Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This is fun
http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/108/S108883.html
4-24
Circular, metallic silver/white object in sky; Rio Rancho, NM.
I was driving down Idalia road after dropping off my child at school. I saw a metallic/shiny white circular/oval shape hovering in the distance.
A lot of planes cross overhead in this area, but this was not a plane or anything I have seen in this area before. I watched it, mesmerized, and then turned left onto Lerma road.
I pulled my vehicle to the side of the road & observed it travel a short distance. It stopped/hovered again, then shot off into the clouds & disappeared.
After it disappeared, I saw two planes/aircraft that were possibly "chasing" it.
How long since Indy's last post?
This one is from February 11th
I was driving east on I-10 15 miles out of Deming, NM when I first spotted it. It appeared as a white blimp like orb at first, than i stopped at a gas station and stared at it for a good 20 minutes, and it never moved an inch. Hard to tell how high or far it was. I then set out on the interstate again and kept a close eye on it. I was with someone else so they drove while I observed. About 15 minutes later, after leaving the gas station, it ascended a good 500 ft or so and started moving east while slighty changing shapes. It moved along with our car, maybe 2 miles from us, and after about 8 minutes, it stopped above a mountain and stayed there until we finally lost sight by driving close to Las Cruces, NM. The skies were clear so it wasn't hard to notice an object standing still in the sky. I first thought it was an airplane, helicopter, or blimp. But it is impossible for any human made aircraft to stand perfectly still for that long and then suddenly start moving at 75 MPH along with our car. I got excited when I first saw it, but than when it moved, I didn't expect it, so it freaked me out. I started seeing purple spots in my vision and feeling light headed in a scared way. I think that's just me though from anxiety. Lost sight as we approached Las Cruces and the sun started falling.
http://www.ufostalker.com/ufostalker/UFO+Sighting+in+Deming+New+Mexico+United+States+on+February+11th+2014/54041
I discount the quoted speed due to perspective issues. It may have only seemed like it was following the car because of the altitude.
Don't worry I'm not confused. UAV= unmanned aerial vehicle. UAS = unmanned aerial system. Thus the sub designations LTA = lighter than air and HTA = heavier than air. On this board we use military designations not Wikipedia definitions.
Edit. Sorry for the brash response. People on this board know me to tell it like it is (I think).
As a follow up to the Mainstream Engineering press release:
http://www.mainstream-engr.com/company/press/20140203.jsp
http://www.mainstream-engr.com/company/press/20140421.jsp
I saw that article but not sure if is related or not. They are located in the same county as WSGI. Im looking up more on their website now. (edit - check out the press release section of the site. very impressive)
From what I have read in academic papers it looks like the two competing factions are parallel vs. serial hybrid drive propulsion systems. I also read that it was generally a clutch issue that was slowing down direct drive hybrid propulsion but I could be wrong. Are there any engineers out there that can help explain and give their opinion considering the lack of extra thrust needed for takeoff (LTA vs. HTA) and altitude?
there are several papers written on this subject out of wright patterson. In addition, they held small competition in 2011 for land based hybrid motors.
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123281664
"Each of the four undergraduate engineering teams was given an all-electric, ground-based propulsion system (an electric motorcycle) and challenged to extend the range by modifying the system into a hybrid propulsion system. Two of the universities -- Colorado State University and University of California-Davis -- created an electro-chemical energy conversion hybrid system utilizing a hydrogen fuel cell. The other two teams (Brigham Young University and the University of Dayton) were challenged to tackle the problem via a thermo-chemical energy conversion approach utilizing a small 6-hp class IC engine, exploring both series and parallel hybrid approaches. The teams were able to able to develop up to a 50% increase in system range and up to a 10% reduction in system weight."
edit:
Here is a more recent article (not from W-P)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3926242/
Great post! I was going to mow the lawn but decided to chase the rabbit down this hole "hybrid propulsion system similar to types presently under development by the USAF"
Long paper but interesting read on some of the hybrid propulsion systems being developed
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC0QFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dtic.mil%2Fcgi-bin%2FGetTRDoc%3FAD%3DADA517586&ei=zdtXU_TbE8jSsASFgYGYCg&usg=AFQjCNHWwXSIrgeYzbKoCSwNG82295nmNA&bvm=bv.65177938,d.cWc
ANALYSIS OF HYBRID-ELECTRIC PROPULSION SYSTEM DESIGNS FOR
SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS
"Three distinct parallel hybrid-electric system designs, each with three unique battery discharging profiles, were analyzed and compared using a constrained static optimization formulation based upon traditional aircraft design equations. Each system combined an ICE sized for cruise speed with an electric motor sized for endurance speed. The nine hybrid variations were
compared using a typical five hour intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance mission profile for a UAS with a maximum gross takeoff weight of 13.6 kg (30.0 lbf)."
I'm not sure of your experience but I am guessing 2-3 years if this ever reaches trial. Federal court is an interesting and costly experience.
Not yet. This is going to sound like business basics but, IMO for the company to to sustain a steady share price increase it needs to stop the bleed of shares and increase revenues to a level that can sustain the company and start paying down some of the recent legacy debt (and the IRS lien would not hurt either). I think management is working harder than some are giving them credit. I also understand the frustration from lack of news. But I also understand the need to protect trade secrets until you have other IP protections in place (and there is some IP that cannot adequately be protected from the current legal IP regime thus the need for trade secrets).
In addition, it needs a good shot in the arm from the LJC lawsuit, even if it is a negotiated settlement. Anything can happen when you are litigating and it is not far enough along yet for me. IMO, WSGI has valid causes of action against LJC and the case is progressing well. At a minimum I want to see what evidence is presented in support of, and the resulting orders on, the cross summary judgment motions.
edit: I have turned on others to this stock and some have bought and others have not. In 2010 I was offered the .075 with .21 and .32(I think) warrants but I declined. Without having to worry about averaging down, I have the luxury of catching the first sustained rise.
With so little faith you should just sell your lot to recoup anything you can, right?
Most of this is normal but it certainly does not make them look great. Fortunately it says nothing about the merits of the claims, only the ability to plead them. In fact, the merits of the claims are specifically not taken into consideration at this stage of the action. There are so many uneducated posters here. (Not a jab at you of course)
The judge ruled on the motion to dismiss:
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2013cv03455/268571/36
Only one of 12 claims dismissed fully. Three need to be restated with more specificity. WSGI has 30 days to file its amended complaint.
Because they are constantly making the payloads more powerful, smaller, lighter, etc. Our time will come.
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27019389
"Engineers at Darpa recently completed the first of three test phases, which saw the development of key technologies to be integrated into a complete system.
"We're pleased with the technical achievements we've seen so far in steerable millimetre-wave antennas and millimetre-wave amplifier technology," said Dick Ridgway, Darpa programme manager."
"The accomplishments of the initial phases include: smaller, steerable antennas; signal boosters; increased power efficiency and a light pod to carry the device on the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) itself. The network is said to be potentially capable of a 1 gigabit per-second (Gb/s) capacity, which is as fast as Google Fiber's."
Does anyone know anything about the power source(s) on this? Anyone want to wildly speculate?
http://news.yahoo.com/secret-spaceplane-mystery-mission-094500663--politics.html
You are showing your lack of knowledge of secured lending and bankruptcy law. And btw the condo appears in the public filings. Any future lender is on notice that the obligation is on the books.
I know we but heads but can you please cut back on the creepy factor?
If the judge ruled on the motion then it may be a delay on the wording of the order. The judge may have taken arguments under advisement and will issue a ruling after his/her clerks reviewed the case law.
My only issue with your analogy is the relative cost of the "upgrades". The packages on the bib and wasp will likely cost more than the unit itself. The point isn't to put the aerostat up in the air. It is to put the radios, etc. in the air. We should be happy they think our platform is the best/most cost efficient way to do that.
After transfer to the Ohio LTA UAS Consortium, the Argus One was immediately dispatched to the Electronic Warfare Associates Engineering Facility in Fairmont, West Virginia. There it underwent static testing, inspection and design assessment. When this was completed, the propulsion and avionics pod of the Argus One was separated from the envelope assembly for installation at the Center for UAV Exploitation (CUE) in Dayton, Ohio that is co-located with the United States Air Force(USAF) Rapid Prototyping Center. The CUE is a supporting partner of the Consortium and this is presently the only commercial product under testing and development within the facility. Beside avionics and flight control testing, the pod will also be evaluated there for the possible installation of a hybrid propulsion system similar to types presently under development by the USAF.
The envelope assembly of the Argus One will be housed with the Unmanned Systems Innovation Center (USIC) at Springfield Beckley Airport near Dayton, Ohio. Two Argus One demos are planned at the USIC this year in conjunction with the Ohio/Indiana UAS Center and Test Complex. One demo will highlight the new ducted fan/vectored thrust propulsion system presently under development and the other will be for congressional staff. We anticipate Certificates of Authorization will be secured for these events through the Ohio/Indiana UAS Center and Test Complex, allowing for untethered operation.
In certain cases, when appropriate, we opt to protect our intellectual property through trade secrets as opposed to filing for patent protection in order to preserve confidentiality.
Here is a good source for Incoterms (such as FOB):
http://export.gov/faq/eg_main_023922.asp
Leasing a unit, rental for specific missions (similar to space florida), licensing IP rights, R&D grants.
How about some proof to support your pathetic bash:
"WSGI took LJC's cash and didn't pay it back"
Mediation resolved the injunction issues and relieved both parties from performing under the agreements. The base issues were allways there.
Wow. Interesting news. It is already the next big fad in photography and videography.
Who does not want one of these?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2576091/The-smart-security-drone-STUN-GUN-built-attack-intruders.html#ixzz2vNTP7taR
We need to get one attached to the tethered ltas unit!
All three amigos are here. That usually means something good is about to happen.
Acumen. Still waiting for your back up information. Why are you ignoring me?
Cole, again, what proof is there to support you accusation? Go back and read the results of the sec case again. Individuals no longer with the company are the scammers. The company was never proven to be a scam.
Go away trolls
Your question is not that far from reality. In addition to being a very bright and talented guy, he is a supporter of this company.
If google is interested in acquiring the "rights to negotiate for the professional services of Argus team leader Dr. Terry Hofecker (OHIO LIGHTER THAN AIR UAS CONSORTIUM)", that would be a great thing for WSGI (and a loss to trident).
IMO, Google sees the benefit of controlled LTA flight and not relying on free floating balloons the way the Loon project is set up now. WSGI owns the IP to the Argus. I highly doubt anyone in the consortium would violate any of their agreements with WSGI.
Now that I have answered your question, I am still waiting for any independent support you have for this statement:
"WSGI took LJC's cash and didn't pay it back"
Oh, that's right, you don't have any.
I don't know if be deserves sympathy. But he did have a vision regardless of his intentions.
Tech companies are starting to see the vision.
http://www.myfoxny.com/story/24879219/report-facebook-buying-drone-manufacturer
Yes. Thanks!
Please see post 150331.
I would love to help you comprehend the complaint but I'm busy partying in Vegas this weekend. ;)
So ljc wanted to be paid in shares, we paid them with shares, and that is a default? If only your abilities matched your confidence in them.
IMO, at a minimum it is a potential new vertical. Different contracting agency and work at an additional location.
Acumen, I am still waiting for any support you have for this statement:
"WSGI took LJC's cash and didn't pay it back"
(and please don't paraphrase someone else's B.S. story)
"February 21, 2014
Engility, Chantilly, Va., is being awarded a $24,882,608, cost-plus-fixed-fee, indefinite-delivery/indefinite quantity, multiple-award contract for engineering and technical support at the Indian Head Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division. A-T Solutions, Fredricksburg, Va., is being awarded a $23,538,703 contract. The contractors will advise and assist with various tasks in support of engineering support, system engineering and technical analysis, development of programs and improvised explosive device defeat technology. The U.S. Navy Indian Head Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division, Indian Head, Md., is the contracting activity (N00174-14-D-0005)."
http://www.afcea.org/content/?q=node/12406
My Bold
I know Sami likes to connect dots...
http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/lighter-than-air-systems-receives-order-blimp-box-sustainment-equipment-support-us-army-otcqb-wsgi-1854664.htm
Interesting timing with this follow up JEIDDO article:
"Johnson said the biometric and forensic capabilities that have and continue to be learned on the battlefields of the Global War on Terror has helped to identify who makes and uses IEDs.
This intelligence has proved useful on the US’s Southwest border, where biometric information collected from foreign battlefields identified at least one suspected terrorist trying to enter the country, Homeland Security Today previously reported.
“The inevitable next fight is somewhere in our future,” Johnson said, and “We must be able to rapidly posture for that fight. We must continue to lean forward and stay abreast of how our enemies are using IEDs and what new tactics and technologies they are employing. This will allow us to develop the capabilities to defeat the IED, the tactics to attack enemy networks and train our forces so they are prepared for the IED environments we will face in the future.”
And it will help to identify terrorists who might try to enter the US, or, if more IEDs are detonated on US soil, help to identify the terrorists responsible."
http://www.hstoday.us/briefings/industry-news/single-article/with-cuts-looming-will-pentagon-preserve-counter-ied-institutional-memory/5b763c8f28d65775fad657ab60b368e6.html
Much more detailed than my answer but all great suggestions! I grow my own herbs, fruits and veggies now in 4x4s and a custom vertical unit.
Bad news for our friends at JIEDDO:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/pentagons-counter-ied-force-shrink-two-thirds-year_783443.html
"JIEDDO's current staff of 3,000 will be reduced to 1,000 by the end of this fiscal year, and further plans could see the number fall as low as 400 down the road."
"Some parts of JIEDDO can't be easily scaled. One of the areas he's looking to protect, Johnson said, is the intelligence integration functions of JIEDDO.
"My concern is, right now, we have a fairly persistent look at the organizations that most commonly use IEDs," he said. "If we were to take our eyes off, what are the chances that there would be an adaptation or permutation in the way they use IEDs that we didn't anticipate, and how long for us to catch up?" "
The farm is a long term goal I shared with Indy. I am not there yet. I would prefer the in the mountains of Kauai. Nice and secluded. As for farming in HI in general, it is one of the most diverse places in the world re: climate zones. Just make sure you pic your parcel in a zone appropriate for your crops.