Tip Of The Week: When going through airport customs and you are asked "Do you have any firearms with you?" do not reply "What do you need?"
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
yea, awful day. red day with heavy volume.
And with what are they actually paying 104 empolyees with....shares?
As the latest DNPI 10Q quarterly report appeared to show, "Amounts due from this affiliate included in accounts receivable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, are $13,064 and $704,375, respectively.", they are still in debt just like they were in 2005/2006.
I got my info., you got yours. It's your life and your money. Keep buying if you have so much confidence. I stopped a long time ago.
yea, gonna keep watching for now though.
You still holding GRO? Those few green days in a row tricked me, im in the red.
"What people have been posting about Capes subsidiaries hiding 158 million in revenue (from Goliath) is complete and utter NONSENSE. No where in Capes 2005 and 2006 audited financials does revenue even come CLOSE to 158 million."
No kidding.
do you honestly think that makes sense? if cape group needed funds wouldnt it make sense to just transfer funds from cape inc. if they have 190 mil. in rev. year after year? or at the least take a no-interest loan from them. why sell warrants and notes and every other way they have acquired debt? in my honest opinion thats because there are no huge revenues to borrow or transfer.
Yea, based on actual credible info., everything points to deficits and debt. And Goliath looks totally far-fetched and extremely false. Even moreso than I had originally thought. As they stated themselves, there net book value was a deficit of $7,000,000 as of Sept. 2002. Again, that wouldnt be the case if they were making hundreds of millions year after year.
On top of all this we have a lying, deceiving CEO and IR dept. Unbelievable amounts of dilution. There is speculation, which is fine and good, but doesn't mean much or instill much confidence. Not good at all imo.
Not to mention the significant and permanent decline in market conditions within their industry, as they stated.
I hope this one happens.
Could Eddie Alvarez-Gilbert Melendez be on the horizon? By Sergio Non, USA Today:
The best lightweight fight available outside the Ultimate Fighting Championship might actually happen, if the promoters can work out the details.
Top-10 fighters Gilbert Melendez and Eddie Alvarez, lightweight champions of Strikeforce and Bellator, want to fight each other. Bellator CEO Bjorn Rebney wants them to fight each other. Now Strikeforce CEO Scott Coker says he's open to the notion.
"If the stars align and we can work out all the terms and conditions and timing, we'd do it," Coker told MMAjunkie.com. "Of course we would. Why wouldn't we?"
During 2002, the sharp downturn in capital spending in the Company's major markets continued to negatively impact our core businesses, resulting in substantially lower than expected revenues, additional operating losses and a concomitant shortfall in working capital. Significantly lower valuations for companies within our industry were commonplace and our stock price declined precipitously. At September 30, 2002, our market capitalization had dropped to approximately $2,000,000, while our net book value (pre goodwill write off) was a deficit of $7,000,000 (where did the $190 million go?).
Based upon these indications, the belief that the decline in market conditions within our industry was significant and permanent, and the consideration of all other available evidence, the Company determined that an impairment of goodwill existed at September 30, 2002 and we recorded a $19,000,000 write-down of the remaining goodwill.
What good news do you guys see in these filings again??
http://sec.edgar-online.com/cape-systems-group-inc/10-ka-amended-annual-report/2005/10/07/section40.aspx
he said 2009 though. not 2010.
Can you or anyone else copy and paste where it says the date the convertibles expire. I'd like to see it.
Seeclear previously wrote this back in Oct.:
"This would free CYSG of any future dilution as the warrants and convertibles have expired May 26th 2009...SC."
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=42866542&txt2find=notes|expires
How is this possible that in 2004 they only had $101,000 in cash if they made anywhere near 198 mil. from 2001-2004 like it says on Goliath? And why would they need to raise $3 mil.?
"During fiscal 2004 we raised approximately $3,100,000 including cash transaction costs through the issuance of notes payable and notes and convertible notes payable from unrelated parties, restructured notes, converted debt into equity, and paid a loan in default. At September 30, 2004, we had a net cash balance of approximately $101,000."
http://sec.edgar-online.com/cape-systems-group-inc/10-ka-amended-annual-report/2005/10/07/section40.aspx
regardless, you're about to get all the financial data that you want very soon.
Do you have any credible information to back that up Gatorboy?
I don't hate you for having that opinion. However, you won't hurt Toms or the company by doing that. He'd probably hire and add you to the team.
this is pretty funny.
I heard the same thing. I am watching this for a bottom bounce though.
Meredith Whitney told CNBC’s Maria Bartiromo that investors should “avoid financials at all costs, particularly in the banking sector” because the financial reform bill currently contemplated by the Senate will further restrict capital and hurt bank earnings.
“Politicians have proven far worse than our worst expectations,” she said during the interview. “It could be very bad for banks.”
I think this is close to turning around.
Main event for Friday's Strikeforce Challengers 8 card.
lol. we'll figure it out eventually.
"Amounts due from this affiliate included in accounts receivable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, are $13,064 and $704,375, respectively."
To me, this sounds like Cape owes this money to DNPI. Let me know if someone else has a different interpretation of that line.
real quick search online i found this:
Two stories about the scar:
1. He got it from a car accident.
2. Someone stab his face with a broken bottle when he was 16.
Don't know if it has any validity though. It was on some forum.
EDIT: Another guy said "Alligator wrestling accident". lol
This has been the case for months. Why is it going to go now?
Heres a pretty nice looking pincher.
USAT
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=USAT&p=D&b=5&g=0&id=p79441005287
lol. i don't think that last picture is real. it looks fake to me. overeem has never looked that fat. and just look at the 2 forearms. they're noticeably different in size.
that sucks.
lol can you tell my level of confidence? I don't have much luck picking the horses. Just makes watching it more fun.
I got $10 on Northern Giant to win.
ECRY nice advertisement
not yet imo. ppo is pointing downward and adx is pointing up so it could be a pincher eventually if the price continues to go down.
Based on less than $5,000 worth changing hands today? When news leaks and price goes up volume is usually well above avg. Didn't see that today.
Yogi Berra once said, “the future ain’t what it used to be.”
While I’ll be the first to admit that quoting Yogi for wisdom’s sake may lack credibility, this particular quote is quite relevant and meaningful today, especially for hiring managers, business owners, boards of directors, and anyone who is in the position to hire or promote an employee.
Up until recently many employees were hired and promoted based on a simple theory: past performance is a good predictor of future performance.
When the world was more predictable and change occurred over decades and not days or even minutes, past performance could be expected to lead to future success. That premise was based on a future environment that would be similar to the previous one.
In today’s world, that assumption is wrong. Predicting performance based on the past is iffy at best and often disastrous. You can just read the headlines about failed executives, financial gurus, and business super-stars who crashed and burned and it becomes readily apparent that past success does not guarantee future performance. What worked in the past could be the recipe for failure in the future.
http://futurestradingsystems.org/past-performance-fails-to-predict-future-performance
and as "pbrain" said well:
Posted by: pbrain Date: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:06:39 PM
In reply to: lawrenzo who wrote msg# 182591 Post # of 184025
"Past performance predicts future behavior" That is fine for the lazyboy couch. There are no absolutes. Dig deep into each investment.
you have stop saying if the audited financials are anywhere near the unaudited financials this will explode or whatever term you use. audited financials are expected to have subsidiaries. unaudited did not. therefore there is no comparison.
Nope, its on Showtime. What I do is I order Showtime a couple days before the event and then cancel it the day after. They'll charge me a pro-rated fee which ends up costing me like $6-7.
yea, i agree. Kind of hoping Overeem wins on Saturday and then Fedor takes care of business against Werdum in June. Then we see Overeem v. Fedor for the Strikeforce Heavyweight Championship. It wouldn't be bad to see Rogers v. Fedor 2 for the belt either.