having been fortunate to fly once in a private jet and too many times commercial.

flying private is just so much better.

walk into the hangar, pilot or copilot takes your bag.
no checking luggage or strip searches lol.



breakfast drinks lunch etc. bathroom was quite nice..

land in subzero weather, emerge from jet into heated vehicle

drive 15 minutes to the rink..

having a friend with a netjets account .. 2 thumbs up

Not true at all

Scotty knows exactly how to get this accomplished

He is a message board expert on all things NWBO

We have all read SOS in the past , most of his stuff with a grain of salt attached.

Look past the messenger



Read is for what it is

It’s a thought out passageway to the finish line

Whether one chooses to believe it with ROSE COLORED GLASSES, BLUBLOCKERS, RAYBANS, or those hideous glasses , name escapes me marketed to the elderly that fit over regular glasses


I would just say NWBO is working in conjunction with 4 SAPS/ regulatory agencies and has been these past few months interacting on a daily weekly basis FINALIZING THE SAPS

let’s see what soon materializes

SOS opinion is just as valid as yours , probably more valid because he is actually linking coherent thought processes together.

Just because he may have been wrong once before does not invalidate every future post one makes. Otherwise we would not have a board

I have been wrong on this board before , well just once, but many have been wrong . Incoherent , thoughtless Nd are permitted to post nonsense like it’s a FACT.


Everyone is free to believe whatever they wish to believe - fact fiction or somewhere in between

I have a healthy amount of skepticism for management

Who really knows what to believe

What I do believe is the science to be sound - after all this time

I think we are close / how close / subject to debate as nauseum on this board

At the end of the day, I think the drug GETS APPROVAL, by EOY 2020

Between now and then everyone is right and wrong and let free speech reign


What is the best way for LP to navigate the labyrinth of misfortune dealt to her over the years - I am just hopeful she makes it to the finish line for the sake of the GBM patients , all future cancer patients and those like myself o have invested hard earned money into this concept

Everything done on this MB is conjecture

U can choose to believe it or not!!!

Free speech and free country

I draw my own conclusions based on my own research and knowledge extended by truthful meme era of this board
Not the wordsmiths who want to parse words with intentional falsehoods

Flipper

I get what your saying
Why believe him now when he was wrong before ??

What are u so hung up on

We are knocking on the door - I expect real news PR from NWBO in 30-60 days

Why are you so upset

No we conjectured that the endpoints have changed

Subtle difference

It’s not a FACT but it makes the most sense because median PFS and mOS were the benchmarks then

FDA hates subgroups, now they love subgroups data because it’s highly specific to a patient group and gives said patient best chance at survival and not wasting cost of therapy on job responders



Larry asked the question of DI SUCH THAT he could surmise that m PFS & mOS are not the priority now

They will be reported but they don’t jive with the 15-40% ORR in the LONG TAIL

TAKE OFF THE BLINDERS and listen or see what info is being given

They didn’t give SOS anything that hasn’t been conjectured here a million times

He just asked the same questions I did

He got virtually the same answers I did

SOS asked questions IF THIS THEN THAT HAPPENS

ASK enough of those questions in and out of sequence to connect all your dots

You are insinuating DI is doing something illegal

He is not

But u keep repeating it -THATS NOT TRUE

Also need to remember we have a few subgroups of patients -

methylated and unmethylated, in SOC and TX GROUP

And in the crossovers — progressors cs pseudo progressors

Does any one subgroup methyl or unmethylated show more likely in progressor or pseudo etc



Many questions to answer

Or just take the raw data throw it in the air and say hey we got 20-25% of all patients LONG TAIL

DO A MIC DROP and let the data stand on its own

Larry connected the dots expertly just like we do here-

except he took everything as a positive and not a negative


Which is why the trial has taken so long - I look at this as a unique opportunity to get in ahead of the herd and own before anyone else knows about this

Many people here own 10-50-100k shares more than enough to make large sums of cash upon unblinding and , partnership or buyout .

This stock truly has the ability to make life changing wealth for those on this board

What is the true value of this technology across any and all solid tumors if it eventually proves to work

This company could become the AAPL GOOG AMZN of the biotech industry in 3-5 years
Yes it could go from 100m to a 1 Trillion dollar company or if it fails be worth nothing

Druggie

Yes 99% on Larry Smith article has been hashed out in parts over many years

It’s fairly obvious this info can directly from NWBO and was compiled recently

It confirms many of the topics I addressed with DI in calls the past few weeks

Does it break any new ground

Yes - removes the facts that the initial trial endpoints will be changed based on new knowledge
Median survival and PFS are muted now because median is the halfway point and we are realistically dealing with 15-40% which is still a vast improvement over SOC DATA which LARRY lays out


Does this give me more basis to own NWBO - YES

DID I ALREADY KNOW MUCH OF THIS - yes

I know all this because of the chatter on this board from great contributors

Doc logic, doc Bala , iwasadiver, mi Dendream, senti, flipper, maverick, marzan , et al who all share knowledge and conjecture in a way beneficial to all

The article basically answered most every question

Except the reason for the hold even though it laid out the reasons for continuing the trial -LONG TAIL

WHAT EXACTLY DO U WANT THEM TO SAY

They can’t give a time frame for the reaction time of the SAP by four diff countries

Just that obviously they are doing everything in their power to expedite

SOC crossovers should not be the issue except they didn’t get to count them as deceased at X time from progression
That is a mistake in classification likely with the original SAP

It’s safe to say I have less invested here than many

My average cost is 0.27

So if when good news occurs

I will do just fine

I did accumulate
3X my original position

So even a low ball offer will make me quite comfortable
An offer said to be enough to get Linda to sell would allow my children a very comfortable life

IBIO

NOT familiar with this message board

Then that would be fraudulent / maybe someone misunderstood him

He is a PHARM D

Which is a DOCTOR OF PHARMACY

MAYBE someone misinterpreted ???

I agree - but I believe his creditability is already in question


He is just a pumper

BSB I don’t ever recall CHRIS saying he was an MD

His twitter profile in the past says he is a pharmacist

I can’t access twitter at work/ darn IT filters

chris is a pumper imo with no more or less creditability than anyone else on the board

Let’s get to the first mountain top before we rule the world

Right now we can’t even ski on a green slope and u want a double black diamond

Pharmacists rank annually 1-2 in most trusted professions so NO, being a pharmacist would not make him more prone to lying — if he was a stock analyst or a POLY PSY MAJOR- then he would be considered a lying liar

Not true at all- a company is only worth what someone else is willing to pay at the time u want to sell

My home is 400k- but we are a distressed seller in a bad luxury home market in the Midwest

So the best we can do is one offer at 330k

Can’t afford to wait for other bids

If LP takes 5-10B she is perfectly within here rights to bring that offer to shareholders or wait for further proof of concept to get a higher bid

The problem is when You pull out progressors and pseudos in those subgroups u might just reduce the stats probability in a negative way

Hence why they are rewriting the SAPS to attempt to account for ALL the irregularities and confoundment In he data

Wow, JR

u have repeated this same post for a week. I hope u are using cut n paste and not free hand typing this out

We expect the data to be positive & that assumes that what has been said about the top 100 PTS survival data.

We have real data not projections and extrapolations of KAPLAN MEYER

what we really need is an explanation of the halt of 2015 and why we needed to extend 4 more years ??

I should not complain as this setback gave me an opportunity to invest here again and I expect to do quite well very soon

I think once topline is announced —

it starts the cascade of news

Unblind -
Gather data breakout above 0.40
Release topline data to public $1-2
Partnership announced $5-8
Direct D trial announces start date $5-8

News Years Eve ??????????????????
New Years Day ????????????

Nice article

Bio I still can’t understand why people want to attack this company.
These posters who claim fraud, deceit, outright lying to shareholders is just plain wrong and disengenuous.

We stand on the precipice of something truly unique that can save lives.

I am all for point counterpoint and free exchange of ideas, but these coordinated attacks on the integrity of the officers of and the company as a whole is downright disgusting.

They will when they partner with NWBO

Big pharma could run concurrentl pivotal trials in different solid tumors and be done within 30 months

Let’s be realistic - they are waiting on FDA and Europe

IMO IF they have positive feedback on either one of these two, the meter starts on the other to be on board or at least not negative. Then unblind and data lock will occur

This is the final check before the ship sails. Anchors up and shove off mates!!!!

No he didn’t say under 30 days

When u talk to DI, u ask questions around a process
If this first , then X , how long is something like this , then how long is X
How long is Y ,
What has to be done in order unblind / DATA LOCK.

How long to calculate the data once u unblind

If Europe SAP says we GOOD
Would you wait on FDA, if so how long , depends on how the dialogue with FDA has progressed

If Canada says good and no one else ?? Probably wait


Many contingencies and WHAT IFS

He always just changes his addiction or focus

He will also become a new father soon

Let’s hope THAT becomes his new purpose and not a new drug

Yes whoever u speak with draws a picture of what can happen and a potential time frame

This differs from the past imo in that we now think we know the end is truly near

Well I think so. Having seen more than a few drugs reach the finish line

My only fear is making stat sig with such a limited number of patients even with the long tail


That’s where trust n faith come into play


BTW. I do understand what u say

Oh ok bc you don’t have a spare 20-30 minutes

I spend as much time as I can with my sons / daughters etc

U always have time it’s what u make of it


Just like u, I have evaluated my investment and it’s potential for success

The drug will succeed , for me it is WHEN

Everyone is allowed to interpret what they wish from 10q or a conversation with an officer of a company

What can’t be denied is the that patients who received DCVAX are living significantly longer than patients on the SOC for this trial and historical SOC in other trials

All the other stuff is a diversion from the goal


The company has to rewrite a SAP to attempt to explain what happened with crossover patients , and other subgroup PTS methylated , unmethylated , SOC , SOC crossover / methylated crossovers unmethylated crossovers

These subgroups on their own can’t yield a stat sig for anyone group

But the totality of the stats for OS is likely what the SAP will try to explain

Considering that they have struggled to raise money hopefully the unblind occurs soon so they don’t have to keep diluting 10-20m shares at a time

Marzan thoughts on $AMRN Maybe u can finance the next bandaid for Linda

ADAM n Matthew were wolves in sheep clothing yesterday saying all good on VASCEPA then today their true colors came out

They will be wrong on DCVAX also very soon

I don’t believe anything said in a phone call would rise to the level of a PR

WE ALL wish they pumped out weekly updates but that’s not prudent

Pretty much every small cap i own puts out PR AND closes down that day

I don’t require a lot of hand holding

I have a good idea what i own

Just have to hope that. NWBO has enough smart people in the room when it’s time

Mani —- I spoke with DI also this week

I concur with everything MHILL said in his post.

And other nuggets he told me

I didn’t post everything he said

But I posted enough


I believe we are very close to data lock and unblind

Under 90 days for sure and probably less than 30

JMHO

Druggie