Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What Poor logic. You said a pipe dream, meaning impossible. We have showed you otc's that went on to Nasdaq. That fact disqualifies your opinion of pipe dream. You seemed confused as to what facts and subjective opinions are.
It's possible. Think harder.
SELL TO ME @ O.05 PLEASE?
I think you need to read more. This previous penny company announced a reverse split in 2014, and was able to list to Nasdaq.
http://investor.cellectar.com/stockquote.cfm
Pipe dreams sometimes come true. Penny stock speculators sometimes win, sometimes THEY lose. This is called "life".
GLTU
Instead of "calling B.S", why don't you simply call the I.R hotline for your own validation?
Where Oh where has common sense gone these days?
sigh
Loaded more 9'5s. THANKS!
Interesting play here. Will do some DD.
NAK more dead than trump's toupee.
I told you, this junk can't float. Dead money play.
Not a "Bro", but you are welcome :)
Some market intelligence on MM actions:
http://www.stockaviator.com/the-level-2-big-players/
Per Wiki,
"In the United States, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a private corporation that acts as a self-regulatory organization (SRO). FINRA is the successor to the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) and the member regulation, enforcement and arbitration operations of the New York Stock Exchange. It is a non-governmental organization that regulates member brokerage firms and exchange markets. The government agency which acts as the ultimate regulator of the securities industry, including FINRA, is the Securities and Exchange Commission."
AND:
"FINRA had total revenues of US$878.6 million in 2012.[12][13] FINRA is funded primarily by assessments of member firms' registered representatives and applicants, annual fees paid by members, and by fines that it levies. The annual fee that each member pays includes a basic membership fee, an assessment based on gross income, a fee for each principal and registered representative, and charge for each branch office."
I reloaded again today. Nice stash accumulated. I'm here for dollars, keep the change.GLTA
We have a long history together dead, I know it's par for the course to get smack when you give smack.
Its all about forward looking statements. The industry is twisting and turning, all the horses are jockeying, time will tell the winners from the losers. Its in stage of infancy this green revolution. I like my odds here, as well as some other choice plays in this arena.
I believe with the right catalyst this one will run significantly higher than 1.00 IMO, it's best days are ahead, not behind.
What's up dead. That's funny, my account has been all green on this position form day one. Adding on dips...toot toot...this train is readying to leave the station.
Watch and learn rookie.
I scooped some .10's today. Couldn't resist.
1st hour of trading typically volatile. Now more reliable trend should appear.
holding for dollars..keep the change.
DAYS away from news. Fresh money loading.
Who cares? The dog can answer as long as this pending deal closes.
chase later.
I've reloaded today. GLTA.
Time to walk her down. $$$$$$
Nice shorting opportunity here. Easy $$ this week.
Stoctivity, I suggest you do yourself a favor. Call your broker and ask. It's obvious you are misinformed. If you feel better sleeping at night thinking your orders are safe from MM borrowings, so be it.
GLTU
Again, I can't respond to private messages.
No, you cannot "lock away" your shares from MM action. This urban myth is a never ending distraction on pink board forums.
I covered this at length recently on another board. Guide yourself accordingly.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=127798369
GRNH>> A real company, with real products, real news. Low float.
Interesting to note that the current "green rush" is the new "gold rush". Not many opportunities for the small players to get in on the ground floor on an entirely new emerging market.
In 15 years, how many micro green companies will get flushed out?
IMO its too early to tell the true winners from losers. GRNH sure has a lot of the dry powder dynamite to be one of the bell weather stocks in the coming years..
I'm holding for dollars. Keep the change.
So basically prepare for monstrous dilution. Extreme dead money.
Anyone has visited GRNH physical location?
Lunch money gang on the way.
What's your entry price?
DRYS>> "Auto dilute" button stuck. FLUSHHHHHH.
DRYS>> A Constant submarine...deep diving is what it does best.
Extreme dead money here.
MM is not your broker. I think the confusion lies in the average investor not understanding the various roles,rights and limitations of the varied and intricate interconnectedness of a financial marketplace. Nevermind d the mystical "clearance houses" and gray markets.
It's simpler to simply buy at your desired price, with a clear plan of profit execution. Beyond that, the small gambler can do very little to affect the enormous financial machinery in which they play.
No downside. No upside.
Yes, you can order paper certs (why in the world would you do this??). You are making your ownership highly illiquid while adding additional costs to your position.
No, paper certs do not disallow MM from borrowing your shares, it's simply an accounting procedure they must account for your future paper call. They simply must gurantee that at some future date they must be able to present you with available shares at your request. No different than electronic delivery.
They gladly take that risk, this is their main mandate, and how they profit on the spreads with highly advanced risk mitigation algorithms and procedures.
People do what they want. I only suggest to refrain from spreading misleading information. A high sell order only shows MM where all the stops are..which can backfire imo.
No, on the contrary, this allows default option for MM to borrow shares from margin accounts. Further, even in non margin accounts, MM reserve the right to provide enough shares in a market to allow for liquidity. That is their only job function.
There is no such thing as locking away shares. See my recent post directly referenced from SEC regulations.
No you cannot "lock" your shares away from MM's-shorting. Please stop spreading rumors. SEC is very clear on this issue.
GRNH looking very strong here...huge breakout pending on news on deal completion imo.
Yes, it is a real photo. Sorry, I don't have private message capability on IHUB.
Ehhh...
“Naked” short selling is not necessarily a violation of the federal securities laws or the Commission’s rules. Indeed, in certain circumstances, “naked” short selling contributes to market liquidity. For example, broker-dealers that make a market in a security[4] generally stand ready to buy and sell the security on a regular and continuous basis at a publicly quoted price, even when there are no other buyers or sellers. Thus, market makers must sell a security to a buyer even when there are temporary shortages of that security available in the market. This may occur, for example, if there is a sudden surge in buying interest in that security, or if few investors are selling the security at that time. Because it may take a market maker considerable time to purchase or arrange to borrow the security, a market maker engaged in bona fide market making, particularly in a fast-moving market, may need to sell the security short without having arranged to borrow shares. This is especially true for market makers in thinly traded, illiquid stocks as there may be few shares available to purchase or borrow at a given time.
1. Is all “naked” short selling abusive or illegal?
When considering “naked” short selling, it is important to know which activity is the focus of discussion.
• Selling stock short without having located stock for delivery at settlement. This activity would violate Regulation SHO, except for short sales by market makers engaged in bona fide market making. Market makers engaged in bona fide market making do not have to locate stock before selling short, because they need to be able to provide liquidity. However, market makers are not excepted from Regulation SHO’s close-out and pre-borrow requirements.
https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/regsho.htm
Dude, I said it was worth lunch money investing. That is your "Take", I respect that and hope you are right. I bought my first position of GRNH at open. I love the low flow float risky play here. GLTU