Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Smart work!!
Oh I get it sorry I forgot. Now I feel stupid.! Since they don’t give me the day off I’m at work so I think it’s a regular day. But it’s actually a holiday.
Stock doesn’t seem to be trading. On my TD Account no bid no ask volume. Total volume has been stuck. Even put a small trade through to test, at the bid And nothing. No volume. Can any of you folks with your level to confirm?
True true. She would want it in the most impactful journal. I hope it happens.
I am not crazy about the NEJM Evidence thing. Much Much much better to be in just the plain old regular New England Journal of Medicine like the stupid (sorry typo the Stupp) trial.
I fear this new format will not be as ubiquitous in the media and not as well read significantly compared to the plain old regular New England Journal of Medicine which is always read and always very well received.
I fear it will be another translational medicine thing. Whoever heard of the Journal of translational medicine before we had our 2018 interim published there. I certainly hadn’t heard of it.
If memory serves I thought DI had said that they would do a PR when they got certified at Advent. So far I don’t see any PR from NWBO regarding this. Wondering what that means.
Thanks. I’ve also been in this since 2013. Like you I still believe but it has been difficult this long long long long long long long long long long long quiet wait.
The quiet. Has had some positives for the company. Less ammo for the likes of AF.
And also when they weren’t in a quiet period. They were actively giving what appears to be false information. And false timelines. So I guess maybe quiet time is better than being almost lied to continuously.
So I guess I prefer a quiet period Rather than them actively giving incorrect timelines and absolutely incorrect forward-looking statements.
Nothing has changed with the data, or my analysis.
I still believe it’s going to be positive.
I will admit however it has been a lot longer to produce the data than I ever thought possible. So I would agree with you that it is absolutely bordering on ridiculous.
Yeah. I booked a flight as well. Covid canceled. Hard to believe we’re coming on two years from that time when we were going to have a victorious ASM meeting.
I thought they were supposed to release the late breaking abstracts this morning.
So that’s why I looked. Literally went through hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of abstracts to find them.
And they were at the very end of supplements seven. Flipper do you know if that represents then all the late breaking abstracts that they’re supposed to disclose today?
Have they disclosed any late breaking abstracts that are new today? Yet? Then? I haven’t been able to find them.
Late breaking abstracts are published online and nothing on our beloved DCVax. I could only find three late breaking abstracts. On the SNO website.
BW.
I know the movie was stupid.
I just got to a higher level of frustration after recently having helped two people go on hospice and one died and while looking into the angel of a caregiver widow tear Filled eyes I became more angry about the dishonesty of management Towards us.
They say coming months and it’s years.
They say for sure TLD September 2020 and they haven’t even locked their data set until October 2020. Dishonesty. That’s what it is. It not only affects investors but it affects real living breathing people who are suffering from this tumor.
When was the 1 yard line comment made by LG? Several years ago?
I think the LP pedal to the metal comment was made probably over a half a decade ago.
The one that really upsets me is the one from over I think eight years ago when they said stay tuned.
Like something is always going to happen right away. Never does.
Dishonesty. That’s what it is. Let’s name it what it really is.
I helped them both earlier sign up for the “waiting list” on the NWBO website. It makes me mad. All this delay.
Maybe this time will be different. It has been over a year with them having the data lock completed.
I am still hopeful that they will actually produce the data and move forward with this. So people can get this treatment.
Thanks. I like DI as well.
I think he can take a joke.!
I think even he is tired of saying those same old Clichés. He wants to present something new but cannot until it’s the correct time.
Thanks ALT. Yes even I will look at My overall survival analysis movie from time to time and it helps me become more balanced and less emotional, with my investment.
Yes I’ve spoken to him a few times. I actually like DI so I’m just joking him with this movie.
But he does like to use those old tired clichés.
Funny. Funny.
New alpha movie. The DI Movie.
I’ve seen too many people die over the last few years waiting for this treatment.
Yep back in March they said that they are going to release things in the “coming months” that’s been over eight months ago. To everyone else on the planet coming months would’ve been up to five months. They are dishonest.
But Happy. LG Said years ago that we were on the 1 yard line, to use a football analogy! It couldn’t be clearer!! It just seems that we are up against a very very very incredible defense!
MI.
Hang in there. You are one of my favorite posters. Very knowledgeable in my opinion and excellent posts and thought process.
I like that you have a lot of pharmaceutical knowledge. Something which I am lacking. I know my way around a Kaplan-Meier curve but I don’t know the process that Has to happen for drugs to get through all of the regulatory stuff. So any insight into that is very valuable for me.
Joey NWBO Has never been on CNBC.
If you’re going to present at the SNO I wonder why the company just doesn’t say we’re going to present at the SNO?
What’s wrong with that?
Thanks that helps me in my thought process.
Seems like it would probably be not legal to negotiate a dilution during a “quiet time” so it’s I guess it’s quiet for everyone except the people buying the dilution? Right.
This price action is reminiscent of the days when we were at $.22.
It seemed like any time prior to a dilution there would be pressure on the stock because those people funding the dilution would usually get something in their contract that says their cost would be the average price over a certain period of time.
And so they know those dates and they will then sell and short the stock and reduce the price because that will give them overall a less price to pay for their large millions of shared dilution.
So they save a ton of money by pressuring the stock down prior to the dilution. I hope not but it has the flavor and feeling of that with there being constant pressure on the stock $.01-$.06 down every day consistently always.
Somebody is doing that.
It is a fear because if LP does a dilution prior to top line to me that means she has no faith in top line and wants to have some money to further continue The company after TLD.
I hope my fears are not The case and are wrong but this price action certainly has that feel.
Is anyone else having trouble accessing the flippers 651 post? Every time I try to access it ihub crashes and closes. Maybe someone can post it again. Weird.
Yes Captn
More like the witness protection program!!!
Meant to say I want to be a Marzan minion!!!
Stupid voice nonrecognition.
I want to be a Marian minion!
But I am stuck being the alpha whale!
Actually I think it’s pretty clear, that our TLD journal article will be I believe in the same timing as the lancet article or just after that article. I think the people who are writing our TLD journal article want to be able to reference that lancet article in their discussion.
I also think that the delay in reporting TLD may have been purposeful in order to get more data on the UCLA combined KyTruda data up. So just in case the FDA wants to request a confirmatory trial they’ll have it ready and available.
Also they wanted some time to wrap up manufacturing capabilities on both sides of the Atlantic.
Just my two cents.
Yes I think you’re correct. I just went on their website and they have all of the current issue article is dated September 23, 2021.
Just remember New England Journal of Medicine always reports their current articles every Thursday at 5 PM. Just saying.
Yes I am really curious how accurate they ( the KM plots) are going to be once we have published data. That said I’m sure we’re going to have positive results. I guess it’s still wait and see.
Thanks flipper I agree.
I guess to me it just speaks volumes regarding the lack of credibility of management. What I am really having trouble wrapping my brain around however is the fact that she says top line in September 2020. But the data wasn’t even locked until October 5, 2020. So There was absolutely no way she would have top line without locking the data set. So she absolutely would have known, that the date it was not locked since she’s the one that decides when to lock the data.
So it would seem that the (mis)statements are verifiably false statements. And she knew it at the time she stated it.
I can’t wrap my head around why she said those things. At worst she has a personality disorder in which she takes pleasure in befuddling the shareholders and I don’t know what the best scenario would be.
Having said all this and from my own due diligence however I do believe we still have a winner here and ultimately the journal article Will be published.
I recall speaking for a long time At the ASCO in 2018 with Dr. Ashlan And he was quite positive about the results with patients and wanted to utilize this therapy for all of his patients. That has been my lifeline through all of this misinformation that the management has given us.
NEJM is Thursday
Ex Also that site specializes in neuroscience.
Hey Ex you forgot to mention the Merck R and D site at West Point Pennsylvania which specializes in vaccines. Check it out
https://jobs.merck.com/us/en/mrl-locations-
That’s where he worked
Located outside Philly.
Nope. It was Pearlmutter. Confirmed by phone call from DI and also Bigger confirmed.
I attended that ASCO presentation with Justin And sat in the front row.
And in walks this guy who had an entourage of assistants and he sat right next to me in the front row. I later found out that this was Perlmutter. I actually spoke to him and thought initially he was just another oncologist at the meeting as he was all suited up and I asked him where he practiced. And he said Philadelphia area.
He was quite attentive and actually took photographs of every slide and all of his young interns were actively taking notes.
He also obviously knew LP who was in attendance because before the meeting started he stood up and went and greeted her And they talked for a couple of minutes prior to the presentation.
I believe I reported that to this board a couple of years ago.
Wow. Ok. Thanks. It is pretty complicated. But I see where you’re coming from.
Thanks for your reasoning. I just have one question though. I am having trouble wrapping my head around one thing.
If these Z warrants expire in October 2022, And HYMC needs to be greater than like $31 for these options to have value isn’t there A very high chance that these Z warrants are going to expire worthless.?
Because I cannot fathom HYMC being greater than $31 in one year. The Z warrants are so far out of the money, shouldn’t they be trading at one or two cents apiece? ; If they would behave like a regular option They are so far out of the money at this time.
Please enlighten me why you think that these would have value and not expire worthless at the expiration date of October 2022???
Do you feel the parameters For the Z warrants,would change? Like a change in the expiration strike price?
Please advise. Thank you for any info you might have.
What do the posters of the board think that the reasonable definition for this statement “in the coming months“ would be?
Since they said months it’s certainly more than one month. Minimum would be 2 months. Maximum would be 6 to 8 months. Anything more than that they would’ve said the coming year. Right now I think it’s about four months since they said that. I just don’t know if this is just another NWBO head fake lie that they like to do. We have to remember they are lawyers.
To me it looks like we’re in the bull’s-eye of coming months. But then again they said the statistics review would only take two weeks. I guess we’ll just have to see if they’re consistent in their Desire to have no credibility with retail; In anything they say on their PR’s. That’s the only thing that is consistent is that they have no credibility.
OK I’ve been a patient long but this is starting to be ridiculous. Like always. I wonder if Linda can get this done. She can’t seem to be able to make a decision. It would seem. Aside from just delaying stuff.
They want you to believe that there’s some higher purpose here. Either she’s totally incompetent or so focused on process that she cannot see the forest from the trees.
OK jump all over me I am venting.But this is getting to be ridiculous.