Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm not sure how shorting equates to a seller liquidating his/her position at .005 instead of 2.
Right, but those two words are listed separately as if they were different tests. Anyway. Seen these type of kits have been available for a couple years now. Wonder how much business is in it at the moment.
I guess the deal is, DNA Co. provides the kits and CBAI runs operates their collection through their network in hospitals. Wonder what kind of information they presented to DNA Co. to get them to go along with this. Although, DNA Co. appears to be a small business. Anything to grow, usually.
Yep, he's been saying that like a broken record for weeks now. Eventually it'll magically be the right estimate.
At that DNA website I see this:
Tests that are available on a walk-in basis:
Ancestry
Predisposition
Infidelity
Paternity
Maternity
Siblingship
Twin Zygosity (fraternal or identical twins)
Aunt/Uncle
Grandparentage
That made me laugh. What do you think they mean by that and how would that work? lol
Wow, lots of questions. How is it that you think that the investor holding 70,000 shares selling his/her position would result in a drop to .005 from $2. Why would that investor sell at .005 when he/she could sell at $2. I don't follow this one.
Not so sure this arrangement is so new. Didn't Ken claim to have gotten rid of Cornell a month or so back? Could it be that this funding has been in place, but he was waiting for the right time to PR it? After all, seems the move to get GreenSmart in order is already on its way.
I'll be setting up a line of Jager Bombs and pounding them consecutively. Sorry guys but I'm still young and I live fast.
Depends on where the PPS rests and what exchange Matt wants this thing, or needs this thing, to trade at. The potential for speculative valuation to prop this thing up overnight is quite large, imo. Regardless, when the opportunity to buyback shares presents itself, I think it'll happen simply because it is adding fuel to the fire. Why in the world wouldn't the entire world jump onboard if these things happened.
True, true. But in this regard I just want the money to be real. Let their website be ass. Somehow Ken is networked with them and obviously it wasn't the website that worked for them. They probably forgot they have it. Don't need it or something. lol/
Ken is an old man. "Them internets and webonline thingy" was an honest misstep, I believe, and he has acknowledged the feedback that it needs to be improved. I'd say it must be coming around, but let's not kid ourselves into thinking that website means a lick in the grand scheme anyways when it comes to generating revenue.
It is an image, and image is marketing, granted. However, I've realized that our first impressions phase is currently ongoing. Haven't missed out on any opportunities to capitalize yet.
Wow, finance just ain't your thing is it ;)
There isn't enough money to do any of it now anyway. It is a long-term issue. Just put me on ignore.
How many billion dollar companies with 7.5 billion OS exist on the BB?
The problem I see is somewhat of a catch 22 if the OS doesn't correct. We need investment to the tune of billions while not having big board investment activity to do so, but we can't get big board investment activity unless we get billions to make the jump.
Whether the OS needs to be reduced is certainly up for debate. What is not up for debate is whether having lower OS would boost the PPS or not. It simply will because mathematiclaly that is just what happens. I'm in this to make as much money as possible.
At least for me, the OS argument has nothing to do with what Ken does with his shares. It's just a question of what the market valuation for this stock is. It's nothing that should be addressed now, because it costs money to improve the SS, but it should be going towards producing more revenue. That is what's important now. The nice PPS can come later.
Lol, funny post. Celebrating pre-emptively. While everything may not pan out as you have suggested, there are some connections too obvious to ignore here, and something good will come. As a sub-penny, that's great to think about.
Ok, so do you expect SSWC to make it to AMEX or NASDAQ in the future? Listing requirements are $3 and $5 respectively. You do the math. We could be waiting a very, super way long time for that. Unless Ken lowers the SS. This is nothing to get defensive about. Ken wants to lower it, I'm sure.
Seriously, a 20+ billion dollar company that isn't on a big board? lmao
Actually float will determine demand in one scenario. Stock buying groups that prey on small floats. This is because the whole reason for buying the stock is the float. They know that because they run in as a group, the small float will have no choice but to give and the PPS will rise. Some of Guru's calls appear to be made this way, as he has a proven following of buyers. It can make some good money for some people, but it's nothing good for the stock at all.
If SSWC runs epic anytime soon, it will be because of strong speculation + the semi-low float. But it won't rest at any upper level until longer-term valuations that justify it start to become a reality. More than OS, it just simply means REVENUES. But when you lower the OS, you magnify the results.
If you're a flipper, SSWC is awesome, and will be for some time. If you're LONG, I don't see how you can argue favorably for a super high OS and relatively lower float.
Which is why OS is an even bigger issue with penny/subpennies. Dividend valuations are non-existent. Most prudent investors will fall back on a simple financials vs. market cap assessment. OS means everything in that respect.
Talking about float does not address the demand side of the issue. No one should expect this to run wild so soon, or else this will be a terrible board full of bag holders.
These potential impacts on CBAI are mostly beneficial. I have been accumulating slowly since 2008 and I'll continue to do so until something major happens.
Well with the introduction of Tuesday and no more Fridays, it has broken what was the regular pattern.
I wouldn't mind one right after the close today :) Makes people desperate to get in on Monday in a rush, if the news is good anyway.
Just the kind of thing that let's handful cash out big and leaves a slew of bagholders. This is why I'm saying a small float is only kinda cool in the face of a giant OS. There will be nothing permanent about any run.
So is that place really called Cheeburger Cheeburger? lol
But you're not necessarily accounting for demand. Saying the float is small only addresses supply. You have to then consider what the market should consider the value of the company in order to warrant demand that warrants an increase in the market cap.
When these pinks run on "momo" a float lock down is viable and there isn't much behind honest valuations. People just go crazy on speculation.
If any of you are hoping like me, this isn't going to be a typical stinky pink where you have to hope for something empty and short-lived like a small float. Let's hope this company correct the OS in the future and that honest valuations by the larger market take over as revenues are generated.
Not being answered because YOU ARE CORRECT SIR. Anyone who thinks the OS does not need to be corrected is an idiot. It doesn't have to be right now, because it probably is impossible on Ken's end.
If you're long term with this company don't forget that current shortcomings shouldn't bother you so much.
The problem is that most prudent investors that aren't too keen on a pinksheet company's future speculation, will look at the OS, not the float, for a realistic valuation.
Point is that dividends come from net income.
True that. Case in point:
Pfizer: Market cap 133 billion, Revenue 50 billion, Net income 8.6 billion
Merck: Market cap 110 billion, Revenue 27.4 billion, Net income 12.9 billion
Well, it typically takes three days to settle funds. When you sell out of something, those funds are not settled. You can use them to buy in to a stock, but you're not allowed to sell out until they clear from that previous transaction. In pinks it's high risk to lock your money into something for three days.
You might also be confusing this with pattern day trading.
Which is why I think it is more significant that he called CBAI as being on its way to be the most significant stem cell company rather than bank.
Since when was Matt's claim that CBAI will be the largest cord blood bank in the world based on the size of a single lab, which they already possess? For one, it would have been a done deal. And two, it implies there is no more growth to come. I really think that 'significant' popped into his head and he liked it. It sounds better than largest, because it implies strategic positioning and relevance.
I think you're reading too much into it. Largest or significant, both terms are nice. Significant means $$$ to me.
Actually he said most significant stem cell company, not bank. This falls in line with the move towards research and not simply banking or storage. Good things.
Funny is that we think of Mahoney so negatively. If you go over to BGN* now, they sing his praises. lol. Two worlds apart.
@ 8:22am for a pink sheet. You're funny.
Yep. Still nothing hardcore in the releases to justify any large increase sustaining. However, it's not as if we're looking at mega run in the past week or anything. The current levels are just as easily maintained I think. Slow and steady creates sort of a conditioning effect with whatever the PPS is at. + or - .0003 over the week wouldn't be anything major.
A. That is part of what financing is for. I don't see the big deal.
B. From what I can gather, there probably aren't many employees at work here. There's probably a contract with a manufacturer and/or distributor. There's Ken who isn't taking any compensation for now. Then there are accountants, sales representatives, and whatever else, but it seems these are contracted entities for now. It's still expenditures nonetheless. But nothing to me so far says to me that there are many employees at all. I'm sure with a retail store, or several, opening possibly in the next few months, there will obviously be some hiring for that.
You're only concerned about something like this if:
You're expecting to get rich in a week to 3 months from now.
How can you think something like this has any real net effect on all of the business developments? If you're expecting long term success, eventually any stupid Cornell financing that involves a dump cycle will be broken and not matter anymore. Takes money to make money. If a company fails, then obviously it's easy to look at a dumping financier and to start drawing conclusions. It fails to reflect what it was about the business that sucked ass.
And yeah, I don't believe this is an issue here any longer anyway, but what do we really know.
Yeah, good on them but also annoying because you can't set a limit for a certain amount form the current price. In other words, if it's at .0019 now, you're not allowed to set a limit order at a penny. It'll tell you it's too big of a gap. Not sure why that rule is there.