Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Very positive development. Thanks.
GOD HELP US!
Holy CRAP! Where I live the sheriff has stated publicly he will not enforce vaccine mandates. THIS IS INSANITY.
Ya... and full of Corexit, pcb's and God knows what other petroleum byproducts.
Trinity I'd like to know your recipe if you're willing. I believe I read something about grapefruit being one of the ingredients. It was quite awhile ago so I'm not sure. TIA.
Joe Rogan interview with Dr. Peter McCullough MD on all things COVID. This is an excellent interview although quite long. Worth it if your interested.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/12/no_author/joe-rogan-interview-with-dr-peter-mccullough/
This is disgusting.
Ben Carson sounding the alarm over new vaccine spying bill. Both democraps and rethuglicans are supporting this!
https://rightnewswire.com/ben-carson-is-sounding-the-alarm-over-a-new-covid-vaccine-spying-bill/
There are a number of ways to prevent getting infected IMO. Although I had the virus in June 2020 I still practice the following daily. (I did not do these things prior to getting infected, sadly).
1. I spray my nostrils, mouth and eyes with a completely non toxic 10ppm silversol (ionic/colloidal) silver solution. I do this before leaving my home and when I get back. It only takes a few seconds and if I wear a mask I spray my mask as well before putting it on. Studies have shown that silver nanoparticles and ions destroy over 650 pathogens, including Sars CoV2.
2. There is a product called Xlear made from grapefruit seed extract, xylitol and saline (salt water). This is sold as a nasal spray for allergies however the ingredients have been shown in trials to completely destroy the Sars CoV2 virus on contact. Xylitol additionally coats the nasal passages with a protective sticky layer making it difficult for viral particles to adhere to the endothelial cells lining them. This is only used for the nose however.
Just from doing these simple things I haven't had so much as a sniffle since being infected and I work around migrants on a daily basis.
Dr. Peter McCullough MD recommends people use a dilute iodine (Betadine) solution as a nasal wash. 2 tsp. betadine in 6oz. water. Spit out what goes down the throat. For the mouth he recommends simple Listerine as a gargle and mouthwash.
Of course many healthcare workers who are not aware of these techniques do take Ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine preventatively. Dr. Stella Immanuel MD recommends the following; for Ivermectin four 3mg tablets once weekly if 200lbs or less, 6 tabs if over 200lbs. For hydroxychloroquine; one 200mg tablet once weekly if 180lbs or less, 2 tabs weekly if over 180lbs.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year ALL!
Researchers show how COVID damages the immune system, increasing cancer risks. Science says the vaccines may do the same.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccines-immune-system-cancer-risks/
The discovery by Swedish researchers that the SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein weakens the adaptive immune system by damaging a crucial DNA repair mechanism raises questions about whether mRNA COVID vaccines could do the same — and whether that might increase a person’s risk of developing cancer.
By
Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN
SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein weakens the adaptive immune system by damaging a crucial DNA repair mechanism.
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.
The discovery by Swedish researchers that the SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein weakens the adaptive immune system by damaging a crucial DNA repair mechanism raises questions about whether mRNA COVID vaccines could do the same — and whether that might increase a person’s risk of developing cancer.
Intrigued by clinical observations of patients with SARS-CoV-2 which suggested the virus was suppressing adaptive immunity, researchers Hui Jiang and Ya-Fang Mei at the Umeå University in Sweden set out to identify the mechanisms triggering the suppression.
They revealed the results of their findings in a peer-reviewed study, “SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro,” published in October in the journal Viruses.
Noting the importance of adaptive immunity versus innate immunity, the authors wrote:
“Unlike innate immune responses, the adaptive responses are highly specific to the particular pathogen that induced them. They can also provide long-lasting protection. A person who recovers from measles, for example, is protected for life against measles by the adaptive immune system, although not against other common viruses, such as those that cause mumps or chickenpox.”
The study’s authors used an in vitro cell line to study how the SARS CoV-2 spike protein travels through the body in a person infected with the virus. They reported:
“ … the spike protein localizes in the [cell] nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings provide evidence of the spike protein hijacking the DNA damage repair machinery and adaptive immune machinery in vitro.”
The researchers acknowledged the discovery was unexpected, stating, “Surprisingly, we found the abundance of the spike protein in the nucleus.”
The nucleus houses the cell’s chromosomes and coordinates all the cell’s activities. One glitch in the DNA of a cell can have devastating downstream effects.
According to the researchers, the DNA repair system and adaptive immune system “are interdependent, especially during lymphocyte development and maturation.”
A loss of function in crucial DNA repair proteins was found to “inhibit the production of functional B and T cells, leading to immunodeficiency,” the authors wrote.
BUY TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New Book — 'The Real Anthony Fauci'
Do we see evidence of immunodeficiency following vaccination?
Clinical trial data from COVID vaccines previously documented abnormalities in a critical part of the body’s immune system — white blood cells production.
The research noted a transient decrease in lymphocytes (T cells and B cells) associated with the Pfizer vaccine and a similar decline in granulocytes (neutrophils) with the AstraZeneca vaccine.
The fact that the Swedish researchers reported a loss of immune function associated with the invasion of the spike protein into the cell nucleus, combined with previous clinical trial data that found transient reductions in the number of white blood cells, may explain reports of increased COVID infections shortly after vaccination.
A preprint study by Public Health England investigating the early effectiveness of vaccination found a “notable” rise in COVID-19 infections in people immediately after they received the Pfizer-BioNTech or AstraZeneca vaccine.
The investigators reported:
“There were significant numbers of vaccinated individuals who go on to develop COVID-19 and our study indicates that vaccinated individuals must maintain other precautions, in particular during the first two to three weeks after vaccination.”
The Public Health England researchers extracted real-world data from the Israel vaccination program and estimated the incidence per day for each day after the first injection and reported a significant spike in cases shortly after vaccination.
They found the daily incidence of COVID infections doubled the first week following vaccination and did not reach the pre-vaccine incidence until 16 days following vaccination. See figure 2:
Daily incidence new infections graph
Figure 2. Daily incidence of new infections by days from first dose.
The authors of an article in The BMJ analyzed the findings of these early vaccine effectiveness studies documenting an increase in COVID infections in the two weeks following vaccination, and concluded “socialization” was responsible for the increased incidence of infection.
But these real-world reports following the launch of the COVID vaccination program globally align with the original Pfizer trial.
Data reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by Pfizer found a statistically significant 40% increase in suspected COVID cases, with 409 cases in the vaccinated group in the first week of the trial, compared to 287 in the placebo group.
A group of doctors, scientists, lawyers and other professionals from the UK on Feb. 5 sent an urgent open letter to the Minister for COVID-19 Vaccine Deployment, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and two vaccine oversight agencies citing strong epidemiological evidence, from around the world, to support the hypothesis that the COVID vaccine rollout may be linked with increased deaths in certain age groups.
The authors of the letter called for an immediate audit of the deaths following vaccination in the UK.
In their letter, they cited media reports from around the world showing a pattern of outbreaks of COVID and clusters of deaths occurring in the week or two after the vaccine administration, along with statements from national regulators and other official organizations raising serious concerns and calling for investigations.
According to a letter to the editor of The BMJ, commenting on the The BMJ news article that alleged socialization following vaccination was responsible for the increased incidence of infection in the two-week window following COVID vaccination, the UK doctors and scientists wrote:
“Given the evidence of white cell depletion after COVID-19 vaccination from the clinical trial data combined with the findings of and the evidence of increased COVID-19 infection rates shortly after vaccination, the possibility that the two are causally related needs urgent investigation.”
The identification by the Swedish researchers of a molecular mechanism that causes immunosuppression following vaccination only amplifies these concerns.
The critical role of the immune system and DNA repair in preventing cancer
The clinical epidemiologic data supports the Swedish researchers’ finding that immunosuppression caused by the COVID spike protein entering the cell nucleus is a red flag that cancers may also result as an adverse event following COVID vaccination.
The immune system, especially T-cell lymphocytes, is well recognized for the critical role they play in preventing cancer through their constant vigilance in attacking and killing cancer cells before they have an opportunity to develop into a tumor.
In their article, the Swedish researchers did not specifically address injury to the BRAC-1 and 53BP1 repair mechanisms in the cell and its potential to lead to an increased risk of cancer.
But their findings are disturbing given the critical functions these specific two proteins play in protecting the cell from unregulated cell growth.
The BRCA1 protein in the cell is responsible for mending breaks in DNA. It also plays a critical role in maintaining the stability of a cell’s genetic information.
To carry out these functions, the BRCA-1 protein interacts with many other proteins, including other tumor suppressors and proteins that regulate cell division.
The tumor suppressor protein 53BP1 is a pivotal regulator of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair.
When a cell has a reduced capacity to repair breaks in the DNA, defects accumulate that then trigger cells to grow and divide abnormally resulting in the formation of cancerous tumors.
Mutations in the BRAC1 gene result in a reduction of BRAC1 proteins in the cell. This can lead several high-profile cancers, including breast and ovarian cancer in women and prostate and pancreatic in men.
Mikolaj Raszek, Ph.D., who holds a degree in genetics and a doctorate degree in biochemistry, is concerned about the seriousness of these findings. In a short video he explained the significance of the finding by the Swedish researchers.
Raszek said:
“BRCA1 is mutated, then you have the highest predisposition for cancer development precisely because the BRCA1 gene codes for proteins that fix DNA damage.”
Raszek voiced concerns that we don’t yet know what the vaccines might be doing at the molecular level once injected. He concluded that the consequences are so great that the Swedish study should immediately be replicated and verified.
In assessing the potential implications of the Swedish researchers’ findings, it is necessary to identify the biodistribution of the mRNA vaccine lipid nanoparticles which contain the instructions for the cells to manufacture the spike protein.
This information may provide insights as to what tissue and organ systems might be at highest risk for injury.
As The Defender previously reported, Japanese researchers showed lipid nanoparticles from the vaccine did not stay in the deltoid muscle where they were injected, as the vaccine’s developers claimed would happen, but circulated throughout the body.
A Pfizer COVID-19 biodistribution study, obtained by viral immunologist Byram Bridle, showed the lipid nanoparticles that contain the blueprint for the cell to manufacture the spike protein were found in the whole blood circulating throughout the body within four hours.
Dr. Robert Malone, creator of mRNA vaccine technology, joined evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein, Ph.D., for a three-hour conversation on the “DarkHorse Podcast” to discuss multiple safety concerns related to Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, including the Japanese biodistribution study.
The lipid nanoparticles are the “boxes” the mRNA is shipped in, according to Malone. “If you find lipid nanoparticles in an organ or tissue, that tells you the drug got to that location,” Malone explained.
According to the data in the Japanese study, lipid nanoparticles were found in the whole blood circulating throughout the body within four hours, and then settled in large concentrations in the ovaries, bone marrow and lymph nodes.
Healthy bone marrow is an essential part of the body, as it contains stem cells that produce blood cells and the cells that make up the immune system. The accumulation of the vaccine-generated spike protein in the bone marrow could also explain the immunodeficiency and lower numbers of critical white blood cells following immunization.
Malone said:
“There needed to be monitoring of vaccine recipients for leukemia and lymphomas (also multiple myeloma) as there were concentrations of lipid nanoparticles in the bone marrow and lymph nodes that could trigger these cancers. But those signals often don’t show up for six months to three or nine years down the road.”
SARS -CoV-2 full-length spike protein the culprit
According to Swedish researchers, “only the full–length spike protein strongly inhibited” the two DNA repair mechanisms, BRCA1 and 53BP1, in the cell.
This finding is hugely significant, as the authors noted, because the mRNA and adenovirus vaccines approved for use in the U.S. were developed based on the full-length spike protein.
The researchers wrote:
“Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines.”
They further suggested the use of “antigenic epitopes of the SARS-CoV-2” such as receptor-binding domain, or RBD, “might be safer and more efficacious than the full-length spike.”
Scientists voiced concerns about the use of the full-length spike protein in the COVID vaccines even before the vaccines were approved.
For example, in a letter to the FDA in response to a request for public comments during the ‘agencies deliberations to approve the Pfizer vaccine, Dr. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D., urged caution in approving the vaccine prior to having adequate safety data.
Whelan told the FDA, “It appears that the viral spike protein that is the target of the major SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is also one of the key agents causing the damage to distant organs that may include the brain, heart, lung and kidney.”
Whelan concluded his warning to the FDA with:
“As important as it is to quickly arrest the spread of the virus by immunizing the population, it would be vastly worse if hundreds of millions of people were to suffer long-lasting or even permanent damage to their brain or heart microvasculature as a result of failing to appreciate in the short-term an unintended effect of full-length spike protein-based vaccines on these other organs.”
Given that the full-length spike protein utilized in the currently approved mRNA vaccines has been found to be more injurious than fragments of the protein, and given that it may “hijack” critical DNA repair mechanisms resulting in both a heightened risk of cancer and immunodeficiency, our current vaccine recommendation must undergo extensive scrutiny to assure safety and efficacy.
Urgent: 3 Ways to Help Stop Biden’s Vaccine Mandates
Critical need for replication of long-term COVID-19 safety studies
Raszek’s statement in the “DarkHorse Podcast” regarding the urgent need to replicate the Swedish researchers’ study because the consequences are so great is paramount.
As Malone said in that same podcast, the development of cancer following injury to the DNA repair mechanisms may take years to manifest.
And vaccines would never be identified as the culprit without robust long-term monitoring of all health outcomes — not just COVID infection — following vaccination.
Follow-up after vaccination must also include monitoring a robust control group of individuals who did not receive the vaccine.
However, during the clinical trials for both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, individuals who initially received the placebo were subsequently allowed to take the vaccine, which destroyed the opportunity for long-term follow-up of all health outcomes in those who did not receive the vaccine.
The fact that COVID vaccines are being recommended for everyone, and in some cases mandated by employers, will essentially make such studies impossible to conduct.
Despite the fact that we currently lack long-term safety data, recent findings have emerged from England that document all-cause weighted mortality data for vaccinated individuals has steadily increased to the point where the death rate is currently higher among the vaccinated than unvaccinated.
The age-adjusted mortality rates for vaccinated compared to unvaccinated for weeks one to 26 of 2021 are charted below using data generated by Norman Fenton, Ph.D., a risk information management professor, and Martin Neil, Ph.D., a computer science and statistics professor. Both are affiliated with Queen Mary University of London.
Overall, the chart shows that, over time, the weighted mortality rate for the vaccinated has steadily increased and by week 16 (April), surpassed that for the unvaccinated.
Given that the U.S. follows similar vaccine policies, it is only logical to assume the same scenario is playing out here.
Thanks. Sorry about that. Then there's this.
Lactoferrin combined with Benadryl cures covid?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/early-stage-research-suggests-milk-002425317.html
Researchers may be in the early stages of discovering an effective strategy for inhibiting the virus that causes COVID-19, according to the results of a recent study.
The results of the findings from David A. Ostrov, Ph.D., of the University of Florida, were published in Pathogens in late November.
The report suggested that combining diphenhydramine — an antihistamine sold as Benadryl that is used for allergy symptoms — and lactoferrin — a protein found in cow and human milk — reduced replication of SARS-CoV-2 by 99% in lab tests on human lung and monkey cells.
"We found out why certain drugs are active against the virus that causes COVID-19," Ostrov told the University of Florida Health Newsroom. "Then, we found an antiviral combination that can be effective, economical and has a long history of safety."
Key to the research team’s findings was the focus on sigma receptors, which are proteins expressed in human cells. COVID-19 "hijacks" the body’s stress-response machinery, including these receptors, so it can replicate inside its host. Interfering with that process is key to inhibiting the virus’s potency, according to the researchers.
"We know the detailed mechanism of how certain drugs inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection," Ostrov said.
The research, however, is preliminary, and Ostrov has cautioned against self-medicating with either diphenhydramine or lactoferrin for COVID-19 prevention. Lactoferrin is available commercially to treat stomach and intestinal ulcers but differs slightly from the type used in the experiment, Ostrov said.
No Supply Issues With Ivermectin: Pharmaceutical Supplying PRINCIPLE Oxford Trial
By Meiling Lee December 25, 2021 Updated: December 25, 2021
The New Jersey pharmaceutical company supplying ivermectin to a UK trial that was paused for a short period of time, says there are no supply issues with its pills.
Ivermectin is being investigated as part of the government-backed Platform Randomised Trial of Treatments in the Community for Epidemic and Pandemic Illnesses (PRINCIPLE) in the United Kingdom as a possible home treatment for COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus. The trial was put on hold due to “temporary supply issues” as reported by Medpage Today on Dec. 14.
Details were not provided on the cause of the supply issues. The trial’s joint chief investigator, professor Chris Butler, and the trial’s press team declined to comment and respond to a query asking when the supply issue is expected to be resolved.
The Epoch Times also reached out to Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust in England—one of two organizations responsible for QP (quality person) release, importing, and, labeling of ivermectin in the trial—but did not receive a reply.
Daniel Worley Jr., Vice President of Business Development and Associate General Counsel of Edinbridge Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer supplying the medicine, told The Epoch Times in an email that the company “is not experiencing any supply issues related to its ivermectin tablets (3mg) product.”
The company’s ivermectin tablets were added to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Prequalified Medicines List last year in September, which ensures that a medicine meets “acceptable standards of quality, safety, and efficacy” for international procurement agencies to purchase and distribute in “resource-limited countries.” The list is part of the United Nation’s Prequalification of Medicines Programme and is run by the WHO.
The halt on the trial has since been lifted as of Friday. However, PRINCIPLE says it is now pausing “for registrations over the Festive Break” and will “reopen for registrations on January 4th,” according to the trial’s website.
Doctors Question Lack of Ivermectin Supply
When PRINCIPLE announced its ivermectin trial in June 2021, Butler, the co-chief investigator, said the drug was safe and readily available, suggesting that there was an appropriate supply of the drug.
“Ivermectin is readily available globally, has been in wide use for many other infectious conditions, so it’s a well-known medicine with a good safety profile, and because of the early promising results in some studies it is already being widely used to treat COVID-19 in several countries,” Butler said in a news release.
Several doctors questioned the sudden pause on the PRINCIPLE trial as a result of the ivermectin supply.
Dr. Tess Lawrie, director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy, said the supply issue cited was “plainly ridiculous.” The WHO is one of Lawrie’s company’s clientele.
“To cite supply issues is plainly ridiculous,” Lawrie told The Epoch Times via email. “We are talking about a most abundant off-patent medicine that is produced in many countries around the world. There are many European manufacturers too, including Huvepharma in Bulgaria.”
Chief of the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at the Eastern Virginia Medical School Dr. Paul Marik said the reason given by PRINCIPLE was “nonsense.”
“It’s clear this is an ominous plot. A supply issue with IVERMECTIN; you must be kidding,” Marik told The Epoch Times in an email. “After 3.7 BILLION doses have been dispensed in the last 2 decades; we have a supply issue; what nonsense.”
Marik is also the co-founder of a medical organization called the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance that has developed several COVID-19 treatment protocols using ivermectin as “a core medication in the prevention and treatment” along with other medicines that are federally approved, “inexpensive, readily available, and have been used for decades with well-established safety profiles.”
Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the messenger RNA vaccine technology, says that it is unlikely there is a shortage of ivermectin, alleging the Oxford University team was either lying or incompetent.
“The first thing you do before you launch the study is you lock down your trial supply so that one completely fails the sniff test,” Malone said on Fox’s “The Ingraham Angle” show.
“Either they’re grossly incompetent at the University of Oxford or lying. It’s one or the other because [the] worldwide supply of ivermectin is enormous, and there’s no way that a competent clinical research team would not have locked down their trial supply.”
The Oxford University trial team did not reply to The Epoch Times’ request for comment.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the WHO, and the European Medicines Agency advises against the use of the anti-parasitic drug for COVID-19, claiming that more data are needed on its effectiveness and safety. Still, some countries like Mexico and Uttar Pradesh, India, widely made ivermectin available as part of their treatment protocol to treat COVID-19.
Proponents of the drug say that the oral FDA-approved ivermectin formulation for humans, which comes in tablet forms, has a high safety profile. About 4.4 billion doses of the medicine (renamed Mectizan) have been administered in 49 countries to treat river blindness and lymphatic filariasis since 1987. In 2020 alone, “a total of 417 million Mectizan treatments were approved,” according to the Mectizan Donation Program (pdf).
According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), ivermectin is “generally well tolerated” with minimal side effects that include dizziness, nausea, or diarrhea. The NIH neither recommends for nor against the use of ivermectin for COVID-19.
In addition, world-known French toxicologist, Prof. Jacques Descotes, in his comprehensive assessment of the safety profile of ivermectin based on an analysis of more than 350 articles, concluded that “the safety profile of ivermectin has so far been excellent in the majority of treated human patients so that ivermectin human toxicity cannot be claimed to be a serious cause for concern.”
He also wrote in his analysis (pdf) that, “The present extensive review of adverse events reportedly associated with ivermectin treatment for [the] therapeutic or prophylactic purpose did not reveal any significant cause for concern. … In fact, adverse events were mainly mild to moderate and infrequent.”
Simply put pharma in partnership with the government will not recognize natural immunity because they need to sell as many clot shots as possible. It's about money, it's about control, and since people have died after vaccination it's about global depopulation. By my definition vaccination is an assault with a deadly weapon and a crime against humanity.
Podcast was great unfortunately we're going to get a R/S if we want to get on NASDAQ next year. If you can believe Bill Delgado several institutions want to invest once we get there. Expansion plans sounded fantastic IMO.
True but that negates the choice of non lethal force. This can be corrected by better training, especially when confronted with real world criminals or life and death situations. I see your point however.
I didn't see any criminal intent or criminal negligence on her part but yes she was clearly negligent IMO. This was a tragic accident and yes, Mr. Wright should have complied with the officers orders. Still, deadly force was not called for and it was tragically albeit accidentally used. Just my opinion of course.
"When you take the vaccine you are protected". Donald Trump.
I'm sorry, he just erased himself from consideration for my vote should he run again. Here's a link to the story. He also said the only one's dying are the unvaccinated!!!! GOD HELP US.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-pushes-back-on-candace-owens-people-arent-dying-when-they-take-the-vaccine/ar-AAS5Pyc?ocid=chromentp
RON DESANTIS FOR PRESIDENT 2024
Might dip below $.02 here.
This is the single most important and comprehensive interview on COVID IMO.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/12/21/understanding-covid-19.aspx?ui=11b466cb2068e97807e63e08d6743c2ccee30ba526a052beadb03ed6ca870005&sd=20110602&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20211221&mid=DM1071380&rid=1357030614
Mercola.com is a great site for all things related to this disease.
Down 9.78% today so far.
Absolutely nothing new in the podcast. Sigh.....
We now must await the next leg up. I believe patience will pay off here.
You've got that right! HAPPY HOLIDAYS. PCTL!
HOLY SMOKES!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Very nice. Hope it happens.
Wheeeeeee! PCTL!!
Lovin it!
No but I I don't think they'd develop it if they thought it wouldn't be approved.
Looking super nice.
WOWZERS! Happy Holidays all.
LOL! Nice to see you again.
DING DING! ALL ABOARD!
Looking good here.
Maybe the market is looking forward. Happens from time to time.
Slowly creeping. Something cooking in the kitchen perhaps?
Sounds good! Happy Holidays to you. Always appreciate your input.
Looking forward to it.
ABSOLUTE TRUTH!
As long as they keep vaccinating people new variants will emerge. They are CAUSING the variants, forcing the virus to modify itself for survival. Vaccines only target the spike protein. There are four other proteins that are on the surface. Immunity wanes after 3 to 6 months as the virus escapes the antibodies produced against the spike protein. The pandemic could end in weeks if governments would distribute cheap, safe and effective antivirals and antiparasitics like India and now Japan are doing. Our machines not only destroy the virus but also kill bacteria which can infect people from touching contaminated surfaces.
The mist will most certainly kill airborne particles but there is no perfect full time system that will accomplish this 7nless you an operating room with UV lights.