic implant that is within the area of application. ActiPatch should not be used by women who are pregnant or think they may be pregnant.
<--

Patents-will-expire-before-.....-based-on-current-trajectories

Nobody-discounts-speculators-can-see-ROI whats at question is the company leadership or lack of.

Forward-looking-SEC-allegations-substantiated-insurmountable-legal-fees-and-possible-incarceration That's some of the possibilities any potential investors should consider on the BIEL road ahead, before investing and or increasing position. Even if you ignore the history of biel the company and the associated leadership that has now for the 2nd time run afoul of SEC fair and reasonable business practices.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

If-ActiPatch-is-alternative-to-Opioids-then-SmartRelief-is-alternative already OTC available product.
You can’t have it both ways, irrational to position ActiPatch as alternative to Opioids/prescription pharmaceuticals and not realize that SmartRelief is sharing the same TAM. Total addressable market.

Bottom line, like illicit drugs, where there is a will there is a way and if this product was revolutionary to the degree speculators claim that it is, then there would be more products sold then there are pets in the United States. IE: The consumer would by the pet product and apply to humans accordingly.

A-reasonable-product-but-a-mismanaged-business-to-the-detriment-of-the-healthcare-industry
Alternatives targeting same addressable market space promoted with world famous athlete.... what more can you say.
Any viable customers have OTC access to an alternative product:
http://www.smartrelief.com/

A person walking down the isle at local retail or Amazon....
Sees Shaq promoting smartrelief and who knows promoting Acti-Patch, who you think the customer is going to be more inclined to believe?

Especially when they google the company and find SEC proceedings against the company as one of the main results in google.....

Any rational individual that does not have dreams of winning the lottery influencing thier decision is going with Shaq's product.

Yep-agreed-invest-what-you-are-wlling-to-loose-its-a-lottery-ticket with similar odds of winning.

ROFLMAO-niether-is-irrational-exuberance-IE:Pumping

By Definition: Irrational Exuberance
-->
Unsustainable investor enthusiasm that drives asset prices up to levels that aren't supported by fundamentals
<--

Remember-not-feasible-to-be-Long-and-not-a-Financial-Looser
Unless the definition of Long is really Trader and not the typical definition of Buy & Hold "Long"

sit-and-watch-your-money-disappear
Depends, but when feel game is rigged walk away and be sure to let others know the house is rigged, also known as "Pay it forward."

Love-the-game-of-craps-the-probabilities-are-reasonably-deterministic
What we have here is a scenario where the FED's are accusing the casino of unscrupulous business practices and of taking advantage of unsuspecting gamer's and pocketing 50% of the proceeds that were supposed to be being placed into the game not their pockets.

Easy-to-be-politically-correct-when-not-a-victim For all those investors that have been "allegedly" victimized not so easy to show the patience and understanding being portrayed.

Suggest expressing more understanding for the victims and less for the "alleged" perpetrators as determined by the SEC filings.
Wheres the sympathy for the little guy who was hoping to ride a lottery ticket, instead of supporting the perpetrators who have "allegedly" pocketed 50% of the toxic dilution proceeds.

Not to mention this is not the 1st offense by the perpetrators nor is it a single offense but the "allegations" reflect multiple offenses.

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

Agreed-SEC-is-only-citing-the-facts/evidence-available

--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

2-root-causes-is-like-saying-Madoff-only-had-one-root-cuase
There are multiple occurrences of nearly every item cited by the SEC complaint against the perpetrators.

Do you really think Madoff acted alone... much less based on singular root cause.... he accepted responsibility to protect the family from incarceration.

A rational interpretation/analogy is like an officer cites you for speeding with radar as the evidence, do you think he and the judge assumes this is the 1st and only occurrence of you exceeding the posted speed limit?

Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

....inaccurate public disclosure
....unlawful distribution of securities
....falsely recognizing revenue
....overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
....offerings were not registered with the Commission.
....constitutes improper professional conduct.

OK-"Complaint-States"-falsely-recognizing-revenue

Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

OK-"Complaint-States"-unlawful-distribution-of-securities

Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

OK-"Complaint-States"-inaccurate-public-disclosure

Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

OK-"Complaint-States"-as-stipulated-by-SEC-allegations-citing-perpetrators

Pertinent keywords/statements as stipulated by the SEC
--> http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

....inaccurate public disclosure
....unlawful distribution of securities
....falsely recognizing revenue
....overstated BIELs revenue by $366,000, or 47%.
....engaged in an illegal distribution of unrestricted securities
....unregistered transactions at a discount
....orchestrated the illegal distribution.
....half of the proceeds .....was retained by the entities
....offerings were not registered with the Commission.
....constitutes improper professional conduct.

If any doubts read the filing/complaint, if disagree suggest writing to the SEC as any comments on this forum are not going to change reality of what has been filed for public knowledge and subsequently the legal system to takes its course.

constitutes_improper_professional_conduct-is-legalese-for-unscrupulous

Just for clarity -->
Define unscrupulous: not honest or fair : doing things that are wrong, dishonest, or illegal

unscrupulousness-synonymous-with-"constitutes_improper_professional_conduct"
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10036.pdf

TOXIC-Dilution-is-historically-factual-AS-15B You don't get to an AS of 15 billion and market cap below 15 million without TOXIC Dilution, that is just the reality of the facts.