Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
tain't rambling since it's the truth....
You sometimes post kinda drively too...but, unlike samples, I like ya!
That's groundless and you know it, bvan....
If there was really anything promising happening, surely the PP'rs would have heard, and there'd be some more buying going on. Instead, the price continues its slide toward oblivion.
The only value is in some rusting mining equipment...a dozer or two, etc etc.....
your math is off. Only move the decimal point over one.
Thus, 0.077.
Moot point. The dirt is worthless, virtually.
fein, if you read more of his posts, you'll see that most are nonsensical rambling diatribes, pretty much.
Umm, the share figure was 5.75 bn, I think.....(the revised report they filed with Az is scribbled--kinda laughable, really) and could be higher by now.
Your math is off a bit, value per share of the dirt would be about 7-8 cents, methinx. But that doesn't allow for extraction costs. Even if it was worth that much, a buyer would only pay a fraction of that for the rights to process it.
bvan, as there's been no exploration done on any of the properties....and the old data is lacking in showing any value, the properties will not be worth anything.
Same with SV, which is a dirt pile. Blackstone can't change that.
I'd buy it for .0001...but that would be overpaying.....
good gawd, investorvest, you really are pathetic....
Just yesterday, I made two posts on yahoo.....wow, you must really be board hopping.
There is NO short in this stock...and never has been, more than a tiny number of shares. Just like CMKX, the problem has been massive insider and company selling.
After the 1998 reverse split, there was prolly less than 1 million o/s....by the time HCCA was revoked, there was over 500 million.....nuff said!
One alias per message board..that's it..
The only reason you're not ignored is for the hilarity gained from reading your nonsensical baloney.
The 1998 price jump to 1.18 was due to the huge reverse split....
More telling is seeing how fast the stock went back down....as Furlong diluted the crap out of the stock again.
Fein, that was due to a 1-1000 reverse split. Here's a post from the Silicon Investor HCCA board. (There's only 3400 posts on that board, and some good reading is to be had...
<<To: Andre Daedone who wrote (3371) 7/11/1998 1:33:00 AM
From: SnakeCharmer Read Replies (1) of 3459
Well........ after the 1000:1 reverse split they don't have a billion shares in the float anymore........ but they will have close to a billion shares they can re-issue!
Funny thing though, these guys don't have product one and the SEC continues to allow these jerks to bilk investors out of their money:(
B A D SEC!!:(
BTW.. did you get burned on this split?>..
a link to another post at SI
http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=5476415
S~
How so, bvan? What do they know of mining? They can't turn water into wine, can they? or dirt into riches beyond belief?
You've conveniently neglected to allow for the two reverse splits.....one was 1-1000...ouch. It wasn't long thereafter than HCCA was trading at .001 or thereabouts.....
Few ever made any $ on this scam...well, save for Furlong, his family, and Pietrzak...
Bla bla bla. Sheppard, the affinity scammer, is clueless...but it would take an alchemist to divine value into the SV dirt......and a much better one than was Jordan.....
You know, you really shouldn't be blabbing on about that which you have no clue. Actually, the original lease did NOT give HCCA rights to the common value minerals at SV....which unfortunately is all there is there...dirt...
What the heck good would a "non commercial" lease do anyone.....
I must say, your posts get weirder by the day...thanks for the laughs!
fein, this link has historical daily data. The high trades you've mentioned don't show up. http://www.stockhouse.com/comp_info_history.asp?symbol=NMCX&table=LIST&view_history=1
On 12/23/05, it opened at .006 and traded as high as .012 on 106mm shares. That's the closest I found to what you're referring to.
Likely it was just a bad print....
Kindly provide documentation that any so called bashers are members of the securities industry......
Next, there is no proof, or even indication, that this stock has ever been shorted.
In fact, the trade price of this stock has been relatively stable, considering the fact that the o/s is now about 11 times higher than it was when HCCA was revoked.
As usual, your drivel is nonsensical and baseless.
I still say this stock, being nothing but a reincarnated HCCA, shouldn't have been allowed to trade.
I don't see it as a waste of time....It's a very valid topic. I think the SEC should be made aware of the situation, if they aren't already.
Bottom line, it seems the stock should never have been allowed to trade. And, had that been the case, many folks would have a lot more jingle in their pockets....
As usual you are sloppy. This time you've messed up dates and volumes...
http://www.stockhouse.com/comp_info_history.asp?symbol=NMCX&table=LIST&coname=NMC+INC&shpage=4&datestamp=3/18/2004&row=1&history=yes
I found this....
By: sepod0
28 Feb 2004, 01:59 PM EST
Msg. 38557 of 39047
(This msg. is a reply to 38539 by bobotn0.)
Jump to msg. #
BOBO, a friend of mine works for the cusip bureau. I phoned him yesterday and he told me the following...
the record says that HCCA became NMCX on 9/9/2003, with a Cusip # of 629-196-106.
Hope that helps.
Stan
Also so some posts from about 2 weeks after NMC started trading. For some, NMCX didn't appear in their broker accounts till then.
alba posted MF death notice at RB:
Yo! PT Check this out.
http://www.palmmortuary.com/funeral_f.cfm
Maurice William Furlong Visitation 02/16/2008 2:00P
Palm Mortuary Henderson
800 South Boulder Highway
Henderson, NV 89105
(702) 464-8440
First Jordan, now Furlong.
As usual, you post nonsense. see: http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=NMC&read=57
and http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/search.cgi?for=parl&where=symbol
http://www.stockhouse.com/comp_info.asp?drawChart=1&originalSymbol=PARL&economy=0&originalTable=LIST&advanced=1&chart_symbol=PARL&priceDisplay=1&duration=72&moveavg1=&moveavg2=&movecolor1=ff3300&movecolor2=66cc66&addchart=0&Submit.x=55&Submit.y=9
NMC symbol was changed 2 months after NMCX was trading, and became TMZ. PARL was already in existence, a different company.
THE SEC had NOTHING to do with NMCX starting trading. THE stock isn't even registered.
Better go get your med prescription refilled.
old oaks post: Another reply from MadFranco....>>>
Pretty much tells us what Furlong is probably up to. Question is, how long is this process going to drag on?
-------------------------
From: MadFranco@aol.com |
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:52:23 EDT
Subject: Re:
When the SEC rescinds a company's registration on a Section (j), all trading, of necessity, stops. If you read the reg, you'll see it's explicit in the provisions. The way for a company in this position to begin trading again is to get its 3-year audit completed, file another 10-SB, and keep current with filings. To graduate from pink sheets, it must have a sponsoring broker a la 15C211.
-------------------------
Oaks
Here's an old post from HCCA board, I don't think everything he said is correct.....
shows though the timing--it didn't take Furlong long, after revocation, to change the company name. The info actually showed up on shareholder's brokerage statements.
<<By: truerword
16 Nov 2003, 10:20 PM EST
Msg. 37868 of 39047
Jump to msg. #
TS,
I don't think that NMC would be anything more than perhaps
a reported corporation and couldn't be a trading shell.
That being true, NMC will have to jump a few hoops to become
active on the board. Also, a trading symbol is not assigned
until the corp has been accepted and is ready to trade. A company can request a particular symbol but it is up to the SEC to choose the symbol. Who knows the reasons that HCCA has moved to this new entity? Maybe it will be cleaner to
just award shareholders of HCCA NEW shares in this NMC company and more cost efficient than trying to clean up
HCCA. I don't think they did it thinking they could escape
the problems of HCCA, that will follow them for a long time to come, probably forever, and will certainly effect whether or not NMC will ever be allowed to trade.
>>
Here's an excerpt from that 2003 Furlong sh letter:
16. Will HCCA s stock resume trading again?
Management intends to take all necessary steps toward the resumption of the trading of HCCA s common stock. A Form 10-SB becomes effective 60 days after it is filed. However, the period for SEC comments and the Company s responses may take longer. Also, it is possible that the Company will have to apply for a trading symbol from the NASD, which involves yet another review. Because of the variables associated with the SEC and the NASD, we are unable to estimate a time frame; management intends to do what is required to avoid unnecessary delays
------------------------------------------------------
and the whole letter, which was filled with lies...
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=HCCA&read=38873
Just repeating what Tim and perhaps others have said, that Shepp wants out.
I can and I will doubt that his reputation is any good. There is plenty of negative data about the affinity swindle...and little of his other history is verifiable---with simple searches anyhow.
Don't know where you got the idea that MS contacted the SEC about anything. Not only is NMC non reporting, but its stock isn't even registered.
Yes, Janice. The HCCA shareholders' shares became NMCX....whether they held cert's or not.
Thanks for finding those REGDEX filings (I'd forgotten the term....) Of note, is that, after those 4 filings, NMC's o/s share count continued to balloon. They raised the a/s twice from '04 to '07. You can follow the progression here: http://starpas.azcc.gov/scripts/cgiip.exe/WService=wsbroker1/names-detail.p
I don't recall if they PR'd the Diversified assays, but those were bogus, of that there is no doubt.
It's the exact same dirt, and scheme. Therefore, it is still a scam. Sheppard got in over his head...and now wants out, but doesn't know how, it appears. As well, imo, he is plenty culpable, having continued the lies.
Yes, I hate all scams. There are many many stock message boards where the truth is available about the ongoing scammy activities of the company.....CSHD, ZNXT, BKMP, GPGI, SLJB, to name a few.
Dead wrong, atlanta. I'm here to make sure the scam continues to be exposed.
Yup, thanks for popping over, Janice!
There is no farking way there's anything of value at SV.....
If there was, it would have been a slam dunk to market.
What do you mean, today's economy? The market prices for pm's is the best it's ever been!
Sorry, atlanta, but there is no way this is nothing but a worthless con.
Go research some real junior mining plays. The TSX Venture exchange is the place to look. Forget the US pink market, there's little regulation.
Could be, alba. but for at least a year, Furlong didn't sell/dump many shares that we're aware of. NMC simply started trading, with the shares already held by all the stockholders.
There were those two notices of Reg 505 ( I have the actual number wrong, I know) that were put out back in mid '06, I think. Of course, about 6 billion shares in total were dumped.
Here's my response to Ms Shell:
Posted by: rbtree
In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 244760 Date:2/15/2008 7:18:00 PM
Post #of 244761
Thanks, Janice. I've always been of the opinion that NMC shouldn't have been allowed to trade...
Furlong registered the NMCX symbol, I think, not long after HCCA was revoked in June '03. Story was, some MM noticed it, and started accepting trades in Feb '04. The then CEO Maurice Furlong, ever the slimy conman, may have been hoping for this to happen.
I asked Janice Shell a question abt unregistered stock, which defines NMC, over on the CMKX board. Here is her response:
Posted by: janice shell
In reply to: rbtree who wrote msg# 244745 Date:2/15/2008 6:08:52 PM
Post #of 244761
Companies don't necessarily have to register stock with the SEC in order to trade:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=25659480
HCCA was revoked on 12 June 2006. (really 2003)
http://sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-47716.htm
If a company whose stock was registered under 12(g) has its registration revoked, then it shouldn't ever trade again. There've been a few cases in which the revoked stock had been more or less dead for years and somehow traders didn't realize it'd been revoked.
It looks like the assets of HCCA were rolled into a new company, which then became NMCX, and that NMCX simply began trading as an unsolicited Pinkie without registering any 12(g) stock.
The Company, formerly known as Hexagon Consolidated Companies of America, Inc., was incorporated on April 3, 1984. On February 4, 1997, the Company formed Peeples Mining Company (“PMC”), a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The assets of Peeples Mining LLC and F&H Mining, Inc. were consolidated into PMC. In addition, the first stage concentrated precious metals acquired from Zarzion, Ltd were transferred to PMC. On September 9, 2003, the Company merged with PMC, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation. The Company currently has one subsidiary, namely, Peeples, Inc., (“Peeples”), a Delaware corporation.
http://www.nmcinc.com/showpage.ww?page=proxy
Why don't you write to Mad Franco, the IR? She's also IR for ZNXT (the former PAIM), and she does reply if you get in touch with her.
Thanks, Janice. I've always been of the opinion that NMC shouldn't have been allowed to trade...
Furlong registered the NMCX symbol, I think, not long after HCCA was revoked in June '03. Story was, some MM noticed it, and started accepting trades in Feb '04. The then CEO Maurice Furlong, ever the slimy conman, may have been hoping for this to happen.
Janice, can you help me understand how some grey sheet stocks can trade? For instance, NMCX, which is reincarnated from the revoked HCCA. Apparantly it is not SEC registered. (Which is prolly why the SEC has never cracked down on it.)
See the disclaimer at the bottom of NMC news releases:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/quotes.asp?ticker=NMCX
You sound like tuktuk......whom I invited over here....
Of course the PP'rs are deluded about an imminent sale.
This is the first I've heard of some university study....probably another myth....
Was that IR, or an executive....?
Regardless, the price is slowly tanking. Reality is that BX is incapable of performing miracles. The dirt is worthless, virtually.
And, one whopping $35 buy so far today....Wow!
Blik, just curious, what is the chatter at PP board about Blackstone? Wonder if anyone has any concrete info.
Welcome to the board. Are you in the industry?
That was my first thought when they announced the seismic tests....I hadn't heard of miners using the process, just oil and gas companies.
And did any of those folks find anything out? for sure? I emailed BX twice, with no response.
Hard to believe the deluded folks, who, after seeing an alltime low, still rush in and buy a whole .001 higher....
99.5% sure they'll never recoup much....soon, .002 will look good, imo, sad to say.
We're really not disagreeing. Sometimes the MM's take the opposite side of a trade, when there's no match, and if they have an interest. I doubt they do much of this with a crap stock like NMC.
That's not entirely true, as far as the retail investor goes, at least with listed stocks. One purpose MM's serve is to keep an orderly market. Thus, sometimes they will hold a larger inventory, to slow down a market move. How much they do that with grey sheet stocks, I don't know.
However, sooner or later, buyers will dry up...then it will be nearly impossible to sell this stock, at any price. .003 will be long gone.....
Witness the scam CSHD, which has an SEC case ongoing. It's price collapsed, on relatively low cumulative volume, from $6, all the way to todays sub penny level.