Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Actually, 0-S has raised many valid points, points that scream for answers. But few have been forthcoming, from the board or the company.
And, yes, you do deserve to be reported for name calling and a personal attack.
I doubt there will ever be a "reset". Heck, maybe never a 10-K that validates all of Rufus's sensational claims. Regardless, it is the street that determines the stock price. And it has given one big collective yawn to all this reset talk.
Did y'all see this post to Rufus by the iHub boss?:
Posted by: Bob Zumbrunnen
In reply to: Rufus Paul Harris who wrote msg# 56151
Date:8/27/2006 10:12:10 PM
Post #of 59212
CEO's, as should all business-people, whether they're with private or public companies, should at least *try* to appear articulate and educated.
I doubt I'm alone in preferring to invest in companies run by people more intelligent than myself. If they show themselves to be less intelligent, why would I trust them with my money?
I'm watching this only out of the corner of my eye because this whole concept of a "reset" suddenly making the stock "worth" $54 per share leaves me nothing short of incredulous.
I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I'm no spoon. And the concept that a stock that's already trading can suddenly trade at nearly 70 times its current value at the CEO's whim is a brand new one on me. And being a devout Missourian, I don't believe it because I haven't seen it.
"Reset" isn't another way of saying "reverse split", is it?
berry, it's obvious the cognitive ability of many of the lemmings and Kool-aid drinkers is severely lacking.
Actually, no one, Rufus included, has been able to refute any of the allegations made by Our-Street.
Valis, I viewed your image. Funny, but it may well end up being the other way around.
You did it wrong....get rid of the "chart" but add http:// before the rest of the link...Or, click on the forum url on your image page, highlight it, copy and paste it over here.
Edit. maybe you did it right, but it didnt hotlink, or you meant it that way.. i see iHub has its own guidleines: http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=107
Like this...
http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/8479/turnermaple1845wrn0.jpg
Happy birthday, ya young spring chicken!!
I'm looking forward to hearing what the crystals are.
Did ya read my response to your email?
I doubt if he will, or can. The old thread on the due diligizer board is enough evidence (even though nothing concrete was posted) for me to assume that Sakli is a conman. I've been aware of that board for many years. Too bad it is no longer active.
http://p066.ezboard.com/fduediligenceboardfrm13.showMessage?topicID=290.topic&index=4
Methinks you and bluediamonds might want to read the board a little more closely. It is Rufus who has the ball in his court....
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=12931006
Hmmm. makes sense.
Also telling is the fact that little or nothing positive has been found on Canady or Sakli. And nothing on their foundation.
"If Rufus holds the float" too funny....
Institutions use common sense...methinx that precludes any interest from them in this stock.....probably ever....but what do I know?
More than likely, mn is the "clueless" one, hunter. He loves to attempt to throw his weight around, and put people down. In doing so, he is simply exposing his naivete, even ignorance.
It is obvious that the pumper types just ignore all the red flags here; even as said warning signs continue to balloon.
Well, jannie, I reckon I'm just a good cognitive reasoner.....To wit, had Rufus and the bond deal been legit, there would have been a far different ending to the case. But these allegations were never challenged, were they?:
"On April 4, 2004, the board of directors of Broadband Wireless International Corporation (OTCBB-BBAN) (hereinafter the “company”) passed a resolution to cancel the agreement entered into on December 29, 2002, by and between Enhancement Holdings, LLC, Stanley Holdings Business Trust (referred to herein as EHLLC) and Entertainment Direct, TV, Inc./Broadband Wireless International Corporation. Such cancellation is based on the fact that pursuant to the terms of the agreement EHLLC was to place on the books of the company a 100 Million USD Insurance Guarantee Bond. The bond was to be used to facilitate a $57 million credit line for the company. Under the agreement, the company agreed to render three (3) seats on its board to EHLLC. The three members appointed to BBAN’s board pursuant to the agreement were Paul Harris, Benjamin Stanley and John Walsh. Harris and Stanley are directors of EHLLC and Harris is the CEO of EHLCC.
EHLLC failed to perform its obligations under the agreement. Furthermore, the company has been provided with evidence that the bond is underwritten by insolvent companies and has been assigned to other parties, one of whom recently received a multi-million dollar judgment against EHLLC and its officers/directors in an action alleging fraud and other improprieties. Additionally, the company has reason to believe that EHLLC and its officers/directors have committed other infractions which are under investigation by the company’s counsel and others. The company intends to pursue all appropriate legal remedies against EHLLC, Paul Harris, Benjamin Stanley and John Walsh on behalf of itself and its shareholders. >>
So, you Kool-aid drinkers go right ahead in your beliefs that Rufus is capable of turning water into wine, and a near penniless company into one worth billions at a couple strikes of a pen. Meanwhile I will feel justified in believing that it is all one big con.
So, you're the one that found that article. I've never seen it..Are you a basher?
mn, that 8K filing, and ALL of Rufus's sensational utterances are all hearsay, till proof is provided, in the form of audited financials. Those, if they ever appear, will be gone over in detail by the SEC.
By the way, methinx it is rather smelly that the CVSU financials that were called "audited", which in fact were not, have disappeared from the company website. What say you to that?
Excerpt from BBAN SEC filing http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/print_filings.jsp?url=%2Fredirect.asp%3Ffilename%3D0001077048%252D05....
"After the removal of Paul Harris, Benjamin Stanley and John Walsh from our board of directors and due to the fact that they have no assets to attach, we decided it would be in the best interest of the Company to dismiss the case without prejudice."
So, not only was the bond deal bogus, but the company gave up on the suit, since the defendants were essentially penniless? Hmmmm.
Sure, I don't know much about all those dealings. Regardless, BBAN's entire histroy has been mighty smelly.
I could care less, mn. Go check for yourself. I've read a few of your posts, and find you to be a very narrow minded individual. If this stock fails, as many here expect, I will have no sympathy for you and those of your ilk.
Why don't you email the NY Post article writer and tell him he's way off base?
You guys are hilarious. I posted a link to a public document. I think, regardless of the outcome, it is very relevant. I don't own any of this stinker, so have no need to go over every detail.
You might consider it yourself, though. Nothing wrong with looking at all sides of the issue, now is there. Spend some time looking into Rufus's past. It will be eye opening. Like reading all his posts at BBAN on RB and the exchanges with Dimension and others.
Ask Dimension or review BBAN's SEC filings....
Rufus has a history of bogus bond deals, what makes people think these latest deals are as they appear?:
http://www.our-street.com/fhal/broadband%20case.pdf
How so? It's over and done with. Miles has stated so several times. Sounds like he came out relatively unscathed.
Far worse could well be in store for Rufus and this company.
It's all hearsay until backed up with auduted financials. If they ever do appear, you can bet the SEC will scrutinize them with a fine tooth comb.
Geeshhh. you get an F- for originality.
churak gets a B-. He could have said, WHEN it gets halted.....it will reopen on the greys...
Bingo, liable. That's kinda what I alluded to.....
axtually, methinx the Ruf has been taking grammer and speelling lessins from Benbo.....
pork bellies?
how 'bout chitlins? Oh dang, there's no futures market in them? yet?
Have at it, Ruf!!!
It had a big head...
or my hammer was huge....
one or t'other....heh
Right, ole Ruf looks to be well on his way to cornering the bond market. Weehaaaa!!!
Ahh, but you're a CEO that can't even spell lose correctly, or so it seems. But then, maybe you meant for folks to hang "loose" with their investment....
"I a different kind of CEO" So we've noticed.....great grammar as well....
First $15, now $54...Criminy...The street is calling BS on that. I reckon if it takes notice, which I doubt, we'll see $3 soon?
Reset? We'll believe it when we see it.
Heh. I like your style, Ozark!!
They have yet to file anything verifiable. No audited figures.
I've been around the block a few times, mn. Believe me, this story is too sensational to be above board.
I read it.....doesn't mean a thing. Just a bunch of gobbledeegook. No way can they claim $2.6 bn in assets from them. Obviously, the street agrees that Rufus's insanely crazy valuations are bunk.
Mn, I admitted I don't know much about them, but neither do many on this board. But I am capable of cognitive reasoning, and using those abilities and reading what others have to say, leads me to believe that there is no way CSHD can claim all that valuation. Simply put, you can't turn a near penniless company into Fortune 500 size.
I'm no bond expert either, not even close, but I find those suppositions highly doubtful. How can they receive interest on something they don't own...and is owned by many different private parties...that's what that pdf that stocklemon posted showed. Seems to me that is correct, but what do I know.
Bottom line, in this world, getting something for nothing is mighty rare. And that's how these deals appear.
Not too smart.....meaningless with audited numbers and verification of all this bond talk..which is highly unlike to prove out as you all think.
Regardless of how those cases turned out, I'd steer way way clear of any shyster that tried to sell anything that purported to have a 10-1 return in a year or less. The shady world of HYIP's is 100% fraud.
You think??? A big question should be, how can CSHD get soemthing for nothing? How does a cash poor company with no proven assets become worth billions?
Also, aren't the bonds owned in a lot of little pieces by numerous entitites.
Weeelll, duh, dat figgers, eh?
See, I can say eh, eh....I lived in Canadia for three years, eons ago....and love to crash the border in search of powdery slopes and sinewy.......ummmmm .
...mooners...
What's a "Belgium"?
Umm, this Belgian would prolly say, "Whinnieeee":
http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/horses/belgian/
Dang, this board is fun..and I've only one more post today, after this one.....
Nice idea, nuff, you had me all excited to haul my glass out into the night sky.....
actually i recall that same story circulatin' round da web last summa.......
now how bout if you and Janice mooned over Venus, that I'd like to take pics of......
http://www.arboristsite.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=36197&d=1153108373
http://www.arboristsite.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=37052&d=1155611122