Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What is the layout of the building Somatic Systems occupies? What is the layout of the neighborhood where this other store you mention lies in relationship to the Somatic Systems location? You have not provided the evidence to back up your claim.
No, that is ridiculous. It does not prove your point. That another company that has nothing to do with Somatic Systems does not mention our company proves nothing.
If you are going to say that costume design company, or whatever it is, has a negative opinion of Somatic Systems, show the proof. That they mention some third company is not proof. It is not even evidence. It has nothing to do with Somatic Systems. If you think it does, prove it.
When giving directions, it is quite common to say "we are located across the street from....". It doesn't say anything about Somatic Systems. If you are going to say that this other company has a negative attitude about Somatic Systems, show some proof.
To my way of thinking, if a business sharing Somatic Systems' address mentions Somatic Systems, that could possibly be considered Somatic Systems news, though probably not worth mentioning. However if the ballet studio that you mentioned, or a Starbucks or any other business sharing Somatic System's address wrote something about 'the alleyway behind Packards', that is not Somatic Systems news. So it would be both insignificant and off topic in my opinion.
I don't see why an art gallery or shop exchange should be under any obligation to mention Somatic Systems or any other business that shares the same address. And what these other businesses do or do not do has nothing to do with Somatic Systems which is involved in pain management.
I wish you luck.
Most welcome. SNRS is definitely not boring. ;0)
My guess would be that the Zecco system can't handle volume this high. I've seen this in the past when volume hit this range on other stocks. Various brokerages began reporting different numbers for the volume, including negative numbers. Right now Fidelity is reporting 2,317,772,157.
Will definitely look forward to hearing about the legal issues on 4/14.
SMAS certainly has been intellectually stimulating recently for a gray market stock. ;0)
Keep those great posts coming!
8,901,933 shares at .0002 on Tuesday.
No history of R/S on this stock. There was a forward split of 3 for 2 on February 15, 2005.
You never know. We can always discuss SMAS.
The discussion was never about who made more money on this stock. It was about the folly of making predictions about SMAS. Because you never know.
Winning. hmmmm... I think we all agree that winning with a stock means making a profit. The past is always relevant, and SMAS has provided a number of opportunities for profit. I'm sure that I am not the only one who took advantage of those opportunities. Billions of shares of SMAS have traded at .0001 in recent years. But look at 2009. That year 631,431,550 shares of SMAS traded at .0002 as well. Look at 2008. That year 3,203,792,530 shares of SMAS traded at .0002 as well and 695,743,900 traded at .0003. For anyone who bought SMAS at .0001, and clearly many did, that provided a lot of opportunity to double or triple their investment. I place a value on winning like that. As for winning arguments on a message board, the value and relevance of that I suppose depends on personal preference and to what extent the argument is about pink elephants. I really can't comment. As for the future, you never know.
SMAS has presented a number of money-making opportunities for anyone who purchased it at .0001. I have no idea how many people may have profited from SMAS in the past, but I know it is possible because I have done so. I'm sorry you did not. I really can't comment about pink elephants or rocks because they have nothing to do with me or with SMAS. As for the future, I think you had it right the first time. Predictions are worthless because you never know.
When I am talking about SMAS and I say that you never know, it is not a prediction. It is a simple statement of fact. I really can't comment on steering wheels, pink elephants or rocks on mountains as they have nothing to do with SMAS. As for SMAS making shareholders money, it already has. I know it has for me.
We've broken our previous volume record. We're at all-time volume high.
We are approaching the all-time daily volume record of 1,373,934,000 set on June 29, 2010. On that day ARSC was trading between .0001 and .0003.
Just taking the PR at face value, what it said was that anyone who owns ARSC shares on a given date yet to be set will receive a dividend of shares in new Hydra shares. Your ARSC shares would not be directly affected. You would maintain your current number of ARSC shares. The company is projecting a value for the new Hydra shares. Using their projections one can calculate that an ARSC shareholder will receive 6,666.67 shares of the new Hydra stock for each one-million shares of ARSC that he owns, and the value of those 6,666.67 Hydra shares would be between $533.33 and $1,066.67. However those are just projections, and the value of the Hydra shares can change. Typically dividend shares are sent to brokers and placed directly into a shareholder's portfolio. Dividend dates and method of payment have not yet been announced.
Sometimes dividends are valuable. They need to release more information. We'll see.
As I read the news we would keep our ARSC shares and receive the new shares as a dividend.
Taken at face value, today's dividend news means that for each one-million shares of ARSC owned we would receive a dividend of 6,666.67 shares of the new Hydra Fuel Cell shares with a projected value of between $533.33 and $1,066.67. That is taking today's news at face value. That does not take into consideration share restrictions or changes in the projected value or any other possible factors.
We agree that predictions are worthless. That's why I've never made any predictions about getting rich on SMAS, nor time lines for "pump and dumps", nor do I engage in doom and gloom predictions based on current rates, because as we all know current rates can change. The future is unknown. One can always point out the obvious about where things with SMAS are at a given time, and one can repeat those observations endlessly. I don't see the value in it, but I'm not opposed to others satisfying their needs, as long as we continue to agree that making predictions about SMAS is a worthless exercise. And we do agree. That pleases me.
I agree with this post.
I'm glad we agree that things can change with SMAS. They can. As for predictions, we agree that they are worthless.
Isn't it lovely? We agree on something! If a hypothetical situation exists in which we say that something never changes, then it never changes. We agree on that. This unfortunately doesn't apply to SMAS, because with SMAS things can always change. Therefore you never know.
Maybe the rate can be fixed. Maybe it can't. You never know.
You never know.
Cool! What do our SMAS buildings look like?
Morning SweeBeeps. Apparently everything is. I haven't enjoyed SMAS this much in a long time.
You never know. Depends on where the building is located. I suppose we could discuss gravity-free environments such as deep space, but first I must know. Is your theoretical building a Somatic Systems facility, or is it completely off-topic? Or do we just never know?
Congratulations on your success with SMAS. Me too.
I hope SMAS didn't cost anyone any money.
Thank you for sharing.
You never know.