14 million volume till now. May touch 15 million today close of the day.

AAMRQ in 2012 January traded around 0.30 cents. After that it went above $1 in 2012 before falling down to around 0.30 cents again in Dec 2012. After that it slowly went up day by day and month by month till Jun 2013. It was at $17 when the AAMRQ stopped trading on OTC and straightly up listed at about $25(?).

Hit $1.10

If it doesn't roar, it may fall well below a $1. Just IMHO.

Thanks obiterdictum for the detailed explanation. Thanks for your time.

Just think what you do if it doesn't come down to 0.30 instead skies up to $30 ?? That's why I bought but now in loss . We never know.

I think we may close below a $1 either today or tomorrow because this falling every day and it already traded below a dollar today. So I think it would close below a $1. If at all it is around/below a $1 for a long time, we may see this around 0.30 cents as blue said. This is Just IMHO. I wish I am wrong as I am in loss already.

Looks like you are the only one correct here ??? I might have listened to you !!!!

If it goes below $1, isn't it difficult to uplist in the near future ?? as any stock needed to be traded above $1 for a while before uplist ?? In that aspect I think we may close below $1 today ?? Because closing price is important I think not the trading price in the day. This is just IMHO. Please let me know what you think on this.

$1 now

exostatic, please keep posting. Thanks.

Exist attic, please keep posting. Thanks.

Is it possible ?? can we see below 50 cents ??

Day's low is 1.09 !!! WOW!!

10 million plus already traded. Something is cooking ?? Don't know whether it's good or bad ??

Jacob, I just saw his message. Thanks.

Yea I just saw his message.

I dint know that. I didn't see him recently in this board.

LoL . Did he posted here today ?

Blue might pop up anytime now !!!

This fact might not know to the insiders. That's why they dumped most of their shares on the naive buyers at $1 per share about a year back. Wait they may dump more shares at about a $1 or higher again. I think here they may not have any scarcity for new shares !!!

Isn't it pumping ???

Thanks Jaren.

How many years it took in Exide. 3 years ??

If 3rd Amendment will be canceled, wouldn't that money goes to commons after being paid dividends to preferds ?? Then the commons won't be worth multiples of 10s of the current pps ??? In that case how could you been saying, from the beginning of your posts on this board, that only preferred swill be paid out and commons worth zero ?? Trying to misguide others ??

If 3rd Amendment will be canceled, wouldn't that money goes to commons after being paid dividends to preferds ?? Then the commons won't be worth multiples of 10s of the current pps ???

Really thank you very much for your valuable post/information schnabel. Please keep posting and thanks.

Thanks Stockman. Where do you think this falling would stop.

That means 20% of private share holders will get 16% of the equity share when the govt sell 80% of its shares and put that money towards equity in FNMA.

My guess is something similar will happen.

Most of the people on this board are longs. Owning shares from few thousands to a million.

I just read it. You know how many years that legal battle took place ?? 20 years. See the link below.


http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hindes-featured-in-new-book-by-former-fdic-executive-300182740.html

This is just a naive analysis!!!

Ok Commander it's giving me some hope. But let's see what's the final outcome would be here. Thanks for your post.

Don't assume too much and have too many hopes that something very favorable would happen overnight for shareholders in the courts. What has happened in the Lamberth's ruling or in Nevada(?) case ??. Based on reading almost every one's posts here I understand the partial win (I mean getting about 20% share for the private share holders with out expecting any returns from the extra payments made through the net worth sweeps) is big for us. So warrants may be valid as Ackman saying. Just IMHO.

The govt. don't need care what the consequences for net worth sweep. Because in the best case, the court may request/order the govt. to share some percentage of the profits(for sure not more than 20%) with the share holders. For getting this achieved it may take long time. That's why bill Ackman might be telling from the beginning that the warrants are valid. Read between the lines. Not easy to get absolute win for share holders as some people posting here. It might be some partial win if we are lucky. JIMHO. Thanks.

What if, if the govt. decides to share the 20% profit with the share holders as big-yank telling ?? Please let us know your view on this. Thanks.

big-yank, thanks for taking time to post your analysis. Much appreciated and it's a different view point. I used to see your analysis on XIDEQ, which finally proved you are right. Have to see what happens here.

I think you are exactly right pearjammer. I don't know how many here know that many insiders, including Derek's wife sold big portion of their holdings when this crossed a $1 about two years back. Poor buyers bought at $1. Some posters just hyping in big hopes. Please be careful here.

Is this hvpatel?