Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
like how urban even mispealls his name lol urben
I find it interesting it was faxed at 6pm and made it to paceer so quickly.
kevins took a day
dvoraks took a day
urbans took an hour and a half after hours on a friday.
right and Im sure that answer will be yep your right they looted the company illegally issued shares and robbed everyone blind
maheu can be tied directly to harold gewerter and nevwest securities thru transactions with crowne ventures.
maheu can also be tied to mike david williams and alfonse cassone shawn hackman daniel chapman and herbert jacobi thru medsonix.
rics is absolutely correct.
x clearing is just basically that there is a pre arranged transaction between 2 parties at a pre arranged price. they do the deal on an x clearing basis because usually 1 of teh 2 parties is an affilliate and holds control securities or is a major shareholder that is bound by the 1% rule. so they utilize a broker to make the market between them at the prearranged price as to make the transaction orderly and so it creates as little volitility in the market dependant on the size of the batch of shares in the transaction.
The rules state that x clearing transactions are supposed to still hit the tape tho, that is where people get into trouoble by bypassing the reporting of the transactions on the ticker.
They also run into trouble when the x clearing trades are not reported because affilliate shares even if unrestricted in an affilliates hands they become restricted in teh buyers hands.
Just like the jefferies problem. those shares were not nss!
but they were affilliate shares which should have become restricted in the buyers hands immediately after the transactions took place.
You also run into problems with violations of reg s shares that are issued to parties outside of the us for "services" and are not to be sold back into the us markets but are sold to third parties thru x clearing transactions and are basically washed back into the us markets thru that loophole. basiclly bypassing regulation d registration requirements by gaming regulation s.
if everyone did so.
I have no orders in at this time but I bet they would love to have my whole lot lol
and these guys
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/04/07/ap4863449.html
http://www.mondovisione.com:80/index.cfm?section=news&action=detail&id=73792
http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/making-millions-from-fraud/
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-wrap8apr08,1,6371920.story
http://www.lvrj.com/business/17380599.html
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/the-collar/2008/04/08/14-charged-in-alleged-stock-scheme.html
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/apr/08/sec-charges-nev-mining-company-with-fraud/
http://www.lvrj.com/news/17415609.html
http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page66?oid=50436&sn=Detail
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2008/lr20519.htm
http://www.diamondintelligence.com/magazine/magazine.asp?id=6270
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1323518/
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080410.RDIAMOND10/TPStory/Business
defend them from what?
"The SEC seeks a permanent injunction against all defendants and an accounting, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against all of the defendants except CMKM."
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-54.htm
we will see who is signing off on the a/s increases when the docs I ordered from the nevada sos today show up. I'll post them when I get em.
guess the well is pretty dry down her eh?
gbdx is registered to first global address!
chris jensen jeff turrino john edwards gary walters all run scams out of that address. it cant get much clearer.
as if either tyler or the sec has a different goal?
arent both of their complaints, causes of action, and prayers for releif basically the same? except the sec's numbers are a bit lower?
Im not sure these facts are being weighed in.
also if you look at the sec's summons for uc its addressed to 90 princeville ln that property hasnt been in uc's posession for years.
Im not so sure that the sec is as on the ball as you would like to believe.
actually the boxes came from urbans personal attorney. my guess lizzy baird.
I tend to agree! within hours of the filing of the suit
this was filed
http://i26.tinypic.com/vfjtkx.jpg
from a kinkos in flagstaff, az according to the fax number on top of the document.
this action was expected and the waiver was planned to be sent in as soon as notice was given to Kevin who was "out of town on company business"
I think some people will be very suprised by what comes up in the future on this thing.
Since I was appointed sole officer and director in March of 2007, the Company has cooperated fully with the SEC investigation and I look forward to continuing this relationship.
thast the numbers that cooinside with the nasd complaint for nevwest if you read the nasd complaint and the relevant info in the sec complaint alot of it is identical.
there is was and will be alot higher number trail once things really start rolling.
with 23 years experience in the diamond industry how come the only mention of any of these people anywhere is thru gbdx press releases?
sec dosent file criminal charges they forward the info to the proper authorities
Somehow I think it will become easier to find Mr Casavant in Sask now.
http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/index.html
sib=russian slang for siberian
almaz=russian for diamond
is sibverian diamond a company or a person?
is there anywhere this person/company is listed outside of gbdx pr's?
and does anyone know of a good entry point for me?
willy said
By: raginganny
14 Aug 2007, 09:17 PM EDT
Msg. 2646 of 7399
(This msg. is a reply to 2641 by mojammer0.)
Jump to msg. #
TGLT's actually saying high .02s to low .03s. Regardless I'll take the betweeners.
anny
less than a year ago
short against spikes down to cost basis provided in the agreement cover shorts at cost basis, pocket tax free profit.
no different that dilutive convertable financing except tteh continued anti dilution clause isnt there. the trick is to short against any and all spikes. even if you have to create the spikes yourself?
convert thru
http://convert.neevia.com/
output format jpg
save to computer upload to tinypic.com
post url.
hill your gonna have to move.
the only seller has been your client and he has to cover.
those of us that have a chitload of your clients shares aint goin nowhere.
looks like mr ice cold stocks just may have tried to convert that cert to cover his sales and now his clearing firm might have a lil problem with him. This might get a lil interesting.
well we will see if the weird trading continues.
hey barry
Civil / Family / Probate Justice System Record Search Results
FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT INC vs DAVIS, BARRY DOCKET - PARTIES
2008-19125-CA-01
13-2008-CA-019125-0000-01
N/A 11
FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT INC PN 01 81 04/08/08
DAVIS, BARRY
081 - INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
http://www.miami-dadeclerk.com/civil/searchresult.asp?page=1
sold it to themselves one of their corporations
Address: 749 NE 71st Street
Buyer(s): Tomasso Ventures Llc
Seller(s): Anthony Tomasso and Kathleen Tomasso
Sale date: 2008-02-21
http://southflorida.blockshopper.com/news/story/199684/
they signed it over to their own company as a deed in lieu of forclosure.
http://oris.co.palm-beach.fl.us/or_web1/details.asp?doc_id=16863757&file_num=20080064471&doc_status=V
Report: A.J.T.M. FINANCIAL GROUP LLC
Category: Loans
A.J.T.M. FINANCIAL GROUP LLC ANTHONY TOMASSO (a.k.a) ANTHONY J. TOMASI Weston Florida
Rebuttal Box
Respond to this report!
Are you an owner, employee or ex-employee with either negative or positive information about the company or can you provide "insider information" on this company?
Victim of this person/company?
Are you also a victim of the same company or person? Want Justice? File a Ripoff Report and don´t let them get away with it!
A.J.T.M. FINANCIAL GROUP LLC
Phone: 877-229-8880
Fax: 561-431-6433
491 Racquet Club Rd, (Suite 103)
Weston, Florida, 33326
U.S.A.
Submitted: 3/8/2008 3:03:24 PM
Modified: 3/8/2008 3:03:00 PM
James workman
Jacksonville, Florida
TRANSATLANTIC COMMERCIAL FINANCIAL LLC
TRANSATLANTIC MORTGAGE FUNDING LLC
TRANSATLANTIC FUNDING GROUP LLC
NATIONWIDE COMMERCAIL GROUP LLC
A.J.T.M. FINANCIAL GROUP LLC
NATIONWIDE COMMERCAIL GROUP LLC
VINTAGE EQUITY FUND LLC
KRKA L.L.C.
K.R.K.A. REALTY INC.
(D.B.A.) SUCCESS REALTY INC
T & T EQUITY LLC
FEDERAL INVESTMENTS LLC
NEWKIRK INVESTMENTS INC
GLOBAL MANAGED FINANCIAL LLC
71ST ST HOLDINGS LLC
ANTHONY TOMASSO (a.k.a)
ANTHONY J. TOMASI
ANTHONY J. TOMASI Jr.
KATHLEEN TOMASSO
Being diligent in your research of these people could save you time and money. The name changes, companies opened and closed to blow out the lien positions of people defrauded and a track record of deceit. If you are having trouble locating these individuals for service of court documents the address located in the Palm Beach Property Appraisers web site:
(TOMASSO VENTURES LLC) is 749 North East 71st St, Boca Raton, FL 33487.
If you have no luck with that address try this one 491 Racquet Club Rd, (Suite 103) Weston, FL 33326.
Information for research purposes:
Florida Department of Corporations Search Engine (http://www.sunbiz.org/index.html)
Florida Office of Financial Regulation (http://www.flofr.com/licensing/licensecheck.htm)
Individual (Name) Search in the FL Office of Regulation
(https://cf.fldfs.com/pubinqry/pub1/individuals.cfm)
The State of Florida recommends this site (http://www.finra.org/index.htm)
Palm Beach Clerk of the Court (http://www.pbcountyclerk.com/oris/records_home.html)
The last web site I recommend is the FBI tips web page. (https://tips.fbi.gov/)
James
Jacksonville, Florida
U.S.A.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/316/RipOff0316059.htm
out of that lsit of companies for tomasso how many were on the cmkm master shareholders list?
just as many as on the gbdx list im willing to bet
ask willy if hes worried about those calls with tomasso, treff, jensen, and turrino yet! lmao
barry might be in for a bit of an issue.
lloks like some brokers like jefferies knight and a few others that are still in bidness might have a claim against them as well.
but helen did. and she is the one responsible.
"The SEC seeks a permanent injunction against all defendants and an accounting, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against all of the defendants except CMKM. In addition, the Commission seeks a penny stock bar against each of the individuals and an order prohibiting Casavant from acting as an officer or director of any public company."
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-54.htm
except cmkm?
I like the inclusion of wire and mail fraud in the procedings that shows definite potential for federal indictments.
I have no clue about anything whatsoever to do with brewer or his dealings they do not concern me. as far as damage comtrol why would I do that? Ive have not invested a single penny in togi togi entertainment or any affiliate out of tyler.
I dont have any connection with brewer or any other investors in togi other than message board posting. not sure what your implying. all I was doing is pointing out the inconsistancies.
thats it.
and as far as the statement from frizzell about stopping a major brokerage from transfering a large bulk cert. last i checked ccls was a clearing firm not a broker.
as is penson financial services. they are both independent clearing firms with arrangements made to clear for broker dealers taht do not have their own in house clearing firms.
so a statement about a broker ordering a large cert would be a bout a broker.
a statement about a clearing firm would be about a clearing firm.
its probably easier to clarify the statement with frizzell himself Im sure his number is listed somewhere.
penson financial bought computer clearing services may 19th 2005, so that statement of the large bulk cert being transfered in that update to ccs is an untrue statement. also Steven Brewer does not work for togi nor soes he work for bill frizzell, he is invested in togi tho
we hit a wall?
bid building hey barry hows that short feel?
hey check out mr icemans site he hs changed back to 875k shares ownership. lol
http://icecoldstocks.com/hot_stock_picks.html#
whats interesting if you hold your mouse over info he says he is accumulating to his readers
yet he is selling.
////////////////////////
this is interesting in the disclaimer
"For stocks that Commentators have received as compensation, said stock must be off the site for at least one (1) day before they can sell it. Investors therefore should not rely on Commentator's disclosed trades whatsoever when making trading or investment decisions"
//////////////////////////////////
he is selling yet the stock is listed as a stock they are accumulating?
dosent that violate his disclaimer?
well if it hasnt been converted then this guys in a real mess.
Id cancel the shares and make him sue me to get them. In that suit he would have to prove what he did as far as services for the shares. If his broker allowed him to sell againt the box and the cert is worthless then a forced buyin on his side would be necessary.
if he has not yet converted the shares to unrestricted then he could easily be in hot water with his brokerage.
this is an easy fix under nevada law.
///////////////////////////////////////////
rule 144 states.
What If a Dispute Arises Over Whether I Can Remove the Legend?
If a dispute arises about whether a restricted legend can be removed, the SEC will not intervene. The removal of a legend is a matter solely in the discretion of the issuer of the securities. State law, not federal law, covers disputes about the removal of legends. Thus, the SEC will not take action in any decision or dispute about removing a restrictive legend.
http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/rule144.htm
///////////////////
that places it under nevada state law
and
NRS 78.211 states
Consideration for shares: Authority of board of directors; effect of receipt; corporate action pending receipt in future.
1. The board of directors may authorize shares to be issued for consideration consisting of any tangible or intangible property or benefit to the corporation, including, but not limited to, cash, promissory notes, services performed, contracts for services to be performed or other securities of the corporation. The judgment of the board of directors as to the consideration received for the shares issued is conclusive in the absence of actual fraud in the transaction.
2. When the corporation receives the consideration for which the board of directors authorized the issuance of shares, the shares issued therefor are fully paid.
3. The corporation may place in escrow shares issued for a contract for future services or benefits or a promissory note, or make any other arrangements to restrict the transfer of the shares. The corporation may credit distributions made for the shares against their purchase price, until the services are performed, the benefits are received or the promissory note is paid. If the services are not performed, the benefits are not received or the promissory note is not paid, the shares escrowed or restricted and the distributions credited may be cancelled in whole or in part.
//////////////////////////////
If the company feels he has not done what was agreed they do not have to unrestrict his shares and can cancel them for non performance.
its up to him to prove he provided a service for the shares. which he did not.
and if that cert is not converted and he holds a short position against that cert he is in a bit of hot water. especially if aes and hugo are buying at these levels.