Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
cigarman, don't get upset with me, just commenting on an observation. I only offered my opinion.
Lucullus, are you sure the document is the 43-101?
emilyroberts, you have to feel sorry for the longs, they were really looking forward to huge rally today. Maybe later in the day, if new investors decide to take the bait.
If all is well i.e. this document is genuine, there will be nothing to pick out that won't stand decent scrutiny.
Lets wait and see if new investors will come in on this. I doubt it though. Price is KING! Price will tell us all we need to know about Aurus.
Unless Aurus is what it says it is, they will always make a mistake. The datestamp is a BIG BIG mistake.
I'm just a logical thinker. Do you have any other explanation.
"You have quite an imagination"
I wasnt talking about the error. My question was, how did aurus get the stamp on the translated version?
I'll have to get out my microscope to find the date. With my normal spectacles, I'm finding it difficult to locate.
What? An important document like this that has no data stamp of any kind? No wonder the pps isnt responding
I know that TSNGRI isn't going to give their stamp to aurus, but is not possible that aurus could've reproduced the stamp by other means?
I just find it strange that the papermark of TSNGRI bearing their logo and stamp appeared on a translated copy of the report, yet as I deduce from the last PR, the translation was not done by TSNGRI. This is why this document is suspect IMHO.
"I'm curious to know whether the translation was done by theTSNGRI or by aurus.
I'm curious because the translated version bears the seal/stamp of the company that did the report. If aurus privately translated it, then they must have the original stamp/seal.
Can anyone shed more light on this"
IF the translation was not done by TSNIGRI, the report is suspect. Reasons:
1. Where the the original stamp come from?
2. The translated version bears logo of TSNIGRI, where did the letter headed paper come from?
Does anyone who knows what a 43-101 looks like tell me if the report on the aurc website is a 43-101. The link on the aurus homepage says it is.
I'm curious to know whether the translation was done by theTSNGRI or by aurus.
I'm curious because the translated version bears the seal/stamp of the company that did the report. If aurus privately translated it, then they must have the original stamp/seal.
Can anyone shed more light on this
I noticed that the first 15/20 posts today were not negative and the price went up. Is it possible to have just one day without any negative post. Lets see how the price reacts. Any takers? Just one day!
"divtrader9, What did you find in those documents that supports the theory that another company is going to aquire Aurus's assets? "
Nothing at all.
I just wanted to determine if it's true that 2C and Mr Dovgan are truely in this together. If they are, I will give a lot of credibilty to whatever Party posted (even if he said that a merger is being planned), because he(Party) was the first to let us know that 2C is in another mining project with the president of aurc.
One thing people don't realise about charts is that they show the pychological state of the participants in a market or stock. Whether its a pinky or a heavily traded instrument, the fear, greed or lack of participation is displayed on the charts.
ckbirygo seems to think that because aurc is news driven and charts can't predict when news will be released, then charting is useless wrt aurc. This is wrong, because charts are not supposed to help you predict future events.
News events and reactions to such events are depicted on the charts. For example the the recent news left aurc charts with a tail hanging up. This candle has an interpretation or meaning, which is; price rejection and doubts by the market participants.
So whether a stock is ews driven or not, one can still read its chart to tell the story of what is happening with the chart and then make a decision wether to buy, sell or hold.
"Yes we did. I can not tell you what he said as that would violate at least two TOS rules here on I-Hub."
I did not ask you to detail what you discussed. Since you said that he never mentioned that he was in partnership with Mr Dovgan on another project, yet you discussed Party's post, then one has to conclude that either you or 2C is lying or Party's document is fake. Which is which? Can you help?
DOS, thanks for the response. I'm sure if his new project involved Mr Dovgan, he would have mentioned it. I thought that you would have asked in light of recent revelations from Party.
BTW did you discuss Party's posted document though?
Would be interesting to know, and would give credibilty to what Party posted the other day. So, does his new venture involve Mr Dovgan or not.
But does it have anything to do with Mr Dovgan?
"He said is new venture has nothing to do with Aurus, nothing."
Somebody asked why the geological reports were not released at the same time as the last PR. Well here's my answer. In my own opinion, the MAIN reason for the last PR was to postpone the shareholders meeting. But because they did'nt want the share price to drop, they had to sugarcoat the PR with alot of sweet paragraphs. The part about the reports were just to act as a diversion for the main purpose of the PR.
I think they will eventually release 'some reports' in January after been silent for another 4 weeks. I hope I'm proven wrong for the sakes of LONGS AND STRONGS.
VIVA AURC!!!!
tombernis, dont you know that in technical analysis world, anything above the 68% fib retracement nullifies the preceeding move? How can that be bullish for aurc. A 75% retracement says a reversal is coming up. So look for price to go below $0.02 soon.
Sorry longs, I don't mean to cause you more pain than you feel right now, just saying it as it is.
"Imo, when aurus fell to 0.02/share and then bounced back to 0.08 within a week...what was that??? Now we have 75% retracement of move.
I don't want to get into stock manipulation allegations, but what is happening here looks to be far more bullish than bearish. Someone is accumulating...bigtime!!! "
"I hope that Aurus Corp will FLY on TIME. "
If aurc runs an airline, you'll never miss a flight. They are always late.
Keith, I guess you have to wait for sometime before you finally get the shareholders meeting hence your 0.50.
Posted by: keithhpkns
In reply to: None Date:11/27/2007 7:11:09 PM
Post #of 83305
Will probably open at 50+ cents on Monday December 10th, right after the shareholders meeting. People will buy it there and be willing to hold it for a few more weeks to have it guaranteed bought from them for 55 cents a share.
We all know that some people think this is a scam. But, after the shareholders meeting, and we approve the buyout, (Really why wouldn't we?) then all of those fears will be gone, and this will be free to skyrocket!
keithhpkns,
please buy some more when more funds become available to you. The more you buy the lower it goes and your loss increase exponentially. There are people on this board that have been adding to their loss since 0.25. You won't be the first and you won't be the last. Shows how wise you are indeed.
"Someone here has as their quote something like "Think of how stupid the average person is, and then think of how half of them are stupider than that." Well my friends, all I can say is that we take advantage of people's stupidity and we load up the trucks ourselves for our own gain. I wish I had more shares, and once I do have more funds I plan on buying more."
ckirbygo, your reason for the postponment is a possibilty. However, its not the only possibility. Another reason could be that they are just prolonging the scam. Maybe you should take some time this weekend to read through all previous PRs(you'll find these on the yahoo website for AURC). Refresh your mind and get a bigger/fuller picyure of past events. You will notice a pattern of delays, prolonging and issues that have been swept under the carpet. You'll also a pattern of unambigious PRs.
A company that claims to achieve better than expected results, above the norm assets, but cannot meet basic deadlines for things they themselves promised to do.
Have you considered the possibility that this might be a scam yet?
ckirbygo, but there will always be new development that will affect the future of aurus. Does that mean the meeting will forever be postponed? How many times will they postpone a meeting before they finally have it? 3or 4 so far and counting.
"Divtrader9, this statement made by them in the PR "On one hand, there are most recently new elements being introduced that will affect the future of Aurus". This statement is the reason they gave (or at least I have interpreted) as to why the meeting was delayed. New developments and new buyers."
The lastest PR from Aurus was to announce the postponement of the meeting, and this was done in just one paragraph. Yet noone can really say why the meeting was cancelled. They have cleverly written this so that you have to conjecture, imply of infer why the meeting was postponed.
"In the matter of the shareholders' meeting scheduled for December 7, 2007, the Board has made the decision to postpone the meeting. On one hand, there are most recently new elements being introduced that will affect the future of Aurus. The geological reports that were recently finalized have attracted a number of Canadian gold producing companies. The Board expects to receive definite propositions in January, 2008. The shareholders will once again be required to cast their vote."
They already have the $0.55 offer, yet they expect more propositions in Jan 08 based on the result of a geological report that noone has seen. Delay delay and more delay.
Has anybody asked why are they are always looking for propositions to sell the company.
tombernis, its almost a whole year from this post and your holding must be down about 80% (rough guess) as of todays price.
"Prove that AURUS is a real, legitimate, revenue producing gold mine with billions in reserves. They don't care what IHub members think. If anything, I use this board as a barometer for my purchase and exits. Right now...too many bashers and skeptics that know nothing about mining companies wasting all this time questioning aurc every single day. C'mon this is crazy! An evident buy sign if you are a contrarian investor."
Is this board really helping you for your entry and exit?
Posted by: tombernis
In reply to: westcott who wrote msg# 23680 Date:12/14/2006 11:11:34 AM
Post #of 82989
Aurus still HAS an opportunity to dispel
any pinksheet stereotypes.
Unfortunately, you can't change the nature of a PS. As is
evidence of todays results.
I'll be the first to admit that CASH IS KING.
However, Aurus never insinuated a cash divy.
If they did, we would have traded a new 52-wk HI.
You see I have met management a couple of times and they clearly laid out the facts that AURC is a real company with realistic goals that take time to achieve.
I'm buyer today under .13 and I can only wish I had money to burn too!
Do you distrust what a whistleblower says about his employer just because he broke an NDA?
"The question is quite relevant. If Party signed an NDA and betrayed that trust, then can you trust the veracity of the rest of his post?"
So who is stupid now?
Posted by: keithhpkns
In reply to: None Date:11/27/2007 7:11:09 PM
Post #of 82650
Will probably open at 50+ cents on Monday December 10th, right after the shareholders meeting. People will buy it there and be willing to hold it for a few more weeks to have it guaranteed bought from them for 55 cents a share.
We all know that some people think this is a scam. But, after the shareholders meeting, and we approve the buyout, (Really why wouldn't we?) then all of those fears will be gone, and this will be free to skyrocket!
It is not the business of posters on ihub whether Party signed an NDA or not. What is important is the sharing a document that suggests that Mr & Mrs 2C are in bed (no pun intended) with the president of Aurus by forming a new company, which intends to generate revenues solely from sale of shares.
If Party gets sued by whoever gave him the document is not my business.
Now I get it. Thanks
Party,
Please can you summarise what you posted here? Is Golden Share Co buying or merging with aurus? Are aurus' assets being transferred to other companies? I don't get the plot here. TIA.
President of Aurus Addresses Shareholders
Wednesday December 5, 4:36 pm ET
The title of this PR should have been : Aurus Postpones Shareholders' Meeting, and Offers lots of Promises To Boost Share Price.
If aurc closes below 0.04 today, then there's no hope for the LONGS who didnt take the opportunity to get out earlier.
This is one strange stock, so unresponsive to pump PR.
da da da de da the beat goes on. yawn! same old same old.
I can't believe he's bringing this up again. When it suits the LONGS they readily imply, but at other times, nothing must be implied but outrightly stated.
nd as I rightly replied you. Just to keep things balanced...
Posted by: divtrader9
In reply to: optiskeptic who wrote msg# 77489 Date:10/30/2007 2:58:18 PM
Post #of 81764
I have not said that the main agenda of the meeting was voting for the buyout. It is implied that voting will be on the agenda.
"This date was chosen to permit sufficient time for the shareholders to receive their dividends as previously announced. "The shares issued as a result of the dividend carry voting rights and it is important that these shareholders be permitted to vote in virtue of these shares especially on important matters such as the offer that was submitted by Kartex to purchase all the outstanding shares for $.55 per share as well as other matters," says Fedor Dovgan, president".
Now you said "Whether or not is implied, depends on how you read it."
Now tell us, how can you INTELLIGENTLY read the PR and not think that 'voting on important matters' will not take place at the meeting.
I accept that other things apart form voting will take place at the meeting. The PR (pasted below) suggested that the meeting was "to discuss their business model and present other achievements".
Press Release Source: Aurus Corporation
AURUS Corp Calls a Special Shareholders Meeting
Tuesday July 17, 10:30 am ET
NEW YORK, NY--(MARKET WIRE)--Jul 17, 2007 -- AURUS Corp (Other OTC:AURC.PK - News), a junior mining company specializing in gold extraction, has announced today that it has retained the services of L2I - Financial Solutions Consultants for the purpose of organizing a special shareholders meeting to be held in late August or very early September 2007. The contract granted to L2I is for a three month period. The Shareholders meeting will take place in the United States: place, date and time will be communicated to all registered shareholders by formal notice. L2I - Financial Solutions Consultants is a leading provider of state of the art investor relation services to microcap companies traded in the United States and in Europe.
AURUS management is presently completing the company annual reports for 2006-2007 as well as the financial statements. The Shareholders meeting will be held in a convenient location in the United States to facilitate the participation of all shareholders and to guarantee a very broad attendance. ''This meeting will be a unique opportunity to demonstrate our strong commitment towards our business model and to present our achievements,'' said Fedor Dovgan, chief executive officer of AURUS
My point is that voting for the buyout was supposed to be on the agenda too. Now it looks like it won't, which will be a failure on AURUS's part to deliver on their word.
crydaddy, thanks for the nice words, we'll send you some money when the buyout happens. lol
cfpjbs, it seems to me that the "20 rooms" were booked by the heavyweight shareholders of aurc mentioned in the last PR.
"Aurus consulted with shareholders holding a large stake in the Company and they emphatically requested that the shareholders meeting be postponed to permit the vote on the Kartex offer."