Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yeah really strange.
Also note that Steve Yariv and his business are located very close to Lawrence Sands' Consulting company in Florida.
So, it is very likely that the Steve Yariv I have found is the one that is taking their company public via PTRA.
Giddy Up.
Here's the one 4-star rating on Facebook:
I had a negative experience due largely to a subcontractor's poor judgement. Dealer's Choice took full ownership of the situation and, while they couldn't realistically "un-ruin" my Thanksgiving, made it right within the confines of what they could do. Things like this happen one out of a thousand times. Wish it hadn't been me, but having owned a distribution business, I was impressed with the response.
The company and it's CEO mean business and don't screw customers to earn a buck.
This doesn't sound like the average OTC CEO to me.
Here is the Facebook listing for the company:
https://www.facebook.com/Dealers-Choice-Auto-Transport-1549266588683419/
Please note that the company appears to be fairly active on social media.
The company also has a very high star rating (LOL, the CEO gave his company a 5 out of 5, but there are other perfect ratings as well).
This appears to be the new CEOs LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/steven-yariv-81a536b
This appears to be the new CEOs Twitter handle:
https://twitter.com/dealerschoiceat/with_replies
Note that the LinkedIn profile lists Dealers Choice Auto Transport as his company (he is Presidnt).
Here is the link to his company's website:
http://www.dealerschoiceautotransport.com/
Yesterday was the first over 1 Million shares traded day since 2015.
Let's see what happens now.
Don't you think it is highly coincidental that they ran that one just after the change here?
Of course I want this to work out.
Why would Nick explicitly want to mention that he is focused elsewhere?
That is a little worrisome.
Hopefully it all goes good and we get an update this week.
I bought on the pullback thinking 1 Million shares (or thereabouts).
Maybe like 5 or 10 Million.
Over 100 Million - like someone posted earlier - wasn't even in my thoughts.
When the stock continued down and someone mentioned over 100 Million I had to do my own digging.
Yeah, at this point it looks like the company made it seem like a R/S happened when it did not.
Of course, I could be wrong. But so much points to an R/S and yet there is no record on otcmarkets other than the 944,120 on the profile page.
Which may be false.
Yuck. Trades should be reversed here, there is some very conflicting information and multiple filings by not only the company, but by outsiders as well.
I wonder if the ticker and name change served a different purpose.
Another stock with a similar name as our old one has been suspended.
Note that when you typed our old ticker you were spelling the others name and when you spelled the others name, our ticker would show up.
Conveniently the other ran just as we changed our ticker and name.
I hope that I am wrong and that we will hear something soon here.
Maybe I should just be quiet and tell everyone else this has 1 Million shares outstanding as well.
Who cares what I do when KCG perpetuated the belief as well?
I bought a small position thinking it was a pullback of sorts.
Unfortunately, it looks like potential shareholders were lied to.
I am referring to the multiple filings that suggest a R/S was completed and that less than 1 million shares were outstanding.
Of course, this may bounce if the updated total is still less than 110 Million shares, but it still feels wrong that there were multiple filings completed suggesting that only 1 Millions shares existed.
Do you think it is misleading that the filings have indicated a 30 to 1 Reverse Split and yet it appears that has not happened?
If what I wrote is true, I think it would be prudent to reverse all of today's trades.
We are not talking about a single filing.
There are multiple filings that suggest the O/S was split down to under 1 Million shares. I don't think this is the case.
Sadly, the trading suggests that the O/S isn't under 1 Million either.
At this point in time, I am unsure of the status of the Reverse Split.
How can a company say they will do a Reverse Split and make filings as if they did a Reverse Split and yet it appears that from the NVSOS filings, they actually did not do one?
If they did, the NVSOS would show the old A/S and then the split adjusted A/S.
The PTRA Stock Split entry says stock split and yet does not indicate a change in the A/S.
Well, at least I think I know why the stock has cratered from the $0.11 high.
People bought in thinking the O/S was less than 1 Million shares.
Correction.
I am unsure of whether the stock split occurred, does anyone know either way?
Well, 115 Million is quite different than less than 1 Million.
Seems like too many shares are available for some reason.
Bids getting wacked when they show up doesn't help.
Lots of volume today.
Past volume suggests that the stock isn't widely held.
Obviously there is some overhang, let's see if this can break and hold a bid over $0.10 before talking about $1
It's because you had a fantastic gain somewhere else.
The Matrix is out to get you.
But really, the stock recently did a reverse split and has gone 90% down since then. That's not very good.
Dip appears over.
If this gets some buying, it may close over $0.001
Once people wake up, this will run on speculation.
Market Makers want cheap inventory so they are hoping people bail.
Also note that for a triple zero stock, there has been relatively little volume over the last couple of years.
That means that there isn't a lot of shares waiting to be sold into a potential run.
I mean the stock has jumped 100% on less than 100 Million volume.
For a triple zero stock to jump it can 100s of Millions.
Read the posts on the forum.
PTAB has thrown out case by Cisco in regards to patents held by UOIP subsidiary.
This paves the way to settlement or a trial with Cisco.
And the patents in the same case with Cisco also have been questioned by other companies.
In other words multiple settlements may be in the pipeline.
In simpler terms go look at Strike Force. It went from 0.0001 to over $0.01
You are looking at the beginning of something potentially life changing.
But hey, it's all up to you whether you want to buy or not.
The less people that know about it, the more people here can buy if they like.
Market Makers running out of shares?
Love taps at 0.0004 going through.
What are you talking about?
I think you have confused 2 tickers you have posted about.
One recently did a 1 for 100 Reverse split while the other did a 1 for 400 reverse split a couple of years ago.
Don't worry, drunk posting happens to the best of us.
Well, there was another triple z stock - low of 0.0001 - that ran last year and it had a court case that was settled favorably.
Hint, it had a Strike of Force given to it's price.
So, it could happen here.
Very few $0.0001s have gone off, got to wonder if someone was hoping that they would.
That is, sell into the 3s 4s and 5s hoping that someone bails.
Let's see if the company provides any updates now that the symbol change has been completed and a number of people with the major brokers have got their shares.
If you haven't got yours, it would be great if you let the board know which broker you use. If only to let people know who not to deal with when it comes to OTC stocks in the future.
Some of the brokers may have lower commissions, but you may be stuck in these situations longer.
One thing that worries me is the mirror trades.
Is some market maker front running the stock?
That is, say you put in an order for $0.05 while someone has shares for $0.049 the market maker should give you a fill of $0.049
However, it seems they are buying the $0.049 and selling right back at $0.05
I hate this practice and it's really crappy that someone is doing this.
Go look at the trades yourself and you will see their is quite a few of mirror trades. Not all, but their is quite a few.
My old shares finally converted. The new shares arrived sometime yesterday. Probably happened internally during the day but retail traders don't see the update right away.
What's strange is that in my activity it uses the old cost that I actually paid but on my dashboard it using some different price for "book value".
The book value corresponds to the March 24, 2017 close price.
It just creates another tax reporting event for anyone that held through.
That is you have been deemed to have sold the old ticker at $0.05 and you bought the new ticker at $0.05
The company description of SSGOF at my broker has been changed and for now references the old ticker and company information.
"Stop Sleep Go, formerly... is a development-stage company."
It's all coming together.
Could be worse.
I remember someone sold I think 100,000 shares of some stock that did a reverse split.
He only was supposed to have 100 shares.
The stock bounced to $1 or close to there as the broker forced a buy-in. I am pretty sure this is why a number of brokers won't let people sell "D" stocks held before split .... until the numbers are resolved - when the "D" comes off.
Let's see if people get SSGOF shares on Friday.
I am glad that the company has been quiet while we get this issue resolved.
I am suggesting that we don't post anything until everyone gets the new shares.
Apparently Nick hasn't tried to run this up while some are stuck without shares.
Why can't we follow Nick's intent and keep this board quiet until we get the share issue resolved?
It's obvious that he respects the old shareholders because he hasn't said anything publicly.
It serves no purpose to run this up while people are stuck without shares.
Because if we are at $1 and people get access to shares that cost them $0.05, we will just end up down here again.
Nick seems to respect old shareholders, why do you want it to run this up when it should be fixed by Tuesday next week?
Regardless, someone with about 40,000 shares keeps popping up at $0.25
I believe we won't hear anything until next week, if some fool can't wait, let them sell.
Again, I think it is less likely to be a scam because they didn't promote the heck out of it during this transition.
Again, the old ticker shares COULD be worth nothing and the shares deleted.
I also note that trades from last Friday settled today.
It's possible that the company and transfer agent have to wait until trades have settled to process the change.
To be honest, I feel better that the company has been quiet.
It is far less likely that they have cancelled old shares.
A corrupt promo would be to cancel shares and then promote the new ticker. What would happen is that people would sell short and then would have to buy back when their broker revealed the truth.
Again, their is still the risk that shares have been cancelled. This is why brokers don't let you sell and walk away.
YOU BEAR THE RISK OF OLD TICKER SHARES BEING CANCELLED. NOT YOUR BROKER.
I spoke with my broker's back office today.
The expected arrival for shares is between Friday this week and Tuesday next week.
As I have said countless times, a promo run this week would not have been good as shares from old ticker are locked up.
Again, depending on your relationship with your broker, you could have sold shares. However, you would have been technically short until delivery.
I see nothing to suggest that old ticker, IMMA, shares have been cancelled, but the risk is that they were and you would have to buy what you have sold short.
Your broker will not let you simply sell shares they don't have and say you owe them nothing. You owe them delivery of the shares if you sell short.
Anyways, we will have to wait and see what transpires next week.
It's all relative.
A stock that had 1 post last week and then has 500 from various posters this week is said to be highly active and will likely hit the Breakout Boards.
Seems the V Brother ran off.
Let's see if this can recover a little bit.
I did some research on ChanBond LLC.
This seems to be a subsidiary of UOIP, correct?
It looks like most of their trials have been stayed pending decisions at the PTAB.
Please search for Chanbond at: https://ptab.uspto.gov/#/login
You don't need to login, you are able to search cases though.
Well, apparently, ChanBond has several cases to be heard at the PTAB.
They did have one oral argument at the end of January 2017 which is now pending an opinion.
They also have an oral argument scheduled for November 2017.
It also look like yesterday they had a patent claim denied - maybe this was the cause of the volume?
At this point, it seems like we are waiting to see the outcome of the PTAB on the various cases.
I have no position, but I think people ought to know what is happening.
This is far more useful than just talking about the price.
Good Luck to all, if you are invested, use the PTAB link and tell the board what you think.
Well, given the company filed an S-3 which was given a notice of effectiveness, there is probably an equity offering looming.
The valuation is suspect given that a significant dilution event may be looming.
Also may be an attempt to bail relatively high in hopes that they can participate in the offering itself.
ATHX came up in a morning scan for me.
I am curious to know who the Transfer Agent is, can you let us know, otcmarkets.com doesn't indicate it.