Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If your an investor I will take the very latest example asln. Take it when you can. I have 530,000 shares. I’m sitting and waiting. When it finally takes off am I going to cash in?! Of course I am but not ALL of them, I will leave 10% and let the Lord decide
Actually I will correct one of your statements. It is not UNfortunate but rather FORTUNATE that the long tail has extended the trial!!
Ok Flip, I’m listening. I am not suggesting that it would or should take another year. When we were told “multi-month” it was not explained how they are or are not integrated. I am simply saying that realistically the entire process could very well be an entire year but certainly not additionally from where we are at considering the number of steps x “multi-months” again not knowing what can be done in parallel we are not necessarily out of a reasonable range. That’s all I’m pointing out. Sorry that it is so frustrating I feel some of your pain
I truly believe that the delay in results is because of unusual complex trial results. One clue to me is “people are living longer” from one well known doctor . It will come soon. Did the last (2) event or did we level out to the point of when do you make that decision. One would believe that time should be of the essence in reviewing the data so I think that now that the time has passed the results are eminent. Nothing beats real time so now it’s just examining what happened in that real time to control vs crossover vs placebo. I remember hearing multi-month so without knowing fully how all of the processes integrate or do not integrate it could very well take a year even though I know that’s what none of us want to hear regardless!! What will scotty3371 and JRIII do with themselves once top line is announced peace.
I’m showing 160.49m for them in my E*TRADE outstanding shares column
Hahahaha!! Thanks Flip. Happy Thanksgiving. Going to ride the old 3 wheelers with my kids on the farm. Have a great day!
And once again ex, TRIAL NOT DATA. I said no one has seen an unblinded TRIAL NOT DATA!! Geeeeeeezz.
Thanks Doc. Backup when I needed it. I’ve been getting beat up all day by disgruntled investors!!
You just said the key point, they are in Europe
Good luck to you as well Sir. Again, I respect your input and have read a lot of your post and I believe in the end we both want the same thing and that’s a successful outcome of this endeavor. Good luck to US. Happy Thanksgiving!
DMC Information
https://www.fda.gov/media/75398/download
This explains in more detail the function of the DMC for those who may not have all of the details. They can unblind DATA but they do not unblind entire TRIALS!! They have to be justified in what they ask for and what they review.
Trial has never been unblinded. Some data sets within the trial no doubt but entire results to interpret the entire trial NEVER. That is my point in case. Again, I realize that the DMC can unblind DATA but that is not the same as unblinding the TRIAL. Apples and Oranges. The DMC just can’t run ram shot through whatever DATA they want when they feel like it to the point where they can taint the Trial. They have to justify their actions as well when performing their job. Read scotty3371 post #253547. He asked if you were in belief that at this time the entire trial is currently unblinded to Linda Powers and others. I’m telling you No. Impossible.
Let me clarify:
I wrote: Untrue. You would not have to unblind the entire trial for a safety review. This can be done sectionally without unblinding.
Clarification - I was speaking of the TRIAL as a WHOLE meaning the ENTIRE POPULATION thus SECTIONALLY analyzing Data (For instance control arm only). I realize that the DMC can look at "Unblinded Data" THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE UNBLINDING THE ENTIRE TRIAL !!
Sorry if I misunderstood (Interpreting someone's statement that the DMC could unblind the trial) or visa versa, might be two completely different thoughts or points.
Again, HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYONE!!
Link please!! Touche'
https://www.verywellhealth.com/double-blind-placebo-controlled-clinical-trial-715861
Here Flipper44, maybe this will simplify it for you. NOTHING has been unblinded at any time.
Correct, NOT THE ENTIRE BODY, not the complete trial. Why don’t you try reading the ENTIRE article!! And by the way, I do respect you and your post. Happy Thanksgiving!
Why? That doesn't even make sense.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3834937/
And also Flipper44, how would they know of the handful of cases where patients did have "adverse" affects and the cause being the administration of the vaccine? I can tell you one thing, they didn't unblind the entire trial to find that out.
Bingo. Thus, SECTIONAL
Untrue. You would not have to unblind the entire trial for a safety review. This can be done sectionally without unblinding
Sir Pumpernickel here!! Happy Thanksgiving to all. Let not your heart be troubled and enjoy
Flipper44.....chill out. Believe in the science like you have. Collect yourself. You seem to have a timeline in your head or “line in the sand”. This is groundbreaking when it happens therefore your expectation is unreasonable
Thank you Doc Logic!! You are one of my favorites!!
I have one question for all regulars on the board. Do you believe that NWBO will move forward with just (1)RA approval or do they "wait" a certain time frame after a first approval regardless of which RA approves first?
Thank you
Sir Pumpernickel
Sir Pumpernickel Here!! I have been a stock holder for just under 2 years now and really enjoy reading this board. Sometimes informative some times silly!! My personal opinion though is that we are very close to getting a very complicated approval for such ground breaking technology !! GLTAL