Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Inventory Data posted today....
Inventories Gain, but Remain Very Lean
By Tony Crescenzi
RealMoney.com Contributor
8/9/2006 10:40 AM EDT
Click here for more stories by Tony Crescenzi
Wholesale inventories increased slightly more than expected in June, gaining 0.8% against forecasts for a gain of 0.6%. Data for the prior month were revised upward to show a gain of 0.9% instead of 0.8%. These data point to the possibility of a slight upward revision to the second-quarter GDP, which was originally reported as up 2.5%.
Although the outright level of inventories increased during the month, relative to sales the inventory gain was meager. Sales increased 1.4% in June, bringing the inventory-to-sales ratio down to a new record low of 1.14 months from 1.15 months in May.
The leanness of business inventories is a major positive for the U.S. economy. In past cycles, bloated inventories were a cause of recession. That seems improbable this time around.
------------------
Perhaps things aren't as bad as expected? Consumer spending is likely to be sluggish, but it appears that businesses have anticipated this pretty well.
Wade, look at the earnings estimates for FY07 for WNR:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=WNR
They clearly beat expectations for Q2, but the consensus view (6 analysts) is for eps to drop to 1.86 in FY07.
Based upon that estimate, WNR is trading at 14.5x future earnings.
VLO earnings are also expected to drop next FY, so its not an isolated phenomenon:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=VLO
VLO estimates
FY06: 9.05
FY07: 7.68
There could be some one-times in there that I haven't factored or changes in tax rates. If that isn't the case and these are clean comps, then VLO is trading at 9x FY07 estimates.
VLO actually looks cheaper, purely on that basis of comparison.
Not sure I'd want to own either one if the predictions are accurate.
Hweb, I looked at KSW when its earnings came out. Isn't the backlog figure flat vs Q1?
(12/31): 82.2MM
"BACKLOG. The Company has a backlog (anticipated revenue from the
uncompleted portions of awarded projects) of orders totaling approximately
$82,200,000 as of December 31, 2005, compared to approximately $36,000,000 as of
December 31, 2004, and approximately $20,900,000 at December 31, 2003. See the
discussion of the restatements in "Item 6 - Selected Financial Data" and "Item 7
- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations." Approximately $68,000,000 of the December 31, 2005 backlog is
expected to be completed in the next fiscal year. The backlog at December 31,
2005 does not include a $9,000,000 contract which is subject to the project's
owner obtaining financing. The Company is actively seeking new contracts to add
to its backlog. Management believes that its value engineering services will
lead to a greater number of contracts to bid, because the Company is able to be
part of the initial planning of a project.
-----------
Q1 Backlog:
With this project, the Company's current backlog of work is approximately $100,000,000. -company PR on April 24.
"As of March 31, 2006, the Company had backlog of
approximately $84,000,000 as compared to approximately $46,800,000 as of March
31, 2005. The Company believes that approximately $34,000,000 of the Company's
backlog at March 31, 2006 is not reasonably expected to be completed within the
year ended December 31, 2006.
Q2 Backlog:
"The Company's backlog at the end of the second quarter was approximately $84,000,000."
---------------------
So, are investors reacting to the flat backlog? Could also be interpreted as down if using the intra-quarter PR back on April....
I don't think anyone believes that the NYC market will be immune to a national slowdown in RE projects.
Perhaps HURC is trading on what its outlook will be? It does seem to be cheap, but its closely tied to cyclical business investment spending:
Hurco Companies, Inc. is an industrial technology company that designs and produces interactive computer controls, software and computerized machine tools for the worldwide metal cutting industry. The end market for the company's products consists primarily of independent job shops and short-run manufacturing operations within large corporations in industries such as aerospace, defense, medical equipment, energy, transportation and computer equipment. The Company is based in Indianapolis, Indiana, and has sales, application engineering and service subsidiaries in High Wycombe, England; Munich, Germany; Paris, France; Milan, Italy; Shanghai, China and Singapore, along with manufacturing operations in Taiwan. Products are sold through independent agents and distributors in the United States, Europe and Asia. The Company also has direct sales forces in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy and Asia
------------
Customers are in some sectors (med equipment, energy, defense)that might be less immune to a slowdown, but the others (aerospace, transportation, computer equip) are not. Any ideas what the rev breakdown is by sector?
Michael T, I'm glad you posted the earnings number out to the ten thousands place for TSSW.
Looking at Q1, which was reported as 0.02, was actually 0.0164. So Q2 was only slightly worse than Q1, but because of rounding, the impact is seen as much larger.
Of course, seq drop in revenue doesn't help, esp after guiding for a range of 750k - 1MM! I was looking at the seasonality issues here, and Q2 and Q3 are clearly slower than Q1 and Q4:
Seq drop in rev Q2 -vs- Q1
FY03: -30%
FY04: -27%
FY05: -18%
FY06: -7% (reported today)
Not sure why the company was so aggressive with a top-end guidance of 1MM based on these results!
Going on the past records, Q3 revenues are usually flat vs Q2. How does Q4 look vs. Q3?
Seq increase in rev Q4 -vs- Q3:
FY03: +13%
FY04: +19%
FY05: +48%
FY06: ???
----------------
Bottom line, today's results were a disappointment and the stock may drift down a bit for the next few months. But with a seasonally stronger Q4 on tap, plus FY07 catalysts like the Microsoft introduction of Vista, this one could be a decent longer-term hold.
Gilead, re cash taxes. I agree with your point that cash flows are improved by not paying cash for income taxes. But that is a separate issue from the income statement tax rates.
Taxes listed on an income statement don't necessarily equal taxes paid in actual cash to the IRS. Why? To understand this key point, its important to understand the difference between a valuation allowance and a deferred tax asset.
A Valuation allowance is an off-balance sheet "asset" that is used by a company to shield it from declaring taxes on their income statement. No cash paid for taxes shows up in its cash flow statement.
Deferred tax assets are former valuation allowances that have been brought on to the balance sheet. These get reduced over time by recognizing normal tax rates on the income statement but NO CASH IS ACTUALLY PAID FOR TAXES.
So what is the difference here? None from the perspective of cash flows, but HUGE difference from an earnings perspective.
If you value companies on a cash flow basis, then the tax issue is meaningless. If you value companies on a PE basis (and virtually everyone here on this board does) then it is unfair to reward companies higher multiples using untaxed net eps. Valuation allowances are supposed to be recognized as true assets when it becomes more likely than not that it will be recognized. Huge gray area there.....
If a company has started to generate solid net income, why shouldn't most of the valuation allowance be recognized? Because companies don't like to show lower net income....who does?? But its a cheap way to get a higher multiple, because at some point they will have to start paying taxes.
The mistake that I think a lot of investors make is that they assume that the NOLs or valuation allowances have to be exhausted before taxes show up on the income statement. Not true. It can happen a lot sooner than that.....
I would STRONGLY echo R59's points here re SMTX. Ignoring tax impacts simply because they don't appear on the income statement now or in the intermediate future doesn't mean other investors aren't weighing that issue.
Good post, R59. I'm glad that someone else agrees with my stance on adjusting net income using pro-forma tax rates that are close to statutory.
I think its important to compare PE multiples on an apples to apples basis. That means using pro-forma tax rates when calculating net eps. Companies that don't record taxes on their income statement are unfairly rewarded for poor operating histories in the past if you give them the same PE as fully taxed companies......
Just to follow up on TBYH's PR regarding its new relationship with Via, if they can reach their minimum prediction:
"The first series of PCB board mobile design solutions, with a chipset platform provided by VIA, will be available in October 2006, followed by three additional design solutions to be introduced later this year. The first design solution will be targeted for the mid-end market segment. Management anticipates selling 50,000-80,000 units per month for the first six months following the release."
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060804/laf030.html?.v=63
50k units/mo, starting in October, would mean an additional 5-6 mos worth of sales. At minimum, they expect this to increase units sold by 275k for FY06. Last year, the company sold 1.2MM units:
"Mr. Xiaofeng Li, CEO of T-BAY Holdings, stated: "I look forward to another successful year for T-BAY with over 1.6 million units of T-BAY designed products expected to be sold in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. This would be a 33 percent increase over the previous year where T-BAY sold approximately 1.2 million units."
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060516/cltu522.html?.v=37
They seem to be taking strong steps to make good on their guidance. Even at 2.60, they are trading at 7.5x trailing earnings, with growth expectations for sales and earnings of 10-30% in FY07. If they got just a 10x multiple, the stock could be at 3.70 later this year (based upon 10% growth in eps over 0.34 in FY06, ending in March).
I wouldn't advise throwing caution to the winds at this stage, with the stock up 85% from its recent lows, but it might be a decent buy on a pullback.
---------------------------------------
Who is VIA?
http://www.via.com.tw/en/company/
While not mentioned, this could be the chipset design they will be working with:
http://www.via.com.tw/en/resources/pressroom/2006_archive/pr060706VX700.jsp
"UMPCs (Ultra Mobile PCs) is an exciting new category of devices that can fit comfortably into a pocket or handbag enabling users to access and interact with their entire digital world wherever they go. Creating exciting opportunities for entertainment, productivity, and communication focused products the VIA VX700 is the next step in this mobile future, enabling smaller form factor "computing" devices with reduced power consumption and enhanced functionality. As the first single chip implementation of its kind for ultra mobile devices, the VIA VX700 continues VIA's history of chipset innovation and blazes a strong path for a new breed of digital companions."
and
"Product Availability and Pricing
The VIA VX700 is expected to be available in volume quantities later in Q3 2006. Pricing is available upon request. For more information on the VIA VX700, please visit the VIA website at:
http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/chipsets/v-series/vx700/
Q3 2006 would be the same time frame that TBYH said they would start shipping product (October). Perhaps TBYH is working on a smart-phone???
T-Bay Holdings Establishes Strategic Partnership With VIA Technologies Inc.
Friday August 4, 12:00 pm ET
SHANGHAI, China, Aug. 4 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- T-Bay Holdings Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: TBYH - News), a leading mobile telecommunications device designer, announced today that T-Bay Holdings Inc. and VIA Technologies (China) Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of VIA Technologies Co., Ltd., (Taiwan Stock Exchange: 2388), a leading chipset solution provider, have established a partnership agreement to jointly develop multi-media Global Systems for Mobile Communications (GSM) handsets for the Chinese mobile telecommunications market.
The strategic partnership between T-Bay Holdings and VIA will enable both companies to accelerate the design-to-production phase for the enhanced deployment of mobile telecommunications devices. Both companies believe the new cooperative will reduce operating and production costs and provide increased efficiencies. Additionally, both companies expect that this partnership has the potential to increase their market share in China, one of the fastest growing telecommunications markets in the world. The first series of PCB board mobile design solutions, with a chipset platform provided by VIA, will be available in October 2006, followed by three additional design solutions to be introduced later this year. The first design solution will be targeted for the mid-end market segment. Management anticipates selling 50,000-80,000 units per month for the first six months following the release.
Xiaofeng Li, Chief Executive Officer of T-Bay Holdings, stated, "In the past, T-Bay's technology solutions were based on a platform provided by Skyworks. Our intention is to continue to work with Skyworks, but to also expand our strategic partner base by commencing work with VIA to further diversify our product line. This new platform will expand our line of products to provide mobile communication solutions to a larger segment of the marketplace. The initial terms of this partnership agreement may just be the beginning; we look forward to continued collaborative efforts between T-Bay and VIA to provide mobile telecommunications solutions to the growing Chinese marketplace. We believe that partnerships like these will continue to support the type of high margin growth T Bay generated in FY 2006."
About VIA Technologies Inc., Ltd.:
VIA Technologies Inc., Ltd., founded in 1987 in Silicon Valley California with headquarters based in Taiwan since 1992, is one of the leading chipset solution providers in the world. VIA's global network links the high-tech centers of the US, Europe and Asia. Its customer base includes the world's top OEMs, motherboard vendors and system integrators. VIA Technologies Inc., Ltd. is listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange under the symbol 2388.
About T-Bay Holdings Inc.:
T-BAY conducts its mobile phone design business through its 95% owned subsidiary, Shanghai SunPlus Communication Technology Co., Ltd. ("SunPlus"). Established in October 2002, SunPlus is a Sino-foreign joint venture providing total solution and full-range design services to leading mobile handset brand owners in China. The broad spectrum of services that SunPlus provides include overall product design, mechanical design, module architecture design, software design, prototype production, product testing, manufacturing and after-sale technical support. The Company currently has a staff of 160, comprised mostly of engineers and software programmers.
SunPlus develops its mobile phone modules based mainly on the chipset platform provided by SKYWORKS. Currently, major customers of SunPlus include CECT, Panda Electronics and Siemens Mobile.
SunPlus was jointly formed by Wise Target International Limited, Amber Link International Limited and Shanghai Fanna Industrial Product Design Co., Ltd. Wise Target and Amber Link are 100% subsidiaries of T-Bay Holdings, Inc. and they altogether hold 95% shareholding in SunPlus.
Contact Information
Investor Relations:
Equity Performance Group
Gary Geraci
(617) 723-2373
gary@equityperfgp.com
Safe Harbor Statement
SVL will have some tough comps in the upcoming quarters, because of one-time gains and changes in accounting.
Guidance was pretty tepid, and to me factors in virtually no growth in the back half. I adjusted for one-times and changes in acctg to come up with a TTM eps of 0.55. If we believe management, they won't show any y/y increases for two quarters?
Still seems cheap, at <7x trailing adj earnings. LT growth is for 10-15% sales growth in FY07:
"Sharon K. Brayfield, President, commented, "The first half of 2006 has been well ahead of our initially projected growth expectations for the period. We have achieved these results by continuing to increase sales efficiencies. This has allowed us to maximize our closing rate on Vacation Interval sales for new and existing customers. Based on reported results through the first half of 2006 we now expect this increased level of efficiency can be maintained through the remainder of 2006. Furthermore, sustaining these sales efficiencies should allow us to meet our plan of 10-15% top-line growth for 2007.
-------------
Here's what is confusing, I think. If they were "well ahead of initially projected growth expectations for the period [first half]".....why didn't they raise guidance?
Outlook
The Company continues to anticipate that its net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 will be its previously issued guidance of $21 million to $22 million ($0.53 to $0.56 per diluted share).
--------------
Net income over the next two periods is expected to be 9MM (high end). Last year, net income over the last two quarters was 15.7MM, but that included gains on sale of real estate and gain on sale of A/R, which the company doesn't acct for anymore.
Catalysts are still there for the stock to appreciate, but it might take a while.
Yes, TBYH has had an amazing run. Even more amazing is that it still only trades at 6.8x ttm fd eps.
I don't know who was behind the selling after the report. No Form 144 filings since June 9, and even that was for a modest 10,000 shares.
Perhaps the next catalyst will be the Q1 earnings report, filed last year on Aug 15. If the company can show that its sales and earnings will improve by the minimum 10%, this could hit the $3.00 mark (and still only trade at 8-9x trailing earnings)
Regarding the A/R balances, I was told by the company's IR group (via a company executive):
"I forwarded your inquiry along to Jack Zeng, Justin and another consultant.
The receivables issue was addressed in my call with him last night. He told me he expected approximately half of them to be worked down within 90 days and that these types of late payments are common in China."
----------
From Zeng:
"Most of the A/R(61%) was in 3 months and Most of the Notes receivable will be on due by the end of Sept. this year. All of our customers owe our money, the bigger the business we do, the more money they owe us. Our customers are big and have good reputation in China, we don't think its difficult to take the money back."
-----------
This company is highly levered to XING. As XING goes, so should results here. Chinese domestic cell phone manufactureres have lost market share in China to international competitors, but the pie is still growing.....
Also, don't forget that TBYH had 4.7MM in cash on its balance sheet as of y/e. If they can begin collecting those A/R and N/R (albeit slowly) they can continue to grow without having to tap the equities markets.
CPHI is probably an ok buy here, but I'm concerned about their need for capital this year:
"Interest expense for December 31, 2005 is $186,452 and net income is $3,799,550.
The company just paid off two long-term loans and the Company plans to apply for
new loans, of approximately $3,130,000. The expected annual interest rate is 6%.
The Company's subsidiary has forecasted $10 million in capital expenditure for
the coming year, which it expects to finance from internal sources and issuance
of shares. The financed cash is intended to be used in the following projects:
(1) $5 million of the amount will be invested in establishment of product line
for new medicine and investment in support of research and development.
(2) $3 million of the amount will be used to increase working capital due to
expansion of manufacturing capacity.
(3) $2 million of the amount will be used to expand marketing and promotion of
products."
--------
That was from the 10K.
The announcement today regarding the hiring of an IR firm may mean that they are ready to start raising money via a PIPE for expansion. They had 74k in cash as of the end of last quarter, but they expected to be able to get a line of credit of $3MM for working capital:
"Interest expenses
-----------------
Interest expense for three months ended March 31, 2006 is $23,799 and net income
is $1,618,936. The Company just paid off two long-term loans in 2005, but the
Company had not applied for new loans up to March 31, 2006, which made a
significant decrease of interest expenses during the first quarter of 2006.
However, the Company plans to apply for a new loan of approximately $3,130,000
in May of 2006. The expected annual interest rate is 6% will cause an increase
in interest expenses later.
---------------------
I would think they will still need to raise cash, at minimum $5MM. If I were looking to put big money in here, I'd demand a substantial discount to market....say 35-40%. Even with the additional dilution, they could still do well if they can hit their minimum guidance of $8MM net.
..someone still selling at 1.61! If someone did want out...why not sell at $2? Who waits for a cheap stock to drop 20% after a good earnings report and THEN sells? I don't think the company's prospects have changed that much in a few days.
---------
Hweb, I was thinking the EXACT same thing about TBYH last week....
Perhaps some traders were expecting a sustainable pop from earnings and decided to get out at any cost when that didn't materialize. There was a spike of volume in JOB back on 7/17 of 120k shares. Not news related or filing related, so looks suspiciously like someone was playing the earnings pop.
If you believe in the value, then just hunker down and wait. JOB not my cup of tea, as they don't appear to have the growth catalysts I like to see....
Skillz, you could be right about JOB getting down to bargain levels....but they are in the wrong sector at this point. Contract staffing in the early stages of a possible economic slowdown? They will have a difficult FY07 imho, if one believes that we are in a weakening economic environment for the US.
Biz:
"General Employment provides professional staffing services through a network of 20 branch offices located in 10 states, and specializes in information technology, accounting and engineering placements.
The Company's business is highly dependent on national employment trends in general and on the demand for professional staff in particular. "
At some point, you will get the transition from growth oriented investors to value investors, and the selling will subside....but what are the growth catalysts to spark interest here (other than possible takeover attempt?)
Also, note that eps are untaxed. Revs were mixed, with placement up and contract down. Total revs were basically flat, with margins up due to rev mix.
Back in the last recession (2002), this stock traded below 0.50.
Hweb, re EZEN and its guidance:
"Positive guidance with expected earnings growth of 30-35% in 2006."
Do you (or anyone else) know if that guidance is inclusive of the tax benefit recorded in Q1 2006?
Mike, re: CHID. Perhaps there is some "lumpiness" with Sono Digital sales, but it looks at the surface that the recognition of sales is in question here. If management purposely deferred sales recognition in order to pump up numbers in the second half, then this is illegal.
Either way, we haven't seen any PRs from the company explaining the Q1 results which were pretty ugly for Sono, as you noted.
Here are some other numbers that raise questions in my mind as to how CHID/Sono Digital is manipulating numbers for a decent back half. Check out the deferred revs, which were only 94k as of Mar 31 (up slightly from Dec's total of 70k). My guess is that they are going to string out recognition of Sono's sales until they are included in CHID's numbers as of Q3. Q2 should be similar to Q1, if E'Jenie can just maintain its sales. If so, then Q3 and Q4 would have to show numbers of 0.035 each just to make guidance.
Not sure if there are many earnings catalysts for ACSEF between now and the end of the year. With current sales projections set at 5.6 - 6.0MM for the whole second half (2.9MM/qtr), that would be roughly equivalent to what the company earned in Q2 2005 (2.9MM rev; 0.05/qtr).
That would project to only 0.20 annualized eps, so there could be more room to fall for ACSEF if they don't replace those revenues next year.
I was a seller on the news, although you didn't have much of a window! There were a lot of trapped longs in this one....
DAAT news this AM is positive:
David A. Collins, Chairman and CEO, stated, "The sales are in line with our projected sales increases for 2006, although we are seeing larger sales increases in July due to the acceptance of our GunMaster gun cleaning line in most all major retailers, distributors and catalog companies. Also, the Company has received orders from Kmart and will begin shipping immediately. The Company shipped the Wal-Mart module set at the end of June. Our electric meat grinder went into 2,200 stores versus 280 stores last year, and our new meat processing kit (knives) went into over 2,000 stores. All of this is contributing to higher than expected July sales."
---------------
The company has hit its top-end guidance of 20% growth; it will be interesting to see what they can do on margins.
Q3 appears to be off to a good start, and 20%+ growth seems achievable for the year. The stock trades at 1.85, or 10x trailing eps.
Quick summary:
1. If the company can hit its +20% forecast for earnings growth then the company might earn 0.23 for FY06.
2. Appropriate forward multiple? 10x? 12x? Higher?
3. PEG ratio: (most conservative): 0.80 at current price.
4. Price target: 2.30 - 2.75
I'd like to post some thoughts on TBYH. As some of us are painfully aware, the stock has collapsed after reporting its y/e fiscal report. Was there anything fundamentally wrong with the company that warrants such a sell-off?
A few have speculated that its engineering prowess isn't well advanced in 3G, which could push out its transition to 3G into FY08. Others have said that the A/R are an issue, and point to the creation of a note receivable as an indicator that one or more customers are in danger of not paying their bills to TBYH.
All of this could be legitimate, but with the Q4 numbers that were posted, and with guidance for a minimum of 10% growth on existing products, I really doubt that these issues were cause for most of the selling.
Here's my theory on what's happening. After tearing apart the 10k again, I believe that a big part of the problem is the issuance of shares in the past to "consultants" who helped put together the reverse merger and acquisition of Shangai Sunplus. Here's what I've found:
<snip from 10K>
Changes in Securities
Unless otherwise noted all securities were issued to accredited investors in private transactions, without registration in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Furthermore, all investors had access to all material information pertaining to our company and financial condition, and no broker was involved and no commissions were paid in the transactions.
During the eight months ended August 31, 2003 we issued 6,003,000 restricted common shares to 29 investors for payment of $60,030 in debt that was due on December 31, 2002.
[My NOTE]: split adjusted: 300k shares
During the eight months ended August 31, 2003 we issued 1,151,000 restricted common shares to four investors as payment for services valued at $11,510. 57k split adjusted
***Share issuances prior to 2004 have not been adjusted for the 20 to one reverse split effective in November 2004. Share issuances listed below were issued after the reverse split was effective.***
In November 2004, we sold 1,440,000 post 20 to one reverse split restricted common shares to seven individuals for $50,000. This sale resulted in a change of control of the Company as described in Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2004.
Also in November 2004, we issued 50,000 restricted common shares to an individual for services of a consultant.
In January 2005, we established a non-Qualified Stock Option Plan to encourage stock ownership by officers, directors, employees and consultants. The aggregate number of shares subject to stock grants and options are not to exceed 6,5000,000 shares of our common stock and may be granted pursuant to the Plan for up to ten years. In March 2005, we issued 6,336,189 common shares were issued to eleven individuals for services rendered pursuant to the Plan.
In July 2005, we issued 3,100,000 restricted common shares to 5 individuals and corporations for services rendered to the Company as payment for services valued at $3,100.
In August 2005, we issued 18,550,000 restricted common shares pursuant to the terms of our Reorganization Agreement stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Wise Target and Amber Link.
===================
The rules on restricted shares are usually Form 144 restrictions. They are the following (quickly summarized):
Restricted shares may only be sold after a one year holding period, subject to certain restrictions. First, sales cannot exceed 1% of outstanding shares. Second, notice must be filed with the SEC. If shares have been held for 2 years or more, than they can be sold without regard to the above restrictions.
The SEC Form 144 rule (for those interested in reading more):
http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/rule144.htm
--------
What does that mean for TBYH? Note that 3.1MM restricted shares just passed the 1 year mark. That means that 1%, or 310k shares, could have been sold at some point during July. My guess is that we had a Form 144 seller at work once the numbers were officially released, AND the one year anniversary in July passed. Nothing has been filed yet with the SEC, but my guess is we might see something in the next few weeks.
Second point on restricted shares being sold in TBYH. Notice that there is another block of original shell shares (1.4MM) that are due to reach the 2 year anniversary in November 2006. Those can be sold free of any restriction, included filing with the SEC. That is a lot of low basis shares that may be coming on to the market very soon and savvy buyers are perhaps waiting for this time period to go by and see how far the stock can fall.
-------------------
So.....there are some very good reasons to avoid TBYH at present. However, if you want to look at this as an aggressive speculator, this may be a fantastic opportunity to buy in at a cheap price assuming the fundamentals remain solid. TBYH has set out to configure and engineer a 3G phone by Q4 FY07. They may be late on this, but guidance of 10% growth in sales and net income from existing phones indicates that they should have at least a good fighting chance of achieving that minimum guidance.
Financials:
1. TTM PE of 4.4x
2. Cash of 4.7MM on the balance sheet, no debt. A Note receivable of 7.8MM, which may not be all collectable.
3. Generated positive cash flow from operations (FY07): +3.9MM
4. Guidance (from y/e PR):
"Xiaofeng Li continued, "The Chinese market is the largest in the world, with about 50 million new phones currently sold each year. Sales and royalties on our 2006 products alone should create earnings growth of at least 10% in fiscal 2007 but emerging catalysts suggest that an earnings growth rate approaching 30% is entirely possible for 2007."
"Through investments in R&D and a planned increase in capital expenditures, we are on track to market up to 35 total design solutions in fiscal 2007, a 40% increase in new products, including two 3G phones. In addition to offering new products, we are also continuing to add new customers and plan to aggressively enter additional markets in Eastern European and South America in fiscal 2007," stated Xiaofeng Li."
5. Earnings growth of 10% = 0.37. Forward PE: 4x; Growth rate: 10%; PEG ratio: 0.40
----------
I don't know when the sellers will be exhausted or what their game plan is for maximizing their exit price. It just seems amazing to me that TBYH is hovering near 52 week lows given its financials and recent guidance.
Bottom line: restricted shares could be creating an overhang of supply, but with the passage of time and a successful Q1 and Q2 under its belt, I think the stock can eventually get back up to the 3s again. May take a while though....
Sskillz, I think you've timed your buy well. Someone wants out, and that has depressed the price. Trading at 4.7x trailing eps, with 10% - 30% growth expected? There can't be many cheaper micros out there. I wish I knew the reasons for the selling....nothing in the company filings or PRs have indicated problems. Could be that the CNTF warning has spooked investors, but even CNTF is trading at 10x FY07 estimates, and trades much higher on a trailing multiple.
We're finally getting some serious (for TBYH) volume this AM; perhaps the bottom is closer at hand? 50k shares traded by noon, avg daily volume is around 34k.
BBC got some mention at the Motley Fool:
The evidence
Aswath Damodaran is a professor of finance at NYU's Stern School of Business, and he's one of the sharpest minds in his field. In his book Investment Fables, he notes that small-cap stocks have, on average, outperformed large caps over the very long term and that the greatest outperformance comes from micro caps valued under $250 million. What's more, there's also evidence that returns tend to increase as the number of analysts following a stock decreases.
The execution
This makes sense, and it's exactly what we look for in Motley Fool Hidden Gems: small, obscure, undervalued companies with little or no following. It's what's led to 26% total average returns over the past three years, when equal investments in the S&P 500 would have returned 9%.
To give us a good starting place in the hunt for the market's next batch of great returns, I started with my Modified Foolish 8 screen, which has returned a total of 749% since 1998, according to the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). The screen passes only high-growth companies with strong insider ownership and reasonable price-to-growth ratios. To that, I made one simple change, keeping only companies with a market cap of $250 million or less. Only five passed the screen (and remember, these companies carry a whole lotta risk, and your own proper due diligence is required):
Company
Market Cap
(millions)
Fuel Tech (FTEK)
$232.5
Bodisen Biotech (AMEX: BBC)
$219
Warrior Energy Service (WARR)
$198.2
U.S. Global Investors (GROW)
$137.3
RELM Wireless (RWC)
$94.1
Speaking of short interest, I'm amazed that the SI is up again for BBC:
http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/quotes_full.asp?kind=shortint&symbol=BBC&selected=BBC
Wonder what these shorts are banking on? The company has already announced record sales and net income for the quarter:
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060710/20060710005192.html?.v=1
New short interest reports for OTC securities will be posted tomorrow:
--------------
Short Interest Information Available for Pink Sheet Securities on July 26th
New York, NY, July 5, 2006 -- Changes to NASD short interest reporting rules were effective July 3, 2006. These changes expand short interest reporting requirements to over-the-counter (OTC) equity securities, including those quoted on Pink Sheets. The first short interest information for OTC securities will be available on July 26, 2006, per Nasdaq’s short interest publication schedule, available on line at: http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/trader/defincludes/nasdshortint_def.stm#pubnew. Each month, on the publication date, Pink Sheets will publish short interest information for each OTC equity stock on pinksheets.com.
For additional information, see NASD Notice to Members 06-14 – April 2006 or contact Pink Sheets by email at info@pinksheets.com or by phone at 212.896.4420.
-------------
Now this should be interesting. I've always wondered what the short interest is for some of the OTC:BB stocks on the Reg SHO list...
Interview with CKGT.ob (China Kangtai Cactus) CEO here:
http://www.wallstreetreporter.com/profile.php?id=19132
You will need to register at the website in order to listen. Its difficult to understand in places, but I was able to hear that current Q2 revs are expected to be a new record. CEO expects revs of 3.5 - 4.0 MM, and 17MM for FY06!
Last quarter (Q1), the company had revs of 3.57MM and earned 0.08/share (untaxed and fd). They may have some higher expenses this quarter due to the recent S-8 filing, but their second half could be tremendous. Don't expect a similar 0.08 quarter in Q2, but if they can match Q1 results in Q3 and Q4 then the stock could really take off.
Current price of 0.90 x 1.15 and volume is terrible.
TBYH getting hammered down to 1.80 now. Stock only trades at 5x trailing eps, grew revs by 20% last quarter and has guided for minimum growth of 10% in the coming year.
Guess no one believes the story right now. CNTF (a competitor) warned this week, but the issues they have are due to 3G transitions for international customers. TBYH has no international customers at present, just Chinese. 3G phones weren't even expected to be introduced until Q4 fy07, so even if they did have problems with that transition, I doubt it would have impacted their 10% minimum growth expectation.
I may be dead wrong here, but this appears to be too good a bargain to pass up at 1.80!
Wade, ALY's acquisition terms:
The purchase agreement provides that the consideration for the DLS stock will consist of cash in the amount of US $102.4 million and 2.5 million shares of Allis-Chalmers' common stock. Allis-Chalmers' obligations under the agreement are subject to obtaining equity and debt financing necessary to complete the acquisition.
The S-1/A is a bit more detailed:
The Offering
Common stock offered by Allis-Chalmers 2,500,000 shares.
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering 23,492,760 shares.
Use of proceeds We estimate that the net proceeds to Allis-Chalmers from this offering will be approximately $26.3 million. We plan to use the net proceeds to us from this offering to fund a portion of the purchase price for our pending acquisition of DLS.
American Stock Exchange symbol ALY.
Risk factors See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9 of this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our common stock.
The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding upon consummation of this offering is based upon 18,514,260 shares of our common stock outstanding as of July 1, 2006, 2,500,000 shares to be issued in this offering, and 2,500,000 shares of common stock to be issued as a portion of the consideration for our pending acquisition of DLS. In addition, the number of shares of common stock excludes:
• 1,843,634 shares reserved for issuance under our 2003 Incentive Stock Plan (of which 1,595,534 shares are currently issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options with a weighted average exercise price of $6.32 per share),
• 71,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants with a weighted exercise price of $4.98 per share, and
• 4,000 shares reserved (of which 4,000 shares are currently issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options at an exercise price of $13.75 per share) for options granted to former and continuing board members in 1999 and 2000.
Allis-Chalmers has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 375,000 additional shares to cover any over-allotments. Unless otherwise noted, this prospectus assumes no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.
----------------
All told, that's about 25MM fd shares. Is it dilutive? Depends on when the acquisition officially closes and how the results are.....
Wade, its selling off from your buy point, but its still up on the day. Contrast that with the OIH (oil&gas service holders index) which is down over 3% today and appears to be forming the dreaded head and shoulders technical pattern.
ALY isn't really going to soar given its association with that group, right or wrong. I think there is a serious debate in the investment community about whether this quarter might have been the high water mark. No real confirmation out there yet (as per the ALY CC), so its just speculation on the hedge fund/institutional community. ALY also has some stock to place for its recent acquisition, so that could be holding it back too.
Another point mentioned on the CC is that Q3 and Q4 could have weather disruptions that impact revs (hurricanes in the gulf). I thought I heard that 30% of revs were tied to offshore (Gulf) products.
Thanks Nelson! I think that's the reason why PDC has been in such a downtrend. NG prices have dropped fairly dramatically over the past year, and who knows what kind of NG price/supply assumptions were built into the growth numbers for FY07....
I guess its a bit riskier now, but if your projections are that NG will rebound than it could be a good time to take a position.
Curlews, do you have a sense as to the rig breakdown for PDC based upon NG vs. Oil? Thanks...
Can anyone recommend a better free site for monitoring portfolios than Yahoo Finance?
Bigpike, I think that CEDA's management has no clue when it comes to PR. I think they got taken advantage of by their last "PR" firm which really was nothing more than a pump and dump shop. The former PR firm, Sinavest, did a poor job with translation in that PR as you point out.
Sifting through their numbers shows a company that has strong cash flow, very high margins and is in the online education sector. Growth is fantastic, with sales and net income expected to double this year. Here's an older PR with more details on guidance:
China Education Alliance Reports Financial Results for 2005
THURSDAY, MARCH 30, 2006 9:45 PM
- BusinessWire
HARBIN, China, Mar 30, 2006 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- China Education Alliance, Inc. (CEDA) ("CEDA"), one of the leading e-learning enterprises engaged in the online education business in China, today announced year end 2005 financial results.
Highlights from the year end 2005 include:
-- Revenue increased 5,920% to $3.1 million
-- Gross margin increased to 67%
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2005
CEDA's revenue increased 5,920%, to $3.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2005 from $51,700 in the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily due to:
-- A strong increase in the sales of general study cards, including e-business income;
-- New tuition income generated from our education center;
-- New income from advertisement, domain name service, and other technical services;
Net income for FY 2005 increased to $1.7 million from a loss of $(109,721) for FY 2004. Operating income for 2005 is $1.7 million with gross margin of 67% compared to an operation loss in 2004.
Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2005, the company's cash position increased $507,703, or 566%, to $597,444 of cash compared to $89,741 at the beginning of the year. Debt outstanding as of December 31, 2005 was $117,945, resulting from a loan from a shareholder that can be converted to equity upon their request.
CEDA is a technology company engaged in the online education industry in China. There is a significant market in China for education and education related products. It has been reported that the education budget established by the Chinese government is over US$60 billion annually, which accounts for 3.41% of the GDP. It is expected to increase year over year. In addition, one of the top three expenditures of every Chinese household is education.
In 2005, CEDA provided services through three main channels: a large educational online portal, an education center and educational software and media. We own the only website, www.edu-chn.com, in China that holds copyrights of examination materials for elementary, middle and high schools aimed at users from age 7 through 18. We have enriched the content of the website with more than 100,000 sets of exam questions and more than 15,000 various training materials. The database is continually being increased/updated every month. The website has attracted 220 million visits as of year end 2005. Our education center started The Big Classroom of the Famous Instructors in July 2005, providing middle school, high school and occupational training students the opportunity to hear lectures by famous instructors either at the education center or online. CEDA believes that having top educational experts such as Professor Liansheng Zhang and Hongmei Wang join the company will attract other famous instructors. As of December 2005, a total of 167,640 people have been trained in our education center.
Yu Xiqun, CEO of China Education Alliance, Inc., stated, "CEDA is profitable in 2005 with net income to be 54.7% of revenue. We believe this trend will continue to grow as we expand our market into other educational services and provinces in China. CEDA's liquidity position is also fairly good. The operating income was sufficient to support all the expenses and investment needs for 2005. Even though competition continues to grow in our industry, our goal is to become the largest online educational portal in China within the next few years."
Competition
As the Chinese educational market is enormous and growing, CEDA expects that there will be more competitors, both domestic and foreign, in the following years. However, CEDA plans to secure their industry-leading market share through the following actions:
-- Rapidly growing our website with the goal in 2 years to become the largest online educational portal in China;
-- Constructing our website to provide full range e-commerce services;
-- Integrating our service with leading communication and IT hardware partners;
-- Entering into exclusive agreements with local educational authorities and elite schools throughout the country;
-- Applying for additional copyrights of examination materials and educational course data that CEDA has collected.
Guidance
CEDA is reiterating 2006 guidance; we expect revenue to increase to $6.0-$6.5 million, or a 94%-110% increase from 2005. The company expects net income to increase to $3.0-$3.5 million, or a 76%-106% increase from 2005. CEDA's 2006 plans also include:
-- Strengthen the website and network infrastructure;
-- Develop the online occupational education section;
-- Secure and develop our current market presence in the Heilongjiang province;
-- Expand our market presence into the neighboring provinces such as Liauning and Jilin;
-- Initiate our collaboration between website and local school business model to every province in China.
CEDA will be filing a Form 12b-25 request to file an extension for the 2005 10-KSB filing.
------------------
NOTE: 3.0 - 3.5MM in net income/58MM fd shares = 0.052 - 0.06. Even with a conservative 10x multiple, the shares could be trading in the mid 0.50s. China stocks have been sold off pretty harshly by US investors who are focusing more on the risk side of the equation....but at what point does the reward potential start to outweigh the enormous risks??
Here's the website put together by that "PR" firm:
http://www.chinaeducational.com/
Boy, CEDA has sure been beaten up. Just touched 0.365. Company earned 0.01 last quarter, and gave guidance that indicated they could earn close to 0.02 in the current quarter:
China Education Alliance Provides 2nd Quarter Financial Expectations
Monday May 22, 7:05 am ET
HARBIN, China, May 22 /Xinhua-PRNewswire/ -- China Education Alliance, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board:CEDA - News), one of the leading e-learning enterprises engaged in the online education business in China, today provided financial expectations for 2nd quarter.
For 1st quarter of 2006, the Company achieved revenue to be $1.3 million. For 2nd quarter of 2005, the company achieved revenue to be $0.285 million, and achieved net income to be 0.145 million.
For 2nd quarter of 2006, the Company expects revenue to increase to $2- $2.2million, or a 54%-69% increase from 1st quarter of 2006 and a 600%-670% increase from 2nd quarter of 2005. The company expects net income to increase to $1.0-$1.1million, or a 590%-658% increase from 2nd quarter of 2005.
The reason of the revenue and net income increase of 2nd quarter of FY 2006:
-- The promotion plan is carried out results that the sales increase.
-- The entrance to high school exam and the entrance to university exam
will hold in June.
------------
If they hit the low end of expectations, that would translate into 0.02 fd, and 0.03 ytd through the first two quarters.
We've had some big sales via Form 144 in the past few months, and this selling has overwhelmed the stock. If you believe the guidance, then its dirt cheap and poised to rebound.....
Hweb, I think that's an amended filing from the ACSEF CEO. It was only amended to include an earlier unreported 10K share purchase at 6.75 and a smaller subsequent purchase at 3.25 yesterday.
I'm actually more impressed that he was buyer at 6.75!
MSGI, it depends on which way investors want to interpret the horrible numbers from the builders survey. It could easily be used by the Fed to pause interest rates and declare that the economy is more at risk than future growth in inflation. This would likely give a pop to the market.
However, with oil/commodity prices still stubbornly high, it could also prop up the dreaded "stagflation" argument. If we are in the midst of a return to a similar market like the 70s era, that would be very bad for stocks (with the notable exception of oil & commodities).
I think either way the US market gets hit first. Emerging countries like China are showing no real signs of slowing, so that keeps pressure on commodity demand. I think the US consumer is going to be in trouble as interest rates rise in response to growing inflation, and this is starting to show up in the retail data. Of course, the US consumer drives global demand and this will in turn hurt China and other big exporters. However, what about domestic demand in China? Could that support growth in those countries beyond what the US provides? I think that is the real nightmare for US policy makers. Global demand continuing to be strong even in the face of a US recession......
Fund Managers Turn Dramatically Pessimistic
07/18/06
DailyII.com
In just three months, the outlook on the global economy has gone from 5% of fund managers being pessimistic about the next 12 months to 60% having a dim view of the coming year, according to Merrill Lynch’s Survey of Fund Managers for July. “This survey is so grim it could constitute a contrarian signal,” says Dave Bowers, a Merrill spokesman. “High cash levels, high risk aversion and extreme pessimism about growth are the raw ingredients for a stock market rally if we get the merest pinch of good news to add to the mix.” As dire as the survey sounds – Merrill says it is its most negative in its history – few believe there will be a “full-blown recession” within the next 12 months. About one in three institutional investors are overweight in cash, a level exceeded only after Sept. 11. The one almost positive glimmer, according to the survey, is that investment time horizons are about where they were in May. Incidentally, dire predictions notwithstanding, Merrill’s profits soared 42% in the second quarter.
-----------
Good news for the hard-core contrarians among us....
China's Economy Soars 11.3%;
More Fiscal Restraint Expected
By ANDREW BROWNE
July 18, 2006; Page A2
BEIJING -- China's economy is picking up more speed, expanding by 11.3% in the second quarter of this year from a year earlier despite Beijing's efforts to slow the pace.
The figure released Tuesday by the National Bureau of Statistics highlights the failure of measures by Beijing to rein in expansion and avoid overheating. It is likely to dismay Chinese leaders who began clamping down more seriously after data showed the economy expanded by 10.2% in the first quarter. The first-quarter number was later revised to 10.3%.
For the first half of the year, the economy expanded by 10.9%. The Chinese economy is increasing by the fastest pace in roughly a decade.
The fear is that an overheated economy is producing excessive investment that could lead to industrial overcapacity, falling profits and, eventually, a crash caused by mass bankruptcies.
Many Chinese and foreign economists expect authorities will be forced to raise bank-interest rates for a second time this year, and issue more aggressive instructions to banks to curb lending. Reducing lending is the best way to bring down investment in a bank-dominated economy.
In releasing the data, statistics bureau spokesman Zheng Jingping characterized growth as "fast and stable." Nevertheless, he said in a statement that investment in fixed assets was "excessive" and the supply of credit was "overscaled."
One of the root causes of expansion is excess money in the economy, partly the result of trade surpluses with the U.S. and other trading partners. As dollars flood into China as payment for exports, they are bought by the central bank in return for yuan, a process that keeps the value of the yuan stable. Some of the surplus of yuan ends up being lent out by banks, swelling investment that is running far too hot.
The figures showed that fixed-asset investment increased by 30% in the first half of this year on a national basis. Industrial output for the month of June was up 20%. Retail sales for the month expanded 14% from the same month a year earlier.
Authorities have been comforted by the fact that inflation is low. Tuesday's figure shows that it is creeping up, with the consumer-price index in June up 1.5% from a year earlier after rising 1.4% in May.
In the first half of this year, banks have dished out 87% of the whole year's loan target set by the central bank.
Yet few economists believe Beijing is prepared to tackle the problem of easy money by allowing the yuan to appreciate more steeply, a move that could help narrow the trade surplus by making China's exports more expensive in dollar terms and its imports cheaper.
Last month's trade surplus hit its highest level ever of $14.5 billion, helping to balloon the surplus for the first half to $61.45 billion, 54% bigger than the surplus for the same period a year earlier. After tripling to $102 billion for the whole of last year, the surplus this year is on track to reach $150 billion or more.
The increasing surplus risks a protectionist backlash in Washington, where the Bush administration is pressing China to allow its currency to appreciate faster.
Beijing is scrambling to cool overheated parts of the economy, including property markets in several large cities, without derailing rapid expansion needed to create jobs. In April, the central bank lifted benchmark one-year bank lending rates by 0.27 percentage points to 5.85% from 5.58%. This month it raised the reserve requirement ratio for commercial banks -- the amount of money banks must deposit with the central bank -- by half a percentage point to 8%. For every $100 dollars of deposits, banks must set aside $8 in reserves, meaning the money can't be lent out.
Some economists believe another lending-rate increase of a similar magnitude is imminent. They speculate that it may be accompanied by a simultaneous increase in bank-deposit rates. That is because banks make most of their money from the difference between the low interest rates that they pay depositors and the higher rates they charge borrowers, and widening that so-called spread by raising lending rates might encourage banks to lend more.
But authorities are in a bind. If they raise interest rates sharply enough to cause a significant drop in lending, they risk attracting new inflows of speculative money betting that eventually the yuan will have to appreciate. Those inflows will add to liquidity in the domestic economy, undermining the effectiveness of the rate increases.
I agree Hweb. This situation reminds me of WEX, which announced that it had lost its exclusive contract with Select Comfort and the stock tanked but then staged a rally on the next earnings report.
Hopefully that will be the case here as well. Long-term issues are still there (needing to replace revs), plus the fact that its an Isreali company will scare away potential investors.
Larry I would preach caution about annualizing those quarterly numbers from IEHC. My guess is that they had a tremendous quarter due to sales mix and order patterns that probably won't be repeated in the upcoming quarters. The drop in backlog that Hweb noted may not be considered significant, but what it does imply is that business could also dry up very quickly. That kind of lumpy revenue stream is very tricky to guess, so I would not chase the stock today.
Rollin, it was buried in a Schedule 13D/A filing.....
This is a foreign security issuer, so I'm not sure if they have the same insider disclosures.
ACSEF insider buy just filed. President and 25%+ owner bought some stock over the past two weeks:
ITEM 2. IDENTITY AND BACKGROUND
(a) Mr. Ze'ev Kirshenboim
(b) Ha'Mada Ave., Migdal Ha'Emek 10500, Israel.
(c) President, CEO and director of the Issuer.
ITEM 3. SOURCE AND AMOUNT OF FUNDS OR OTHER CONSIDERATION
Personal funds.
ITEM 4. PURPOSE OF TRANSACTION
The reporting person shall, in the future, consider the purchase or sale of
additional securities of the Issuer depending on market and other
conditions
------------------- ------------ -----------------
CUSIP NO. M01773106 SCHEDULE 13D PAGE 4 OF 5 PAGES
------------------- ------------ -----------------
ITEM 5. INTEREST IN SECURITIES OF THE ISSUER
(a) and (b) The reporting person has sole power to vote or direct the vote
and to dispose or direct the disposition of 909,893 Ordinary Shares of
the Issuer (which number includes 160,000 Ordinary Shares that the
reporting person has the right to acquire by exercising options that
have vested), which constitute 26.37% of the outstanding Ordinary
Shares of the Issuer. The reporting person's spouse, Mrs. Ilana
Kirshenboim, has shared power to vote or direct the vote and to
dispose or direct the disposition of 6,440 Ordinary Shares of the
Issuer (which number includes 5,000 Ordinary Shares that Mrs. Ilana
Kirshenboim has the right to acquire by exercising options that have
vested, but does not include 3,000 additional Ordinary Shares subject
to options that will vest as follows: 1,500 on December 31, 2006, 375
on December 31, 2008, 375 on December 31, 2009, 375 on December 31,
2010 and 375 on December 31, 2011), which constitute 0.2% of the
outstanding Ordinary Shares of the Issuer. With respect to 6,440
Ordinary Shares, which are held by the Reporting Person's Spouse, Mrs.
Ilana Kirshenboim, the Reporting Person has shared power to vote or
direct the vote and to dispose or direct the disposition thereof,
together with his spouse.
(c) The following is a schedule of the transactions of the reporting
persons in the Issuer's Ordinary Shares effected during the past 60
days:
NUMBER OF SHARES
DATE OF TRANSACTION ACQUIRED DISPOSED OF PRICE NATURE OF TRANSACTION
------------------- -------- ----------- ----- ---------------------
June 29, 2006 20,000 $3.75 Bought on the market
July 13, 2006 20,000 $3.59 Bought on the market
July 13, 2006 13,810 $3.50 Bought on the market
Total 53,810